Summary:
The problem:
When an operand had bits explicitly set to "1" (as in the InitValue.td test case attached), the decoder was ignoring those bits, and the DecoderMethod was receiving an input where the bits were still zero.
The solution:
We added an "InitValue" variable that stores the initial value of the operand based on what bits were explicitly initialized to 1 in TableGen code. The generated decoder code then uses that initial value to initialize the "tmp" variable, then calls fieldFromInstruction to read the values for the remaining bits that were left unknown in TableGen.
This is mainly useful when there are variations of an instruction that differ based on what bits are set in the operands, since this change makes it possible to access those bits in a DecoderMethod. The DecoderMethod can use those bits to know how to handle the input.
Patch by Nicolas Guillemot
Reviewers: craig.topper, dsanders, fhahn
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63741
llvm-svn: 368458
Refactor `LibCallSimplifier::optimizeExp2()` to use the new
`emitBinaryFloatFnCall()` version that fetches the function name from TLI.
llvm-svn: 368457
For type values that do not have proper names, print reasonable representation
in llvm-nm, llvm-readobj and llvm-readelf, matching GNU tools.s
Fixes PR41713.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65537
llvm-svn: 368451
Summary:
This is exposed by adding a new testcase in PowerPC in
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL367732
The testcase got different output on different platform, hence breaking
buildbots.
The problem is that we get differnt FuncUnitOrder when calculateResMII.
The root cause is:
1. Two MachineInstr might get SAME priority(MFUsx) from minFuncUnits.
2. Current comparison operator() will return `MFUs1 > MFUs2`.
3. We use iterators for MachineInstr, so the input to FuncUnitSorter
might be different on differnt platform due to the iterator nature.
So for two MI with same MFU, their order is actually depends on the
iterator order, which is platform (implemtation) dependent.
This is risky, and may cause cross-compiling problems.
The fix is to check make sure we assign a determine order when they are
equal.
Reviewers: bcahoon, hfinkel, jmolloy
Subscribers: nemanjai, hiraditya, MaskRay, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65992
llvm-svn: 368441
Summary: Implement a new analysis to estimate the number of cache lines
required by a loop nest.
The analysis is largely based on the following paper:
Compiler Optimizations for Improving Data Locality
By: Steve Carr, Katherine S. McKinley, Chau-Wen Tseng
http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/mckinley/papers/asplos-1994.pdf
The analysis considers temporal reuse (accesses to the same memory
location) and spatial reuse (accesses to memory locations within a cache
line). For simplicity the analysis considers memory accesses in the
innermost loop in a loop nest, and thus determines the number of cache
lines used when the loop L in loop nest LN is placed in the innermost
position.
The result of the analysis can be used to drive several transformations.
As an example, loop interchange could use it determine which loops in a
perfect loop nest should be interchanged to maximize cache reuse.
Similarly, loop distribution could be enhanced to take into
consideration cache reuse between arrays when distributing a loop to
eliminate vectorization inhibiting dependencies.
The general approach taken to estimate the number of cache lines used by
the memory references in the inner loop of a loop nest is:
Partition memory references that exhibit temporal or spatial reuse into
reference groups.
For each loop L in the a loop nest LN: a. Compute the cost of the
reference group b. Compute the 'cache cost' of the loop nest by summing
up the reference groups costs
For further details of the algorithm please refer to the paper.
Authored By: etiotto
Reviewers: hfinkel, Meinersbur, jdoerfert, kbarton, bmahjour, anemet,
fhahn
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Subscribers: reames, nemanjai, MaskRay, wuzish, Hahnfeld, xusx595,
venkataramanan.kumar.llvm, greened, dmgreen, steleman, fhahn, xblvaOO,
Whitney, mgorny, hiraditya, mgrang, jsji, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63459
llvm-svn: 368439
As discussed on PR42825, if we are inverting the selection mask we can just swap the inputs and avoid the inversion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65522
llvm-svn: 368438
MSVC (19.16) wants to see the definition of Instruction in
`std::pair<unsigned, const Instruction &> SourceRef` to decide
if it is assignable.
Patch by Orivej Desh.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65844
llvm-svn: 368436
This patch addresses two closely related bugs:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42930 and
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42931.
GNU readelf prints the file name for every input unless there is only
one input and that input is not an archive. This patch adds the printing
for multiple inputs. A previous change did it for archives, but
introduced a regression with GNU compatibility for single-output
formatting, resulting in a spurious initial blank line. This is fixed in
this patch too.
Reviewed by: grimar, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65953
llvm-svn: 368435
Fast-isel was picking AFGR64 register class for processing call
arguments when +fp64 options was used. We simply check is option +fp64
is used and pick appropriate register.
Patch by Mirko Brkusanin.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65886
llvm-svn: 368433
Flag -show-encoding enables the printing of instruction encodings as part of the
the instruction info view.
Example (with flags -mtriple=x86_64-- -mcpu=btver2):
Instruction Info:
[1]: #uOps
[2]: Latency
[3]: RThroughput
[4]: MayLoad
[5]: MayStore
[6]: HasSideEffects (U)
[7]: Encoding Size
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] Encodings: Instructions:
1 2 1.00 4 c5 f0 59 d0 vmulps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm2
1 4 1.00 4 c5 eb 7c da vhaddps %xmm2, %xmm2, %xmm3
1 4 1.00 4 c5 e3 7c e3 vhaddps %xmm3, %xmm3, %xmm4
In this example, column Encoding Size is the size in bytes of the instruction
encoding. Column Encodings reports the actual instruction encodings as byte
sequences in hex (objdump style).
The computation of encodings is done by a utility class named mca::CodeEmitter.
In future, I plan to expose the CodeEmitter to the instruction builder, so that
information about instruction encoding sizes can be used by the simulator. That
would be a first step towards simulating the throughput from the decoders in the
hardware frontend.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65948
llvm-svn: 368432
This is a bit strange method. It works like a unwrapOrError,
but named error. It does not report an Input name.
I removed it.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66000
llvm-svn: 368430
This patch changes the code to use a modern unwrapOrError(StringRef Input, Expected<T> EO)
version that contains the input source name and removes the deprecated version.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65946
llvm-svn: 368428
All TLS access on Darwin is in the "general dynamic" form where we call
a function to resolve the address, so implementation is pretty simple.
llvm-svn: 368418
It is outdated. Using of Expected<> is preferred, also it does
not provide a way to report a file name.
I updated the code to use the modern version of unwrapOrError instead.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65951
llvm-svn: 368410
I've now needed to add an extra parameter to this call twice recently. Not only
is the signature getting extremely unwieldy, but just updating all of the
callsites and implementations is a pain. Putting the parameters in a struct
sidesteps both issues.
llvm-svn: 368408
As loads are combined and widened, we replaced their sext users
operands whereas we should have been replacing the uses of the sext.
I've added a load of tests, with only a few of them originally
causing assertion failures, the rest improve pattern coverage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65740
llvm-svn: 368404
Summary:
Make sure that we report that changes has been made
by InstSimplify also in situations when only trivially
dead instructions has been removed. If for example a call
is removed the call graph must be updated.
Bug seem to have been introduced by llvm-svn r367173
(commit 02b9e45a7e4b81), since the code in question
was rewritten in that commit.
Reviewers: spatel, chandlerc, foad
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65973
llvm-svn: 368401
The only way to generate these was through promoting legalization
of narrow vectors, but we widen those types now. So we shouldn't
produce these nodes.
llvm-svn: 368396
This isn't the most robust error handling API, but does allow clients to
opt-in to getting Errors they can handle. I suspect the long-term
solution would be to move away from the lazy unit parsing and have an
explicit step that parses the unit and then allows access to the other
APIs that require a parsed unit.
llvm-dwarfdump could be expanded to use this (or newer/better API) to
demonstrate the benefit of it - but for now lld will use this in a
follow-up cl which ensures lld can exit non-zero on errors like this (&
provide more descriptive diagnostics including which object file the
error came from).
(error access to later errors when parsing nested DIEs would be good too
- but, again, exposing that without it being a hassle for every consumer
may be tricky)
llvm-svn: 368377
