To be used/tested by llvm-dsymutil. (llvm-dsymutil does a 'static' link,
no need for relocations for most things, so it'll just emit raw integers
for most attributes)
llvm-svn: 231298
Here's a rough/first draft - it at least hits the actual textual IR
examples and some of the phrasing. It's probably worth a full pass over,
but I'm not sure how much these docs should reflect the strange
intermediate state we're in anyway.
Totally open to lots of review/feedback/suggestions.
llvm-svn: 231294
When calling lock() after all passes are registered, the PassRegistry doesn't need a mutex anymore to look up passes.
This speeds up multithreaded llvm execution by ~5% (tested with 4 threads).
In an asserts build of llvm this has an even bigger impact.
Note that it's not required to use the lock function.
llvm-svn: 231276
Reverted in r231254 due to a self-hosting crash of Clang (see Clang
PR22793). Workaround the crash by using {} instead of = default to
define a dtor.
llvm-svn: 231274
The issue was that we were always printing the remarks. Fix that and add a test
showing that it prints nothing if -pass-remarks is not given.
Original message:
Correctly handle -pass-remarks in the gold plugin.
llvm-svn: 231273
Summary:
DataLayout keeps the string used for its creation.
As a side effect it is no longer needed in the Module.
This is "almost" NFC, the string is no longer
canonicalized, you can't rely on two "equals" DataLayout
having the same string returned by getStringRepresentation().
Get rid of DataLayoutPass: the DataLayout is in the Module
The DataLayout is "per-module", let's enforce this by not
duplicating it more than necessary.
One more step toward non-optionality of the DataLayout in the
module.
Make DataLayout Non-Optional in the Module
Module->getDataLayout() will never returns nullptr anymore.
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: resistor, llvm-commits, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7992
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 231270
This reverts r231200 and r231204. The second one added an explicit move
ctor for MSVC.
This change broke the clang-cl self-host due to weirdness in MSVC's
implementation of std::map::insert. Somehow we lost our rvalue ref-ness
when going through variadic placement new:
template <class _Objty, class... _Types>
void construct(_Objty *_Ptr,
_Types &&... _Args) { // construct _Objty(_Types...) at _Ptr
::new ((void *)_Ptr) _Objty(_STD forward<_Types>(_Args)...);
}
For some reason, Clang decided to call the deleted std::pair copy
constructor at this point. Needs further investigation, once I can
build.
llvm-svn: 231269
Summary:
In PNaCl, most atomic instructions have their own @llvm.nacl.atomic.* function, each one, with a few exceptions, represents a consistent behaviour across all NaCl-supported targets. Unfortunately, the atomic RMW operations nand, [u]min, and [u]max aren't directly represented by any such @llvm.nacl.atomic.* function. This patch refines shouldExpandAtomicRMWInIR in TargetLowering so that a future `Le32TargetLowering` class can selectively inform the caller how the target desires the atomic RMW instruction to be expanded (ie via load-linked/store-conditional for ARM/AArch64, via cmpxchg for X86/others?, or not at all for Mips) if at all.
This does not represent a behavioural change and as such no tests were added.
Patch by: Richard Diamond.
Reviewers: jfb
Reviewed By: jfb
Subscribers: jfb, aemerson, t.p.northover, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7713
llvm-svn: 231250
This "itinerary class map" in PPCSchedule.td is incomplete and
redundant with the actual code. As it provides no value, we've
decided to remove it.
No functional change.
llvm-svn: 231246
The target-independent selection algorithm in FastISel already knows how
to select a SINT_TO_FP if the target is SSE but not AVX.
On targets that have SSE but not AVX, the tablegen'd 'fastEmit' functions
for ISD::SINT_TO_FP know how to select instruction X86::CVTSI2SSrr
(for an i32 to f32 conversion) and X86::CVTSI2SDrr (for an i32 to f64
conversion).
This patch simplifies the logic in method X86SelectSIToFP knowing that
the code would not be reachable if the subtarget doesn't have AVX.
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 231243
Do not instrument direct accesses to stack variables that can be
proven to be inbounds, e.g. accesses to fields of structs on stack.
But it eliminates 33% of instrumentation on webrtc/modules_unittests
(number of memory accesses goes down from 290152 to 193998) and
reduces binary size by 15% (from 74M to 64M) and improved compilation time by 6-12%.
The optimization is guarded by asan-opt-stack flag that is off by default.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D7583
llvm-svn: 231241
Summary:
Use more reasonable names for these pseudo-instructions.
As there's only one definition tied to any one of these classes, I named them with abbreviated versions of their respective class' name.
Reviewers: dsanders
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7831
llvm-svn: 231240
Summary:
Move the "Filler" parameter to the end of the parameter list as it is,
conceptually, the only output parameter of that function.
Reviewers: dsanders
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7726
llvm-svn: 231239
a flag for now.
First off, thanks to Daniel Jasper for really pointing out the issue
here. It's been here forever (at least, I think it was there when
I first wrote this code) without getting really noticed or fixed.
The key problem is what happens when two reasonably common patterns
happen at the same time: we outline multiple cold regions of code, and
those regions in turn have diamonds or other CFGs for which we can't
just topologically lay them out. Consider some C code that looks like:
if (a1()) { if (b1()) c1(); else d1(); f1(); }
if (a2()) { if (b2()) c2(); else d2(); f2(); }
done();
Now consider the case where a1() and a2() are unlikely to be true. In
that case, we might lay out the first part of the function like:
a1, a2, done;
And then we will be out of successors in which to build the chain. We go
to find the best block to continue the chain with, which is perfectly
reasonable here, and find "b1" let's say. Laying out successors gets us
to:
a1, a2, done; b1, c1;
At this point, we will refuse to lay out the successor to c1 (f1)
because there are still un-placed predecessors of f1 and we want to try
to preserve the CFG structure. So we go get the next best block, d1.
... wait for it ...
Except that the next best block *isn't* d1. It is b2! d1 is waaay down
inside these conditionals. It is much less important than b2. Except
that this is exactly what we didn't want. If we keep going we get the
entire set of the rest of the CFG *interleaved*!!!
a1, a2, done; b1, c1; b2, c2; d1, f1; d2, f2;
So we clearly need a better strategy here. =] My current favorite
strategy is to actually try to place the block whose predecessor is
closest. This very simply ensures that we unwind these kinds of CFGs the
way that is natural and fitting, and should minimize the number of cache
lines instructions are spread across.
It also happens to be *dead simple*. It's like the datastructure was
specifically set up for this use case or something. We only push blocks
onto the work list when the last predecessor for them is placed into the
chain. So the back of the worklist *is* the nearest next block.
Unfortunately, a change like this is going to cause *soooo* many
benchmarks to swing wildly. So for now I'm adding this under a flag so
that we and others can validate that this is fixing the problems
described, that it seems possible to enable, and hopefully that it fixes
more of our problems long term.
llvm-svn: 231238
This commit fixes a bug introduced in r230956 where we were creating
CMovFP_{T,F} nodes with multiple return value types (one for each operand).
With this change the return value type of the new node is the same as the
value type of the True/False operands of the original node.
llvm-svn: 231237
In a CFG with the edges A->B->C and A->C, B is an optional branch.
LLVM's default behavior is to lay the blocks out naturally, i.e. A, B,
C, in order to improve code locality and fallthroughs. However, if a
function contains many of those optional branches only a few of which
are taken, this leads to a lot of unnecessary icache misses. Moving B
out of line can work around this.
Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7719
llvm-svn: 231230
As is described at http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22408, the GNU linkers
ld.bfd and ld.gold currently only support a subset of the whole range of AArch64
ELF TLS relocations. Furthermore, they assume that some of the code sequences to
access thread-local variables are produced in a very specific sequence.
When the sequence is not as the linker expects, it can silently mis-relaxe/mis-optimize
the instructions.
Even if that wouldn't be the case, it's good to produce the exact sequence,
as that ensures that linkers can perform optimizing relaxations.
This patch:
* implements support for 16MiB TLS area size instead of 4GiB TLS area size. Ideally clang
would grow an -mtls-size option to allow support for both, but that's not part of this patch.
* by default doesn't produce local dynamic access patterns, as even modern ld.bfd and ld.gold
linkers do not support the associated relocations. An option (-aarch64-elf-ldtls-generation)
is added to enable generation of local dynamic code sequence, but is off by default.
* makes sure that the exact expected code sequence for local dynamic and general dynamic
accesses is produced, by making use of a new pseudo instruction. The patch also removes
two (AArch64ISD::TLSDESC_BLR, AArch64ISD::TLSDESC_CALL) pre-existing AArch64-specific pseudo
SDNode instructions that are superseded by the new one (TLSDESC_CALLSEQ).
llvm-svn: 231227
Asserting that the source and destination iterators are from the same
region is unnecessary - there's no reason to disallow reassignment from
any regions, so long as they aren't compared.
llvm-svn: 231224
When trying to convert a BUILD_VECTOR into a shuffle, we try to split a single source vector that is twice as wide as the destination vector.
We can not do this when we also need the zero vector to create a blend.
This fixes PR22774.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8040
llvm-svn: 231219
Since OptionValue (& its base classes) have user-declared dtors, use of
the implicit copy ctor/assignment operator is deprecated in C++11.
Provide them explicitly (defaulted) to avoid depending on this
deprecated feature.
llvm-svn: 231218
These objects are never polymorphically owned, so there's no need for
virtual dtors - just make the dtor protected in the base classes, and
make the derived classes final.
llvm-svn: 231217
This will now display enum definitions both at the global
scope as well as nested inside of classes. Additionally,
it will no longer display enums at the global scope if the
enum is nested. Instead, it will omit the definition of
the enum globally and instead emit it in the corresponding
class definition.
llvm-svn: 231215
