This patch introduces the following changes to the btver2 scheduling model:
- The number of micro opcodes for YMM loads and stores is now 2 (it was
incorrectly set to 1 for both aligned and misaligned loads/stores).
- Increased the number of AGU resource cycles for YMM loads and stores
to 2cy (instead of 1cy).
- Removed JFPU01 and JFPX from the list of resources consumed by pure
float/vector loads (no MMX).
I verified with llvm-exegesis that pure XMM/YMM loads are no-pipe. Those
are dispatched to the FPU but not really issues on JFPU01.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68871
llvm-svn: 374765
Summary:
As disscused in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43219,
i believe it may be somewhat useful to show //some// aggregates
over all the sea of statistics provided.
Example:
```
Average Wait times (based on the timeline view):
[0]: Executions
[1]: Average time spent waiting in a scheduler's queue
[2]: Average time spent waiting in a scheduler's queue while ready
[3]: Average time elapsed from WB until retire stage
[0] [1] [2] [3]
0. 3 1.0 1.0 4.7 vmulps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm2
1. 3 2.7 0.0 2.3 vhaddps %xmm2, %xmm2, %xmm3
2. 3 6.0 0.0 0.0 vhaddps %xmm3, %xmm3, %xmm4
3 3.2 0.3 2.3 <total>
```
I.e. we average the averages.
Reviewers: andreadb, mattd, RKSimon
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: gbedwell, arphaman, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68714
llvm-svn: 374361
Before this patch, loads and stores were only tracked by their corresponding
queues in the LSUnit from dispatch until execute stage. In practice we should be
more conservative and assume that memory opcodes leave their queues at
retirement stage.
Basically, loads should leave the load queue only when they have completed and
delivered their data. We conservatively assume that a load is completed when it
is retired. Stores should be tracked by the store queue from dispatch until
retirement. In practice, stores can only leave the store queue if their data can
be written to the data cache.
This is mostly a mechanical change. With this patch, the retire stage notifies
the LSUnit when a memory instruction is retired. That would triggers the release
of LDQ/STQ entries. The only visible change is in memory tests for the bdver2
model. That is because bdver2 is the only model that defines the load/store
queue size.
This patch partially addresses PR39830.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68266
llvm-svn: 374034
This adds a -mattr flag to llvm-mca, for cases where the -mcpu option does not
contain all optional features.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68190
llvm-svn: 373358
This patch introduces a cut-off threshold for dependency edge frequences with
the goal of simplifying the critical sequence computation. This patch also
removes the cost normalization for loop carried dependencies. We didn't really
need to artificially amplify the cost of loop-carried dependencies since it is
already computed as the integral over time of the delay (in cycle).
In the absence of backend stalls there is no need for computing a critical
sequence. With this patch we early exit from the critical sequence computation
if no bottleneck was reported during the simulation.
llvm-svn: 372337
On BtVer2 conditional SIMD stores are heavily microcoded.
The latency is directly proportional to the number of packed elements extracted
from the input vector. Also, according to micro-benchmarks, most of the
computation seems to be done in the integer unit.
Only a minority of the uOPs is executed by the FPU. The observed behaviour on
the FPU looks similar to this:
- The input MASK value is moved to the Integer Unit
-- [ a VMOVMSK-like uOP-executed on JFPU0].
- In parallel, each element of the input XMM/YMM is extracted and then sent to
the IntegerUnit through JFPU1.
As expected, a (conditional) store is executed for every extracted element.
Interestingly, a (speculative) load is executed for every extracted element too.
It is as-if a "LOAD - BIT_EXTRACT- CMOV" sequence of uOPs is repeated by the
integer unit for every contionally stored element.
VMASKMOVDQU is a special case: the number of speculative loads is always 2
(presumably, one load per quadword). That means, extra shifts and masking is
performed on (one of) the loaded quadwords before each conditional store (that
also explains the big number of non-FP uOPs retired).
This patch replaces the existing writes for conditional SIMD stores (i.e.
WriteFMaskedStore, and WriteFMaskedStoreY) with the following new writes:
WriteFMaskedStore32 [ XMM Packed Single ]
WriteFMaskedStore32Y [ YMM Packed Single ]
WriteFMaskedStore64 [ XMM Packed Double ]
WriteFMaskedStore64Y [ YMM Packed Double ]
Added a wrapper class named X86SchedWriteMaskMove in X86Schedule.td to describe
both RM and MR variants for conditional SIMD moves in a single tablegen
definition.
Instances of that class are then passed in input to multiclass avx_movmask_rm
when constructing MASKMOVPS/PD definitions.
Since this patch introduces new writes, I had to update all the X86 scheduling
models.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66801
llvm-svn: 370649
This is a follow up of r369642.
This patch assigns a ReadAfterLd to every implicit register use of instruction
CMPXCHG8B and instruction CMPXCHG16B. Perf micro-benchmarks show that implicit
registers are read after 3cy from the start of execution.
llvm-svn: 369750
Excluding ADC/SBB and the bit-test instructions (BTR/BTS/BTC), the observed
latency of all other RMW integer arithmetic/logic instructions is 6cy and not
5cy.
Example (ADD):
```
addb $0, (%rsp) # Latency: 6cy
addb $7, (%rsp) # Latency: 6cy
addb %sil, (%rsp) # Latency: 6cy
addw $0, (%rsp) # Latency: 6cy
addw $511, (%rsp) # Latency: 6cy
addw %si, (%rsp) # Latency: 6cy
addl $0, (%rsp) # Latency: 6cy
addl $511, (%rsp) # Latency: 6cy
addl %esi, (%rsp) # Latency: 6cy
addq $0, (%rsp) # Latency: 6cy
addq $511, (%rsp) # Latency: 6cy
addq %rsi, (%rsp) # Latency: 6cy
```
The same latency profile applies to SUB/AND/OR/XOR/INC/DEC.
The observed latency of ADC/SBB is 7-8cy. So we need a different write to model
those. Latency of BTS/BTR/BTC is not fixed by this patch (they are much slower
than what the model for btver2 currently reports).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66636
llvm-svn: 369748
On Jaguar, XCHG has a latency of 1cy and decodes to 2 macro-opcodes. Maximum
throughput for XCHG is 1 IPC. The byte exchange has worse latency and decodes to
1 extra uOP; maximum observed throughput is 0.5 IPC.
```
xchgb %cl, %dl # Latency: 2cy - uOPs: 3 - 2 ALU
xchgw %cx, %dx # Latency: 1cy - uOPs: 2 - 2 ALU
xchgl %ecx, %edx # Latency: 1cy - uOPs: 2 - 2 ALU
xchgq %rcx, %rdx # Latency: 1cy - uOPs: 2 - 2 ALU
```
The reg-mem forms of XCHG are atomic operations with an observed latency of
16cy. The resource usage is similar to the XCHGrr variants. The biggest
difference is obviously the bus-locking, which prevents the LS to issue other
memory uOPs in parallel until the unlocking store uOP is executed.
```
xchgb %cl, (%rsp) # Latency: 16cy - uOPs: 3 - ECX latency: 11cy
xchgw %cx, (%rsp) # Latency: 16cy - uOPs: 3 - ECX latency: 11cy
xchgl %ecx, (%rsp) # Latency: 16cy - uOPs: 3 - ECX latency: 11cy
xchgq %rcx, (%rsp) # Latency: 16cy - uOPs: 3 - ECX latency: 11cy
```
The exchanged in/out register operand becomes available after 11cy from the
start of execution. Added test xchg.s to verify that we correctly see that
register write committed in 11cy (and not 16cy).
Reg-reg XADD instructions have the same latency/throughput than the byte
exchange (register-register variant).
```
xaddb %cl, %dl # latency: 2cy - uOPs: 3 - 3 ALU
xaddw %cx, %dx # latency: 2cy - uOPs: 3 - 3 ALU
xaddl %ecx, %edx # latency: 2cy - uOPs: 3 - 3 ALU
xaddq %rcx, %rdx # latency: 2cy - uOPs: 3 - 3 ALU
```
The non-atomic RM variants have a latency of 11cy, and decode to 4
macro-opcodes. They still consume 2 ALU pipes, and the exchange in/out register
operand becomes available in 3cy (it matches the 'load-to-use latency').
```
xaddb %cl, (%rsp) # latency: 11cy - uOPs: 4 - 3 ALU
xaddw %cx, (%rsp) # latency: 11cy - uOPs: 4 - 3 ALU
xaddl %ecx, (%rsp) # latency: 11cy - uOPs: 4 - 3 ALU
xaddq %rcx, (%rsp) # latency: 11cy - uOPs: 4 - 3 ALU
```
The atomic XADD variants execute in 16cy. The in/out register operand is
available after 11cy from the start of execution.
```
lock xaddb %cl, (%rsp) # latency: 16cy - uOPs: 4 - 3 ALU -- ECX latency: 11cy
lock xaddw %cx, (%rsp) # latency: 16cy - uOPs: 4 - 3 ALU -- ECX latency: 11cy
lock xaddl %ecx, (%rsp) # latency: 16cy - uOPs: 4 - 3 ALU -- ECX latency: 11cy
lock xaddq %rcx, (%rsp) # latency: 16cy - uOPs: 4 - 3 ALU -- ECX latency: 11cy
```
Added test xadd.s to verify those latencies as well as read-advance values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66535
llvm-svn: 369642
Latency and throughput of LOCK INC/DEC/NEG/NOT is always 19cy.
Number of uOPs is still 1.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66469
llvm-svn: 369388
On Jaguar, CMPXCHG has a latency of 11cy, and a maximum throughput of 0.33 IPC.
Throughput is superiorly limited to 0.33 because of the implicit in/out
dependency on register EAX. In the case of repeated non-atomic CMPXCHG with the
same memory location, store-to-load forwarding occurs and values for sequent
loads are quickly forwarded from the store buffer.
Interestingly, the functionality in LLVM that computes the reciprocal throughput
doesn't seem to know about RMW instructions. That functionality only looks at
the "consumed resource cycles" for the throughput computation. It should be
fixed/improved by a future patch. In particular, for RMW instructions, that
logic should also take into account for the write latency of in/out register
operands.
An atomic CMPXCHG has a latency of ~17cy. Throughput is also limited to
~17cy/inst due to cache locking, which prevents other memory uOPs to start
executing before the "lock releasing" store uOP.
CMPXCHG8rr and CMPXCHG8rm are treated specially because they decode to one less
macro opcode. Their latency tend to be the same as the other RR/RM variants. RR
variants are relatively fast 3cy (but still microcoded - 5 macro opcodes).
CMPXCHG8B is 11cy and unfortunately doesn't seem to benefit from store-to-load
forwarding. That means, throughput is clearly limited by the in/out dependency
on GPR registers. The uOP composition is sadly unknown (due to the lack of PMCs
for the Integer pipes). I have reused the same mix of consumed resource from the
other CMPXCHG instructions for CMPXCHG8B too.
LOCK CMPXCHG8B is instead 18cycles.
CMPXCHG16B is 32cycles. Up to 38cycles when the LOCK prefix is specified. Due to
the in/out dependencies, throughput is limited to 1 instruction every 32 (or 38)
cycles dependeing on whether the LOCK prefix is specified or not.
I wouldn't be surprised if the microcode for CMPXCHG16B is similar to 2x
microcode from CMPXCHG8B. So, I have speculatively set the JALU01 consumption to
2x the resource cycles used for CMPXCHG8B.
The two new hasLockPrefix() functions are used by the btver2 scheduling model
check if a MCInst/MachineInst has a LOCK prefix. Calls to hasLockPrefix() have
been encoded in predicates of variant scheduling classes that describe lat/thr
of CMPXCHG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66424
llvm-svn: 369365
In D66424 it has been requested to move all the new tests added by r369278 into
resources-x86_64.s. That is because only the 8b/16 ops should be tested by
resources-cmpxchg.s. This partially reverts r369278.
llvm-svn: 369288
Flag -show-encoding enables the printing of instruction encodings as part of the
the instruction info view.
Example (with flags -mtriple=x86_64-- -mcpu=btver2):
Instruction Info:
[1]: #uOps
[2]: Latency
[3]: RThroughput
[4]: MayLoad
[5]: MayStore
[6]: HasSideEffects (U)
[7]: Encoding Size
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] Encodings: Instructions:
1 2 1.00 4 c5 f0 59 d0 vmulps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm2
1 4 1.00 4 c5 eb 7c da vhaddps %xmm2, %xmm2, %xmm3
1 4 1.00 4 c5 e3 7c e3 vhaddps %xmm3, %xmm3, %xmm4
In this example, column Encoding Size is the size in bytes of the instruction
encoding. Column Encodings reports the actual instruction encodings as byte
sequences in hex (objdump style).
The computation of encodings is done by a utility class named mca::CodeEmitter.
In future, I plan to expose the CodeEmitter to the instruction builder, so that
information about instruction encoding sizes can be used by the simulator. That
would be a first step towards simulating the throughput from the decoders in the
hardware frontend.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65948
llvm-svn: 368432
The upper 4 bits of the immediate byte are used to encode a
register. We need to limit the explicit immediate to fit in the
remaining 4 bits.
Fixes PR42899.
llvm-svn: 368123
This patch adds a new llvm-mca flag named -print-imm-hex.
By default, the instruction printer prints immediate operands as decimals. Flag
-print-imm-hex enables the instruction printer to print those operands in hex.
This patch also adds support for MASM binary and hex literal numbers (example
0FFh, 101b).
Added tests to verify the behavior of the new flag. Tests also verify that masm
numeric literal operands are now recognized.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65588
llvm-svn: 367671
This patch teaches the bottleneck analysis how to identify and print the most
expensive sequence of instructions according to the simulation. Fixes PR37494.
The goal is to help users identify the sequence of instruction which is most
critical for performance.
A dependency graph is internally used by the bottleneck analysis to describe
data dependencies and processor resource interferences between instructions.
There is one node in the graph for every instruction in the input assembly
sequence. The number of nodes in the graph is independent from the number of
iterations simulated by the tool. It means that a single node of the graph
represents all the possible instances of a same instruction contributed by the
simulated iterations.
Edges are dynamically "discovered" by the bottleneck analysis by observing
instruction state transitions and "backend pressure increase" events generated
by the Execute stage. Information from the events is used to identify critical
dependencies, and materialize edges in the graph. A dependency edge is uniquely
identified by a pair of node identifiers plus an instance of struct
DependencyEdge::Dependency (which provides more details about the actual
dependency kind).
The bottleneck analysis internally ranks dependency edges based on their impact
on the runtime (see field DependencyEdge::Dependency::Cost). To this end, each
edge of the graph has an associated cost. By default, the cost of an edge is a
function of its latency (in cycles). In practice, the cost of an edge is also a
function of the number of cycles where the dependency has been seen as
'contributing to backend pressure increases'. The idea is that the higher the
cost of an edge, the higher is the impact of the dependency on performance. To
put it in another way, the cost of an edge is a measure of criticality for
performance.
Note how a same edge may be found in multiple iteration of the simulated loop.
The logic that adds new edges to the graph checks if an equivalent dependency
already exists (duplicate edges are not allowed). If an equivalent dependency
edge is found, field DependencyEdge::Frequency of that edge is incremented by
one, and the new cost is cumulatively added to the existing edge cost.
At the end of simulation, costs are propagated to nodes through the edges of the
graph. The goal is to identify a critical sequence from a node of the root-set
(composed by node of the graph with no predecessors) to a 'sink node' with no
successors. Note that the graph is intentionally kept acyclic to minimize the
complexity of the critical sequence computation algorithm (complexity is
currently linear in the number of nodes in the graph).
The critical path is finally computed as a sequence of dependency edges. For
edges describing processor resource interferences, the view also prints a
so-called "interference probability" value (by dividing field
DependencyEdge::Frequency by the total number of iterations).
Examples of critical sequence computations can be found in tests added/modified
by this patch.
On output streams that support colored output, instructions from the critical
sequence are rendered with a different color.
Strictly speaking the analysis conducted by the bottleneck analysis view is not
a critical path analysis. The cost of an edge doesn't only depend on the
dependency latency. More importantly, the cost of a same edge may be computed
differently by different iterations.
The number of dependencies is discovered dynamically based on the events
generated by the simulator. However, their number is not fixed. This is
especially true for edges that model processor resource interferences; an
interference may not occur in every iteration. For that reason, it makes sense
to also print out a "probability of interference".
By construction, the accuracy of this analysis (as always) is strongly dependent
on the simulation (and therefore the quality of the information available in the
scheduling model).
That being said, the critical sequence effectively identifies a performance
criticality. Instructions from that sequence are expected to have a very big
impact on performance. So, users can take advantage of this information to focus
their attention on specific interactions between instructions.
In my experience, it works quite well in practice, and produces useful
output (in a reasonable amount time).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63543
llvm-svn: 364045
Summary:
llvm.x86.sse.stmxcsr only writes to memory.
llvm.x86.sse.ldmxcsr only reads from memory, and might generate an FPE.
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62896
llvm-svn: 363773
Bottleneck Analysis is one of the many views available in llvm-mca. Therefore,
it should be enabled when flag -all-views is passed in input to the tool.
llvm-svn: 362964
This fixes a problem where back-pressure increases caused by register
dependencies were not correctly notified if execution was also delayed by memory
dependencies.
llvm-svn: 361740
This copies the Sandy Bridge zero idiom support to later CPUs. Adding the AVX2 and AVX512F/VL instructions as appropriate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62360
llvm-svn: 361690
This patch fixes PR41523
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41523
Regions can now nest/overlap provided that they have different names.
Anonymous regions cannot overlap.
Region end markers must specify the region name. The only exception is for when
there is only one user-defined region; in that particular case, the region end
marker doesn't need to specify a name.
Incorrect region end markers are no longer ignored. Instead, the tool reports an
error and we exit with an error code.
Added test cases to verify the new diagnostic error messages.
Updated the llvm-mca docs to reflect this feature change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61676
llvm-svn: 360351
I've started this cleanup more several times now, but got sidetracked
elsewhere, e.g. by llvm-exegesis problems. Not this time, finally!
This is mainly cleaning up the inverse throughput values,
and a few latencies/uops, based on the llvm-exegesis measured values.
Though this is not complete by any means,
there's certainly more cleanup to be done.
The performance numbers (i've only checked by RawSpeed benchmark) aren't
really surprising - overall this *slightly* (< -1%) improves perf.
llvm-svn: 360341
We require d/q suffixes on the memory form of these instructions to disambiguate the memory size.
We don't require it on the register forms, but need to support parsing both with and without it.
Previously we always printed the d/q suffix on the register forms, but it's redundant and
inconsistent with gcc and objdump.
After this patch we should support the d/q for parsing, but not print it when its unneeded.
llvm-svn: 360085
Many of our instructions have both a _Int form used by intrinsics and a form
used by other IR constructs. In the EVEX space the _Int versions usually cover
all the capabilities include broadcasting and rounding. While the other version
only covers simple register/register or register/load forms. For this reason
in EVEX, the non intrinsic form is usually marked isCodeGenOnly=1.
In the VEX encoding space we were less consistent, but usually the _Int version
was the isCodeGenOnly version.
This commit makes the VEX instructions match the EVEX instructions. This was
done by manually studying the AsmMatcher table so its possible I missed some
cases, but we should be closer now.
I'm thinking about using the isCodeGenOnly bit to simplify the EVEX2VEX
tablegen code that disambiguates the _Int and non _Int versions. Currently it
checks register class sizes and Record the memory operands come from. I have
some other changes I was looking into for D59266 that may break the memory check.
I had to make a few scheduler hacks to keep the _Int versions from being treated
differently than the non _Int version.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60441
llvm-svn: 358138
It makes more sense to print out the number of micro opcodes that are issued
every cycle rather than the number of instructions issued per cycle.
This behavior is also consistent with the dispatch-stats: numbers from the two
views can now be easily compared.
llvm-svn: 357919
This patch adds an experimental stage named MicroOpQueueStage.
MicroOpQueueStage can be used to simulate a hardware micro-op queue (basically,
a decoupling queue between 'decode' and 'dispatch'). Users can specify a queue
size, as well as a optional MaxIPC (which - in the absence of a "Decoders" stage
- can be used to simulate a different throughput from the decoders).
This stage is added to the default pipeline between the EntryStage and the
DispatchStage only if PipelineOption::MicroOpQueue is different than zero. By
default, llvm-mca sets PipelineOption::MicroOpQueue to the value of hidden flag
-micro-op-queue-size.
Throughput from the decoder can be simulated via another hidden flag named
-decoder-throughput. That flag allows us to quickly experiment with different
frontend throughputs. For targets that declare a loop buffer, flag
-decoder-throughput allows users to do multiple runs, each time simulating a
different throughput from the decoders.
This stage can/will be extended in future. For example, we could add a "buffer
full" event to notify bottlenecks caused by backpressure. flag
-decoder-throughput would probably go away if in future we delegate to another
stage (DecoderStage?) the simulation of a (potentially variable) throughput from
the decoders. For now, flag -decoder-throughput is "good enough" to run some
simple experiments.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59928
llvm-svn: 357248
Based on llvm-exegesis measurements.
Now that llvm-exegesis is ~2 magnitudes faster, and is a bit smarter,
it is now possible to continue cleanup of the scheduler model.
With this, there are no more latency inconsistencies for the
opcodes that produce stable measurements, and only a few inconsistencies
for unstable measurements (MMX_* opcodes, opcodes that llvm-exegesis
measures by chaining - CMP, TEST, BT, SETcc, CVT, MOV, etc.)
llvm-svn: 357169
Previously we had a regular form of the instruction used when the immediate was 0-7. And _alt form that allowed the full 8 bit immediate. Codegen would always use the 0-7 form since the immediate was always checked to be in range. Assembly parsing would use the 0-7 form when a mnemonic like vpcomtrueb was used. If the immediate was specified directly the _alt form was used. The disassembler would prefer to use the 0-7 form instruction when the immediate was in range and the _alt form otherwise. This way disassembly would print the most readable form when possible.
The assembly parsing for things like vpcomtrueb relied on splitting the mnemonic into 3 pieces. A "vpcom" prefix, an immediate representing the "true", and a suffix of "b". The tablegenerated printing code would similarly print a "vpcom" prefix, decode the immediate into a string, and then print "b".
The _alt form on the other hand parsed and printed like any other instruction with no specialness.
With this patch we drop to one form and solve the disassembly printing issue by doing custom printing when the immediate is 0-7. The parsing code has been tweaked to turn "vpcomtrueb" into "vpcomb" and then the immediate for the "true" is inserted either before or after the other operands depending on at&t or intel syntax.
I'd rather not do the custom printing, but I tried using an InstAlias for each possible mnemonic for all 8 immediates for all 16 combinations of element size, signedness, and memory/register. The code emitted into printAliasInstr ended up checking the number of operands, the register class of each operand, and the immediate for all 256 aliases. This was repeated for both the at&t and intel printer. Despite a lot of common checks between all of the aliases, when compiled with clang at least this commonality was not well optimized. Nor do all the checks seem necessary. Since I want to do a similar thing for vcmpps/pd/ss/sd which have 32 immediate values and 3 encoding flavors, 3 register sizes, etc. This didn't seem to scale well for clang binary size. So custom printing seemed a better trade off.
I also considered just using the InstAlias for the matching and not the printing. But that seemed like it would add a lot of extra rows to the matcher table. Especially given that the 32 immediates for vpcmpps have 46 strings associated with them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59398
llvm-svn: 356343
Rotate with explicit immediate is a single uop from Haswell on. An immediate of 1 has a dependency on the previous writer of flags, but the other immediate values do not.
The implicit rotate by 1 instruction is 2 uops. But the flags are merged after the rotate uop so the data result does not see the flag dependency. But I don't think we have any way of modeling that.
RORX is 1 uop without the load. 2 uops with the load. We currently model these with WriteShift/WriteShiftLd.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59077
llvm-svn: 355636
Haswell and possibly Sandybridge have an optimization for ADC/SBB with immediate 0 to use a single uop flow. This only applies GR16/GR32/GR64 with an 8-bit immediate. It does not apply to GR8. It also does not apply to the implicit AX/EAX/RAX forms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59058
llvm-svn: 355635
Summary:
Since bottleneck hints are enabled via user request, it can be
confusing if no bottleneck information is presented. Such is the
case when no bottlenecks are identified. This patch emits a message
in that case.
Reviewers: andreadb
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: tschuett, gbedwell, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59098
llvm-svn: 355628
