should become a no-op when not running in multithreaded mode. Make sys::Mutex a typedef of SmartMutex<false>, to preserve source compatibility.
llvm-svn: 73709
casted induction variables in cases where the cast
isn't foldable. It ended up being a pessimization in
many cases. This could be fixed, but it would require
a bunch of complicated code in IVUsers' clients. The
advantages of this approach aren't visible enough to
justify it at this time.
llvm-svn: 73706
- Register allocator should resolve the second part of the hint (register number) before passing it to the target since it knows virtual register to physical register mapping.
- More fixes to get ARM load / store double word working.
llvm-svn: 73671
adding a check to catch this case at compile time
instead of quietly generating incorrect code.
That will at least let us identify CBE failures
that are not due to this problem.
llvm-svn: 73668
move loads back past a check that the load address
is valid, see new testcase. The test that went
in with 72661 has exactly this case, except that
the conditional it's moving past is checking
something else; I've settled for changing that
test to reference a global, not a pointer. It
may be possible to scan all the tests you pass and
make sure none of them are checking any component
of the address, but it's not trivial and I'm not
trying to do that here.
llvm-svn: 73632
lock. This is obviously bad, but at least it's threadsafe! If you know how
to improve this in a pre-Vista friendly well, patches welcome!
Patch by Max Burke.
llvm-svn: 73607
>>
>
> It doesn't matter in terms of semantics: because AnalyzeGlobal
> returned false, we're guaranteed the address of the global is never
> taken. I wouldn't be surprised if we end up generating invalid IR in
> some cases, though, because of the semantics of replaceAllUsesWith.
> Do you have a testcase that breaks?
>
>
The problem is replaceAllUsesWith asserts for type mismatch here. Try attached .bc with llvm-ld.
assert(New->getType() == getType() &&
"replaceAllUses of value with new value of different type!");
Since stack is always on address space zero, I don't think that type of GV in a different address space is ever going to match.
The other way is to allow replaceAllUsesWith to ignore address spaces while comparing types. (do we have a way to do that ?).
But then such an optimization may fail the entire idea of user wanting to place a variable into different memory space. The original idea of user might be to save on the stack space (data memory) and hence he asked the variable to be placed into different memory space (program memory). So the best bet here is to deny this optimization by checking
GV->getType()->getAddressSpace() == 0.
llvm-svn: 73605
