1
0
mirror of https://github.com/RPCS3/llvm-mirror.git synced 2024-10-30 15:32:52 +01:00
Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jakob Stoklund Olesen
e6574db283 Don't kill the base register when expanding strd.
When an strd instruction doesn't get the registers it wants, it can be
expanded into two str instructions. Make sure the first str doesn't kill
the base register in the case where the base and data registers are
identical:

  t2STRi12 %R0<kill>, %R0, 4, pred:14, pred:%noreg
  t2STRi12 %R2<kill>, %R0, 8, pred:14, pred:%noreg

<rdar://problem/11101911>

llvm-svn: 153611
2012-03-28 23:07:03 +00:00
Jakob Stoklund Olesen
7623979dd6 Spill DPair registers, not just QPR.
The arm_neon intrinsics can create virtual registers from the DPair
register class which allows both even-odd and odd-even D-register pairs.

This fixes PR12389.

llvm-svn: 153603
2012-03-28 21:20:32 +00:00
Bob Wilson
c01101e76c Add alignment arguments to all the NEON load/store intrinsics.
Update all the tests using those intrinsics and add support for
auto-upgrading bitcode files with the old versions of the intrinsics.

llvm-svn: 112271
2010-08-27 17:13:24 +00:00
Jakob Stoklund Olesen
3f0825f966 TwoAddressInstructionPass::CoalesceExtSubRegs can insert INSERT_SUBREG
instructions, but it doesn't really understand live ranges, so the first
INSERT_SUBREG uses an implicitly defined register.

Fix it in LiveVariableAnalysis by adding the <undef> flag.

llvm-svn: 106333
2010-06-18 22:29:44 +00:00
Jakob Stoklund Olesen
4f5d1d7004 Allow a register to be redefined multiple times in a basic block.
LiveVariableAnalysis was a bit picky about a register only being redefined once,
but that really isn't necessary.

Here is an example of chained INSERT_SUBREGs that we can handle now:

68      %reg1040<def> = INSERT_SUBREG %reg1040, %reg1028<kill>, 14
                register: %reg1040 +[70,134:0)
76      %reg1040<def> = INSERT_SUBREG %reg1040, %reg1029<kill>, 13
                register: %reg1040 replace range with [70,78:1) RESULT: %reg1040,0.000000e+00 = [70,78:1)[78,134:0)  0@78-(134) 1@70-(78)
84      %reg1040<def> = INSERT_SUBREG %reg1040, %reg1030<kill>, 12
                register: %reg1040 replace range with [78,86:2) RESULT: %reg1040,0.000000e+00 = [70,78:1)[78,86:2)[86,134:0)  0@86-(134) 1@70-(78) 2@78-(86)
92      %reg1040<def> = INSERT_SUBREG %reg1040, %reg1031<kill>, 11
                register: %reg1040 replace range with [86,94:3) RESULT: %reg1040,0.000000e+00 = [70,78:1)[78,86:2)[86,94:3)[94,134:0)  0@94-(134) 1@70-(78) 2@78-(86) 3@86-(94)

rdar://problem/8096390

llvm-svn: 106152
2010-06-16 21:29:40 +00:00