Summary: Add SaturatingMultiplyAdd convenience function template since A + (X * Y) comes up frequently when doing weighted arithmetic.
Reviewers: davidxl, silvas
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15385
llvm-svn: 257532
A request has been made to the official registry, but an official value is
not yet available. This patch uses a temporary value in order to support
development. When an official value is recieved, the value of EM_WEBASSEMBLY
will be updated.
llvm-svn: 257517
Summary:
This fixes three bugs, in all of which state is not or incorrecly reset between
objects (i.e. when reusing the same pass manager to create multiple object
files):
1) AttributeSection needs to be reset to nullptr, because otherwise the backend
will try to emit into the old object file's attribute section causing a
segmentation fault.
2) MappingSymbolCounter needs to be reset, otherwise the second object file
will start where the first one left off.
3) The MCStreamer base class resets the Streamer's e_flags settings. Since
EF_ARM_EABI_VER5 is set on streamer creation, we need to set it again
after the MCStreamer was rest.
Also rename Reset (uppser case) to EHReset to avoid confusion with
reset (lower case).
Reviewers: rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15950
llvm-svn: 257473
handlers.
It is expected that RPC handlers will usually be member functions. Accepting them
directly in handle and expect allows for the remove of a lot of lambdas an
explicit error variables.
This patch also uses this new feature to substantially tidy up the
OrcRemoteTargetServer class.
llvm-svn: 257452
Since function definitions are not loaded into the address space, PT_LOAD is
inappropriate. PT_WEBASSEMBLY_FUNCTIONS is used to identify where the function
definitions are so that they can be processed at program startup time.
llvm-svn: 257436
Currently WebAssembly has two kinds of relocations; data addresses and
function addresses. This adds ELF relocations for them, as well as an
MC symbol kind to indicate which type of relocation is needed.
llvm-svn: 257416
Address review feedback from r255909.
Move body of resolveCycles(bool AllowTemps) to
resolveRecursivelyImpl(bool AllowTemps). Revert resolveCycles back
to asserting on temps, and add new resolveNonTemporaries interface
to invoke the new implementation with AllowTemps=true. Document
the differences between these interfaces, specifically the effect
on RAUW support and uniquing. Call appropriate interface from
ValueMapper.
llvm-svn: 257389
When asan is enabled, we poison slabs as we allocate them, and only unpoison the pieces
we need from the slab.
However, in Reset, we were failing to reset the state of the slab back to being poisoned.
Patch by b17 c0de.
llvm-svn: 257388
After these revisions, for arm targets, the -mcpu=xscale option caused
an error: "the clang compiler does not support '-mcpu=xscale'". Adding
"v5e" as a SUB_ARCH in ARMTargetParser.def helps.
Submitted by: Andrew Turner
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16043
llvm-svn: 257376
I'm still seeing GCC ICE locally, but figured I'd throw this at the wall
& see if it sticks for the bots at least. Will continue investigating
the ICE in any case.
llvm-svn: 257367
The new ORC remote-JITing support provides a superset of the old code's
functionality, so we can replace the old stuff. As a bonus, a couple of
previously XFAILed tests have started passing.
llvm-svn: 257343
This patch adds utilities to ORC for managing a remote JIT target. It consists
of:
1. A very primitive RPC system for making calls over a byte-stream. See
RPCChannel.h, RPCUtils.h.
2. An RPC API defined in the above system for managing memory, looking up
symbols, creating stubs, etc. on a remote target. See OrcRemoteTargetRPCAPI.h.
3. An interface for creating high-level JIT components (memory managers,
callback managers, stub managers, etc.) that operate over the RPC API. See
OrcRemoteTargetClient.h.
4. A helper class for building servers that can handle the RPC calls. See
OrcRemoteTargetServer.h.
The system is designed to work neatly with the existing ORC components and
functionality. In particular, the ORC callback API (and consequently the
CompileOnDemandLayer) is supported, enabling lazy compilation of remote code.
Assuming this doesn't trigger any builder failures, a follow-up patch will be
committed which tests these utilities by using them to replace LLI's existing
remote-JITing demo code.
llvm-svn: 257305
This is a more generic version of the MCJITMemoryManager::notifyObjectLoaded
method: It provides only a RuntimeDyld reference (rather than an
ExecutionEngine), and so can be used with ORC JIT stacks.
llvm-svn: 257296
RuntimeDyld::MemoryManager.
The RuntimeDyld::MemoryManager::reserveAllocationSpace method is called when
object files are loaded, and gives clients a chance to pre-allocate memory for
all segments. Previously only the size of each segment (code, ro-data, rw-data)
was supplied but not the alignment. This hasn't caused any problems so far, as
most clients allocate via the MemoryBlock interface which returns page-aligned
blocks. Adding alignment arguments enables finer grained allocation while still
satisfying alignment restrictions.
llvm-svn: 257294
MSVC seems to have problems looking up Value inside of the template. Not
really sure whether that's a bug there or Clang and GCC being too
permissive.
llvm-svn: 257288
type.
This makes it easy and safe to use a set of flags as one elmenet of
a tagged union with pointers. There is quite a bit of code that has
historically done this by casting arbitrary integers to "pointers" and
assuming that this was safe and reliable. It is neither, and has started
to rear its head by triggering safety asserts in various abstractions
like PointerLikeTypeTraits when the integers chosen are invariably poor
choices for *some* platform and *some* situation. Not to mention the
(hopefully unlikely) prospect of one of these integers actually getting
allocated!
With this, it will be straightforward to build type safe abstractions
like this without being error prone. The abstraction itself is also
remarkably simple thanks to the implicit conversion.
This use case and pattern was also independently created by the folks
working on Swift, and they're going to incrementally add any missing
functionality they find.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15844
llvm-svn: 257284
This is a much more general and powerful form of PointerUnion. It
provides a reasonably complete sum type (from type theory) for
pointer-like types. It has several significant advantages over the
existing PointerUnion infrastructure:
1) It allows more than two pointer types to participate without awkward
nesting structures.
2) It directly exposes the tag so that it is convenient to write
switches over the possible members.
3) It can re-use the same type for multiple tag values, something that
has been worked around by either abusing PointerIntPair or defining
nonce types and doing unsafe pointer casting.
4) It supports customization of the PointerLikeTypeTraits used for
specific member types. This means it could (in theory) be used even
with types that are over-aligned on allocation to expose larger
numbers of bits to the tag.
All in all, I think it is at least complimentary to the existing
infrastructure, and a strict improvement for some use cases.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15843
llvm-svn: 257282
