In the original version of the patch the behaviour was like described in
the comment. This behaviour was changed before committing it without
updating the comment.
llvm-svn: 213117
Fix a crash in `InstCombiner::Descale()` when a multiply-by-zero gets
created as an argument to a GEP partway through an iteration, causing
-instcombine to optimize the GEP before the multiply.
rdar://problem/17615671
llvm-svn: 212742
isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute can optionally take a DataLayout pointer. In the
past, this was mainly used to make better decisions regarding divisions known
not to trap, and so was not all that important for users concerned with "cheap"
instructions. However, now it also helps look through bitcasts for
dereferencable loads, and will also be important if/when we add a
dereferencable pointer attribute.
This is some initial work to feed a DataLayout pointer through to callers of
isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute, generally where one was already available.
llvm-svn: 212720
In PR20059 ( http://llvm.org/pr20059 ), instcombine eliminates shuffles that are necessary before performing an operation that can trap (srem).
This patch calls isSafeToSpeculativelyExecute() and bails out of the optimization in SimplifyVectorOp() if needed.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4424
llvm-svn: 212629
This patch reduces the stack memory consumption of the InstCombine
function "isOnlyCopiedFromConstantGlobal() ", that in certain conditions
could overflow the stack because of excessive recursiveness.
For example, in a case like this:
%0 = alloca [50025 x i32], align 4
%1 = getelementptr inbounds [50025 x i32]* %0, i64 0, i64 0
store i32 0, i32* %1
%2 = getelementptr inbounds i32* %1, i64 1
store i32 1, i32* %2
%3 = getelementptr inbounds i32* %2, i64 1
store i32 2, i32* %3
%4 = getelementptr inbounds i32* %3, i64 1
store i32 3, i32* %4
%5 = getelementptr inbounds i32* %4, i64 1
store i32 4, i32* %5
%6 = getelementptr inbounds i32* %5, i64 1
store i32 5, i32* %6
...
This piece of code crashes llvm when trying to apply instcombine on
desktop. On embedded devices this could happen with a much lower limit
of recursiveness. Some instructions (getelementptr and bitcasts) make
the function recursively call itself on their uses, which is what makes
the example above consume so much stack (it becomes a recursive
depth-first tree visit with a very big depth).
The patch changes the algorithm to be semantically equivalent, but
iterative instead of recursive and the visiting order to be from a
depth-first visit to a breadth-first visit (visit all the instructions
of the current level before the ones of the next one).
Now if a lot of memory is required a heap allocation is done instead of
the the stack allocation, avoiding the possible crash.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4355
Patch by Marcello Maggioni! We don't generally commit large stress test
that look for out of memory conditions, so I didn't request that one be
added to the patch.
llvm-svn: 212133
This patch enables transforms for
(x + (~(y | c) + 1) --> x - (y | c) if c is odd
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4210
llvm-svn: 211881
This patch enables transforms for
(x + (~(y | c) + 1) --> x - (y | c) if c is even
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4209
llvm-svn: 211765
This patch enables transforms for following patterns.
(x + (~(y & c) + 1) --> x - (y & c)
(x + (~((y >> z) & c) + 1) --> x - ((y>>z) & c)
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3733
llvm-svn: 211266
* Find factorization opportunities using identity values.
* Find factorization opportunities by treating shl(X, C) as mul (X, shl(C))
* Keep NSW flag while simplifying instruction using factorization.
This fixes PR19263.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3799
llvm-svn: 211261
InstCombineMulDivRem has:
// Canonicalize (X+C1)*CI -> X*CI+C1*CI.
InstCombineAddSub has:
// W*X + Y*Z --> W * (X+Z) iff W == Y
These two transforms could fight with each other if C1*CI would not fold
away to something simpler than a ConstantExpr mul.
The InstCombineMulDivRem transform only acted on ConstantInts until
r199602 when it was changed to operate on all Constants in order to
let it fire on ConstantVectors.
To fix this, make this transform more careful by checking to see if we
actually folded away C1*CI.
This fixes PR20079.
llvm-svn: 211258
These will be used for custom lowering and for library
implementations of various math functions, so it's useful
to expose these as builtins.
llvm-svn: 211247
Summary:
As a starting step, we only use one simple heuristic: if the sign bits
of both a and b are zero, we can prove "add a, b" do not unsigned
overflow, and thus convert it to "add nuw a, b".
Updated all affected tests and added two new tests (@zero_sign_bit and
@zero_sign_bit2) in AddOverflow.ll
Test Plan: make check-all
Reviewers: eliben, rafael, meheff, chandlerc
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Subscribers: chandlerc, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4144
llvm-svn: 211084
As a follow-up to r210375 which canonicalizes addrspacecast
instructions, this patch canonicalizes addrspacecast constant
expressions.
Given clang uses ConstantExpr::getAddrSpaceCast to emit addrspacecast
cosntant expressions, this patch is also a step towards having the
frontend emit canonicalized addrspacecasts.
Piggyback a minor refactor in InstCombineCasts.cpp
Update three affected tests in addrspacecast-alias.ll,
access-non-generic.ll and constant-fold-gep.ll and added one new test in
constant-fold-address-space-pointer.ll
llvm-svn: 211004
The messages were
"PR19753: Optimize comparisons with "ashr exact" of a constanst."
"Added support to optimize comparisons with "lshr exact" of a constant."
They were not correctly handling signed/unsigned operation differences,
causing pr19958.
llvm-svn: 210393
addrspacecast X addrspace(M)* to Y addrspace(N)*
-->
bitcast X addrspace(M)* to Y addrspace(M)*
addrspacecast Y addrspace(M)* to Y addrspace(N)*
Updat all affected tests and add several new tests in addrspacecast.ll.
This patch is based on http://reviews.llvm.org/D2186 (authored by Matt
Arsenault) with fixes and more tests.
llvm-svn: 210375
As discussed in cfe commit r210279, the correct little-endian
semantics for the vec_perm Altivec interfaces are implemented by
reversing the order of the input vectors and complementing the permute
control vector. This converts the desired permute from little endian
element order into the big endian element order that the underlying
PowerPC vperm instruction uses. This is represented with a
ppc_altivec_vperm intrinsic function.
The instruction combining pass contains code to convert a
ppc_altivec_vperm intrinsic into a vector shuffle operation when the
intrinsic has a permute control vector (mask) that is a constant.
However, the vector shuffle operation assumes that vector elements are
in natural order for their endianness, so for little endian code we
will get the wrong result with the existing transformation.
This patch reverses the semantic change to vec_perm that was performed
in altivec.h by once again swapping the input operands and
complementing the permute control vector, returning the element
ordering to little endian.
The correctness of this code is tested by the new perm.c test added in
a previous patch, and by other tests in the test suite that fail
without this patch.
llvm-svn: 210282
This patch implements two things:
1. If we know one number is positive and another is negative, we return true as
signed addition of two opposite signed numbers will never overflow.
2. Implemented TODO : If one of the operands only has one non-zero bit, and if
the other operand has a known-zero bit in a more significant place than it
(not including the sign bit) the ripple may go up to and fill the zero, but
won't change the sign. e.x - (x & ~4) + 1
We make sure that we are ignoring 0 at MSB.
Patch by Suyog Sarda.
llvm-svn: 210186
The code was actually correct. Sorry for the confusion. I have expanded the
comment saying why the analysis is valid to avoid me misunderstaning it
again in the future.
llvm-svn: 210052
if ((x & C) == 0) x |= C becomes x |= C
if ((x & C) != 0) x ^= C becomes x &= ~C
if ((x & C) == 0) x ^= C becomes x |= C
if ((x & C) != 0) x &= ~C becomes x &= ~C
if ((x & C) == 0) x &= ~C becomes nothing
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3777
llvm-svn: 210006
original fix would actually trigger the *exact* same crasher as the
original bug for a different reason. Awesomesauce.
Working on test cases now, but wanted to get bots healthier.
llvm-svn: 209860
across PHI nodes. The code was computing the Idxs from the 'GEP'
variable's indices when what it wanted was Op1's indices. This caused an
ASan heap-overflow for me that pin pointed the issue when Op1 had more
indices than GEP did. =] I'll let Louis add a specific test case for
this if he wants.
llvm-svn: 209857
Currently LLVM will generally merge GEPs. This allows backends to use more
complex addressing modes. In some cases this is not happening because there
is PHI inbetween the two GEPs:
GEP1--\
|-->PHI1-->GEP3
GEP2--/
This patch checks to see if GEP1 and GEP2 are similiar enough that they can be
cloned (GEP12) in GEP3's BB, allowing GEP->GEP merging (GEP123):
GEP1--\ --\ --\
|-->PHI1-->GEP3 ==> |-->PHI2->GEP12->GEP3 == > |-->PHI2->GEP123
GEP2--/ --/ --/
This also breaks certain use chains that are preventing GEP->GEP merges that the
the existing instcombine would merge otherwise.
Tests included.
llvm-svn: 209843
Currently LLVM will generally merge GEPs. This allows backends to use more
complex addressing modes. In some cases this is not happening because there
is PHI inbetween the two GEPs:
GEP1--\
|-->PHI1-->GEP3
GEP2--/
This patch checks to see if GEP1 and GEP2 are similiar enough that they can be
cloned (GEP12) in GEP3's BB, allowing GEP->GEP merging (GEP123):
GEP1--\ --\ --\
|-->PHI1-->GEP3 ==> |-->PHI2->GEP12->GEP3 == > |-->PHI2->GEP123
GEP2--/ --/ --/
This also breaks certain use chains that are preventing GEP->GEP merges that the
the existing instcombine would merge otherwise.
Tests included.
llvm-svn: 209755
