The CL was originally failing due to the use of some C++14
specific features, so I've removed those. Hopefully this will
satisfy the bots.
llvm-svn: 282867
enumerate allows you to iterate over a range by pairing the
iterator's value with its index in the enumeration. This gives
you most of the benefits of using a for loop while still allowing
the range syntax.
llvm-svn: 282804
llvm::join_items is similar to llvm::join, which produces a string
by concatenating a sequence of values together separated by a
given separator. But it differs in that the arguments to
llvm::join() are same-type members of a container, whereas the
arguments to llvm::join_items are arbitrary types passed into
a variadic template. The only requirement on parameters to
llvm::join_items (including for the separator themselves) is
that they be implicitly convertible to std::string or have
an overload of std::string::operator+
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24880
llvm-svn: 282502
This adds 4 new functions to StringRef, which can be used to
take or drop characters while a certain condition is met, or
until a certain condition is met. They are:
take_while - Return characters until a condition is not met.
take_until - Return characters until a condition is met.
drop_while - Remove characters until a condition is not met.
drop_until - Remove characters until a condition is met.
Internally, all of these functions delegate to two additional
helper functions which can be used to search for the position
of a character meeting or not meeting a condition, which are:
find_if - Find the first character matching a predicate.
find_if_not - Find the first character not matching a predicate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24842
llvm-svn: 282346
Summary:
For AMDGPU, we have been using the operating system component of the triple
for specifying the low-level runtime that is being used. The rationale for
this is that the host operating system (e.g. Linux) is irrelevant for GPU code,
since its execution enviroment will be mostly controled by the low-level runtime
being used to execute the code.
In most cases, higher level languages have their own runtime which is
implemented on top of the low-level runtime. The kernel ABIs of each
language mostly depend on the low-level runtime, but there may be some
slight differences between languages. OpenCL for example, may append
additional arguments to the kernel in order to pass values like global
offsets or buffers for printf. OpenMP, HCC, or other languages may want
to add their own values which differ from OpenCL.
The reason for adding a new opencl environment type is to make it possible for the backend
to distinguish between the ABIs of the higher-level languages and handle them correctly.
It seems cleaner to use the enviroment component for this rather than creating a new
OS type for every combination of low-level runtime / high-level language.
Reviewers: Anastasia, chandlerc
Subscribers: whchung, pekka.jaaskelainen, wdng, yaxunl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24735
llvm-svn: 282218
A recent patch added support for consumeInteger() and made
getAsInteger delegate to this function. A few buildbots are
failing as a result with an assertion failure. On a hunch,
I tested what happens if I call getAsInteger() on an empty
string, and sure enough it crashes the same way that the
buildbots are crashing.
I confirmed that getAsInteger() on an empty string did not
crash before my patch, so I suspect this to be the cause.
I also added a unit test for the empty string.
llvm-svn: 282170
StringRef::getInteger() exists and treats the entire string as
an integer of the specified radix, failing if any invalid characters
are encountered or the number overflows.
Sometimes you might have something like "123456foo" and you want
to get the number 123456 and leave the string "foo" remaining.
This is similar to what would be possible by using the standard
runtime library functions strtoul et al and specifying an end
pointer.
This patch adds consumeInteger(), which does exactly that. It
consumes as much as possible until an invalid character is found,
and modifies the StringRef in place so that upon return only
the portion of the StringRef after the number remains.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24778
llvm-svn: 282164
Remove createNode() and any API that depending on it, and add
HasCreateNode to the list of checks for HasObsoleteCustomizations. Now
an ilist *never* allocates (this was already true for iplist).
This factors out all the differences between iplist and ilist. I'll aim
to rename both to "owning_ilist" eventually, to call out the interesting
(not exactly intrusive) ownership semantics. In the meantime, I've left
both names around to reduce code churn.
One of the deleted APIs is the ilist copy constructor. I've lifted up
and tested iplist::cloneFrom (ala simple_ilist::cloneFrom) as a
replacement.
Users of ilist<> and iplist<> that want the list to allocate nodes have
a few options:
- use std::list;
- use AllocatorList or BumpPtrList (or build a similarly trivial list);
- use cloneFrom (which is explicit at the call site); or
- allocate at the call site.
See r280573, r281177, r281181, and r281182 for examples of what to do if
you're updating out-of-tree code.
llvm-svn: 281184
- Add AllocatorList, a non-intrusive list that owns an LLVM-style
allocator and provides a std::list-like interface (trivially built on
top of simple_ilist),
- add a typedef (and unit tests) for BumpPtrList, and
- use BumpPtrList for the list of llvm::yaml::Token (i.e., TokenQueueT).
TokenQueueT has no need for the complexity of an intrusive list. The
only reason to inherit from ilist was to customize the allocator.
TokenQueueT was the only example in-tree of using ilist<> in a truly
non-intrusive way.
Moreover, this removes the final use of the non-intrusive
ilist_traits<>::createNode (after r280573, r281177, and r281181). I
have a WIP patch that removes this customization point (and the API that
relies on it) that I plan to commit soon.
Note: AllocatorList owns the allocator, which limits the viable API
(e.g., splicing must be on the same list). For now I've left out
any problematic API. It wouldn't be hard to split AllocatorList into
two layers: an Impl class that calls DerivedT::getAlloc (via CRTP), and
derived classes that handle Allocator ownership/reference/etc semantics;
and then implement splice with appropriate assertions; but TBH we should
probably just customize the std::list allocators at that point.
llvm-svn: 281182
This adds two declarative configuration options for intrusive lists
(available for simple_ilist, iplist, and ilist). Both of these options
affect ilist_node interoperability and need to be passed both to the
node and the list. Instead of adding a new traits class, they're
specified as optional template parameters (in any order).
The two options:
1. Pass ilist_sentinel_tracking<true> or ilist_sentinel_tracking<false>
to control whether there's a bit on ilist_node "prev" pointer
indicating whether it's the sentinel. The default behaviour is to
use a bit if and only if LLVM_ENABLE_ABI_BREAKING_CHECKS.
2. Pass ilist_tag<TagA> and ilist_tag<TagB> to allow insertion of a
single node into two different lists (simultaneously).
I have an immediate use-case for (1) ilist_sentinel_tracking: fixing the
validation semantics of MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator to match
ilist::reverse_iterator (ala r280032: see the comments at the end of the
commit message there). I'm adding (2) ilist_tag in the same commit to
validate that the options framework supports expansion. Justin Bogner
mentioned this might enable a possible cleanup in SelectionDAG, but I'll
leave this to others to explore. In the meantime, the unit tests and
the comments for simple_ilist and ilist_node have usage examples.
Note that there's a layer of indirection to support optional,
out-of-order, template paramaters. Internal classes are templated on an
instantiation of the non-variadic ilist_detail::node_options.
User-facing classes use ilist_detail::compute_node_options to compute
the correct instantiation of ilist_detail::node_options.
The comments for ilist_detail::is_valid_option describe how to add new
options (e.g., ilist_packed_int<int NumBits>).
llvm-svn: 281167
... and make a few ilist-internal API changes, in preparation for
changing how ilist_node is templated. The only effect for ilist users
should be changing the friend target from llvm::ilist_node_access to
llvm::ilist_detail::NodeAccess (which is only necessary when they
inherit privately from ilist_node).
- Split out SpecificNodeAccess, which has overloads of getNodePtr and
getValuePtr that are untemplated.
- Use more typedefs to prevent more changes later.
- Force inheritance to use *NodeAccess (to emphasize that ilist *users*
shouldn't be doing this).
There should be no functionality change here.
llvm-svn: 281142
This test was using the wrong type, and so not actually testing much.
ilist_iterator constructors weren't going through ilist_node_access, so
they didn't actually work with private inheritance.
llvm-svn: 280564
Many lists want to override only allocation semantics, or callbacks for
iplist. Split these up to prevent code duplication.
- Specialize ilist_alloc_traits to change the implementations of
deleteNode() and createNode().
- One common desire is to do nothing deleteNode() and disable
createNode(). Specialize ilist_alloc_traits to inherit from
ilist_noalloc_traits for that behaviour.
- Specialize ilist_callback_traits to use the addNodeToList(),
removeNodeFromList(), and transferNodesFromList() callbacks.
As a drive-by, add some coverage to the callback-related unit tests.
llvm-svn: 280128
Split out a new, low-level intrusive list type with clear semantics.
Unlike iplist (and ilist), all operations on simple_ilist are intrusive,
and simple_ilist never takes ownership of its nodes. This enables an
intuitive API that has the right defaults for intrusive lists.
- insert() takes references (not pointers!) to nodes (in iplist/ilist,
passing a reference will cause the node to be copied).
- erase() takes only iterators (like std::list), and does not destroy
the nodes.
- remove() takes only references and has the same behaviour as erase().
- clear() does not destroy the nodes.
- The destructor does not destroy the nodes.
- New API {erase,remove,clear}AndDispose() take an extra Disposer
functor for callsites that want to call some disposal routine (e.g.,
std::default_delete).
This list is not currently configurable, and has no callbacks.
The initial motivation was to fix iplist<>::sort to work correctly (even
with callbacks in ilist_traits<>). iplist<> uses simple_ilist<>::sort
directly. The new test in unittests/IR/ModuleTest.cpp crashes without
this commit.
Fixing sort() via a low-level layer provided a good opportunity to:
- Unit test the low-level functionality thoroughly.
- Modernize the API, largely inspired by other intrusive list
implementations.
Here's a sketch of a longer-term plan:
- Create BumpPtrList<>, a non-intrusive list implemented using
simple_ilist<>, and use it for the Token list in
lib/Support/YAMLParser.cpp. This will factor out the only real use of
createNode().
- Evolve the iplist<> and ilist<> APIs in the direction of
simple_ilist<>, making allocation/deallocation explicit at call sites
(similar to simple_ilist<>::eraseAndDispose()).
- Factor out remaining calls to createNode() and deleteNode() and remove
the customization from ilist_traits<>.
- Transition uses of iplist<>/ilist<> that don't need callbacks over to
simple_ilist<>.
llvm-svn: 280107
I'm working on a lower-level intrusive list that can be used
stand-alone, and splitting the files up a bit will make the code easier
to organize. Explode the ilist headers in advance to improve blame
lists in the future.
- Move ilist_node_base from ilist_node.h to ilist_node_base.h.
- Move ilist_base from ilist.h to ilist_base.h.
- Move ilist_iterator from ilist.h to ilist_iterator.h.
- Move ilist_node_access from ilist.h to ilist_node.h to support
ilist_iterator.
- Update unit tests to #include smaller headers.
- Clang-format the moved things.
I noticed in transit that there is a simplify_type specialization for
ilist_iterator. Since there is no longer an implicit conversion from
ilist<T>::iterator to T*, this doesn't make sense (effectively it's a
form of implicit conversion). For now I've added a FIXME.
llvm-svn: 280047
And rename the tests inside from ilistTest to IListTest. This makes the
file sort properly in the CMakeLists.txt (previously, sorting would
throw it down to the end of the list) and is consistent with the tests
I've added more recently.
Why use IListNodeBaseTest.cpp (and a test name of IListNodeBaseTest)?
- ilist_node_base_test is the obvious thing, since this is testing
ilist_node_base. However, gtest disallows underscores in test names.
- ilist_node_baseTest fails for the same reason.
- ilistNodeBaseTest is weird, because it isn't in our usual
TitleCaseTest form that we use for tests, and it also doesn't have the
name of the tested class in it.
- IlistNodeBaseTest matches TitleCaseTest, but "Ilist" is hard to read,
and really "ilist" is an abbreviation for "IntrusiveList" so the
lowercase "list" is strange.
- That left IListNodeBaseTest.
Note: I made this move in two stages, with a temporary filename of
ilistTestTemp in between in r279524. This was in the hopes of avoiding
problems on Git and SVN clients on case-insensitive filesystems,
particularly on buildbots with incremental checkouts.
llvm-svn: 280033
Reverse iterators to doubly-linked lists can be simpler (and cheaper)
than std::reverse_iterator. Make it so.
In particular, change ilist<T>::reverse_iterator so that it is *never*
invalidated unless the node it references is deleted. This matches the
guarantees of ilist<T>::iterator.
(Note: MachineBasicBlock::iterator is *not* an ilist iterator, but a
MachineInstrBundleIterator<MachineInstr>. This commit does not change
MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator, but it does update
MachineBasicBlock::reverse_instr_iterator. See note at end of commit
message for details on bundle iterators.)
Given the list (with the Sentinel showing twice for simplicity):
[Sentinel] <-> A <-> B <-> [Sentinel]
the following is now true:
1. begin() represents A.
2. begin() holds the pointer for A.
3. end() represents [Sentinel].
4. end() holds the poitner for [Sentinel].
5. rbegin() represents B.
6. rbegin() holds the pointer for B.
7. rend() represents [Sentinel].
8. rend() holds the pointer for [Sentinel].
The changes are #6 and #8. Here are some properties from the old
scheme (which used std::reverse_iterator):
- rbegin() held the pointer for [Sentinel] and rend() held the pointer
for A;
- operator*() cost two dereferences instead of one;
- converting from a valid iterator to its valid reverse_iterator
involved a confusing increment; and
- "RI++->erase()" left RI invalid. The unintuitive replacement was
"RI->erase(), RE = end()".
With vector-like data structures these properties are hard to avoid
(since past-the-beginning is not a valid pointer), and don't impose a
real cost (since there's still only one dereference, and all iterators
are invalidated on erase). But with lists, this was a poor design.
Specifically, the following code (which obviously works with normal
iterators) now works with ilist::reverse_iterator as well:
for (auto RI = L.rbegin(), RE = L.rend(); RI != RE;)
fooThatMightRemoveArgFromList(*RI++);
Converting between iterator and reverse_iterator for the same node uses
the getReverse() function.
reverse_iterator iterator::getReverse();
iterator reverse_iterator::getReverse();
Why doesn't iterator <=> reverse_iterator conversion use constructors?
In order to catch and update old code, reverse_iterator does not even
have an explicit conversion from iterator. It wouldn't be safe because
there would be no reasonable way to catch all the bugs from the changed
semantic (see the changes at call sites that are part of this patch).
Old code used this API:
std::reverse_iterator::reverse_iterator(iterator);
iterator std::reverse_iterator::base();
Here's how to update from old code to new (that incorporates the
semantic change), assuming I is an ilist<>::iterator and RI is an
ilist<>::reverse_iterator:
[Old] ==> [New]
reverse_iterator(I) (--I).getReverse()
reverse_iterator(I) ++I.getReverse()
--reverse_iterator(I) I.getReverse()
reverse_iterator(++I) I.getReverse()
RI.base() (--RI).getReverse()
RI.base() ++RI.getReverse()
--RI.base() RI.getReverse()
(++RI).base() RI.getReverse()
delete &*RI, RE = end() delete &*RI++
RI->erase(), RE = end() RI++->erase()
=======================================
Note: bundle iterators are out of scope
=======================================
MachineBasicBlock::iterator, also known as
MachineInstrBundleIterator<MachineInstr>, is a wrapper to represent
MachineInstr bundles. The idea is that each operator++ takes you to the
beginning of the next bundle. Implementing a sane reverse iterator for
this is harder than ilist. Here are the options:
- Use std::reverse_iterator<MBB::i>. Store a handle to the beginning of
the next bundle. A call to operator*() runs a loop (usually
operator--() will be called 1 time, for unbundled instructions).
Increment/decrement just works. This is the status quo.
- Store a handle to the final node in the bundle. A call to operator*()
still runs a loop, but it iterates one time fewer (usually
operator--() will be called 0 times, for unbundled instructions).
Increment/decrement just works.
- Make the ilist_sentinel<MachineInstr> *always* store that it's the
sentinel (instead of just in asserts mode). Then the bundle iterator
can sniff the sentinel bit in operator++().
I initially tried implementing the end() option as part of this commit,
but updating iterator/reverse_iterator conversion call sites was
error-prone. I have a WIP series of patches that implements the final
option.
llvm-svn: 280032
The InitializerList test had undefined behavior by creating a dangling pointer to the temporary initializer list. This patch removes the undefined behavior in the test by creating the initializer list directly.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini, dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23890
llvm-svn: 279783
I'll rename this to IListTest.cpp after a waiting period (tonight?
tomorrow?), with a full explanation in that commit.
First, I'm moving it aside because Git doesn't play well with case-only
filename changes on case-insensitive file systems (and I suspect the
same is true of SVN). This two-stage change should help to avoid
spurious failures on bots that don't do clean checkouts.
llvm-svn: 279524
Separate algorithms in iplist<T> that don't depend on T into ilist_base,
and unit test them.
While I was adding unit tests for these algorithms anyway, I also added
unit tests for ilist_node_base and ilist_sentinel<T>.
To make the algorithms and unit tests easier to write, I also did the
following minor changes as a drive-by:
- encapsulate Prev/Next in ilist_node_base to so that algorithms are
easier to read, and
- update ilist_node_access API to take nodes by reference.
There should be no real functionality change here.
llvm-svn: 279484
Summary: Before the change, *Opt never actually gets updated by the end
of toNext(), so for every next time the loop has to start over from
child_begin(). This bug doesn't affect the correctness, since Visited prevents
it from re-entering the same node again; but it's slow.
Reviewers: dberris, dblaikie, dannyb
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23649
llvm-svn: 279482
This reverts commit r279053, reapplying r278974 after fixing PR29035
with r279104.
Note that r279312 has been committed in the meantime, and this has been
rebased on top of that. Otherwise it's identical to r278974.
Note for maintainers of out-of-tree code (that I missed in the original
message): if the new isKnownSentinel() assertion is firing from
ilist_iterator<>::operator*(), this patch has identified a bug in your
code. There are a few common patterns:
- Some IR-related APIs htake an IRUnit* that might be nullptr, and pass
in an incremented iterator as an insertion point. Some old code was
using "&*++I", which in the case of end() only worked by fluke. If
the IRUnit in question inherits from ilist_node_with_parent<>, you can
use "I->getNextNode()". Otherwise, use "List.getNextNode(*I)".
- In most other cases, crashes on &*I just need to check for I==end()
before dereferencing.
- There's also occasional code that sends iterators into a function, and
then starts calling I->getOperand() (or other API). Either check for
end() before the entering the function, or early exit.
Note for if the static_assert with HasObsoleteCustomization is firing
for you:
- r278513 has examples of how to stop using custom sentinel traits.
- r278532 removed ilist_nextprev_traits since no one was using it. See
lld's r278469 for the only migration I needed to do.
Original commit message follows.
----
This removes the undefined behaviour (UB) in ilist/ilist_node/etc.,
mainly by removing (gutting) the ilist_sentinel_traits customization
point and canonicalizing on a single, efficient memory layout. This
fixes PR26753.
The new ilist is a doubly-linked circular list.
- ilist_node_base has two ilist_node_base*: Next and Prev. Size-of: two
pointers.
- ilist_node<T> (size-of: two pointers) is a type-safe wrapper around
ilist_node_base.
- ilist_iterator<T> (size-of: two pointers) operates on an
ilist_node<T>*, and downcasts to T* on dereference.
- ilist_sentinel<T> (size-of: two pointers) is a wrapper around
ilist_node<T> that has some extra API for list management.
- ilist<T> (size-of: two pointers) has an ilist_sentinel<T>, whose
address is returned for end().
The new memory layout matches ilist_half_embedded_sentinel_traits<T>
exactly. The Head pointer that previously lived in ilist<T> is
effectively glued to the ilist_half_node<T> that lived in
ilist_half_embedded_sentinel_traits<T>, becoming the Next and Prev in
the ilist_sentinel_node<T>, respectively. sizeof(ilist<T>) is now the
size of two pointers, and there is never any additional storage for a
sentinel.
This is a much simpler design for a doubly-linked list, removing most of
the corner cases of list manipulation (add, remove, etc.). In follow-up
commits, I intend to move as many algorithms as possible into a
non-templated base class (ilist_base) to reduce code size.
Moreover, this fixes the UB in ilist_iterator/getNext/getPrev
operations. Previously, ilist_iterator<T> operated on a T*, even when
the sentinel was not of type T (i.e., ilist_embedded_sentinel_traits and
ilist_half_embedded_sentinel_traits). This added UB to all operations
involving end(). Now, ilist_iterator<T> operates on an ilist_node<T>*,
and only downcasts when the full type is guaranteed to be T*.
What did we lose? There used to be a crash (in some configurations) on
++end(). Curiously (via UB), ++end() would return begin() for users of
ilist_half_embedded_sentinel_traits<T>, but otherwise ++end() would
cause a nice dependable nullptr dereference, crashing instead of a
possible infinite loop. Options:
1. Lose that behaviour.
2. Keep it, by stealing a bit from Prev in asserts builds.
3. Crash on dereference instead, using the same technique.
Hans convinced me (because of the number of problems this and r278532
exposed on Windows) that we really need some assertion here, at least in
the short term. I've opted for #3 since I think it catches more bugs.
I added only a couple of unit tests to root out specific bugs I hit
during bring-up, but otherwise this is tested implicitly via the
extensive usage throughout LLVM.
Planned follow-ups:
- Remove ilist_*sentinel_traits<T>. Here I've just gutted them to
prevent build failures in sub-projects. Once I stop referring to them
in sub-projects, I'll come back and delete them.
- Add ilist_base and move algorithms there.
- Check and fix move construction and assignment.
Eventually, there are other interesting directions:
- Rewrite reverse iterators, so that rbegin().getNodePtr()==&*rbegin().
This allows much simpler logic when erasing elements during a reverse
traversal.
- Remove ilist_traits::createNode, by deleting the remaining API that
creates nodes. Intrusive lists shouldn't be creating nodes
themselves.
- Remove ilist_traits::deleteNode, by (1) asserting that lists are empty
on destruction and (2) changing API that calls it to take a Deleter
functor (intrusive lists shouldn't be in the memory management
business).
- Reconfigure the remaining callback traits (addNodeToList, etc.) to be
higher-level, pulling out a simple_ilist<T> that is much easier to
read and understand.
- Allow tags (e.g., ilist_node<T,tag1> and ilist_node<T,tag2>) so that T
can be a member of multiple intrusive lists.
llvm-svn: 279314
This spiritually reapplies r279012 (reverted in r279052) without the
r278974 parts. The differences:
- Only the HasGetNext trait exists here, so I've only cleaned up (and
tested) it. I still added HasObsoleteCustomization since I know
this will be expanding when r278974 is reapplied.
- I changed the unit tests to use static_assert to catch problems
earlier in the build.
- I added negative tests for the type traits.
Original commit message follows.
----
Change the ilist traits to use decltype instead of sizeof, and add
HasObsoleteCustomization so that additions to this list don't
need to be added in two places.
I suspect this will now work with MSVC, since the trait tested in
r278991 seems to work. If for some reason it continues to fail on
Windows I'll follow up by adding back the #ifndef _MSC_VER.
llvm-svn: 279312
This is a little class template that just builds an inheritance chain of
empty classes. Despite how simple this is, it can be used to really
nicely create ranked overload sets. I've added a unittest as much to
document this as test it. You can pass an object of this type as an
argument to a function overload set an it will call the first viable and
enabled candidate at or below the rank of the object.
I'm planning to use this in a subsequent commit to more clearly rank
overload candidates used for SFINAE. All credit for this technique and
both lines of code here to Richard Smith who was helping me rewrite the
SFINAE check in question to much more effectively capture the intended
set of checks.
llvm-svn: 279197
This reverts commit r279086, reapplying r279084. I'm not sure what I
ran before, because the compile failure for ADTTests reproduced locally.
The problem is that TestRev is calling BidirectionalVector::rbegin()
when the BidirectionalVector is const, but rbegin() is always non-const.
I've updated BidirectionalVector::rbegin() to be callable from const.
Original commit message follows.
--
As a follow-up to r278991, add some tests that check that
decltype(reverse(R).begin()) == decltype(R.rbegin()), and get them
passing by adding std::remove_reference to has_rbegin.
I'm using static_assert instead of EXPECT_TRUE (and updated the other
has_rbegin check from r278991 in the same way) since I figure that's
more helpful.
llvm-svn: 279091
As a follow-up to r278991, add some tests that check that
decltype(reverse(R).begin()) == decltype(R.rbegin()), and get them
passing by adding std::remove_reference to has_rbegin.
I'm using static_assert instead of EXPECT_TRUE (and updated the other
has_rbegin check from r278991 in the same way) since I figure that's
more helpful.
llvm-svn: 279084
Change the ilist traits to use decltype instead of sizeof, and add
HasObsoleteCustomization so that additions to this list don't need to be
added in two places.
I suspect this will now work with MSVC, since the trait tested in
r278991 seems to work. If for some reason it continues to fail on
Windows I'll follow up by adding back the #ifndef _MSC_VER.
llvm-svn: 279012
Duncan found that reverse worked on mutable rbegin(), but the has_rbegin
trait didn't work with a const method. See http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20160815/382890.html
for more details.
Turns out this was already solved in clang with has_getDecl. Copied that and made it work for rbegin.
This includes the tests Duncan attached to that thread, including the traits test.
llvm-svn: 278991
This removes the undefined behaviour (UB) in ilist/ilist_node/etc.,
mainly by removing (gutting) the ilist_sentinel_traits customization
point and canonicalizing on a single, efficient memory layout. This
fixes PR26753.
The new ilist is a doubly-linked circular list.
- ilist_node_base has two ilist_node_base*: Next and Prev. Size-of: two
pointers.
- ilist_node<T> (size-of: two pointers) is a type-safe wrapper around
ilist_node_base.
- ilist_iterator<T> (size-of: two pointers) operates on an
ilist_node<T>*, and downcasts to T* on dereference.
- ilist_sentinel<T> (size-of: two pointers) is a wrapper around
ilist_node<T> that has some extra API for list management.
- ilist<T> (size-of: two pointers) has an ilist_sentinel<T>, whose
address is returned for end().
The new memory layout matches ilist_half_embedded_sentinel_traits<T>
exactly. The Head pointer that previously lived in ilist<T> is
effectively glued to the ilist_half_node<T> that lived in
ilist_half_embedded_sentinel_traits<T>, becoming the Next and Prev in
the ilist_sentinel_node<T>, respectively. sizeof(ilist<T>) is now the
size of two pointers, and there is never any additional storage for a
sentinel.
This is a much simpler design for a doubly-linked list, removing most of
the corner cases of list manipulation (add, remove, etc.). In follow-up
commits, I intend to move as many algorithms as possible into a
non-templated base class (ilist_base) to reduce code size.
Moreover, this fixes the UB in ilist_iterator/getNext/getPrev
operations. Previously, ilist_iterator<T> operated on a T*, even when
the sentinel was not of type T (i.e., ilist_embedded_sentinel_traits and
ilist_half_embedded_sentinel_traits). This added UB to all operations
involving end(). Now, ilist_iterator<T> operates on an ilist_node<T>*,
and only downcasts when the full type is guaranteed to be T*.
What did we lose? There used to be a crash (in some configurations) on
++end(). Curiously (via UB), ++end() would return begin() for users of
ilist_half_embedded_sentinel_traits<T>, but otherwise ++end() would
cause a nice dependable nullptr dereference, crashing instead of a
possible infinite loop. Options:
1. Lose that behaviour.
2. Keep it, by stealing a bit from Prev in asserts builds.
3. Crash on dereference instead, using the same technique.
Hans convinced me (because of the number of problems this and r278532
exposed on Windows) that we really need some assertion here, at least in
the short term. I've opted for #3 since I think it catches more bugs.
I added only a couple of unit tests to root out specific bugs I hit
during bring-up, but otherwise this is tested implicitly via the
extensive usage throughout LLVM.
Planned follow-ups:
- Remove ilist_*sentinel_traits<T>. Here I've just gutted them to
prevent build failures in sub-projects. Once I stop referring to them
in sub-projects, I'll come back and delete them.
- Add ilist_base and move algorithms there.
- Check and fix move construction and assignment.
Eventually, there are other interesting directions:
- Rewrite reverse iterators, so that rbegin().getNodePtr()==&*rbegin().
This allows much simpler logic when erasing elements during a reverse
traversal.
- Remove ilist_traits::createNode, by deleting the remaining API that
creates nodes. Intrusive lists shouldn't be creating nodes
themselves.
- Remove ilist_traits::deleteNode, by (1) asserting that lists are empty
on destruction and (2) changing API that calls it to take a Deleter
functor (intrusive lists shouldn't be in the memory management
business).
- Reconfigure the remaining callback traits (addNodeToList, etc.) to be
higher-level, pulling out a simple_ilist<T> that is much easier to
read and understand.
- Allow tags (e.g., ilist_node<T,tag1> and ilist_node<T,tag2>) so that T
can be a member of multiple intrusive lists.
llvm-svn: 278974
Now the tests of TargetParser is in place:
unittests/Support/TargetParserTest.cpp.
So the tests in TripleTest.cpp which actually stressing TargetParser's behavior could be removed.
llvm-svn: 278899
These splices are interesting because they involve swapping two nodes in
the same list. There are two ways to do this. Assuming:
A -> B -> [Sentinel]
You can either:
- splice B before A, with: L.splice(A, L, B) or
- splice A before Sentinel, with: L.splice(L.end(), L, A) to create:
B -> A -> [Sentinel]
These two swapping-splices are somewhat interesting corner cases for
maintaining the list invariants. The tests pass even with my new ilist
implementation, but I had some doubts about the latter when I was
looking at weird UB effects. Since I can't find equivalent explicit
test coverage elsewhere it seems prudent to commit.
llvm-svn: 278887
