This patch also cleans up code that expects there to be a bitcast in the first argument and testcases that call llvm.dbg.declare.
It also strips old llvm.dbg.declare intrinsics that did not pass metadata as the first argument.
llvm-svn: 93531
after the MDNode in memory. This eliminates the operands
pointer and saves a new[] per node.
Note that the code in DIDerivedType::replaceAllUsesWith is wrong
and quite scary. A MDNode should not be RAUW'd with something
else: this changes all uses of the mdnode, which may not be debug
info related! Debug info should use something non-mdnode for
declarations.
llvm-svn: 92321
getMDKindID/getMDKindNames methods to LLVMContext (and add
convenience methods to Module), eliminating MetadataContext.
Move the state that it maintains out to LLVMContext.
llvm-svn: 92259
I asked Devang to do back on Sep 27. Instead of going through the
MetadataContext class with methods like getMD() and getMDs(), just
ask the instruction directly for its metadata with getMetadata()
and getAllMetadata().
This includes a variety of other fixes and improvements: previously
all Value*'s were bloated because the HasMetadata bit was thrown into
value, adding a 9th bit to a byte. Now this is properly sunk down to
the Instruction class (the only place where it makes sense) and it
will be folded away somewhere soon.
This also fixes some confusion in getMDs and its clients about
whether the returned list is indexed by the MDID or densely packed.
This is now returned sorted and densely packed and the comments make
this clear.
This introduces a number of fixme's which I'll follow up on.
llvm-svn: 92235
The semantics of llvm.dbg.value are that starting from where it is executed, an offset into the specified user source variable is specified to get a new value.
An example:
call void @llvm.dbg.value(metadata !{ i32 7 }, i64 0, metadata !2)
Here the user source variable associated with metadata #2 gets the value "i32 7" at offset 0.
llvm-svn: 90788
This allows StringRef to skip controversial if(str) check in constructor.
Buildbots, wait for corresponding clang and llvm-gcc FE check-ins!
llvm-svn: 86914
question, can we get rid of the BasicBlock versions of all inserters
and use Head == 0 to indicate the old case when GetInsertBlock == 0?
llvm-svn: 83216
information. This allows arbitrary code involving DW_OP_plus_uconst
and DW_OP_deref. The scheme allows for easy extention to include,
any, or all of the DW_OP_ opcodes. I thought about just exposing all
of them, but, wasn't sure if people wanted the dwarf opcodes exposed
in the api. Is that a layering violation?
With this scheme, the entire existing block scheme used by llvm-gcc
can be switched over to the new scheme. I think that would be
cleaner, as then the compiler specific bits are not present in llvm
proper. Before the old code can be yanked however, similar code in
clang would have to be removed.
Next up, more testing.
llvm-svn: 83120
