GCC 4.7's libstdc++ doesn't have std::map::emplace, but it does have
std::unordered_map::emplace, and the use case here doesn't appear to
need ordering. The container has been changed in a separate/precursor
patch, and now this patch should hopefully build cleanly even with
GCC 4.7.
& then I realized the order of the container did matter, so extra
handling of ordering was added in r231189.
Original commit message:
This makes LiveRange non-copyable, and LiveInterval is already
non-movable (due to the explicit dtor), so now it's non-copyable and
non-movable.
Fix the one case where we were relying on the (deprecated in C++11)
implicit copy ctor of LiveInterval (which happened to work because the
ctor created an object with a null segmentSet, so double-deleting the
null pointer was fine).
llvm-svn: 231192
Apparently something does care about ordering of LiveIntervals... so
revert all that stuff (r231175, r231176, r231177) & take some time to
re-evaluate.
llvm-svn: 231184
GCC 4.7's libstdc++ doesn't have std::map::emplace, but it does have
std::unordered_map::emplace, and the use case here doesn't appear to
need ordering. The container has been changed in a separate/precursor
patch, and now this patch should hopefully build cleanly even with
GCC 4.7.
Original commit message:
This makes LiveRange non-copyable, and LiveInterval is already
non-movable (due to the explicit dtor), so now it's non-copyable and
non-movable.
Fix the one case where we were relying on the (deprecated in C++11)
implicit copy ctor of LiveInterval (which happened to work because the
ctor created an object with a null segmentSet, so double-deleting the
null pointer was fine).
llvm-svn: 231176
This makes LiveRange non-copyable, and LiveInterval is already
non-movable (due to the explicit dtor), so now it's non-copyable and
non-movable.
Fix the one case where we were relying on the (deprecated in C++11)
implicit copy ctor of LiveInterval (which happened to work because the
ctor created an object with a null segmentSet, so double-deleting the
null pointer was fine).
llvm-svn: 231168
Accidentally committed a few more of these cleanup changes than
intended. Still breaking these out & tidying them up.
This reverts commit r231135.
llvm-svn: 231136
There doesn't seem to be any need to assert that iterator assignment is
between iterators over the same node - if you want to reuse an iterator
variable to iterate another node, that's perfectly acceptable. Just
don't mix comparisons between iterators into disjoint sequences, as
usual.
llvm-svn: 231135
Indices into the table are stored in each MCRegisterClass instead of a pointer. A new method, getRegClassName, is added to MCRegisterInfo and TargetRegisterInfo to lookup the string in the table.
llvm-svn: 222118
shorter/easier and have the DAG use that to do the same lookup. This
can be used in the future for TargetMachine based caching lookups from
the MachineFunction easily.
Update the MIPS subtarget switching machinery to update this pointer
at the same time it runs.
llvm-svn: 214838
define below all header includes in the lib/CodeGen/... tree. While the
current modules implementation doesn't check for this kind of ODR
violation yet, it is likely to grow support for it in the future. It
also removes one layer of macro pollution across all the included
headers.
Other sub-trees will follow.
llvm-svn: 206837
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
physical register numbers.
This makes the hack used in LiveInterval official, and lets LiveInterval be
oblivious of stack slots.
The isPhysicalRegister() and isVirtualRegister() predicates don't know about
this, so when a variable may contain a stack slot, isStackSlot() should always
be tested first.
llvm-svn: 123128
This introduces a new pass, SlotIndexes, which is responsible for numbering
instructions for register allocation (and other clients). SlotIndexes numbering
is designed to match the existing scheme, so this patch should not cause any
changes in the generated code.
For consistency, and to avoid naming confusion, LiveIndex has been renamed
SlotIndex.
The processImplicitDefs method of the LiveIntervals analysis has been moved
into its own pass so that it can be run prior to SlotIndexes. This was
necessary to match the existing numbering scheme.
llvm-svn: 85979
VirtRegMap keeps track of allocations so it knows what's not used. As a horrible hack, the stack coloring can color spill slots with *free* registers. That is, it replace reload and spills with copies from and to the free register. It unfold instructions that load and store the spill slot and replace them with register using variants.
Not yet enabled. This is part 1. More coming.
llvm-svn: 70787
