This patch adds two new target-independent calling conventions for runtime
calls - PreserveMost and PreserveAll.
The target-specific implementation for X86-64 is defined as following:
- Arguments are passed as for the default C calling convention
- The same applies for the return value(s)
- PreserveMost preserves all GPRs - except R11
- PreserveAll preserves all GPRs and all XMMs/YMMs - except R11
Reviewed by Lang and Philip
llvm-svn: 199508
Use separate callee-save masks for XMM and YMM registers for anyregcc on X86 and
select the proper mask depending on the target cpu we compile for.
llvm-svn: 198985
The combination of inline asm, stack realignment, and dynamic allocas
turns out to be too common to reject out of hand.
ASan inserts empy inline asm fragments and uses aligned allocas.
Compiling any trivial function containing a dynamic alloca with ASan is
enough to trigger the check.
XFAIL the test cases that would be miscompiled and add one that uses the
relevant functionality.
llvm-svn: 196986
This re-lands commit r196876, which was reverted in r196879.
The tests have been fixed to pass on platforms with a stack alignment
larger than 4.
Update to clang side tests will land shortly.
llvm-svn: 196939
For stack frames requiring realignment, three pointers may be needed:
- ebp to address incoming arguments
- esi (could be any callee-saved register) to address locals
- esp to address outgoing arguments
We would use esi unconditionally without verifying that it did not
conflict with inline assembly.
This change doesn't do the verification, it simply emits a fatal error
on functions that use stack realignment, dynamic SP adjustments, and
inline assembly.
Because stack realignment is common on Windows, we also no longer assume
that MS inline assembly clobbers esp. Instead, we analyze the inline
instructions for implicit definitions and check if esp is there. If so,
we require the use of a base pointer and consider it in the condition
above.
Mostly fixes PR16830, but we could try harder to find a non-conflicting
base pointer.
Reviewers: sunfish
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1317
llvm-svn: 196876
The idea of the AnyReg Calling Convention is to provide the call arguments in
registers, but not to force them to be placed in a paticular order into a
specified set of registers. Instead it is up tp the register allocator to assign
any register as it sees fit. The same applies to the return value (if
applicable).
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2009
Reviewed by Andy
llvm-svn: 194293
This pass is needed to break false dependencies. Without it, unlucky
register assignment can result in wild (5x) swings in
performance. This pass was trying to handle AVX but not getting it
right. AVX doesn't have partial register defs, it has unused register
reads in which the high bits of a source operand are copied into the
unused bits of the dest.
Fixing this requires conservative liveness analysis. This is awkard
because the pass already has its own pseudo-liveness. However, proper
liveness is expensive, and we would like to use a generic utility to
compute it. The fix only invokes liveness on-demand. It is rare to
detect a case that needs undef-read dependence breaking, but when it
happens, it can be needed many times within a very large block.
I think the existing heuristic which uses a register window of 16 is
too conservative for loop-carried false dependencies. If the loop is a
reduction. The out-of-order engine may be able to execute several loop
iterations in parallel. However, I'll leave this tuning exercise for
next time.
llvm-svn: 192635
Function attributes are the future! So just query whether we want to realign the
stack directly from the function instead of through a random target options
structure.
llvm-svn: 187618
to TargetFrameLowering, where it belongs. Incidentally, this allows us
to delete some duplicated (and slightly different!) code in TRI.
There are potentially other layering problems that can be cleaned up
as a result, or in a similar manner.
The refactoring was OK'd by Anton Korobeynikov on llvmdev.
Note: this touches the target interfaces, so out-of-tree targets may
be affected.
llvm-svn: 175788
exists solely to enable it to call itself for i8 with some registers.
The proposed patch simplifies the function somewhat to make the High
bit only meaningful for the i8 mode, which makes sense. No functional
difference (getX86SubSuperRegister is not getting called from anywhere
outside with i64 and High=true).
llvm-svn: 175762
MS-style inline assembly.
This is a follow-on to r175334. Forcing a FP to be emitted doesn't ensure it
will be used. Therefore, force the base pointer as well. We now treat MS
inline assembly in the same way we treat functions with dynamic stack
realignment and VLAs. This guarantees the BP will be used to reference
parameters and locals.
rdar://13218191
llvm-svn: 175576
(defined by the x32 ABI) mode, in which case its pointers are 32-bits
in size. This knowledge is also added to X86RegisterInfo that now
returns the appropriate registers in getPointerRegClass.
There are many outcomes to this change. In order to keep the patches
separate and manageable, we start by focusing on some simple testable
cases. The patch adds a test with passing a pointer to a function -
focusing on the difference between the two data models for x86-64.
Another test is added for handling of 'sret' arguments (and
functionality is added in X86ISelLowering to make it work).
A note on naming: the "x32 ABI" document refers to the AMD64
architecture (in LLVM it's distinguished by being is64Bits() in the
x86 subtarget) with two variations: the LP64 (default) data model, and
the ILP32 data model. This patch adds predicates to the subtarget
which are consistent with this naming scheme.
llvm-svn: 173503
into their new header subdirectory: include/llvm/IR. This matches the
directory structure of lib, and begins to correct a long standing point
of file layout clutter in LLVM.
There are still more header files to move here, but I wanted to handle
them in separate commits to make tracking what files make sense at each
layer easier.
The only really questionable files here are the target intrinsic
tablegen files. But that's a battle I'd rather not fight today.
I've updated both CMake and Makefile build systems (I think, and my
tests think, but I may have missed something).
I've also re-sorted the includes throughout the project. I'll be
committing updates to Clang, DragonEgg, and Polly momentarily.
llvm-svn: 171366
directly.
This is in preparation for removing the use of the 'Attribute' class as a
collection of attributes. That will shift to the AttributeSet class instead.
llvm-svn: 171253
MC disassembler clients (LLDB) are interested in querying if an
instruction may affect control flow other than by virtue of being
an explicit branch instruction. For example, instructions which
write directly to the PC on some architectures.
llvm-svn: 170610
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
This pass was conservative in that it always reserved the FP to enable dynamic
stack realignment, which allowed the RA to use aligned spills for vector
registers. This happens even when spills were not necessary. The RA has
since been improved to use unaligned spills when necessary.
The new behavior is to realign the stack if the frame pointer was already
reserved for some other reason, but don't reserve the frame pointer just
because a function contains vector virtual registers.
Part of rdar://12719844
llvm-svn: 168627
- Besides used in SjLj exception handling, __builtin_setjmp/__longjmp is also
used as a light-weight replacement of setjmp/longjmp which are used to
implementation continuation, user-level threading, and etc. The support added
in this patch ONLY addresses this usage and is NOT intended to support SjLj
exception handling as zero-cost DWARF exception handling is used by default
in X86.
llvm-svn: 165989
We use the enums to query whether an Attributes object has that attribute. The
opaque layer is responsible for knowing where that specific attribute is stored.
llvm-svn: 165488
- Add 'HwEncoding' for X86 registers and call getEncodingValue() to
retrieve their encoding values.
- This's the first step to adopt new scheme. Furthur revising is onging.
llvm-svn: 165241
X86. Basically, this is a reapplication of r158087 with a few fixes.
Specifically, (1) the stack pointer is restored from the base pointer before
popping callee-saved registers and (2) in obscure cases (see comments in patch)
we must cache the value of the original stack adjustment in the prologue and
apply it in the epilogue.
rdar://11496434
llvm-svn: 160002
This patch causes problems when both dynamic stack realignment and
dynamic allocas combine in the same function. With this patch, we no
longer build the epilog correctly, and silently restore registers from
the wrong position in the stack.
Thanks to Matt for tracking this down, and getting at least an initial
test case to Chad. I'm going to try to check a variation of that test
case in so we can easily track the fixes required.
llvm-svn: 158654
No functional change intended.
Sorry for the churn. The iterator classes are supposed to help avoid
giant commits like this one in the future. The TableGen-produced
register lists are getting quite large, and it may be necessary to
change the table representation.
This makes it possible to do so without changing all clients (again).
llvm-svn: 157854
The getPointerRegClass() hook can return register classes that depend on
the calling convention of the current function (ptr_rc_tailcall).
So far, we have been able to infer the calling convention from the
subtarget alone, but as we add support for multiple calling conventions
per target, that no longer works.
Patch by Yiannis Tsiouris!
llvm-svn: 156328
in order to avoid assertion failures in the register scavenger. The assertion
failures were “Bad machine code: Using an undefined physical register” and
“Bad machine code: MBB exits via unconditional fall-through but its successor
differs from its CFG successor!”.
llvm-svn: 155930
