This commit adds tail call support to the MachineOutliner pass. This allows
the outliner to insert jumps rather than calls in areas where tail calling is
possible. Outlined tail calls include the return or terminator of the basic
block being outlined from.
Tail call support allows the outliner to take returns and terminators into
consideration while finding candidates to outline. It also allows the outliner
to save more instructions. For example, in the X86-64 outliner, a tail called
outlined function saves one instruction since no return has to be inserted.
llvm-svn: 297653
For AVX-512 we force the input to zero if the input is undef or the mask is all ones to break an execution dependency. This patch brings the same behavior to AVX2.
llvm-svn: 297652
We were already forcing undef inputs to become a zero vector, this now catches an all ones mask too.
Ideally we'd use undef and let execution dep fix handle picking the best register/clearance for the undef, but I don't think it can handle the early clobber today.
llvm-svn: 297651
The immediate should be 1 or 2, not 0 or 1. This was found while adding bounds checking to clang. In fact the existing clang builtin test failed if we ran it all the way to assembly.
llvm-svn: 297591
I noticed unnecessary 'sbb' instructions in D30472 and while looking at 'ptest' codegen recently.
This happens because we were transforming any 'setb' - even when we only wanted a single-bit result.
This patch moves those transforms under visitAdd/visitSub, so we we're only creating sbb/adc when it
is a win. I don't know why we need a SETCC_CARRY node type, but I'm not proposing to change that
existing behavior in this patch.
Also, I'm skeptical that sbb/adc are a win for all micro-arches, so I added comments to the test files
where this transform still fires.
The test changes here are all cases where we no longer produce sbb/adc. Avoiding partial register
stalls (generating an xor to clear a register) is not handled in some cases, but that's a separate
issue.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30611
llvm-svn: 297586
I'm pretty sure there are more problems lurking here. But I think this fixes PR32241.
I've added the test case from that bug and added asserts that will fail if we ever try to copy between high registers and mask registers again.
llvm-svn: 297574
Without SSE41 (pextrb) we currently extract byte elements from a vector by spilling to stack and reloading the byte.
This patch is an initial attempt at using MOVD/PEXTRW to extract the relevant DWORD/WORD from the vector and then shift+truncate to collect the correct byte.
Extraction of multiple bytes this way would result in code bloat, but as explained in the patch we could probably afford to be more aggressive with the supported extractions before again falling back on spilling - possibly through counting the number of extracts and which DWORD/WORD they originate?
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29841
llvm-svn: 297568
This only requires a 64-bit memory source, not the whole 128-bits. But the 128-bit case is still supported via X86InstrInfo::foldMemoryOperandImpl
llvm-svn: 297523
In order to make it easier to parse information about the performance of
MacroFusion, this patch adds the function and the instruction names to the
debug output of this pass.
llvm-svn: 297504
We currently have to insert bits via a temporary variable of the same size as the target with various shift/mask stages, resulting in further temporary variables, all of which require the allocation of memory for large APInts (MaskSizeInBits > 64).
This is another of the compile time issues identified in PR32037 (see also D30265).
This patch adds the APInt::insertBits() helper method which avoids the temporary memory allocation and masks/inserts the raw bits directly into the target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30780
llvm-svn: 297458
Summary:
This will allow future patches to inspect the details of the LLT. The implementation is now split between
the Support and CodeGen libraries to allow TableGen to use this class without introducing layering concerns.
Thanks to Ahmed Bougacha for finding a reasonable way to avoid the layering issue and providing the version of this patch without that problem.
The problem with the previous commit appears to have been that TableGen was including CodeGen/LowLevelType.h instead of Support/LowLevelTypeImpl.h.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, ab, javed.absar
Subscribers: arsenm, nhaehnle, mgorny, dberris, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30046
llvm-svn: 297241
More module problems. This time it only showed up in the stage 2 compile of
clang-x86_64-linux-selfhost-modules-2 but not the stage 1 compile.
Somehow, this change causes the build to need Attributes.gen before it's been
generated.
llvm-svn: 297188
Summary:
Loop alignment can cause a significant change of
the perfromance for short loops.
To be able to evaluate the impact of loop alignment this change
introduces the new option x86-experimental-pref-loop-alignment.
The alignment will be 2^Value bytes, the default value is 4.
Patch by Serguei Katkov!
Reviewers: craig.topper
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30391
llvm-svn: 297178
Summary:
This will allow future patches to inspect the details of the LLT. The implementation is now split between
the Support and CodeGen libraries to allow TableGen to use this class without introducing layering concerns.
Thanks to Ahmed Bougacha for finding a reasonable way to avoid the layering issue and providing the version of this patch without that problem.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, ab, javed.absar
Subscribers: arsenm, nhaehnle, mgorny, dberris, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30046
llvm-svn: 297177
X86EvexToVex machine instruction pass compresses EVEX encoded instructions by replacing them with their identical VEX encoded instructions when possible.
It uses manually supported 2 large tables that map the EVEX instructions to their VEX ideticals.
This TableGen backend replaces the tables by automatically generating them.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30451
llvm-svn: 297127
evex2vex pass defines 2 tables which maps EVEX instructions to their VEX identical when possible. Adding all missing entries.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30501
llvm-svn: 297126
A bit more painful than G_INSERT because it was more widely used, but this
should simplify the handling of extract operations in most locations.
llvm-svn: 297100
Fixed the asan bot failure which led to the last commit of the outliner being reverted.
The change is in lib/CodeGen/MachineOutliner.cpp in the SuffixTree's constructor. LeafVector
is no longer initialized using reserve but just a standard constructor.
llvm-svn: 297081
Use the store size of the argument type, which will be a byte-sized
quantity, rather than dividing the size in bits by 8.
Fixes PR32136 and re-enables copy elision from i64 arguments.
Reverts the workaround in from r296950.
llvm-svn: 297045
As described on PR31712, we miss a variety of legalization combines because we lower these to X86ISD::VSEXT/VZEXT despite them having the same functionality. This patch makes 128-bit (SSE41) SIGN/ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_IN_REG ops legal, adds the necessary tablegen plumbing and uses a helper 'getExtendInVec' to decide when to use SIGN/ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_IN_REG or VSEXT/VZEXT.
We're missing a couple of shuffle combines that will be added in a future patch for review.
Later patches can then support the AVX2 cases as a mixture of SIGN/ZERO_EXTEND and SIGN/ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_IN_REG, and then finally deal with the AVX512 cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30549
llvm-svn: 296985
The larger goal is to move the ADC/SBB transforms currently in
combineX86SetCC() to combineAddOrSubToADCOrSBB() because we're
creating ADC/SBB in lots of places where we shouldn't.
This was intended to be an NFC change, but avx-512 has something
strange going on. It doesn't seem like any of the affected tests
should really be using SET+TEST or ADC; a simple ADD could replace
several instructions. But that's another bug...
llvm-svn: 296978
select Cond, C +/- 1, C --> add(ext Cond), C -- with a target hook.
This is part of the ongoing process to obsolete D24480. The motivation is to
canonicalize to select IR in InstCombine whenever possible, so we need to have a way to
undo that easily in codegen.
PowerPC is an obvious winner for this kind of transform because it has fast and complete
bit-twiddling abilities but generally lousy conditional execution perf (although this might
have changed in recent implementations).
x86 also sees some wins, but the effect is limited because these transforms already mostly
exist in its target-specific combineSelectOfTwoConstants(). The fact that we see any x86
changes just shows that that code is a mess of special-case holes. We may be able to remove
some of that logic now.
My guess is that other targets will want to enable this hook for most cases. The likely
follow-ups would be to add value type and/or the constants themselves as parameters for the
hook. As the tests in select_const.ll show, we can transform any select-of-constants to
math/logic, but the general transform for any 2 constants needs one more instruction
(multiply or 'and').
ARM is one target that I think may not want this for most cases. I see infinite loops there
because it wants to use selects to enable conditionally executed instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30537
llvm-svn: 296977
Long ago (2010 according to svn blame), combineShuffle probably needed to prevent the accidental creation of illegal i64 types but there doesn't appear to be any combines that can cause this any more as they all have their own legality checks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30213
llvm-svn: 296966
This fixes cases where i1 types were not properly legalized yet and lead
to the creating of 0-sized stack slots.
This fixes http://llvm.org/PR32136
llvm-svn: 296950
The comments were wrong, and this is not an obvious transform.
This hopefully makes it clearer that we're missing the commuted
patterns for adds. It's less clear that this is actually a good
transform for all micro-arch.
This is prep work for trying to clean up the current adc/sbb
codegen because it's definitely not happening optimally.
llvm-svn: 296918
VZEROUPPER should not be issued on Knights Landing (KNL), but on Skylake-avx512 it should be.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29874
llvm-svn: 296859
MMX extraction often ends up as extract_i32(bitcast_v2i32(extract_i64(bitcast_v1i64(x86mmx v), 0)), 0) which fails to simplify on 32-bit targets as i64 isn't legal
llvm-svn: 296782
Summary:
Avoids tons of prologue boilerplate when arguments are passed in memory
and left in memory. This can happen in a debug build or in a release
build when an argument alloca is escaped. This will dramatically affect
the code size of x86 debug builds, because X86 fast isel doesn't handle
arguments passed in memory at all. It only handles the x86_64 case of up
to 6 basic register parameters.
This is implemented by analyzing the entry block before ISel to identify
copy elision candidates. A copy elision candidate is an argument that is
used to fully initialize an alloca before any other possibly escaping
uses of that alloca. If an argument is a copy elision candidate, we set
a flag on the InputArg. If the the target generates loads from a fixed
stack object that matches the size and alignment requirements of the
alloca, the SelectionDAG builder will delete the stack object created
for the alloca and replace it with the fixed stack object. The load is
left behind to satisfy any remaining uses of the argument value. The
store is now dead and is therefore elided. The fixed stack object is
also marked as mutable, as it may now be modified by the user, and it
would be invalid to rematerialize the initial load from it.
Supersedes D28388
Fixes PR26328
Reviewers: chandlerc, MatzeB, qcolombet, inglorion, hans
Subscribers: igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29668
llvm-svn: 296683
Summary:
This will allow future patches to inspect the details of the LLT. The implementation is now split between
the Support and CodeGen libraries to allow TableGen to use this class without introducing layering concerns.
Thanks to Ahmed Bougacha for finding a reasonable way to avoid the layering issue and providing the version of this patch without that problem.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, qcolombet, rovka, aditya_nandakumar, ab, javed.absar
Subscribers: arsenm, nhaehnle, mgorny, dberris, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30046
llvm-svn: 296474
