Summary:
D25878, which added support for !absolute_symbol for normal X86 ISel,
did not add support for materializing references to absolute symbols for
X86 FastISel. This causes build failures because FastISel generates
PC-relative relocations for absolute symbols. Fall back to normal ISel
for references to !absolute_symbol GVs. Fix for PR38200.
Reviewers: pcc, craig.topper
Reviewed By: pcc
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50116
llvm-svn: 338599
The bug is visible in the constant-folded x86 tests. We can't use the
negated shift amount when the type is not power-of-2:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/US1r
...so in that case, use the regular lowering that includes a select
to guard against a shift-by-bitwidth. This path is improved by only
calculating the modulo shift amount once now.
Also, improve the rotate (with power-of-2 size) lowering to use
a negate rather than subtract from bitwidth. This improves the
codegen whether we have a rotate instruction or not (although
we can still see that we're not matching to a legal rotate in
all cases).
llvm-svn: 338592
There is nothing x86-specific about this code, so it'd be nice to make this available for other targets to use in the future (and get it out of X86ISelLowering!).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50083
llvm-svn: 338586
This patch just extract code into a separate function to remove some
duplication between the old and new pass manager pipeline. Due to the
different CGSCC iterators used, not all code duplication was eliminated.
llvm-svn: 338585
Getting the DWARF types section is only implemented for ELF object
files. We already disabled emitting debug types in clang (r337717), but
now we also report an fatal error (rather than crashing) when trying to
obtain this section in MC. Additionally we ignore the generate debug
types flag for unsupported target triples.
See PR38190 for more information.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50057
llvm-svn: 338527
Summary:
Add _L to _LZ image intrinsic table mapping to table gen.
In ISelLowering check if image intrinsic has lod and if it's equal
to zero, if so remove lod and change opcode to equivalent mapped _LZ.
Change-Id: Ie24cd7e788e2195d846c7bd256151178cbb9ec71
Subscribers: arsenm, mehdi_amini, kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49483
llvm-svn: 338523
The DAG combiner logic to simplify AND masks in shift counts is invalid.
While it is true that the SystemZ shift instructions ignore all but the
low 6 bits of the shift count, it is still invalid to simplify the AND
masks while the DAG still uses the standard shift operators (which are
*not* defined to match the SystemZ instruction behavior).
Instead, this patch performs equivalent operations during instruction
selection. For completely removing the AND, this now happens via
additional DAG match patterns implemented by a multi-alternative
PatFrags. For simplifying a 32-bit AND to a 16-bit AND, the existing DAG
patterns were already mostly OK, they just needed an output XForm to
actually truncate the immediate value.
Unfortunately, the latter change also exposed a bug in TableGen: it
seems XForms are currently only handled correctly for direct operands of
the outermost operation node. This patch also fixes that bug by simply
recurring through the whole pattern. This should be NFC for all other
targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50096
llvm-svn: 338521
Summary:
This patch improves Inliner to provide causes/reasons for negative inline decisions.
1. It adds one new message field to InlineCost to report causes for Always and Never instances. All Never and Always instantiations must provide a simple message.
2. Several functions that used to return the inlining results as boolean are changed to return InlineResult which carries the cause for negative decision.
3. Changed remark priniting and debug output messages to provide the additional messages and related inline cost.
4. Adjusted tests for changed printing.
Patch by: yrouban (Yevgeny Rouban)
Reviewers: craig.topper, sammccall, sgraenitz, NutshellySima, shchenz, chandlerc, apilipenko, javed.absar, tejohnson, dblaikie, sanjoy, eraman, xbolva00
Reviewed By: tejohnson, xbolva00
Subscribers: xbolva00, llvm-commits, arsenm, mehdi_amini, eraman, haicheng, steven_wu, dexonsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49412
llvm-svn: 338494
It's not strictly required by the transform of the cmov and the add, but it makes sure we restrict it to the cases we know we want to match.
While there canonicalize the operand order of the cmov to simplify the matching and emitting code.
llvm-svn: 338492
This revision implements support for generating DWARFv5 .debug_addr section.
The implementation is pretty straight-forward: we just check the dwarf version
and emit section header if needed.
Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie, probinson
Reviewed by: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50005
llvm-svn: 338487
This patch intends to enable jump threading when a method whose return type is std::pair<int, bool> or std::pair<bool, int> is inlined.
For example, jump threading does not happen for the if statement in func.
std::pair<int, bool> callee(int v) {
int a = dummy(v);
if (a) return std::make_pair(dummy(v), true);
else return std::make_pair(v, v < 0);
}
int func(int v) {
std::pair<int, bool> rc = callee(v);
if (rc.second) {
// do something
}
SROA executed before the method inlining replaces std::pair by i64 without splitting in both callee and func since at this point no access to the individual fields is seen to SROA.
After inlining, jump threading fails to identify that the incoming value is a constant due to additional instructions (like or, and, trunc).
This series of patch add patterns in InstructionSimplify to fold extraction of members of std::pair. To help jump threading, actually we need to optimize the code sequence spanning multiple BBs.
These patches does not handle phi by itself, but these additional patterns help NewGVN pass, which calls instsimplify to check opportunities for simplifying instructions over phi, apply phi-of-ops optimization to result in successful jump threading.
SimplifyDemandedBits in InstCombine, can do more general optimization but this patch aims to provide opportunities for other optimizers by supporting a simple but common case in InstSimplify.
This first patch in the series handles code sequences that merges two values using shl and or and then extracts one value using lshr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48828
llvm-svn: 338485
EFLAGS copy lowering.
If you have a branch of LLVM, you may want to cherrypick this. It is
extremely unlikely to hit this case empirically, but it will likely
manifest as an "impossible" branch being taken somewhere, and will be
... very hard to debug.
Hitting this requires complex conditions living across complex control
flow combined with some interesting memory (non-stack) initialized with
the results of a comparison. Also, because you have to arrange for an
EFLAGS copy to be in *just* the right place, almost anything you do to
the code will hide the bug. I was unable to reduce anything remotely
resembling a "good" test case from the place where I hit it, and so
instead I have constructed synthetic MIR testing that directly exercises
the bug in question (as well as the good behavior for completeness).
The issue is that we would mistakenly assume any SETcc with a valid
condition and an initial operand that was a register and a virtual
register at that to be a register *defining* SETcc...
It isn't though....
This would in turn cause us to test some other bizarre register,
typically the base pointer of some memory. Now, testing this register
and using that to branch on doesn't make any sense. It even fails the
machine verifier (if you are running it) due to the wrong register
class. But it will make it through LLVM, assemble, and it *looks*
fine... But wow do you get a very unsual and surprising branch taken in
your actual code.
The fix is to actually check what kind of SETcc instruction we're
dealing with. Because there are a bunch of them, I just test the
may-store bit in the instruction. I've also added an assert for sanity
that ensure we are, in fact, *defining* the register operand. =D
llvm-svn: 338481
It is necessary to generate fixups in .debug_line as relaxation is
enabled due to the address delta may be changed after relaxation.
DWARF will record the mappings of lines and addresses in
.debug_line section. It will encode the information using special
opcodes, standard opcodes and extended opcodes in Line Number
Program. I use DW_LNS_fixed_advance_pc to encode fixed length
address delta and DW_LNE_set_address to encode absolute address
to make it possible to generate fixups in .debug_line section.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46850
llvm-svn: 338477
Previously we were just visiting the blocks in the function in IR order, which
is rather arbitrary. Therefore we wouldn't always visit defs before uses, but
the translation code relies on this assumption in some places.
Only codegen change seen in tests is an elision of a redundant copy.
Fixes PR38396
llvm-svn: 338476
Call shouldOutlineFromFunctionByDefault, isFunctionSafeToOutlineFrom,
getOutliningType, and getMachineOutlinerMBBFlags using the correct
TargetInstrInfo. And don't create a MachineFunction for a function
declaration.
The call to getOutliningCandidateInfo is still a little weird, but at
least the weirdness is explicitly called out.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49880
llvm-svn: 338465
Disable ARMCodeGenPrepare by default again. It is causing verifier
failues in V8 that look like:
Duplicate integer as switch case
switch i32 %trunc, label %if.end13 [
i32 0, label %cleanup36
i32 0, label %if.then8
], !dbg !4981
i32 0
fatal error: error in backend: Broken function found, compilation aborted!
I will continue reducing the test case and send it along.
llvm-svn: 338452
Correct the address space for the inserted argument
stack slot.
AMDGPU seems to not do anything with this information,
so I don't think this was breaking anything.
llvm-svn: 338428
When lowering calling conventions, prefer to decompose vectors
into the constitute register types. This avoids artifical constraints
to satisfy a wide super-register.
This improves code quality because now optimizations don't need to
deal with the super-register constraint. For example the immediate
folding code doesn't deal with 4 component reg_sequences, so by
breaking the register down earlier the existing immediate folding
code is able to work.
This also avoids the need for the shader input processing code
to manually split vector types.
llvm-svn: 338416
Don't declare them as X86SchedWritePair when the folded class will never be used.
Note: MOVBE (load/store endian conversion) instructions tend to have a very different behaviour to BSWAP.
llvm-svn: 338412
As was done for vector rotations, we can efficiently use ISD::MULHU for vXi8/vXi16 ISD::SRL lowering.
Shift-by-zero cases are still problematic (mainly on v32i8 due to extra AND/ANDN/OR or VPBLENDVB blend masks but v8i16/v16i16 aren't great either if PBLENDW fails) so I've limited this first patch to known non-zero cases if we can't easily use PBLENDW.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49562
llvm-svn: 338407
This patch does the same thing as r338153 for COFF.
Note that this patch affects only the order of log messages.
The output file is already deterministic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50023
llvm-svn: 338406
Summary:
Similar to D49636, but for PMADDUBSW. This instruction has the additional complexity that the addition of the two products saturates to 16-bits rather than wrapping around. And one operand is treated as signed and the other as unsigned.
A C example that triggers this pattern
```
static const int N = 128;
int8_t A[2*N];
uint8_t B[2*N];
int16_t C[N];
void foo() {
for (int i = 0; i != N; ++i)
C[i] = MIN(MAX((int16_t)A[2*i]*(int16_t)B[2*i] + (int16_t)A[2*i+1]*(int16_t)B[2*i+1], -32768), 32767);
}
```
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel, zvi
Reviewed By: RKSimon, zvi
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49829
llvm-svn: 338402
