register dependency (rather than glue them together). This is general
goodness as it gives scheduler more freedom. However it is motivated by
a nasty bug in isel.
When a i64 sub is expanded to subc + sube.
libcall #1
\
\ subc
\ / \
\ / \
\ / libcall #2
sube
If the libcalls are not serialized (i.e. both have chains which are dag
entry), legalizer can serialize them in arbitrary orders. If it's
unlucky, it can force libcall #2 before libcall #1 in the above case.
subc
|
libcall #2
|
libcall #1
|
sube
However since subc and sube are "glued" together, this ends up being a
cycle when the scheduler combine subc and sube as a single scheduling
unit.
The right solution is to fix LegalizeType too chains the libcalls together.
However, LegalizeType is not processing nodes in order so that's harder than
it should be. For now, the move to physical register dependency will do.
rdar://10019576
llvm-svn: 138791
to MCRegisterInfo. Also initialize the mapping at construction time.
This patch eliminate TargetRegisterInfo from TargetAsmInfo. It's another step
towards fixing the layering violation.
llvm-svn: 135424
Also switch the return type to ArrayRef<unsigned> which works out nicely
for ARM's implementation of this function because of the clever ArrayRef
constructors.
The name change indicates that the returned allocation order may contain
reserved registers as has been the case for a while.
llvm-svn: 133216
The hook will be used by the register allocator when recomputing register
classes after removing constraints.
Thumb1 code doesn't allow anything larger than tGPR, and x86 needs to ensure
that the spill size doesn't change.
llvm-svn: 130228
Add a avoidWriteAfterWrite() target hook to identify register classes that
suffer from write-after-write hazards. For those register classes, try to avoid
writing the same register in two consecutive instructions.
This is currently disabled by default. We should not spill to avoid hazards!
The command line flag -avoid-waw-hazard can be used to enable waw avoidance.
llvm-svn: 129772
may be called. If the entry block is empty, the insertion point iterator will be
the "end()" value. Calling ->getParent() on it (among others) causes problems.
Modify materializeFrameBaseRegister to take the machine basic block and insert
the frame base register at the beginning of that block. (It's very similar to
what the code does all ready. The only difference is that it will always insert
at the beginning of the entry block instead of after a previous materialization
of the frame base register. I doubt that that matters here.)
<rdar://problem/8782198>
llvm-svn: 122104
Remove movePastCSLoadStoreOps and associated code for simple pointer
increments. Update routines that depended upon other opcodes for save/restore.
Adjust all testcases accordingly.
llvm-svn: 119725
functions in ARMBaseInfo.h so it can be used in the MC library as well.
For anything bigger than this, we may want a means to have a small support
library for shared helper functions like this. Cross that bridge when we
come to it.
llvm-svn: 114016
"For ARM stack frames that utilize variable sized objects and have either
large local stack areas or require dynamic stack realignment, allocate a
base register via which to access the local frame. This allows efficient
access to frame indices not accessible via the FP (either due to being out
of range or due to dynamic realignment) or the SP (due to variable sized
object allocation). In particular, this greatly improves efficiency of access
to spill slots in Thumb functions which contain VLAs."
r112986 fixed a latent bug exposed by the above.
llvm-svn: 112989
large local stack areas or require dynamic stack realignment, allocate a
base register via which to access the local frame. This allows efficient
access to frame indices not accessible via the FP (either due to being out
of range or due to dynamic realignment) or the SP (due to variable sized
object allocation). In particular, this greatly improves efficiency of access
to spill slots in Thumb functions which contain VLAs.
rdar://7352504
rdar://8374540
rdar://8355680
llvm-svn: 112883
Nothing fancy, just ask the target if any currently available base reg
is in range for the instruction under consideration and use the first one
that is. Placeholder ARM implementation simply returns false for now.
ongoing saga of rdar://8277890
llvm-svn: 111374
the local block. Resolve references to those indices to a new base register.
For simplification and testing purposes, a new virtual base register is
allocated for each frame index being resolved. The result is truly horrible,
but correct, code that's good for exercising the new code paths.
Next up is adding thumb1 support, which should be very simple. Following that
will be adding base register re-use and implementing a reasonable ARM
heuristic for when a virtual base register should be generated at all.
llvm-svn: 111315
whether to allocate a virtual frame base register to resolve the frame
index reference in it. Implement a simple version for ARM to aid debugging.
In LocalStackSlotAllocation, scan the function for frame index references
to local frame indices and ask the target whether to allocate virtual
frame base registers for any it encounters. Purely infrastructural for
debug output. Next step is to actually allocate base registers, then add
intelligent re-use of them.
rdar://8277890
llvm-svn: 111262
register for local access when it's closer to the stack slot being refererenced
than the stack pointer. Make sure to take into account any argument frame
SP adjustments that are in affect at the time.
rdar://8256090
llvm-svn: 110366
instructions.
e.g.
%reg1026<def> = VLDMQ %reg1025<kill>, 260, pred:14, pred:%reg0
%reg1027<def> = EXTRACT_SUBREG %reg1026, 6
%reg1028<def> = EXTRACT_SUBREG %reg1026<kill>, 5
...
%reg1029<def> = REG_SEQUENCE %reg1028<kill>, 5, %reg1027<kill>, 6, %reg1028, 7, %reg1027, 8, %reg1028, 9, %reg1027, 10, %reg1030<kill>, 11, %reg1032<kill>, 12
After REG_SEQUENCE is eliminated, we are left with:
%reg1026<def> = VLDMQ %reg1025<kill>, 260, pred:14, pred:%reg0
%reg1029:6<def> = EXTRACT_SUBREG %reg1026, 6
%reg1029:5<def> = EXTRACT_SUBREG %reg1026<kill>, 5
The regular coalescer will not be able to coalesce reg1026 and reg1029 because it doesn't
know how to combine sub-register indices 5 and 6. Now 2-address pass will consult the
target whether sub-registers 5 and 6 of reg1026 can be combined to into a larger
sub-register (or combined to be reg1026 itself as is the case here). If it is possible,
it will be able to replace references of reg1026 with reg1029 + the larger sub-register
index.
llvm-svn: 103835
is preparatory to having PEI's scavenged frame index value reuse logic
properly distinguish types of frame values (e.g., whether the value is
stack-pointer relative or frame-pointer relative).
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 98086
126.gcc nightly tests. These failures uncovered latent bugs that machine DCE
could remove one half of a stack adjust down/up pair, causing PEI to assert.
This update fixes that, and the tests now pass.
llvm-svn: 96822
for ARM to just check if a function has a FP to determine if it's safe
to simplify the stack adjustment pseudo ops prior to eliminating frame
indices. Allow targets to override the default behavior and does so for ARM
and Thumb2.
llvm-svn: 96634
function can support dynamic stack realignment. That's a much easier question
to answer at instruction selection stage than whether the function actually
will have dynamic alignment prologue. This allows the removal of the
stack alignment heuristic pass, and improves code quality for cases where
the heuristic would result in dynamic alignment code being generated when
it was not strictly necessary.
llvm-svn: 93885
