This is the first patch in a series of patches to rename isNormal =>
isFiniteNonZero and isIEEENormal => isNormal. In order to prevent careless
errors on my part the overall plan is:
1. Add the isFiniteNonZero predicate with tests. I can do this in a method
independent of isNormal. (This step is this patch).
2. Convert all references to isNormal with isFiniteNonZero. My plan is to
comment out isNormal locally and continually convert isNormal references =>
isFiniteNonZero until llvm/clang compiles.
3. Remove old isNormal and rename isIEEENormal to isNormal.
4. Look through all of said references from patch 2 and see if we can simplify
them by using the new isNormal.
llvm-svn: 184350
Prior to this change, the considered addressing modes may be invalid since the
maximum and minimum offsets were not taking into account.
This was causing an assertion failure.
The added test case exercices that behavior.
<rdar://problem/14199725> Assertion failed: (CurScaleCost >= 0 && "Legal
addressing mode has an illegal cost!")
llvm-svn: 184341
This matches GNU ar behavior. Also remove the now unused getFileStatus method.
Not sure how to add a test, it would have to run ls -l or something like that.
llvm-svn: 184337
The type <3 x i8> is a common in graphics and we want to be able to vectorize it.
This changes accelerates bullet by 12% and 471_omnetpp by 5%.
llvm-svn: 184317
Previously, we would monkeypatch the vector of YAML::Section's in order
to ensure that the SHT_NULL entry is present. Now we just add it
unconditionally.
The proliferation of small numerical adjustments is beginning to
frighten me, but I can't think of a way having a single point of truth
for them without introducing a whole new layer of data structures (i.e.
lots of code and complexity) between the YAML and binary ELF formats.
llvm-svn: 184260
Said assert assumes that ADDC will always have a glue node as its second
argument and is checked before we even know that we are actually performing the
relevant MLAL optimization. This is incorrect since on ARM we *CAN* codegen ADDC
with a use list based second argument. Thus to have both effects, I converted
the assert to a conditional check which if it fails we do not perform the
optimization.
In terms of tests I can not produce an ADDC from the IR level until I get in my
multiprecision optimization patch which is forthcoming. The tests for said patch
would cause this assert to fail implying that said tests will provide the
relevant tests.
llvm-svn: 184230
