We previously used the default expansion to SELECT_CC, which in turn would
expand to "LHI; BRC; LHI". In most cases it's better to use an IPM-based
sequence instead.
llvm-svn: 192784
This is really an extension of the current (shl (shr ...)) -> shl optimization.
The main difference is that certain upper bits must also not be demanded.
The motivating examples are the first two in the testcase, which occur
in llvmpipe output.
llvm-svn: 192783
This just adds the basics necessary for allocating the upper words to
virtual registers (move, load and store). The move support is parameterised
in a way that makes it easy to handle zero extensions, but the associated
zero-extend patterns are added by a later patch.
The easiest way of testing this seemed to be add a new "h" register
constraint for high words. I don't expect the constraint to be useful
in real inline asms, but it should work, so I didn't try to hide it
behind an option.
llvm-svn: 191739
Remove the command line argument "struct-path-tbaa" since we should not depend
on command line argument to decide which format the IR file is using. Instead,
we check the first operand of the tbaa tag node, if it is a MDNode, we treat
it as struct-path aware TBAA format, otherwise, we treat it as scalar TBAA
format.
When clang starts to use struct-path aware TBAA format no matter whether
struct-path-tbaa is no, and we can auto-upgrade existing bc files, the support
for scalar TBAA format can be dropped.
Existing testing cases are updated to use the struct-path aware TBAA format.
llvm-svn: 191538
The backend tries to use block operations like MVC, NC, OC and XC for
simple scalar operations. For correctness reasons, it rejects any case
in which the regions might partially overlap. However, for performance
reasons, it should also reject cases where the regions might be equal,
since the instruction might then not use the fast path.
This fixes a performance regression seen in bzip2. We may want to limit
the optimisation even more in future, or even remove it entirely, but I'll
try with this for now.
llvm-svn: 191525
The backend previously folded offsets into PC-relative addresses
whereever possible. That's the right thing to do when the address
can be used directly in a PC-relative memory reference (using things
like LRL). But if we have a register-based memory reference and need
to load the PC-relative address separately, it's better to use an anchor
point that could be shared with other accesses to the same area of the
variable.
Fixes a FIXME.
llvm-svn: 191524
For some reason I never got around to adding these at the same time as
the signed versions. No idea why.
I'm not sure whether this SystemZII::BranchC* stuff is useful, or whether
it should just be replaced with an "is normal" flag. I'll leave that
for later though.
There are some boundary conditions that can be tweaked, such as preferring
unsigned comparisons for equality with [128, 256), and "<= 255" over "< 256",
but again I'll leave those for a separate patch.
llvm-svn: 190930
The port originally had special patterns for extload, mapping them to the
same instructions as sextload. It seemed neater to have patterns that
match "an extension that is allowed to be signed" and "an extension that
is allowed to be unsigned".
This was originally meant to be a clean-up, but it does improve the handling
of promoted integers a little, as shown by args-06.ll.
llvm-svn: 190777
The main complication here is that TM and TMY (the memory forms) set
CC differently from the register forms. When the tested bits contain
some 0s and some 1s, the register forms set CC to 1 or 2 based on the
value the uppermost bit. The memory forms instead set CC to 1
regardless of the uppermost bit.
Until now, I've tried to make it so that a branch never tests for an
impossible CC value. E.g. NR only sets CC to 0 or 1, so branches on the
result will only test for 0 or 1. Originally I'd tried to do the same
thing for TM and TMY by using custom matching code in ISelDAGToDAG.
That ended up being very ugly though, and would have meant duplicating
some of the chain checks that the common isel code does.
I've therefore gone for the simpler alternative of adding an extra
operand to the TM DAG opcode to say whether a memory form would be OK.
This means that the inverse of a "TM;JE" is "TM;JNE" rather than the
more precise "TM;JNLE", just like the inverse of "TMLL;JE" is "TMLL;JNE".
I suppose that's arguably less confusing though...
llvm-svn: 190400
The architecture has many comparison instructions, including some that
extend one of the operands. The signed comparison instructions use sign
extensions and the unsigned comparison instructions use zero extensions.
In cases where we had a free choice between signed or unsigned comparisons,
we were trying to decide at lowering time which would best fit the available
instructions, taking things like extension type into account. The code
to do that was getting increasingly hairy and was also making some bad
decisions. E.g. when comparing the result of two LLCs, it is better to use
CR rather than CLR, since CR can be fused with a branch while CLR can't.
This patch removes the lowering code and instead adds an operand to
integer comparisons to say whether signed comparison is required,
whether unsigned comparison is required, or whether either is OK.
We can then leave the choice of instruction up to the normal isel code.
llvm-svn: 190138
For now this just handles simple comparisons of an ANDed value with zero.
The CC value provides enough information to do any comparison for a
2-bit mask, and some nonzero comparisons with more populated masks,
but that's all future work.
llvm-svn: 189819
For now just handles simple comparisons of an ANDed value with zero.
The CC value provides enough information to do any comparison for a
2-bit mask, and some nonzero comparisons with more populated masks,
but that's all future work.
llvm-svn: 189469
Lengths up to a certain threshold (currently 6 * 256) use a series of MVCs.
Lengths above that threshold use a loop to handle X*256 bytes followed
by a single MVC to handle the excess (if any). This loop will also be
needed in future when support for variable lengths is added.
Because the same tablegen classes are used to define MVC and CLC,
the patch also has the side-effect of defining a pseudo loop instruction
for CLC. That instruction isn't used yet (and wouldn't be handled correctly
if it were). I'm planning to use it soon though.
llvm-svn: 189331
If we had a store of an integer to memory, and the integer and store size
were suitable for a form of MV..., we used MV... no matter what. We could
then have sequences like:
lay %r2, 0(%r3,%r4)
mvi 0(%r2), 4
In these cases it seems better to force the constant into a register
and use a normal store:
lhi %r2, 4
stc %r2, 0(%r3, %r4)
since %r2 is more likely to be hoisted and is easier to rematerialize.
llvm-svn: 189098
...so that it can be used for z too. Most of the code is the same.
The only real change is to use TargetTransformInfo to test when a sqrt
instruction is available.
The pass is opt-in because at the moment it only handles sqrt.
llvm-svn: 189097
The initial port used MLG(R) for i64 UMUL_LOHI but left the other three
combinations as not-legal-or-custom. Although 32x32->{32,32}
multiplications exist, they're not as quick as doing a normal 64-bit
multiplication, so it didn't seem like i32 SMUL_LOHI and UMUL_LOHI
would be useful. There's also no direct instruction for i64 SMUL_LOHI,
so it needs to be implemented in terms of UMUL_LOHI.
However, not defining these patterns means that we don't convert
division by a constant into multiplication, so this patch fills
in the other cases. The new i64 SMUL_LOHI sequence is simpler
than the one that we used previously for 64x64->128 multiplication,
so int-mul-08.ll now tests the full sequence.
llvm-svn: 188898
SystemZTargetLowering::emitStringWrapper() previously loaded the character
into R0 before the loop and made R0 live on entry. I'd forgotten that
allocatable registers weren't allowed to be live across blocks at this stage,
and it confused LiveVariables enough to cause a miscompilation of f3 in
memchr-02.ll.
This patch instead loads R0 in the loop and leaves LICM to hoist it
after RA. This is actually what I'd tried originally, but I went for
the manual optimisation after noticing that R0 often wasn't being hoisted.
This bug forced me to go back and look at why, now fixed as r188774.
We should also try to optimize null checks so that they test the CC result
of the SRST directly. The select between null and the SRST GPR result could
then usually be deleted as dead.
llvm-svn: 188779
Post-RA LICM keeps three sets of registers: PhysRegDefs, PhysRegClobbers
and TermRegs. When it sees a definition of R it adds all aliases of R
to the corresponding set, so that when it needs to test for membership
it only needs to test a single register, rather than worrying about
aliases there too. E.g. the final candidate loop just has:
unsigned Def = Candidates[i].Def;
if (!PhysRegClobbers.test(Def) && ...) {
to test whether register Def is multiply defined.
However, there was also a shortcut in ProcessMI to make sure we didn't
add candidates if we already knew that they would fail the final test.
This shortcut was more pessimistic than the final one because it
checked whether _any alias_ of the defined register was multiply defined.
This is too conservative for targets that define register pairs.
E.g. on z, R0 and R1 are sometimes used as a pair, so there is a
128-bit register that aliases both R0 and R1. If a loop used
R0 and R1 independently, and the definition of R0 came first,
we would be able to hoist the R0 assignment (because that used
the final test quoted above) but not the R1 assignment (because
that meant we had two definitions of the paired R0/R1 register
and would fail the shortcut in ProcessMI).
This patch just uses the same check for the ProcessMI shortcut as
we use in the final candidate loop.
llvm-svn: 188774
For now this matches the equivalent of (neg (abs ...)), which did hit a few
times in projects/test-suite. We should probably also match cases where
absolute-like selects are used with reversed arguments.
llvm-svn: 188671
This first cut is pretty conservative. The final argument register (R6)
is call-saved, so we would need to make sure that the R6 argument to a
sibling call is the same as the R6 argument to the calling function,
which seems worth keeping as a separate patch.
Saying that integer truncations are free means that we no longer
use the extending instructions LGF and LLGF for spills in int-conv-09.ll
and int-conv-10.ll. Instead we treat the registers as 64 bits wide and
truncate them to 32-bits where necessary. I think it's unlikely we'd
use LGF and LLGF for spills in other situations for the same reason,
so I'm removing the tests rather than replacing them. The associated
code is generic and applies to many more instructions than just
LGF and LLGF, so there is no corresponding code removal.
llvm-svn: 188669
