I found this from a particular GDB test suite case of inlining
(something similar is provided as a test case) but came across a few
other related cases (other callers of the same functions, and one other
instance of the same coding mistake in a separate function).
I'm not sure what the best way to test this is (let alone to cover the
other cases I discovered), so hopefully this sufficies - open to ideas.
llvm-svn: 206130
Implementing the LLVM part of the call to __builtin___clear_cache
which translates into an intrinsic @llvm.clear_cache and is lowered
by each target, either to a call to __clear_cache or nothing at all
incase the caches are unified.
Updating LangRef and adding some tests for the implemented architectures.
Other archs will have to implement the method in case this builtin
has to be compiled for it, since the default behaviour is to bail
unimplemented.
A Clang patch is required for the builtin to be lowered into the
llvm intrinsic. This will be done next.
llvm-svn: 204802
On x86, shifting a vector by a scalar is significantly cheaper than shifting a
vector by another fully general vector. Unfortunately, because SelectionDAG
operates on just one basic block at a time, the shufflevector instruction that
reveals whether the right-hand side of a shift *is* really a scalar is often
not visible to CodeGen when it's needed.
This adds another handler to CodeGenPrepare, to sink any useful shufflevector
instructions down to the basic block where they're used, predicated on a target
hook (since on other architectures, doing so will often just introduce extra
real work).
rdar://problem/16063505
llvm-svn: 201655
I believe VZEXT_MOVL means "zero all vector elements except the first" (and
should have identical input & output types) whereas VZEXT means "zero extend
each element of a vector (discarding higher elements if necessary)".
For example:
(v4i32 (vzext (v16i8 ...)))
should zero extend the low 4 bytes of the incoming vector to 32-bits,
discarding higher bytes.
However, somewhere in the past, these two concepts had become confused, even
leading to a nonsensical VSEXT_MOVL.
This re-merges the nodes where appropriate (all VSEXT_MOVL -> VSEXT, VZEXT_MOVL
-> VZEXT when it's an actual extension).
rdar://problem/15981990
llvm-svn: 200918
Before this patch we used getIntImmCost from TargetTransformInfo to determine if
a load of a constant should be converted to just a constant, but the threshold
for this was set to an arbitrary value. This value works well for the two
targets (X86 and ARM) that implement this target-hook, but it isn't
target-independent at all.
Now targets have the possibility to decide directly if this optimization should
be performed. The default value is set to false to preserve the current
behavior. The target hook has been moved to TargetLowering, which removed the
last use and need of TargetTransformInfo in SelectionDAG.
llvm-svn: 200271
Added scalar compare VCMPSS, VCMPSD.
Implemented LowerSELECT for scalar FP operations.
I replaced FSETCCss, FSETCCsd with one node type FSETCCs.
Node extract_vector_elt(v16i1/v8i1, idx) returns an element of type i1.
llvm-svn: 197384
target independent.
Most of the x86 specific stackmap/patchpoint handling was necessitated by the
use of the native address-mode format for frame index operands. PEI has now
been modified to treat stackmap/patchpoint similarly to DEBUG_INFO, allowing
us to use a simple, platform independent register/offset pair for frame
indexes on stackmap/patchpoints.
Notes:
- Folding is now platform independent and automatically supported.
- Emiting patchpoints with direct memory references now just involves calling
the TargetLoweringBase::emitPatchPoint utility method from the target's
XXXTargetLowering::EmitInstrWithCustomInserter method. (See
X86TargetLowering for an example).
- No more ugly platform-specific operand parsers.
This patch shouldn't change the generated output for X86.
llvm-svn: 195944
A Direct stack map location records the address of frame index. This
address is itself the value that the runtime requested. This differs
from IndirectMemRefOp locations, which refer to a stack locations from
which the requested values must be loaded. Direct locations can
directly communicate the address if an alloca, while IndirectMemRefOp
handle register spills.
For example:
entry:
%a = alloca i64...
llvm.experimental.stackmap(i32 <ID>, i32 <shadowBytes>, i64* %a)
Since both the alloca and stackmap intrinsic are in the entry block,
and the intrinsic takes the address of the alloca, the runtime can
assume that LLVM will not substitute alloca with any intervening
value. This must be verified by the runtime by checking that the stack
map's location is a Direct location type. The runtime can then
determine the alloca's relative location on the stack immediately after
compilation, or at any time thereafter. This differs from Register and
Indirect locations, because the runtime can only read the values in
those locations when execution reaches the instruction address of the
stack map.
llvm-svn: 195712
This patch moves the jump address materialization inside the noop slide. This
enables patching of the materialization itself or its complete removal. This
patch also adds the ability to define scratch registers that can be used safely
by the code called from the patchpoint intrinsic. At least one scratch register
is required, because that one is used for the materialization of the jump
address. This patch depends on D2009.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2074
Reviewed by Andy
llvm-svn: 194306
This change came about primarily because of two issues in the existing code.
Niether of:
define i64 @test1(i64 %val) {
%in = trunc i64 %val to i32
tail call i32 @ret32(i32 returned %in)
ret i64 %val
}
define i64 @test2(i64 %val) {
tail call i32 @ret32(i32 returned undef)
ret i32 42
}
should be tail calls, and the function sameNoopInput is responsible. The main
problem is that it is completely symmetric in the "tail call" and "ret" value,
but in reality different things are allowed on each side.
For these cases:
1. Any truncation should lead to a larger value being generated by "tail call"
than needed by "ret".
2. Undef should only be allowed as a source for ret, not as a result of the
call.
Along the way I noticed that a mismatch between what this function treats as a
valid truncation and what the backends see can lead to invalid calls as well
(see x86-32 test case).
This patch refactors the code so that instead of being based primarily on
values which it recurses into when necessary, it starts by inspecting the type
and considers each fundamental slot that the backend will see in turn. For
example, given a pathological function that returned {{}, {{}, i32, {}}, i32}
we would consider each "real" i32 in turn, and ask if it passes through
unchanged. This is much closer to what the backend sees as a result of
ComputeValueVTs.
Aside from the bug fixes, this eliminates the recursion that's going on and, I
believe, makes the bulk of the code significantly easier to understand. The
trade-off is the nasty iterators needed to find the real types inside a
returned value.
llvm-svn: 187787
All insertf*/extractf* functions replaced with insert/extract since we have insertf and inserti forms.
Added lowering for INSERT_VECTOR_ELT / EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT for 512-bit vectors.
Added lowering for EXTRACT/INSERT subvector for 512-bit vectors.
Added a test.
llvm-svn: 187491
in-tree implementations of TargetLoweringBase::isFMAFasterThanMulAndAdd in
order to resolve the following issues with fmuladd (i.e. optional FMA)
intrinsics:
1. On X86(-64) targets, ISD::FMA nodes are formed when lowering fmuladd
intrinsics even if the subtarget does not support FMA instructions, leading
to laughably bad code generation in some situations.
2. On AArch64 targets, ISD::FMA nodes are formed for operations on fp128,
resulting in a call to a software fp128 FMA implementation.
3. On PowerPC targets, FMAs are not generated from fmuladd intrinsics on types
like v2f32, v8f32, v4f64, etc., even though they promote, split, scalarize,
etc. to types that support hardware FMAs.
The function has also been slightly renamed for consistency and to force a
merge/build conflict for any out-of-tree target implementing it. To resolve,
see comments and fixed in-tree examples.
llvm-svn: 185956
