1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2025-01-31 20:51:52 +01:00

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Michael Kruse
4625d98371 Revert "[AssumptionCache] Avoid dangling llvm.assume calls in the cache"
This reverts commit b7d870eae7fdadcf10d0f177faa7409c2e37d776 and the
subsequent fix "[Polly] Fix build after AssumptionCache change (D96168)"
(commit e6810cab09fcbc87b6e5e4d226de0810e2f2ea38).

It caused indeterminism in the output, such that e.g. the
polly-x86_64-linux buildbot failed accasionally.
2021-02-11 12:17:38 -06:00
Johannes Doerfert
543c96c937 [AssumptionCache] Avoid dangling llvm.assume calls in the cache
PR49043 exposed a problem when it comes to RAUW llvm.assumes. While
D96106 would fix it for GVNSink, it seems a more general concern. To
avoid future problems this patch moves away from the vector of weak
reference model used in the assumption cache. Instead, we track the
llvm.assume calls with a callback handle which will remove itself from
the cache if the call is deleted.

Fixes PR49043.

Reviewed By: nikic

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96168
2021-02-06 12:18:39 -06:00
Daniel Jasper
4c6537eccb Add files I seem to have dropped in my revert (r290086).
Sorry!

llvm-svn: 290087
2016-12-19 08:32:13 +00:00
Hal Finkel
f224db75d2 Remove the AssumptionCache
After r289755, the AssumptionCache is no longer needed. Variables affected by
assumptions are now found by using the new operand-bundle-based scheme. This
new scheme is more computationally efficient, and also we need much less
code...

llvm-svn: 289756
2016-12-15 03:02:15 +00:00
Chandler Carruth
0147c610be [PM] Actually add the new pass manager support for the assumption cache.
I had already factored this analysis specifically to enable doing this,
but hadn't actually committed the necessary wiring to get at this from
the new pass manager. This also nicely shows how the separate cache
object can be directly managed by the new pass manager.

This analysis didn't have any direct tests and so I've added a printer
pass and a boring test case. I chose to print the i1 value which is
being assumed rather than the call to llvm.assume as that seems much
more useful for testing... but suggestions on an even better printing
strategy welcome. My main goal was to make sure things actually work. =]

llvm-svn: 226868
2015-01-22 21:53:09 +00:00