Add an intrinsic that takes 2 unsigned integers with the scale of them
provided as the third argument and performs fixed point multiplication on
them.
This is a part of implementing fixed point arithmetic in clang where some of
the more complex operations will be implemented as intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55625
llvm-svn: 353059
This cleans up all GetElementPtr creation in LLVM to explicitly pass a
value type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57173
llvm-svn: 352913
This cleans up all LoadInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass the
value type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57172
llvm-svn: 352911
This cleans up all InvokeInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass a
function type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57171
llvm-svn: 352910
This cleans up all CallInst creation in LLVM to explicitly pass a
function type rather than deriving it from the pointer's element-type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57170
llvm-svn: 352909
Recommit r352791 after tweaking DerivedTypes.h slightly, so that gcc
doesn't choke on it, hopefully.
Original Message:
The FunctionCallee type is effectively a {FunctionType*,Value*} pair,
and is a useful convenience to enable code to continue passing the
result of getOrInsertFunction() through to EmitCall, even once pointer
types lose their pointee-type.
Then:
- update the CallInst/InvokeInst instruction creation functions to
take a Callee,
- modify getOrInsertFunction to return FunctionCallee, and
- update all callers appropriately.
One area of particular note is the change to the sanitizer
code. Previously, they had been casting the result of
`getOrInsertFunction` to a `Function*` via
`checkSanitizerInterfaceFunction`, and storing that. That would report
an error if someone had already inserted a function declaraction with
a mismatching signature.
However, in general, LLVM allows for such mismatches, as
`getOrInsertFunction` will automatically insert a bitcast if
needed. As part of this cleanup, cause the sanitizer code to do the
same. (It will call its functions using the expected signature,
however they may have been declared.)
Finally, in a small number of locations, callers of
`getOrInsertFunction` actually were expecting/requiring that a brand
new function was being created. In such cases, I've switched them to
Function::Create instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57315
llvm-svn: 352827
This reverts commit f47d6b38c7a61d50db4566b02719de05492dcef1 (r352791).
Seems to run into compilation failures with GCC (but not clang, where
I tested it). Reverting while I investigate.
llvm-svn: 352800
The FunctionCallee type is effectively a {FunctionType*,Value*} pair,
and is a useful convenience to enable code to continue passing the
result of getOrInsertFunction() through to EmitCall, even once pointer
types lose their pointee-type.
Then:
- update the CallInst/InvokeInst instruction creation functions to
take a Callee,
- modify getOrInsertFunction to return FunctionCallee, and
- update all callers appropriately.
One area of particular note is the change to the sanitizer
code. Previously, they had been casting the result of
`getOrInsertFunction` to a `Function*` via
`checkSanitizerInterfaceFunction`, and storing that. That would report
an error if someone had already inserted a function declaraction with
a mismatching signature.
However, in general, LLVM allows for such mismatches, as
`getOrInsertFunction` will automatically insert a bitcast if
needed. As part of this cleanup, cause the sanitizer code to do the
same. (It will call its functions using the expected signature,
however they may have been declared.)
Finally, in a small number of locations, callers of
`getOrInsertFunction` actually were expecting/requiring that a brand
new function was being created. In such cases, I've switched them to
Function::Create instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57315
llvm-svn: 352791
This is meant to be used with clang's __builtin_dynamic_object_size.
When 'true' is passed to this parameter, the intrinsic has the
potential to be folded into instructions that will be evaluated
at run time. When 'false', the objectsize intrinsic behaviour is
unchanged.
rdar://32212419
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56761
llvm-svn: 352664
Noticed in the asm-goto patch. Callbr needs to go here too. One cast and call is better than 3.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57295
llvm-svn: 352563
This patch adds a new type StringBlockVal which can be used to emit a
YAML block scalar, which preserves newlines in a multiline string. It
also updates MappingTraits<DiagnosticInfoOptimizationBase::Argument> to
use it for argument values with more than a single newline.
This is helpful for remarks that want to display more in-depth
information in a more structured way.
Reviewers: thegameg, anemet
Reviewed By: anemet
Subscribers: hfinkel, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57159
llvm-svn: 352216
Summary:
UBSan wants to detect when unreachable code is actually reached, so it
adds instrumentation before every `unreachable` instruction. However,
the optimizer will remove code after calls to functions marked with
`noreturn`. To avoid this UBSan removes `noreturn` from both the call
instruction as well as from the function itself. Unfortunately, ASan
relies on this annotation to unpoison the stack by inserting calls to
`_asan_handle_no_return` before `noreturn` functions. This is important
for functions that do not return but access the the stack memory, e.g.,
unwinder functions *like* `longjmp` (`longjmp` itself is actually
"double-proofed" via its interceptor). The result is that when ASan and
UBSan are combined, the `noreturn` attributes are missing and ASan
cannot unpoison the stack, so it has false positives when stack
unwinding is used.
Changes:
# UBSan now adds the `expect_noreturn` attribute whenever it removes
the `noreturn` attribute from a function
# ASan additionally checks for the presence of this attribute
Generated code:
```
call void @__asan_handle_no_return // Additionally inserted to avoid false positives
call void @longjmp
call void @__asan_handle_no_return
call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable
unreachable
```
The second call to `__asan_handle_no_return` is redundant. This will be
cleaned up in a follow-up patch.
rdar://problem/40723397
Reviewers: delcypher, eugenis
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56624
llvm-svn: 352003
Summary:
Previously no client of ilist traits has needed to know about transfers
of nodes within the same list, so as an optimization, ilist doesn't call
transferNodesFromList in that case. However, now there are clients that
want to use ilist traits to cache instruction ordering information to
optimize dominance queries of instructions in the same basic block.
This change updates the existing ilist traits users to detect in-list
transfers and do nothing in that case.
After this change, we can start caching instruction ordering information
in LLVM IR data structures. There are two main ways to do that:
- by putting an order integer into the Instruction class
- by maintaining order integers in a hash table on BasicBlock
I plan to implement and measure both, but I wanted to commit this change
first to enable other out of tree ilist clients to implement this
optimization as well.
Reviewers: lattner, hfinkel, chandlerc
Subscribers: hiraditya, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57120
llvm-svn: 351992
This patch replaces the existing LLVMVectorSameWidth matcher with LLVMScalarOrSameVectorWidth.
The matching args must be either scalars or vectors with the same number of elements, but in either case the scalar/element type can differ, specified by LLVMScalarOrSameVectorWidth.
I've updated the _overflow intrinsics to demonstrate this - allowing it to return a i1 or <N x i1> overflow result, matching the scalar/vectorwidth of the other (add/sub/mul) result type.
The masked load/store/gather/scatter intrinsics have also been updated to use this, although as we specify the reference type to be llvm_anyvector_ty we guarantee the mask will be <N x i1> so no change in behaviour
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57090
llvm-svn: 351957
This broke the RISCV build, and even with that fixed, one of the RISCV
tests behaves surprisingly differently with asserts than without,
leaving there no clear test pattern to use. Generally it seems bad for
hte IR to differ substantially due to asserts (as in, an alloca is used
with asserts that isn't needed without!) and nothing I did simply would
fix it so I'm reverting back to green.
This also required reverting the RISCV build fix in r351782.
llvm-svn: 351796
This causes a couple of changes in the upgrade tests as signed/unsigned eq/ne are equivalent and we constant fold true/false codes, these changes are the same as what we already do for avx512 cmp/ucmp.
Noticed while cleaning up vector integer comparison costs for PR40376.
llvm-svn: 351697
We were upgrading these to the new style VPCOM/VPCOMU intrinsics (which includes the condition code immediate), but we'll be getting rid of those shortly, so convert these to generics first.
This causes a couple of changes in the upgrade tests as signed/unsigned eq/ne are equivalent and we constant fold true/false codes, these changes are the same as what we already do for avx512 cmp/ucmp.
Noticed while cleaning up vector integer comparison costs for PR40376.
llvm-svn: 351690
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
An abstract call site is a wrapper that allows to treat direct,
indirect, and callback calls the same. If an abstract call site
represents a direct or indirect call site it behaves like a stripped
down version of a normal call site object. The abstract call site can
also represent a callback call, thus the fact that the initially
called function (=broker) may invoke a third one (=callback callee).
In this case, the abstract call side hides the middle man, hence the
broker function. The result is a representation of the callback call,
inside the broker, but in the context of the original instruction that
invoked the broker.
Again, there are up to three functions involved when we talk about
callback call sites. The caller (1), which invokes the broker
function. The broker function (2), that may or may not invoke the
callback callee. And finally the callback callee (3), which is the
target of the callback call.
The abstract call site will handle the mapping from parameters to
arguments depending on the semantic of the broker function. However,
it is important to note that the mapping is often partial. Thus, some
arguments of the call/invoke instruction are mapped to parameters of
the callee while others are not. At the same time, arguments of the
callback callee might be unknown, thus "null" if queried.
This patch introduces also !callback metadata which describe how a
callback broker maps from parameters to arguments. This metadata is
directly created by clang for known broker functions, provided through
source code attributes by the user, or later deduced by analyses.
For motivation and additional information please see the corresponding
talk (slides/video)
https://llvm.org/devmtg/2018-10/talk-abstracts.html#talk20
as well as the LCPC paper
http://compilers.cs.uni-saarland.de/people/doerfert/par_opt_lcpc18.pdf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54498
llvm-svn: 351627
Summary:
If LTOUnit splitting is disabled, the module summary analysis computes
the summary information necessary to perform single implementation
devirtualization during the thin link with the index and no IR. The
information collected from the regular LTO IR in the current hybrid WPD
algorithm is summarized, including:
1) For vtable definitions, record the function pointers and their offset
within the vtable initializer (subsumes the information collected from
IR by tryFindVirtualCallTargets).
2) A record for each type metadata summarizing the vtable definitions
decorated with that metadata (subsumes the TypeIdentiferMap collected
from IR).
Also added are the necessary bitcode records, and the corresponding
assembly support.
The index-based WPD will be sent as a follow-on.
Depends on D53890.
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, Prazek, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, arphaman, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54815
llvm-svn: 351453
Summary:
Make recoverfp intrinsic target-independent so that it can be implemented for AArch64, etc.
Refer D53541 for the context. Clang counterpart D56748.
Reviewers: rnk, efriedma
Reviewed By: rnk, efriedma
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56747
llvm-svn: 351281
consistently accept a pointee-type argument.
Note: this also adds a new C API and soft-deprecates the old C API.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56559
llvm-svn: 351124
accept a return-type argument.
Note: this also adds a new C API and soft-deprecates the old C API.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56558
llvm-svn: 351123
accept a callee-type argument.
Note: this also adds a new C API and soft-deprecates the old C API.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56557
llvm-svn: 351122
accept a callee-type argument.
Note: this also adds a new C API and soft-deprecates the old C API.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56556
llvm-svn: 351121
Normally, changing the function signatures of C APIs is disallowed,
but as these two are brand new last week, and haven't been released
yet, it is okay in this instance.
As per discussion in D56556, we will not add NameLen arguments to IR
building APIs, for the following reasons:
1. We do not want to deprecate all of the IR building APIs, just to add a
NameLen argument to each one.
2. Consistency is important, so adding it just to new ones is unfortunate.
3. The IR names are completely optional, useful for readability of IR
only. There is no value in ever supporting nul bytes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56669
llvm-svn: 351076
That is, remove many of the calls to Type::getNumContainedTypes(),
Type::subtypes(), and Type::getContainedType(N).
I'm not intending to remove these accessors -- they are
useful/necessary in some cases. However, removing the pointee type
from pointers would potentially break some uses, and reducing the
number of calls makes it easier to audit.
llvm-svn: 350835
Summary: Add a utility function for creating a basic block without a parent function. A useful operation for compilers that need to synthesize and conditionally insert code without having to bother with appending and immediately unlinking a block.
Reviewers: whitequark, deadalnix
Reviewed By: whitequark
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56279
llvm-svn: 350608
Summary: Fix an old outstanding problem with the int cast builder binding always assuming the cast is signed by introducing a new LLVMBuildIntCast2 operation and deprecating the old prototype.
Reviewers: whitequark, deadalnix
Reviewed By: whitequark
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56280
llvm-svn: 350607
MSVC has a nesting limit of around 110-130. An if/else if/else if counts against this next level. The autoupgrade code consists a long chain of these checking matches against strings.
This commit moves some code to a helper function to move out a large if/else chain that was inside of one of the blocks into a separate function. There are more of these we could move or we could change some to lookup tables.
I've also merged together a few similar blocks in the outer chain. This should buy us some margin for a little bit.
llvm-svn: 350564
