the need for a flavor operand, and add a new SDNode subclass,
LabelSDNode, for use with them to eliminate the need for a label id
operand.
Change instruction selection to let these label nodes through
unmodified instead of creating copies of them. Teach the MachineInstr
emitter how to emit a MachineInstr directly from an ISD label node.
This avoids the need for allocating SDNodes for the label id and
flavor value, as well as SDNodes for each of the post-isel label,
label id, and label flavor.
llvm-svn: 52943
purpose, and give it a custom SDNode subclass so that it doesn't
need to have line number, column number, filename string, and
directory string, all existing as individual SDNodes to be the
operands.
This was the only user of ISD::STRING, StringSDNode, etc., so
remove those and some associated code.
This makes stop-points considerably easier to read in
-view-legalize-dags output, and reduces overhead (creating new
nodes and copying std::strings into them) on code containing
debugging information.
llvm-svn: 52924
it impossible to create a MERGE_VALUES node with
only one result: sometimes it is useful to be able
to create a node with only one result out of one of
the results of a node with more than one result, for
example because the new node will eventually be used
to replace a one-result node using ReplaceAllUsesWith,
cf X86TargetLowering::ExpandFP_TO_SINT. On the other
hand, most users of MERGE_VALUES don't need this and
for them the optimization was valuable. So add a new
utility method getMergeValues for creating MERGE_VALUES
nodes which by default performs the optimization.
Change almost everywhere to use getMergeValues (and
tidy some stuff up at the same time).
llvm-svn: 52893
For this it is convenient to permit floats to
be used with EXTRACT_ELEMENT, so I tweaked
things to allow that. I also added libcalls
for ppcf128 to i32 forms of FP_TO_XINT, since
they exist in libgcc and this case can certainly
occur (and does occur in the testsuite) - before
the i64 libcall was being used. Also, the
XINT_TO_FP result seemed to be wrong when
the argument is an i128: the wrong fudge
factor was added (the i32 and i64 cases were
handled directly, but the i128 code fell
through to some generic softening code which
seemed to think it was i64 to f32!). So I
fixed it by adding a fudge factor that I
found in my breakfast cereal.
llvm-svn: 52739
Added abstract class MemSDNode for any Node that have an associated MemOperand
Changed atomic.lcs => atomic.cmp.swap, atomic.las => atomic.load.add, and
atomic.lss => atomic.load.sub
llvm-svn: 52706
the function due to empty index slots. This is suitable for use in backend heuristics that need to reason about the density
of an interval.
llvm-svn: 52652
to DenseMap<SDNode*, SUnit*>, and adjust the way cloned SUnit nodes are
handled so that only the original node needs to be in the map.
This speeds up llc on 447.dealII.llvm.bc by about 2%.
llvm-svn: 52576
of value info (sign/zero ext info) from one MBB to another. This doesn't
handle much right now because of two limitations:
1) only handles zext/sext, not random bit propagation (no assert exists
for this)
2) doesn't handle phis.
llvm-svn: 52383
still excluding types like i1 (not byte sized)
and i120 (loading an i120 requires loading an i64,
an i32, an i16 and an i8, which is expensive).
llvm-svn: 52310
maps can be deleted. This happens when RAUW
replaces a node N with another equivalent node
E, deleting the first node. Solve this by
adding (N, E) to ReplacedNodes, which is already
used to remap nodes to replacements. This means
that deleted nodes are being allowed in maps,
which can be delicate: the memory may be reused
for a new node which might get confused with the
old deleted node pointer hanging around in the
maps, so detect this and flush out maps if it
occurs (ExpungeNode). The expunging operation
is expensive, however it never occurs during
a llvm-gcc bootstrap or anywhere in the nightly
testsuite. It occurs three times in "make check":
Alpha/illegal-element-type.ll,
PowerPC/illegal-element-type.ll and
X86/mmx-shift.ll. If expunging proves to be too
expensive then there are other more complicated
ways of solving the problem.
In the normal case this patch adds the overhead
of a few more map lookups, which is hopefully
negligable.
llvm-svn: 52214
of apint codegen failure is the DAG combiner doing
the wrong thing because it was comparing MVT's using
< rather than comparing the number of bits. Removing
the < method makes this mistake impossible to commit.
Instead, add helper methods for comparing bits and use
them.
llvm-svn: 52098
and better control the abstraction. Rename the type
to MVT. To update out-of-tree patches, the main
thing to do is to rename MVT::ValueType to MVT, and
rewrite expressions like MVT::getSizeInBits(VT) in
the form VT.getSizeInBits(). Use VT.getSimpleVT()
to extract a MVT::SimpleValueType for use in switch
statements (you will get an assert failure if VT is
an extended value type - these shouldn't exist after
type legalization).
This results in a small speedup of codegen and no
new testsuite failures (x86-64 linux).
llvm-svn: 52044
are the same as in unpacked structs, only field
positions differ. This only matters for structs
containing x86 long double or an apint; it may
cause backwards compatibility problems if someone
has bitcode containing a packed struct with a
field of one of those types.
The issue is that only 10 bytes are needed to
hold an x86 long double: the store size is 10
bytes, but the ABI size is 12 or 16 bytes (linux/
darwin) which comes from rounding the store size
up by the alignment. Because it seemed silly not
to pack an x86 long double into 10 bytes in a
packed struct, this is what was done. I now
think this was a mistake. Reserving the ABI size
for an x86 long double field even in a packed
struct makes things more uniform: the ABI size is
now always used when reserving space for a type.
This means that developers are less likely to
make mistakes. It also makes life easier for the
CBE which otherwise could not represent all LLVM
packed structs (PR2402).
Front-end people might need to adjust the way
they create LLVM structs - see following change
to llvm-gcc.
llvm-svn: 51928
