Fixing bots failure. test/ExecutionEngine/RuntimeDyld/SystemZ/cfi-relo-pc64.s
requires SystemZ backend. Mark the test as unsupported if the backend is not
available.
llvm-svn: 269470
Transition InstrProf and Coverage over to the stricter Error/Expected
interface.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19901
llvm-svn: 269462
Summary: This way we can get rid of one of the fields in the .def file.
Reviewers: llvm-commits
Subscribers: zturner
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20251
llvm-svn: 269461
When setting the frame pointer, the offset from SP is calculated based on the
stack slot it gets allocated, but this slot is in turn based on the order of
the CSR list so that list should match the order we actually save the registers
in. Mostly it did, but in the edge-case of MachO AAPCS targets it was wrong.
llvm-svn: 269459
Recent changes to the instruction selection code exposed a problem where
a dead node was not removed on time. This node had both input and output
chains, which lead to an apparent cycle.
llvm-svn: 269458
- Insert one nop for each high level statement instead of two
- Do not insert nop before prologue
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20215
llvm-svn: 269452
Most immediates are printed in Aarch64InstPrinter using 'formatImm' macro,
but not all of them.
Implementation contains following rules:
- floating point immediates are always printed as decimal
- signed integer immediates are printed depends on flag settings
(for negative values 'formatImm' macro prints the value as i.e -0x01
which may be convenient when imm is an address or offset)
- logical immediates are always printed as hex
- the 64-bit immediate for advSIMD, encoded in "a🅱️c:d:e:f:g:h" is always printed as hex
- the 64-bit immedaite in exception generation instructions like:
brk, dcps1, dcps2, dcps3, hlt, hvc, smc, svc is always printed as hex
- the rest of immediates is printed depends on availability
of -print-imm-hex
Signed-off-by: Maciej Gabka <maciej.gabka@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Osmialowski <pawel.osmialowski@arm.com>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16929
llvm-svn: 269446
This patch adds basic support for MachO::load_command. Load command types and sizes are encoded in the YAML and expanded back into MachO.
The YAML doesn't yet support load command structs, that is coming next. In the meantime as a temporary measure when writing MachO files the load commands are padded with zeros so that the generated binary is valid.
llvm-svn: 269442
Currently there is no reasonable way to control the warnings in the 'use' phase
of the IRPGO pass. This is problematic because the output can be somewhat
spammy. This patch adds some flags which allow us to optionally disable these
warnings. The current upstream behavior will remain the default.
Patch by Jake VanAdrighem (jvanadrighem@gmail.com)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20195
llvm-svn: 269437
Summary: When the MCJIT generates ELF code, some DWARF data requires 64-bit PC-relative relocation (R_390_PC64). This patch adds support for R_390_PC64 relocation to RuntimeDyld::resolveSystemZRelocation, to avoid an assertion failure.
Reviewers: uweigand
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20033
llvm-svn: 269436
Summary: This change fix the bug in isProfitableToUseMemset() where MaxIntSize shoule be in byte, not bit.
Reviewers: arsenm, joker.eph, mcrosier
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20176
llvm-svn: 269433
This reverts commit r269428, as it breaks the LLDB build. We need to
understand how to change LLDB in the same way as LLC before landing this
again.
llvm-svn: 269432
Without a diagnostic handler installed, llc's behaviour is to exit on the first
error that it encounters. This is very different from the behaviour of clang
and other front ends, which try to gather as many errors as possible before
exiting.
This commit adds a diagnostic handler to llc, allowing it to find and report
more than one error. The old behaviour is preserved under a flag (-exit-on-error).
Some of the tests fail with the new diagnostic handler, so they have to use the
new flag in order to run under the previous behaviour. Some of these are known
bugs, others need further investigation. Ideally, we should fix the tests and
remove the flag at some point in the future.
Patch by Diana Picus.
llvm-svn: 269428
*We don't currently handle the edge case constants (min/max values), so it's not a complete
canonicalization.
To fully solve the motivating bugs, we need to enhance this to recognize a zero vector
too because that's a ConstantAggregateZero which is a ConstantData, not a ConstantVector
or a ConstantDataVector.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17859
llvm-svn: 269426
Fix "Logic error" warnings of the type "Called C++ object pointer is
null" reported by Clang Static Analyzer on the following files:
lib/Analysis/ScalarEvolution.cpp,
lib/Analysis/LoopInfo.cpp.
Patch by Apelete Seketeli!
llvm-svn: 269424
It's not entirely clear why R_MICROMIPS_(GOT|HI16|LO16) are evaluated
incorrectly in a small number of the LNT tests at this point. However, it's not
related to the STO_MIPS_MICROMIPS issue.
At this point all the microMIPS-related changes of r268900 have been reverted.
llvm-svn: 269410
- Where we were returning a node before, call ReplaceNode instead.
- Where we would return null to fall back to another selector, rename
the method to try* and return a bool for success.
- Where we were calling SelectNodeTo, just return afterwards.
Part of llvm.org/pr26808.
llvm-svn: 269393
We only really need this to be true for SIFixSGPRCopies.
I'm not sure there's any way this could happen before that point.
Fixes a case where MachineCSE could introduce a cross block
scc use.
llvm-svn: 269391
a sequence of values.
It increments through the values in the half-open range: [Begin, End),
producing those values when indirecting the iterator. It should support
integers, iterators, and any other type providing these basic arithmetic
operations.
This came up in the C++ standards committee meeting, and it seemed like
a useful construct that LLVM might want as well, and I wanted to
understand how easily we could solve it. I suspect this can be used to
write simpler counting loops even in LLVM along the lines of:
for (int i : seq(0, v.size())) {
...
};
As part of this, I had to fix the lack of a proxy object returned from
the operator[] in our iterator facade.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17870
llvm-svn: 269390
Summary:
...loop after the last iteration.
This is really hard to do correctly. The core problem is that we need to
model liveness through the induction PHIs from iteration to iteration in
order to get the correct results, and we need to correctly de-duplicate
the common subgraphs of instructions feeding some subset of the
induction PHIs. All of this can be driven either from a side effect at
some iteration or from the loop values used after the loop finishes.
This patch implements this by storing the forward-propagating analysis
of each instruction in a cache to recall whether it was free and whether
it has become live and thus counted toward the total unroll cost. Then,
at each sink for a value in the loop, we recursively walk back through
every value that feeds the sink, including looping back through the
iterations as needed, until we have marked the entire input graph as
live. Because we cache this, we never visit instructions more than twice
-- once when we analyze them and put them into the cache, and once when
we count their cost towards the unrolled loop. Also, because the cache
is only two bits and because we are dealing with relatively small
iteration counts, we can store all of this very densely in memory to
avoid this from becoming an excessively slow analysis.
The code here is still pretty gross. I would appreciate suggestions
about better ways to factor or split this up, I've stared too long at
the algorithmic side to really have a good sense of what the design
should probably look at.
Also, it might seem like we should do all of this bottom-up, but I think
that is a red herring. Specifically, the simplification power is *much*
greater working top-down. We can forward propagate very effectively,
even across strange and interesting recurrances around the backedge.
Because we use data to propagate, this doesn't cause a state space
explosion. Doing this level of constant folding, etc, would be very
expensive to do bottom-up because it wouldn't be until the last moment
that you could collapse everything. The current solution is essentially
a top-down simplification with a bottom-up cost accounting which seems
to get the best of both worlds. It makes the simplification incremental
and powerful while leaving everything dead until we *know* it is needed.
Finally, a core property of this approach is its *monotonicity*. At all
times, the current UnrolledCost is a conservatively low estimate. This
ensures that we will never early-exit from the analysis due to exceeding
a threshold when if we had continued, the cost would have gone back
below the threshold. These kinds of bugs can cause incredibly hard to
track down random changes to behavior.
We could use a techinque similar (but much simpler) within the inliner
as well to avoid considering speculated code in the inline cost.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: sanjoy, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11758
llvm-svn: 269388
Summary:
Currently we consider such instructions as simplified, which is incorrect,
because if their user isn't simplified, we can't actually simplify them too.
This biases our estimates of profitability: for instance the analyzer expects
much more gains from unrolling memcpy loops than there actually are.
Reviewers: hfinkel, chandlerc
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17365
llvm-svn: 269387
This change is the gold side of the change made in D17115 and clang
patch r261045 to add a ThinLTO specific pipeline that moves more of
the optimization to the backends.
llvm-svn: 269386
