Masked-expand-load node represents load operation that loads a variable amount of elements from memory according to amount of "true" bits in the mask and expands the loaded elements according to their position in the mask vector.
Right now, the node is used in intrinsics for VEXPAND* instructions.
The work is done towards implementation of masked.expandload and masked.compressstore intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25322
llvm-svn: 283694
The core of the change is supposed to be NFC, however it also fixes
what I believe was an undefined behavior when calling:
va_start(ValueArgs, Desc);
with Desc being a StringRef.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25342
llvm-svn: 283671
This seems to have been responsible for the XMM16-31 spills observed in PR29112. With this fixed the test case has been modified to no longer have a spill of XMM16.
llvm-svn: 283668
Summary:
When there is a call to an alias in the same module, we were not
adding a call edge. So we could incorrectly think that the alias
was dead if it was inlined in that function, despite having a
reference imported elsewhere. This resulted in unsats at link time.
Add a call edge when the call is to an alias.
Reviewers: davide, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25384
llvm-svn: 283664
Avoid generating indexed vector instructions for Exynos. This is needed for
fmla/fmls/fmul/fmulx. For example, the instruction
fmla v0.4s, v1.4s, v2.s[1]
is less efficient than the instructions
dup v2.4s, v2.s[1]
fmla v0.4s, v1.4s, v2.4s
Patch written by Abderrazek Zaafrani.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21571
llvm-svn: 283663
Value names may be prefixed with a binary '1' to indicate that the
backend should not modify the symbols due to any platform naming
convention.
This should not show up in the YAML opt record file because it breaks
the YAML parser.
llvm-svn: 283656
Clang always emit a hash for ThinLTO, but as other frontend are
starting to use ThinLTO, this could be a serious bug.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25379
llvm-svn: 283655
We need to add an entry in the combined-index for modules that have
a hash but otherwise empty summary, this is needed so that we can
get the hash for the module.
Also, if no entry is present in the combined index for a module, we
need to skip it when trying to compute a cache entry.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25300
llvm-svn: 283654
This is the first step towards round-tripping symbol information,
and thusly being able to write symbol information to a PDB.
This patch writes the symbol information for each compiland to
the Yaml when running in pdb2yaml mode. There's still some loose
ends, such as what to do about relocations (necessary in order to
print linkage names), how to print enums with friendly names, and
how to give the dumper access to the StringTable, but this is a
good first start.
llvm-svn: 283641
Once MULHS was expanded, this exposed an issue where the condition
register was thought to be 16-bit. This caused an attempt to copy a
16-bit register to an 8-bit register.
Authored by Jake Goulding
llvm-svn: 283634
Because screen space is precious, if an optimization (vectorization, for
example) never happens, don't leave empty space for the associated markers on
every line of the output. This makes the output much more compact, and allows
for the later inclusion of markers for more (although perhaps rare)
optimizations.
llvm-svn: 283626
Summary:
If heap allocation of a coroutine is elided, we need to make sure that we will update an address stored in the coroutine frame from f.destroy to f.cleanup.
Before this change, CoroSplit synthesized these stores after coro.begin:
```
store void (%f.Frame*)* @f.resume, void (%f.Frame*)** %resume.addr
store void (%f.Frame*)* @f.destroy, void (%f.Frame*)** %destroy.addr
```
In those cases where we did heap elision, but were not able to devirtualize all indirect calls, destroy call will attempt to "free" the coroutine frame stored on the stack. Oops.
Now we use select to put an appropriate coroutine subfunction in the destroy slot. As bellow:
```
store void (%f.Frame*)* @f.resume, void (%f.Frame*)** %resume.addr
%0 = select i1 %need.alloc, void (%f.Frame*)* @f.destroy, void (%f.Frame*)* @f.cleanup
store void (%f.Frame*)* %0, void (%f.Frame*)** %destroy.addr
```
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25377
llvm-svn: 283625
