compile, and everyone's tests have shown it to be slower in practice, even for
quite large graphs.
I also hope to do an optimization that is only correct with the simpler data
structure, which would break this even further.
llvm-svn: 122684
naively implemented, the Lengauer-Tarjan algorithm requires a separate bucket
for each vertex. However, this is unnecessary, because each vertex is only
placed into a single bucket (that of its semidominator), and each vertex's
bucket is processed before it is added to any bucket itself.
Instead of using a bucket per vertex, we use a single array Buckets that has two
purposes. Before the vertex V with DFS number i is processed, Buckets[i] stores
the index of the first element in V's bucket. After V's bucket is processed,
Buckets[i] stores the index of the next element in the bucket to which V now
belongs, if any.
Reading from the buckets can also be optimized. Instead of processing the bucket
of V's parent at the end of processing V, we process the bucket of V itself at
the beginning of processing V. This means that the case of the root vertex can
be simplified somewhat. It also means that we don't need to look up the DFS
number of the semidominator of every node in the bucket we are processing,
since we know it is the current index being processed.
This is a 6.5% speedup running -domtree on test-suite + SPEC2000/2006, with
larger speedups of around 12% on the larger benchmarks like GCC.
llvm-svn: 122680
Nodes that had children outside of the post dominator tree (infinite loops)
where removed from the post dominator tree. This seems to be wrong. Leave them
in the tree.
llvm-svn: 93633
Remove a FIXME and unify code that was necessary to work around broken
updateDFSNumbers(). Before updateDFSNumbers() did not work correctly for post
dominators.
llvm-svn: 92968
