As part of the unification of the debug format and the MIR format,
always print registers as lowercase.
* Only debug printing is affected. It now follows MIR.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40417
llvm-svn: 319187
This is needed for cases when the memory access is not as big as the width of
the data type. For instance, storing i1 (1 bit) would be done in a byte (8
bits).
Using 'BitSize >> 3' (or '/ 8') would e.g. give the memory access of an i1 a
size of 0, which for instance makes alias analysis return NoAlias even when
it shouldn't.
There are no tests as this was done as a follow-up to the bugfix for the case
where this was discovered (r318824). This handles more similar cases.
Review: Björn Petterson
https://reviews.llvm.org/D40339
llvm-svn: 319173
LLVM Coding Standards:
Function names should be verb phrases (as they represent actions), and
command-like function should be imperative. The name should be camel
case, and start with a lower case letter (e.g. openFile() or isFoo()).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40416
llvm-svn: 319168
The priorities in the section name suffixes are zero padded,
allowing the linker to just do a lexical sort.
Add zero padding for .ctors sections in ELF as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40407
llvm-svn: 319150
Unoptimized IR can have linear sequences of stores to an array, where the
initial GEP for the first store is formed from the pointer to the array, and the
GEP for each store after the first is formed from the previous GEP with some
offset in an inductive fashion.
The (large) resulting DAG when analyzed by DAGCombine undergoes an excessive
number of combines as each store node is examined every time its' offset node
is combined with any child of the offset. One of the transformations is
findBetterNeighborChains which assists MergeConsecutiveStores. The former
relies on repeated chain walking to do its' work, however MergeConsecutiveStores
is disabled at O0 which makes the transformation redundant.
Any optimization level other than O0 would invoke InstCombine which would
resolve the chain of GEPs into flat base + offset GEP for each store which
does not exhibit the repeated examination of each store to the array.
Disabling this optimization fixes an excessive compile time issue (30~ minutes
for the test case provided) at O0.
Reviewers: niravd, craig.topper, t.p.northover
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40193
llvm-svn: 319142
This fixes cases where we wouldn't perform various register operand
checks just because we didn't happen to have a definition in the
MCInstrDesc. This changes the code to only skip the tests that actually
depend on the MCInstrDesc definition.
This makes the machine verifier spot the problem from
https://llvm.org/PR33071 after the pass that actually caused it.
llvm-svn: 319141
Additional checks for phi operands:
- first operand should be a virtual register def. It should not be
tied, implicit, internalread, earlyclobber or a read.
- The other operands should be register/mbb operands next to each other
- The register operands should not be implicit, internalread,
earlyclobber, debug or tied.
- We can perform most of the PHI checks even for unreachable blocks.
llvm-svn: 319140
With AVX512 vXi1 types are legal so we shouldn't be extending them.
This change is similar to existing code in the zext(setcc) combine.
llvm-svn: 319120
The current way that trivial addressing modes are detected incorrectly thinks
that null pointers are non-trivial, leading to an infinite loop where we keep
duplicating the same select. Fix this by aware of null when deciding if an
addressing mode is trivial.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40447
llvm-svn: 319019
Summary:
Currently ScalarizeVecRes_SETCC checks for the result type being a vector and jumps to ScalarizeVecRes_VSETCC. But if we're scalarizing a vector result, aren't we guaranteed to be looking at a vector type?
This patch deletes the current ScalarizeVecRes_SETCC and renames ScalarizeVecRes_VSETCC to ScalarizeVecRes_SETCC.
Reviewers: RKSimon, arsenm, eladcohen, zvi
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40452
llvm-svn: 318982
CodeGenPrepare sinks address computations from one basic block to another
and attempts to reuse address computations that have already been sunk. If
the same address computation appears twice with the first instance as an
operand of a load whose result is an operand to a simplifable select,
CodeGenPrepare simplifies the select and recursively erases the now dead
instructions. CodeGenPrepare then attempts to use the erased address
computation for the second load.
Fix this by erasing the cached address value if it has zero uses before
looking for the address value in the sunken address map.
This partially resolves PR35209.
Thanks to Alexander Richardson for reporting the issue!
This fixed version relands r318032 which was reverted in r318049 due to
sanitizer buildbot failures.
Reviewers: john.brawn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39841
llvm-svn: 318956
This patch extends the recent work in optimizeMemoryInst to make it able to
combine more ExtAddrMode fields than just the BaseReg.
This fixes some benchmark regressions introduced by r309397, where GVN PRE is
hoisting a getelementptr such that it can no longer be combined into the
addressing mode of the load or store that uses it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38133
llvm-svn: 318949
TableGen already generates code for selecting a G_FDIV, so we only need
to add a test.
For the legalizer and reg bank select, we do the same thing as for the
other floating point binary operations: either mark as legal if we have
a FP unit or lower to a libcall, and map to the floating point
registers.
llvm-svn: 318915
TableGen already generates code for selecting a G_FMUL, so we only need
to add a test for that part.
For the legalizer and reg bank select, we do the same thing as the other
floating point binary operators: either mark as legal if we have a FP
unit or lower to a libcall, and map to the floating point registers.
llvm-svn: 318910
This patch reverts change to X86TargetLowering::getScalarShiftAmountTy in
rL318727 and move the logic to DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitInteger.
The reason is that getScalarShiftAmountTy returns a shift amount type that
is suitable for common use cases in CodeGen. DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitInteger
is a rare situation which requires a shift amount type larger than what
getScalarShiftAmountTy. In this case, it is more reasonable to do special
handling of shift amount type in DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitInteger only. If
similar situations arises the logic may be moved to a separate function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40320
llvm-svn: 318890
Since i1 is a legal type, this:
NumBytes = Op1->getMemoryVT().getSizeInBits() >> 3;
is wrong and should be instead
NumBytes = Op0->getMemoryVT().getStoreSize();
There seems to be more places where this should be fixed outside DAGCombiner.
Review: Hal Finkel
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35366
llvm-svn: 318824
DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitInteger uses default pointer size as shift amount constant type,
which causes less performant ISA in amdgcn---amdgiz target since the default pointer
type is i64 whereas the desired shift amount type is i32.
This patch fixes that by using TLI.getScalarShiftAmountTy in DAGTypeLegalizer::SplitInteger.
The X86 change is necessary since splitting i512 requires shifting amount of 256, which
cannot be held by i8.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40148
llvm-svn: 318727
Normally this would be cleaned up by promoting the condition operand next. But in the attached case we promoted the result from v2i48 to v2i64 and the condition from v2i1 to v2i48. Then we tried to "promote" the v2i48 condition back to v2i1 because that's what the SetCC result type for v2i64 is on X86 with VLX. But promote is either a NOP or SIGN_EXTEND and this would need a truncation.
With the change here we now get the SetCC type of v2i1 when we're handling the result promotion and the operand no longer needs to be promoted itself.
Fixes PR35272.
llvm-svn: 318706
MachineSink attempts to place instructions near the basic blocks where
they are needed. Once an instruction has been sunk, its location
relative to other instructions is no longer consistent with the
original source code. In order to ensure correct single-stepping and
profiling, the debug location for sunk instructions is either merged
with the insertion point or erased if the target successor block is
empty.
Patch by Matthew Voss!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39933
llvm-svn: 318679
The instructions addis,addi, bl are used to calculate the address of TLS thread
local variables. These TLS access code sequences are generated repeatedly every
time the thread local variable is accessed. By communicating to Machine CSE that
X2 is guaranteed to have the same value within the same function call (so called
Caller Preserved Physical Register), the redundant TLS access code sequences are
cleaned up.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39173
llvm-svn: 318661
We must collect all AddModes even if they are the same.
This is due to Original value is different but we need all original
values collected as they are used as anchors in common phi finding.
Reviewers: john.brawn, reames
Reviewed By: john.brawn
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40166
llvm-svn: 318638
Instead of asserting that the type sizes are exactly equal, we check
that the new size is big enough to contain the original type.
We have to relax this constrain because, right now, we sometimes
specify that things that are smaller than a storage type are legal
instead of widening everything to the size of a storage type.
E.g., we say that G_AND s16 is legal and we map that on GPR32.
This is something we may revisit in the future (either by changing
the legalization process or keeping track separately of the storage
size and the size of the type), but let us reflect the reality of
the situation for now.
llvm-svn: 318587
If a vreg's bank is specified in the registers block and one of its
defs or uses also specifies the bank, we end up checking that the
RegBank is equal to diagnose conflicting banks. The problem comes up
for generic vregs, where we weren't fully initializing the VRegInfo
when parsing the registers block, so we'd end up comparing a null
pointer to uninitialized memory.
This fixes a non-deterministic failure when round tripping through MIR
with generic vregs.
llvm-svn: 318543
Previously we were assuming all results were vectors and calling SetWidenedVector, but if its a chain result we should just replace uses instead.
This fixes an error found by expensive checks after r318368.
llvm-svn: 318509
TransferDbgValues (capital 'T') is wired into ReplaceAllUsesWith, and
transferDbgValues (lowercase 't') is used elsewhere (e.g in Legalize).
Both functions should be doing the exact same thing. This patch
consolidates the logic into one place.
This was reverted in r318455 because some newly introduced asserts,
which I thought were NFC, were firing. I filed PR35338. For now I've
weakened the asserts.
Testing: check-llvm, check-clang, and a stage2 Rel+Deb build of clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40104
llvm-svn: 318498
All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into
CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, not the
other way around).
llvm-svn: 318490
The sign extend might be from an i16 or i8 type and was inserted by InstCombine to match the pointer width. X86 gather legalization isn't currently detecting this to reinsert a sign extend to make things legal.
It's a bit weird for the SelectionDAGBuilder to do this kind of optimization in the first place. With this removed we can at least lean on InstCombine somewhat to ensure the index is i32 or i64.
I'll work on trying to recover some of the test cases by removing sign extends in the backend when its safe to do so with an understanding of the current legalizer capabilities.
This should fix PR30690.
llvm-svn: 318466
TransferDbgValues (capital 'T') is wired into ReplaceAllUsesWith, and
transferDbgValues (lowercase 't') is used elsewhere (e.g in Legalize).
Both functions should be doing the exact same thing. This patch
consolidates the logic into one place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40104
llvm-svn: 318448
SelectionDAGBuilder::visitAlloca assumes alloca address space is 0, which is
incorrect for triple amdgcn---amdgiz and causes isel failure.
This patch fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40095
llvm-svn: 318392
Change the calculation for the desired ValueType for non-sign
extending loads, as in those cases we don't care about the
higher bits. This creates a smaller ExtVT and allows for such
combinations as:
(srl (zextload i16, [addr]), 8) -> (zextload i8, [addr + 1])
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40034
llvm-svn: 318390
The LatencyPriorityQueue doesn't currently check whether the SU being removed really exists in the Queue.
This method fails quietly when SU is not found and removes the last element from the Queue, leading to unexpected behavior.
Unfortunately, this only occurs on our custom target, with the custom scheduler. In our case, when remove() is invoked, it removes the wrong SU at the end of the Queue, which is only discovered later when VerifyScheduledDAG() is invoked and finds that some nodes were not scheduled at all.
As this is only reproducible with a lot of proprietary code, I'm hopeful this assert is straightforward enough to not necessitate a test.
Patch by Ondrej Glasnak!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40084
llvm-svn: 318387
Summary:
Use use_nodbg_empty() rather than use_empty() in
MachineRegisterInfo::EmitLiveInCopies() when determining if a livein
register has any uses or not. Otherwise a single dbg.value can make us
generate different code, meaning -g would affect code generation.
Found when compiling code for my out-of-tree target. Unfortunately I
haven't been able to reproduce the problem on X86 or any of the other
in-tree targets that I tried, so no test case.
Reviewers: MatzeB
Reviewed By: MatzeB
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39044
llvm-svn: 318382
For example, this is currently reachable by X86 if you use a masked store intrinsic with a v1iX type.
Using a fatal error seems like a better user experience if someone were to encounter this on a release build. There are several other similar places that have been converted from unreachable to fatal error previously.
llvm-svn: 318379
processDbgDeclares assumes pointer size is the same for different addr spaces.
It uses pointer size for addr space 0 for all pointers, which causes assertion
in stripAndAccumulateInBoundsConstantOffsets for amdgcn---amdgiz since
pointer in addr space 5 has different size than in addr space 0.
This patch fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40085
llvm-svn: 318370
Summary:
This patch adds a LLVM_ENABLE_GISEL_COV which, like LLVM_ENABLE_DAGISEL_COV,
causes TableGen to instrument the generated table to collect rule coverage
information. However, LLVM_ENABLE_GISEL_COV goes a bit further than
LLVM_ENABLE_DAGISEL_COV. The information is written to files
(${CMAKE_BINARY_DIR}/gisel-coverage-* by default). These files can then be
concatenated into ${LLVM_GISEL_COV_PREFIX}-all after which TableGen will
read this information and use it to emit warnings about untested rules.
This technique could also be used by SelectionDAG and can be further
extended to detect hot rules and give them priority over colder rules.
Usage:
* Enable LLVM_ENABLE_GISEL_COV in CMake
* Build the compiler and run some tests
* cat gisel-coverage-[0-9]* > gisel-coverage-all
* Delete lib/Target/*/*GenGlobalISel.inc*
* Build the compiler
Known issues:
* ${LLVM_GISEL_COV_PREFIX}-all must be generated as a manual
step due to a lack of a portable 'cat' command. It should be the
concatenation of all ${LLVM_GISEL_COV_PREFIX}-[0-9]* files.
* There's no mechanism to discard coverage information when the ruleset
changes
Depends on D39742
Reviewers: ab, qcolombet, t.p.northover, aditya_nandakumar, rovka
Reviewed By: rovka
Subscribers: vsk, arsenm, nhaehnle, mgorny, kristof.beyls, javed.absar, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39747
llvm-svn: 318356
Due to integer precision, we might have numerator greater than denominator in
the branch probability scaling. Add a check to prevent this from happening.
llvm-svn: 318353
