There is no situation where this rarely-used argument cannot be
substituted with a DIExpression and removing it allows us to simplify
the DWARF backend. Note that this patch does not yet remove any of
the newly dead code.
rdar://problem/33580047
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35951
llvm-svn: 309426
Summary: Continuing the work from https://reviews.llvm.org/D33240, this change introduces an element unordered-atomic memset intrinsic. This intrinsic is essentially memset with the implementation requirement that all stores used for the assignment are done with unordered-atomic stores of a given element size.
Reviewers: eli.friedman, reames, mkazantsev, skatkov
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: jfb, dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, aheejin, efriedma, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34885
llvm-svn: 307854
Summary: Continuing the work from https://reviews.llvm.org/D33240, this change introduces an element unordered-atomic memmove intrinsic. This intrinsic is essentially memmove with the implementation requirement that all loads/stores used for the copy are done with unordered-atomic loads/stores of a given element size.
Reviewers: eli.friedman, reames, mkazantsev, skatkov
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34884
llvm-svn: 307796
OpenCL 2.0 introduces the notion of memory scopes in atomic operations to
global and local memory. These scopes restrict how synchronization is
achieved, which can result in improved performance.
This change extends existing notion of synchronization scopes in LLVM to
support arbitrary scopes expressed as target-specific strings, in addition to
the already defined scopes (single thread, system).
The LLVM IR and MIR syntax for expressing synchronization scopes has changed
to use *syncscope("<scope>")*, where <scope> can be "singlethread" (this
replaces *singlethread* keyword), or a target-specific name. As before, if
the scope is not specified, it defaults to CrossThread/System scope.
Implementation details:
- Mapping from synchronization scope name/string to synchronization scope id
is stored in LLVM context;
- CrossThread/System and SingleThread scopes are pre-defined to efficiently
check for known scopes without comparing strings;
- Synchronization scope names are stored in SYNC_SCOPE_NAMES_BLOCK in
the bitcode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21723
llvm-svn: 307722
Also document the attribute, since "probe-stack" already is.
Reviewed By: majnemer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34528
llvm-svn: 306069
This attribute is used to ensure the guard page is triggered on stack
overflow. Stack frames larger than the guard page size will generate
a call to __probestack to touch each page so the guard page won't
be skipped.
Reviewed By: majnemer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34386
llvm-svn: 305939
Summary:
Background: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-May/112779.html
This change is to alter the prototype for the atomic memcpy intrinsic. The prototype itself is being changed to more closely resemble the semantics and parameters of the llvm.memcpy intrinsic -- to ease later combination of the llvm.memcpy and atomic memcpy intrinsics. Furthermore, the name of the atomic memcpy intrinsic is being changed to make it clear that it is not a generic atomic memcpy, but specifically a memcpy is unordered atomic.
Reviewers: reames, sanjoy, efriedma
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, anna, llvm-commits, skatkov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33240
llvm-svn: 305558
Summary:
Points to existing documentation for branch_weights and
function_entry_count, and adds an example for VP value profile metadata.
Reviewers: davidxl, reames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34218
llvm-svn: 305475
Summary:
This patch is part of 3 patches that together form a single patch, but must be introduced in stages in order not to break things.
The way that LLVM interprets DW_OP_plus in DIExpression nodes is basically that of the DW_OP_plus_uconst operator since LLVM expects an unsigned constant operand. This unnecessarily restricts the DW_OP_plus operator, preventing it from being used to describe the evaluation of runtime values on the expression stack. These patches try to align the semantics of DW_OP_plus and DW_OP_minus with that of the DWARF definition, which pops two elements off the expression stack, performs the operation and pushes the result back on the stack.
This is done in three stages:
• The first patch (LLVM) adds support for DW_OP_plus_uconst.
• The second patch (Clang) contains changes all its uses from DW_OP_plus to DW_OP_plus_uconst.
• The third patch (LLVM) changes the semantics of DW_OP_plus and DW_OP_minus to be in line with its DWARF meaning. This patch includes the bitcode upgrade from legacy DIExpressions.
Patch by Sander de Smalen.
Reviewers: echristo, pcc, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: fhahn, javed.absar, aprantl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33894
llvm-svn: 305386
Summary:
This patch is part of 3 patches that together form a single patch, but must be introduced in stages in order not to break things.
The way that LLVM interprets DW_OP_plus in DIExpression nodes is basically that of the DW_OP_plus_uconst operator since LLVM expects an unsigned constant operand. This unnecessarily restricts the DW_OP_plus operator, preventing it from being used to describe the evaluation of runtime values on the expression stack. These patches try to align the semantics of DW_OP_plus and DW_OP_minus with that of the DWARF definition, which pops two elements off the expression stack, performs the operation and pushes the result back on the stack.
This is done in three stages:
• The first patch (LLVM) adds support for DW_OP_plus_uconst.
• The second patch (Clang) contains changes all its uses from DW_OP_plus to DW_OP_plus_uconst.
• The third patch (LLVM) changes the semantics of DW_OP_plus and DW_OP_minus to be in line with its DWARF meaning. This patch includes the bitcode upgrade from legacy DIExpressions.
Patch by Sander de Smalen.
Reviewers: pcc, echristo, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: fhahn, aprantl, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33892
llvm-svn: 305304
Some InstCombine optimizations already rely on the result being poison
rather than undef.
For example, the following rewrite is wrong if undef is used:
; (1 << Y) * X -> X << Y
%Op0 = shl 1, %Y
%r = mul %Op0, %Op1
=>
%r = shl %Op1, %Y
ERROR: Mismatch in values for i4 %r
Example:
i4 %Y = 0x8 (8, -8)
i4 %Op0 = 0x0 (0)
i4 %Op1 = 0x0 (0)
source: 0x0 (0)
target: 0x1 (1)
The optimization is correct if poison is returned instead:
http://rise4fun.com/Alive/ygX
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33654
llvm-svn: 304780
This patch extends llvm-ir to allow attributes to be set on global variables.
An RFC was sent out earlier by my colleague James Molloy: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2017-March/053100.html
A key part of that proposal was to extend LLVM-IR to carry attributes on global variables.
This generic feature could be useful for multiple purposes.
In our present context, it would be useful to carry user specified sections for bss/rodata/data.
Reviewed by: Jonathan Roelofs, Reid Kleckner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32009
llvm-svn: 302794
- This change allows targets to opt-in to using them instead of the log2
shufflevector algorithm.
- The SLP and Loop vectorizers have the common code to do shuffle reductions
factored out into LoopUtils, and now have a unified interface for generating
reductions regardless of the preference of the target. LoopUtils now uses TTI
to determine what kind of reductions the target wants to handle.
- For CodeGen, basic legalization support is added.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30086
llvm-svn: 302514
Fixes PR31789 - When loop-vectorize tries to use these intrinsics for a
non-default address space pointer we fail with a "Calling a function with a
bad singature!" assertion. This patch solves this by adding the 'vector of
pointers' argument as an overloaded type which will determine the address
space.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31490
llvm-svn: 302018
The DWARF specification knows 3 kinds of non-empty simple location
descriptions:
1. Register location descriptions
- describe a variable in a register
- consist of only a DW_OP_reg
2. Memory location descriptions
- describe the address of a variable
3. Implicit location descriptions
- describe the value of a variable
- end with DW_OP_stack_value & friends
The existing DwarfExpression code is pretty much ignorant of these
restrictions. This used to not matter because we only emitted very
short expressions that we happened to get right by accident. This
patch makes DwarfExpression aware of the rules defined by the DWARF
standard and now chooses the right kind of location description for
each expression being emitted.
This would have been an NFC commit (for the existing testsuite) if not
for the way that clang describes captured block variables. Based on
how the previous code in LLVM emitted locations, DW_OP_deref
operations that should have come at the end of the expression are put
at its beginning. Fixing this means changing the semantics of
DIExpression, so this patch bumps the version number of DIExpression
and implements a bitcode upgrade.
There are two major changes in this patch:
I had to fix the semantics of dbg.declare for describing function
arguments. After this patch a dbg.declare always takes the *address*
of a variable as the first argument, even if the argument is not an
alloca.
When lowering a DBG_VALUE, the decision of whether to emit a register
location description or a memory location description depends on the
MachineLocation — register machine locations may get promoted to
memory locations based on their DIExpression. (Future) optimization
passes that want to salvage implicit debug location for variables may
do so by appending a DW_OP_stack_value. For example:
DBG_VALUE, [RBP-8] --> DW_OP_fbreg -8
DBG_VALUE, RAX --> DW_OP_reg0 +0
DBG_VALUE, RAX, DIExpression(DW_OP_deref) --> DW_OP_reg0 +0
All testcases that were modified were regenerated from clang. I also
added source-based testcases for each of these to the debuginfo-tests
repository over the last week to make sure that no synchronized bugs
slip in. The debuginfo-tests compile from source and run the debugger.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32382
<rdar://problem/31205000>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31439
llvm-svn: 300522
At the very least, we have CallInst::setIsNoInline() for adding the
noinline attribute to callsites, and I'm told alwaysinline seems to
work.
Thought of adding "not all attributes are guaranteed to work here". If
someone thinks that would be better (or has a better way of phrasing
that, etc.), happy to add it.
llvm-svn: 300168
As discussed in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32486
...the canonicalization of vector select to shufflevector does not hold up
when undef elements are present in the condition vector.
Try to make the undef handling clear in the code and the LangRef.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31980
llvm-svn: 300092
Summary:
Alias analysis would like to know that
invariant.group.barrier returns pointer that mustalias,
but this can't imply that we can replace one pointer with another
Reviewers: dberlin, sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits, chandlerc, hfinkel, nlewycky, amharc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31758
llvm-svn: 300033
LLVM makes several assumptions about address space 0. However,
alloca is presently constrained to always return this address space.
There's no real way to avoid using alloca, so without this
there is no way to opt out of these assumptions.
The problematic assumptions include:
- That the pointer size used for the stack is the same size as
the code size pointer, which is also the maximum sized pointer.
- That 0 is an invalid, non-dereferencable pointer value.
These are problems for AMDGPU because alloca is used to
implement the private address space, which uses a 32-bit
index as the pointer value. Other pointers are 64-bit
and behave more like LLVM's notion of generic address
space. By changing the address space used for allocas,
we can change our generic pointer type to be LLVM's generic
pointer type which does have similar properties.
llvm-svn: 299888
-ffp-contract=fast does not currently work with LTO because it's passed as a
TargetOption to the backend rather than in the IR. This adds it to
FastMathFlags.
This is toward fixing PR25721
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31164
llvm-svn: 298939
This adds a parameter to @llvm.objectsize that makes it return
conservative values if it's given null.
This fixes PR23277.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28494
llvm-svn: 298430
This is an ELF-specific thing that adds SHF_LINK_ORDER to the global's section
pointing to the metadata argument's section. The effect of that is a reverse dependency
between sections for the linker GC.
!associated does not change the behavior of global-dce. The global
may also need to be added to llvm.compiler.used.
Since SHF_LINK_ORDER is per-section, !associated effectively enables
fdata-sections for the affected globals, the same as comdats do.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29104
llvm-svn: 298157
Summary:
This change edits the language reference to explicitly allow the
existence of readnone and readonly functions that can throw. Full
discussion at
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-January/108637.html
Reviewers: dberlin, chandlerc, hfinkel, majnemer
Reviewed By: majnemer
Subscribers: majnemer, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28740
llvm-svn: 295000
Summary:
Update the TBAA section to mention the struct path TBAA that LLVM
implements today. This is not a proposal or change in semantics -- it
is intended only to **document** what LLVM already does today.
This is related to https://reviews.llvm.org/D26438 where I've tried to
implement some of the constraints as verifier checks.
Reviewers: anna, reames, rsmith, chandlerc, hfinkel, rjmccall, mehdi_amini, dexonsmith, manmanren
Reviewed By: manmanren
Subscribers: dberlin, dberris, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26831
llvm-svn: 294999
Summary:
This patch starts the implementation as discuss in the following RFC: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-October/106532.html
When optimization duplicates code that will scale down the execution count of a basic block, we will record the duplication factor as part of discriminator so that the offline process tool can find the duplication factor and collect the accurate execution frequency of the corresponding source code. Two important optimization that fall into this category is loop vectorization and loop unroll. This patch records the duplication factor for these 2 optimizations.
The recording will be guarded by a flag encode-duplication-in-discriminators, which is off by default.
Reviewers: probinson, aprantl, davidxl, hfinkel, echristo
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, anemet, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26420
llvm-svn: 294782
Summary:
The intrinsic, marked as returning it's first argument, has no code
generation effect (though currently not every optimization pass knows
that intrinsics with the returned attribute can be looked through).
It is about to be used to by the PredicateInfo pass to attach
predicate information to existing operands, and be able to tell what
the predicate information affects.
We deliberately do not attach any info through a second operand so
that the intrinsics do not need to dominate the comparisons/etc (since
in the case of assume, we may want to push them up the post-dominator
tree).
Reviewers: davide, sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29517
llvm-svn: 294341
