The test only checks the existence of the `Types CU list` line.
Unfortunately I can't make a better test because
{gcc,clang} -fuse-ld={lld,gold} --gdb-index do not give me a non-empty types CU list.
Reviewed By: ikudrin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63537
llvm-svn: 363800
This allows the DWARFExpression class to handle addresses without
crashing on targets with 16-bit pointers like AVR.
This is required in order to generate assembly from clang via the '-S'
flag.
This fixes an error with the following message:
clang: llvm/include/llvm/DebugInfo/DWARF/DWARFExpression.h:132: llvm::DWARFExpression::DWARFExpression(llvm::DataExtractor, uint16_t, uint8_t):
Assertion `AddressSize == 8 || AddressSize == 4' failed.
llvm-svn: 362290
This lead to errors when dumping binaries with v4 and v5 units linked
together (but could've also errored on v5 units that did/didn't use
str_offsets).
Also improves error handling and messages around invalid str_offsets
contributions.
llvm-svn: 361683
This adds `-parent-recurse-depth` which limits the number of parent DIEs
being dumped.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62359
llvm-svn: 361671
This test case was incorrect because it mixed DWARF32 and DWARF64 for a
single unit (DWARF32 unit referencing a DWARF64 str_offsets section). So
fix enough of the unit parsing for DWARF64 and make the test valid.
(not sure if anyone needs DWARF64 support though - support in
libDebugInfoDWARF has been added piecemeal and LLVM doesn't produce it
at all)
llvm-svn: 361582
Summary:
This was flagged in https://www.viva64.com/en/b/0629/ under "Snippet No.
15" (see under #13). It looks like PVS studio flags nullptr checks where
the ptr is used inbetween creation and checking against nullptr.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, probinson
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: RKSimon, hiraditya, llvm-commits, srhines
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62118
llvm-svn: 361176
r360876 didn't fix 2 call sites in clang.
Expected<ArrayRef<uint8_t>> may be better but use Expected<StringRef> for now.
Follow-up of D61781.
llvm-svn: 360892
It broke the Clang build, see llvm-commits thread.
> Expected<ArrayRef<uint8_t>> may be better but use Expected<StringRef> for now.
>
> Follow-up of D61781.
llvm-svn: 360878
Follow up to r359122, after a bug was reported in it - the original
change too aggressively tried to move related types out of type units,
which included unnamed types (like array types) which can't reasonably
be declared-but-not-defined.
A step beyond that is that some types in type units can be anonymous, if
they are types with a name for linkage purposes (eg: "typedef struct { }
x;"). So ensure those don't get turned into plain declarations (without
signatures) because, lacking names, they can't be resolved to the
definition.
[Also include a fix for llvm-dwarfdump/libDebugInfoDWARF to pretty print
types in type units]
llvm-svn: 360458
Summary:
Prior to DWARF v5, a directory index of 0 represents DW_AT_comp_dir.
In DWARF v5, the index starts with 0 and Entry.DirIdx is the index into
Prologue.IncludeDirectories.
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61253
llvm-svn: 360015
Another attempt to land the changes in debug line header to prevent duplicate
files in Dwarf 5. I rolled back my previous commit because of a mistake in
generating the object file in a test. Meanwhile, I addressed some offline
comments and changed the implementation; the largest difference is that
MCDwarfLineTableHeader does not keep DwarfVersion but gets it as a parameter. I
also merged the patch to fix two lld tests that will strt to fail into this
patch.
Original Commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59515
Original Message:
Motivation: In previous dwarf versions, file name indexes started from 1, and
the primary source file was not explicit. Dwarf 5 standard (6.2.4) prescribes
the primary source file to be explicitly given an entry with an index number 0.
The current implementation honors the specification by just duplicating the
main source file, once with index number 0, and later maybe with another
index number. While this is compliant with the letter of the standard, the
duplication causes problems for consumers of this information such as lldb.
(Some files are duplicated, where only some of them have a line table although
all refer to the same file)
With this change, dwarf 5 debug line section files always start from 0, and
the zeroth entry is not duplicated whenever possible. This requires different
handling of dwarf 4 and dwarf 5 during generation (e.g. when a function returns
an index zero for a file name, it signals an error in dwarf 4, but not in dwarf
5) However, I think the minor complication is worth it, because it enables all
consumers (lldb, gdb, dwarfdump, objdump, and so on) to treat all files in the
file name list homogenously.
llvm-svn: 358732
It didn't handle empty LHS correctly. If two ranges of LHS were
contiguous and jointly contained one range of RHS, it could also be incorrect.
DWARFAddressRange::contains can be removed and its tests can be merged into DWARFVerifier::DieRangeInfo::contains
llvm-svn: 358387
Summary:
Make DW_LNS_copy set the discriminator register to 0, to conform to
DWARF 4 & 5: "Then it sets the discriminator register to 0, and sets the
basic_block, prologue_end and epilogue_begin registers to false."
Because all of DW_LNE_end_sequence, DN_LNS_copy, and special opcodes reset
discriminator to 0, we can move discriminator=0 to appendRowToMatrix.
Also, make DW_LNS_copy print before appending the row, as it is similar
to a address+=0,line+=0 special opcode, which prints before appending
the row.
Reviewers: dblaikie, probinson, aprantl
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Subscribers: danielcdh, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60364
llvm-svn: 358148
We want the last row whose address is less than or equal to Address.
This can be computed as upper_bound - 1, which is simpler than
lower_bound followed by skipping equal rows in a loop.
Since FirstRow (LowPC) does not satisfy the predicate (OrderByAddress)
while LastRow-1 (HighPC) satisfies the predicate. We can decrease the
search range by two, i.e.
upper_bound [FirstRow,LastRow) = upper_bound [FirstRow+1,LastRow-1)
llvm-svn: 358053
In a sorted list of non-overlapping [LowPC,HighPC) ranges, locating an address with
upper_bound on HighPC is simpler than lower_bound on LowPC.
llvm-svn: 358012
The current lower_bound approach has to check two iterators pos and pos-1.
Changing it to upper_bound allows us to check one iterator (similar to
DWARFUnitVector::getUnitFor*).
llvm-svn: 357834
The standard doesn't require a DW_TAG_variable, DW_TAG_formal_parameter
or DW_TAG_constant to A DW_AT_type attribute describing the type of the
variable. It only specifies that it *can* have one.
llvm-svn: 357628
This reverts commit rL357020.
The commit broke the test llvm/test/tools/llvm-objdump/embedded-source.test
on some builds including clang-ppc64be-linux-multistage,
clang-s390x-linux, clang-with-lto-ubuntu, clang-x64-windows-msvc,
llvm-clang-lld-x86_64-scei-ps4-windows10pro-fast (and others).
llvm-svn: 357026
Reapply rL356941 after regenerating the object file in the failing test
llvm/test/tools/llvm-objdump/embedded-source.test from source.
Original commit message:
[llvm] Prevent duplicate files in debug line header in dwarf 5.
Motivation: In previous dwarf versions, file name indexes started from 1, and
the primary source file was not explicit. Dwarf 5 standard (6.2.4) prescribes
the primary source file to be explicitly given an entry with an index number 0.
The current implementation honors the specification by just duplicating the
main source file, once with index number 0, and later maybe with another
index number. While this is compliant with the letter of the standard, the
duplication causes problems for consumers of this information such as lldb.
(Some files are duplicated, where only some of them have a line table although
all refer to the same file)
With this change, dwarf 5 debug line section files always start from 0, and
the zeroth entry is not duplicated whenever possible. This requires different
handling of dwarf 4 and dwarf 5 during generation (e.g. when a function returns
an index zero for a file name, it signals an error in dwarf 4, but not in dwarf 5)
However, I think the minor complication is worth it, because it enables all
consumers (lldb, gdb, dwarfdump, objdump, and so on) to treat all files in the
file name list homogenously.
Tags: #llvm, #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59515
llvm-svn: 357018
Summary:
Motivation: In previous dwarf versions, file name indexes started from 1, and
the primary source file was not explicit. Dwarf 5 standard (6.2.4) prescribes
the primary source file to be explicitly given an entry with an index number 0.
The current implementation honors the specification by just duplicating the
main source file, once with index number 0, and later maybe with another
index number. While this is compliant with the letter of the standard, the
duplication causes problems for consumers of this information such as lldb.
(Some files are duplicated, where only some of them have a line table although
all refer to the same file)
With this change, dwarf 5 debug line section files always start from 0, and
the zeroth entry is not duplicated whenever possible. This requires different
handling of dwarf 4 and dwarf 5 during generation (e.g. when a function returns
an index zero for a file name, it signals an error in dwarf 4, but not in dwarf 5)
However, I think the minor complication is worth it, because it enables all
consumers (lldb, gdb, dwarfdump, objdump, and so on) to treat all files in the
file name list homogenously.
Reviewers: dblaikie, probinson, aprantl, espindola
Reviewed By: probinson
Subscribers: emaste, jvesely, nhaehnle, aprantl, javed.absar, arichardson, hiraditya, MaskRay, rupprecht, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59515
llvm-svn: 356941
Summary:
getRelocatedValue may compute incorrect value for SHT_RELA-typed relocation entries.
// DWARFDataExtractor.cpp
uint64_t DWARFDataExtractor::getRelocatedValue(uint32_t Size, uint32_t *Off,
...
// This formula is correct for REL, but may be incorrect for RELA if the value
// stored in the location (getUnsigned(Off, Size)) is not zero.
return getUnsigned(Off, Size) + Rel->Value;
In this patch, we
* refactor these visit* functions to include a new parameter `uint64_t A`.
Since these visit* functions are no longer used as visitors, rename them to resolve*.
+ REL: A is used as the addend. A is the value stored in the location where the
relocation applies: getUnsigned(Off, Size)
+ RELA: The addend encoded in RelocationRef is used, e.g. getELFAddend(R)
* and add another set of supports* functions to check if a given relocation type is handled.
DWARFObjInMemory uses them to fail early.
Reviewers: echristo, dblaikie
Reviewed By: echristo
Subscribers: mgorny, aprantl, aheejin, fedor.sergeev, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57939
llvm-svn: 356729
Introduce a DW_OP_LLVM_convert Dwarf expression pseudo op that allows
for a convenient way to perform type conversions on the Dwarf expression
stack. As an additional bonus it paves the way for using other Dwarf
v5 ops that need to reference a base_type.
The new DW_OP_LLVM_convert is used from lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp
to perform sext/zext on debug values but mainly the patch is about
preparing terrain for adding other Dwarf v5 ops that need to reference a
base_type.
For Dwarf v5 the op maps to DW_OP_convert and for earlier versions a
complex shift & mask pattern is generated to emulate sext/zext.
This is a recommit of r356442 with trivial fixes for the failing tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56587
llvm-svn: 356451
Introduce a DW_OP_LLVM_convert Dwarf expression pseudo op that allows
for a convenient way to perform type conversions on the Dwarf expression
stack. As an additional bonus it paves the way for using other Dwarf
v5 ops that need to reference a base_type.
The new DW_OP_LLVM_convert is used from lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp
to perform sext/zext on debug values but mainly the patch is about
preparing terrain for adding other Dwarf v5 ops that need to reference a
base_type.
For Dwarf v5 the op maps to DW_OP_convert and for earlier versions a
complex shift & mask pattern is generated to emulate sext/zext.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56587
llvm-svn: 356442
Summary:
This is similar to how addr2line handles consecutive entries with the
same address - pick the last one.
Reviewers: dblaikie, friss, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Subscribers: eugenis, vitalybuka, echristo, JDevlieghere, probinson, aprantl, hiraditya, rupprecht, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #debug-info
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58952
llvm-svn: 356265
