This was done with the following sed invocation to catch label lines demarking function boundaries:
sed -i '' "s/^;\( *\)\([A-Z0-9_]*\):\( *\)test\([A-Za-z0-9_-]*\):\( *\)$/;\1\2-LABEL:\3test\4:\5/g" test/CodeGen/*/*.ll
which was written conservatively to avoid false positives rather than false negatives. I scanned through all the changes and everything looks correct.
llvm-svn: 186258
memory intrinsics in the SDAG builder.
When alignment is zero, the lang ref says that *no* alignment
assumptions can be made. This is the exact opposite of the internal API
contracts of the DAG where alignment 0 indicates that the alignment can
be made to be anything desired.
There is another, more explicit alignment that is better suited for the
role of "no alignment at all": an alignment of 1. Map the intrinsic
alignment to this early so that we don't end up generating aligned DAGs.
It is really terrifying that we've never seen this before, but we
suddenly started generating a large number of alignment 0 memcpys due to
the new code to do memcpy-based copying of POD class members. That patch
contains a bug that rounds bitfield alignments down when they are the
first field. This can in turn produce zero alignments.
This fixes weird crashes I've seen in library users of LLVM on 32-bit
hosts, etc.
llvm-svn: 176022
I really need to find a way to automate this, but I can't come up with a regex
that has no false positives while handling tricky cases like custom check
prefixes.
llvm-svn: 162097
The theory is it's still faster than a pair of movq / a quad of movl. This
will probably hurt older chips like P4 but should run faster on current
and future Intel processors. rdar://8817010
llvm-svn: 122955
up freebsd bootloader. However, this doesn't make much sense for Darwin, whose
-Os is meant to optimize for size only if it doesn't hurt performance.
rdar://8821501
llvm-svn: 122936
that are too large. This causes the freebsd bootloader to be too
large apparently.
It's unclear if this should be an -Os or -Oz thing. Thoughts welcome.
llvm-svn: 105228
The only generated code difference is that now we call memcpy when
the size of the array is unknown. This matches GCC behavior and is
better since the run time value can be arbitrarily large.
llvm-svn: 42433
