string_ostream is a safe and efficient string builder that combines opaque
stack storage with a built-in ostream interface.
small_string_ostream<bytes> additionally permits an explicit stack storage size
other than the default 128 bytes to be provided. Beyond that, storage is
transferred to the heap.
This convenient class can be used in most places an
std::string+raw_string_ostream pair or SmallString<>+raw_svector_ostream pair
would previously have been used, in order to guarantee consistent access
without byte truncation.
The patch also converts much of LLVM to use the new facility. These changes
include several probable bug fixes for truncated output, a programming error
that's no longer possible with the new interface.
llvm-svn: 211749
We would get confused by '@' characters in symbol names, we would
mistake the text following them for the variant kind.
When an identifier a string, the variant kind will never show up inside
of it. Instead, check to see if there is a variant following the
string.
This fixes PR19965.
llvm-svn: 211249
I saw at least a memory leak or two from inspection (on probably
untested error paths) and r206991, which was the original inspiration
for this change.
I ran this idea by Jim Grosbach a few weeks ago & he was OK with it.
Since it's a basically mechanical patch that seemed sufficient - usual
post-commit review, revert, etc, as needed.
llvm-svn: 210427
Only emit calls to compiler-rt asm routines on platforms where they are
present (currently limited to linux i386/x86_64).
Patch by Yuri Gorshenin.
llvm-svn: 207651
For now it contains a single flag, SanitizeAddress, which enables
AddressSanitizer instrumentation of inline assembly.
Patch by Yuri Gorshenin.
llvm-svn: 206971
This changes the implementation of local directional labels to use a dedicated
map. With that it can then just use CreateTempSymbol, which is what the rest
of MC uses.
CreateTempSymbol doesn't do a great job at making sure the names are unique
(or being efficient when the names are not needed), but that should probably
be fixed in a followup patch.
This fixes pr18928.
llvm-svn: 203826
This is required to include MSVC's <atomic> header, which we do now in
LLVM.
Tests forthcoming in Clang, since that's where we test semantic inline
asm changes.
llvm-svn: 202865
X86Operand is extracted into individual header, because it allows to create an
arbitrary memory operand and append it to MCInst. It'll be reused in X86 inline
assembly instrumentation.
Patch by Yuri Gorshenin.
llvm-svn: 202496
scale factors in memory addresses. As it does for .att_syntax.
It was producing:
Assertion failed: (((Scale == 1 || Scale == 2 || Scale == 4 || Scale == 8)) && "Invalid scale!"), function CreateMem, file /Volumes/SandBox/llvm/lib/Target/X86/AsmParser/X86AsmParser.cpp, line 1133.
rdar://14967214
llvm-svn: 199942
The target specific parser should return `false' if the target AsmParser handles
the directive, and `true' if the generic parser should handle the directive.
Many of the target specific directive handlers would `return Error' which does
not follow these semantics. This change simply changes the target specific
routines to conform to the semantis of the ParseDirective correctly.
Conformance to the semantics improves diagnostics emitted for the invalid
directives. X86 is taken as a sample to ensure that multiple diagnostics are
not presented for a single error.
llvm-svn: 199068
We can't do a perfect job here. We *have* to allow (%dx) even in 64-bit
mode, for example, because it might be used for an unofficial form of
the in/out instructions. We actually want to do a better job of validation
*later*. Perhaps *instead* of doing it where we are at the moment.
But for now, doing what validation we *can* do in the place that the code
already has its validation, is an improvement.
llvm-svn: 198760
This is not really expected to work right yet. Mostly because we will
still emit the OpSize (0x66) prefix in all the wrong places, along with
a number of other corner cases. Those will all be fixed in the subsequent
commits.
Patch from David Woodhouse.
llvm-svn: 198584
That's what it actually means, and with 16-bit support it's going to be
a little more relevant since in a few corner cases we may actually want
to distinguish between 16-bit and 32-bit mode (for example the bare 'push'
aliases to pushw/pushl etc.)
Patch by David Woodhouse
llvm-svn: 197768
this commit as the only one on the Blamelist so I quickly reverted this.
However it was actually Nick's change who has since fixed that issue.
Original commit message:
Changed the X86 assembler for intel syntax to work with directional labels.
The X86 assembler as a separate code to parser the intel assembly syntax
in X86AsmParser::ParseIntelOperand(). This did not parse directional labels.
And if something like 1f was used as a branch target it would get an
"Unexpected token" error.
The fix starts in X86AsmParser::ParseIntelExpression() in the case for
AsmToken::Integer, it needs to grab the IntVal from the current token
then look for a 'b' or 'f' following an Integer. Then it basically needs to
do what is done in AsmParser::parsePrimaryExpr() for directional
labels. It saves the MCExpr it creates in the IntelExprStateMachine
in the Sym field.
When it returns to X86AsmParser::ParseIntelOperand() it looks
for a non-zero Sym field in the IntelExprStateMachine and if
set it creates a memory operand not an immediate operand
it would normally do for the Integer.
rdar://14961158
llvm-svn: 197744
The X86 assembler has a separate code to parser the intel assembly syntax
in X86AsmParser::ParseIntelOperand(). This did not parse directional labels.
And if something like 1f was used as a branch target it would get an
"Unexpected token" error.
The fix starts in X86AsmParser::ParseIntelExpression() in the case for
AsmToken::Integer, it needs to grab the IntVal from the current token
then look for a 'b' or 'f' following the Integer. Then it basically needs to
do what is done in AsmParser::parsePrimaryExpr() for directional
labels. It saves the MCExpr it creates in the IntelExprStateMachine
in the Sym field.
When it returns to X86AsmParser::ParseIntelOperand() it looks
for a non-zero Sym field in the IntelExprStateMachine and if
set it creates a memory operand not an immediate operand
it would normally do for the Integer.
rdar://14961158
llvm-svn: 197728
