lld already marks shared library defs as ExportDynamic, which prevents
potentially unsafe devirtualization of symbols defined in shared
libraries. Match that behavior in the gold plugin, and add the same
test.
Depends on D96721.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96722
The gold LTO plugin uses a set of hooks to implements emit-llvm and capture intermediate file generated during LTO. The hooks are called by each lto backend thread with a taskID as argument to differentiate between threads and tasks. Currently, all threads are overwriting the same file which results into only the intermediate output of the last backend thread to be preserved. This diff encodes the taskID into the filename.
Reviewed By: tejohnson, wenlei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96173
Identify dynamically exported symbols (--export-dynamic[-symbol=],
--dynamic-list=, or definitions needed to preempt shared objects) and
prevent their LTO visibility from being upgraded.
This helps avoid use of whole program devirtualization when there may
be overrides in dynamic libraries.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91583
-DENABLE_EXPERIMENTAL_NEW_PASS_MANAGER=on configured LLD and LLVMgold.so
will use the new pass manager by default. Add an option to
use the legacy pass manager. This will also be used by the Clang driver
when -fno-new-pass-manager (D92915) / -fno-experimental-new-pass-manager is set.
Reviewed By: aeubanks, tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92916
This is the #1 of 2 changes that make remarks hotness threshold option
available in more tools. The changes also allow the threshold to sync with
hotness threshold from profile summary with special value 'auto'.
This change modifies the interface of lto::setupLLVMOptimizationRemarks() to
accept remarks hotness threshold. Update all the tools that use it with remarks
hotness threshold options:
* lld: '--opt-remarks-hotness-threshold='
* llvm-lto2: '--pass-remarks-hotness-threshold='
* llvm-lto: '--lto-pass-remarks-hotness-threshold='
* gold plugin: '-plugin-opt=opt-remarks-hotness-threshold='
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85809
Summary:
This patch does the following:
1. Make InitTargetOptionsFromCodeGenFlags() accepts Triple as a
parameter, because some options' default value is triple dependant.
2. DataSections is turned on by default on AIX for llc.
3. Test cases change accordingly because of the default behaviour change.
4. Clang Driver passes in -fdata-sections by default on AIX.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, DiggerLin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88737
This matches LLD and fixes https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26262#c1
.o is a bad choice for save-temps output because it is easy to override the bitcode file (*.o)
```
# Use bfd for the example, -fuse-ld=gold is similar.
clang -flto -c a.c # generate bitcode file a.o
clang -fuse-ld=bfd -flto a.o -o a -Wl,-plugin-opt=save-temps # override a.o
# The user repeats the command but get surprised, because a.o is now a combined module.
clang -fuse-ld=bfd -flto a.o -o a -Wl,-plugin-opt=save-temps
```
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84132
Summary:
That unless the user requested an output object (--lto-obj-path), the an
unused empty combined module is not emitted.
This changed is helpful for some target (ex. RISCV-V) which encoded the
ABI info in IR module flags (target-abi). Empty unused module has no ABI
info so the linker would get the linking error during merging
incompatible ABIs.
Reviewers: tejohnson, espindola, MaskRay
Subscribers: emaste, inglorion, arichardson, hiraditya, simoncook, MaskRay, steven_wu, dexonsmith, PkmX, dang, lenary, s.egerton, luismarques, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78988
Before this patch, it wasn't possible to extend the ThinLTO threads to all SMT/CMT threads in the system. Only one thread per core was allowed, instructed by usage of llvm::heavyweight_hardware_concurrency() in the ThinLTO code. Any number passed to the LLD flag /opt:lldltojobs=..., or any other ThinLTO-specific flag, was previously interpreted in the context of llvm::heavyweight_hardware_concurrency(), which means SMT disabled.
One can now say in LLD:
/opt:lldltojobs=0 -- Use one std::thread / hardware core in the system (no SMT). Default value if flag not specified.
/opt:lldltojobs=N -- Limit usage to N threads, regardless of usage of heavyweight_hardware_concurrency().
/opt:lldltojobs=all -- Use all hardware threads in the system. Equivalent to /opt:lldltojobs=$(nproc) on Linux and /opt:lldltojobs=%NUMBER_OF_PROCESSORS% on Windows. When an affinity mask is set for the process, threads will be created only for the cores selected by the mask.
When N > number-of-hardware-threads-in-the-system, the threads in the thread pool will be dispatched equally on all CPU sockets (tested only on Windows).
When N <= number-of-hardware-threads-on-a-CPU-socket, the threads will remain on the CPU socket where the process started (only on Windows).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75153
MCTargetOptionsCommandFlags.inc and CommandFlags.inc are headers which contain
cl::opt with static storage.
These headers are meant to be incuded by tools to make it easier to parametrize
codegen/mc.
However, these headers are also included in at least two libraries: lldCommon
and handle-llvm. As a result, when creating DYLIB, clang-cpp holds a reference
to the options, and lldCommon holds another reference. Linking the two in a
single executable, as zig does[0], results in a double registration.
This patch explores an other approach: the .inc files are moved to regular
files, and the registration happens on-demand through static declaration of
options in the constructor of a static object.
[0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756977#c5
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75579
The goal of this patch is to maximize CPU utilization on multi-socket or high core count systems, so that parallel computations such as LLD/ThinLTO can use all hardware threads in the system. Before this patch, on Windows, a maximum of 64 hardware threads could be used at most, in some cases dispatched only on one CPU socket.
== Background ==
Windows doesn't have a flat cpu_set_t like Linux. Instead, it projects hardware CPUs (or NUMA nodes) to applications through a concept of "processor groups". A "processor" is the smallest unit of execution on a CPU, that is, an hyper-thread if SMT is active; a core otherwise. There's a limit of 32-bit processors on older 32-bit versions of Windows, which later was raised to 64-processors with 64-bit versions of Windows. This limit comes from the affinity mask, which historically is represented by the sizeof(void*). Consequently, the concept of "processor groups" was introduced for dealing with systems with more than 64 hyper-threads.
By default, the Windows OS assigns only one "processor group" to each starting application, in a round-robin manner. If the application wants to use more processors, it needs to programmatically enable it, by assigning threads to other "processor groups". This also means that affinity cannot cross "processor group" boundaries; one can only specify a "preferred" group on start-up, but the application is free to allocate more groups if it wants to.
This creates a peculiar situation, where newer CPUs like the AMD EPYC 7702P (64-cores, 128-hyperthreads) are projected by the OS as two (2) "processor groups". This means that by default, an application can only use half of the cores. This situation could only get worse in the years to come, as dies with more cores will appear on the market.
== The problem ==
The heavyweight_hardware_concurrency() API was introduced so that only *one hardware thread per core* was used. Once that API returns, that original intention is lost, only the number of threads is retained. Consider a situation, on Windows, where the system has 2 CPU sockets, 18 cores each, each core having 2 hyper-threads, for a total of 72 hyper-threads. Both heavyweight_hardware_concurrency() and hardware_concurrency() currently return 36, because on Windows they are simply wrappers over std:🧵:hardware_concurrency() -- which can only return processors from the current "processor group".
== The changes in this patch ==
To solve this situation, we capture (and retain) the initial intention until the point of usage, through a new ThreadPoolStrategy class. The number of threads to use is deferred as late as possible, until the moment where the std::threads are created (ThreadPool in the case of ThinLTO).
When using hardware_concurrency(), setting ThreadCount to 0 now means to use all the possible hardware CPU (SMT) threads. Providing a ThreadCount above to the maximum number of threads will have no effect, the maximum will be used instead.
The heavyweight_hardware_concurrency() is similar to hardware_concurrency(), except that only one thread per hardware *core* will be used.
When LLVM_ENABLE_THREADS is OFF, the threading APIs will always return 1, to ensure any caller loops will be exercised at least once.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71775
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
This restores 59733525d37cf9ad88b5021b33ecdbaf2e18911c (D71913), along
with bot fix 19c76989bb505c3117730c47df85fd3800ea2767.
The bot failure should be fixed by D73418, committed as
af954e441a5170a75687699d91d85e0692929d43.
I also added a fix for non-x86 bot failures by requiring x86 in new test
lld/test/ELF/lto/devirt_vcall_vis_public.ll.
Summary:
Third part in series to support Safe Whole Program Devirtualization
Enablement, see RFC here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137543.html
This patch adds type test metadata under -fwhole-program-vtables,
even for classes without hidden visibility. It then changes WPD to skip
devirtualization for a virtual function call when any of the compatible
vtables has public vcall visibility.
Additionally, internal LLVM options as well as lld and gold-plugin
options are added which enable upgrading all public vcall visibility
to linkage unit (hidden) visibility during LTO. This enables the more
aggressive WPD to kick in based on LTO time knowledge of the visibility
guarantees.
Support was added to all flavors of LTO WPD (regular, hybrid and
index-only), and to both the new and old LTO APIs.
Unfortunately it was not simple to split the first and second parts of
this part of the change (the unconditional emission of type tests and
the upgrading of the vcall visiblity) as I needed a way to upgrade the
public visibility on legacy WPD llvm assembly tests that don't include
linkage unit vcall visibility specifiers, to avoid a lot of test churn.
I also added a mechanism to LowerTypeTests that allows dropping type
test assume sequences we now aggressively insert when we invoke
distributed ThinLTO backends with null indexes, which is used in testing
mode, and which doesn't invoke the normal ThinLTO backend pipeline.
Depends on D71907 and D71911.
Reviewers: pcc, evgeny777, steven_wu, espindola
Subscribers: emaste, Prazek, inglorion, arichardson, hiraditya, MaskRay, dexonsmith, dang, davidxl, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71913
down to pass builder in ltobackend.
Currently CodeGenOpts like UnrollLoops/VectorizeLoop/VectorizeSLP in clang
are not passed down to pass builder in ltobackend when new pass manager is
used. This is inconsistent with the behavior when new pass manager is used
and thinlto is not used. Such inconsistency causes slp vectorization pass
not being enabled in ltobackend for O3 + thinlto right now. This patch
fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72386
Avoids the need to include TargetMachine.h from various places just for
an enum. Various other enums live here, such as the optimization level,
TLS model, etc. Data suggests that this change probably doesn't matter,
but it seems nice to have anyway.
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
llvm-svn: 369013
Use -fsave-optimization-record=<format> to specify a different format
than the default, which is YAML.
For now, only YAML is supported.
llvm-svn: 363573
* Add a common function to setup opt-remarks
* Rename common options to the same names
* Add error types to distinguish between file errors and regex errors
llvm-svn: 363415
* Add a common function to setup opt-remarks
* Rename common options to the same names
* Add error types to distinguish between file errors and regex errors
llvm-svn: 363328
Currently we have -Rpass for filtering the remarks that are displayed as
diagnostics, but when using -fsave-optimization-record, there is no way
to filter the remarks while generating them.
This adds support for filtering remarks by passes using a regex.
Ex: `clang -fsave-optimization-record -foptimization-record-passes=inline`
will only emit the remarks coming from the pass `inline`.
This adds:
* `-fsave-optimization-record` to the driver
* `-opt-record-passes` to cc1
* `-lto-pass-remarks-filter` to the LTOCodeGenerator
* `--opt-remarks-passes` to lld
* `-pass-remarks-filter` to llc, opt, llvm-lto, llvm-lto2
* `-opt-remarks-passes` to gold-plugin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59268
Original llvm-svn: 355964
llvm-svn: 355984
Currently we have -Rpass for filtering the remarks that are displayed as
diagnostics, but when using -fsave-optimization-record, there is no way
to filter the remarks while generating them.
This adds support for filtering remarks by passes using a regex.
Ex: `clang -fsave-optimization-record -foptimization-record-passes=inline`
will only emit the remarks coming from the pass `inline`.
This adds:
* `-fsave-optimization-record` to the driver
* `-opt-record-passes` to cc1
* `-lto-pass-remarks-filter` to the LTOCodeGenerator
* `--opt-remarks-passes` to lld
* `-pass-remarks-filter` to llc, opt, llvm-lto, llvm-lto2
* `-opt-remarks-passes` to gold-plugin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59268
llvm-svn: 355964
Current PGO profile counts are not context sensitive. The branch probabilities
for the inlined functions are kept the same for all call-sites, and they might
be very different from the actual branch probabilities. These suboptimal
profiles can greatly affect some downstream optimizations, in particular for
the machine basic block placement optimization.
In this patch, we propose to have a post-inline PGO instrumentation/use pass,
which we called Context Sensitive PGO (CSPGO). For the users who want the best
possible performance, they can perform a second round of PGO instrument/use on
the top of the regular PGO. They will have two sets of profile counts. The
first pass profile will be manly for inline, indirect-call promotion, and
CGSCC simplification pass optimizations. The second pass profile is for
post-inline optimizations and code-gen optimizations.
A typical usage:
// Regular PGO instrumentation and generate pass1 profile.
> clang -O2 -fprofile-generate source.c -o gen
> ./gen
> llvm-profdata merge default.*profraw -o pass1.profdata
// CSPGO instrumentation.
> clang -O2 -fprofile-use=pass1.profdata -fcs-profile-generate -o gen2
> ./gen2
// Merge two sets of profiles
> llvm-profdata merge default.*profraw pass1.profdata -o profile.profdata
// Use the combined profile. Pass manager will invoke two PGO use passes.
> clang -O2 -fprofile-use=profile.profdata -o use
This change touches many components in the compiler. The reviewed patch
(D54175) will committed in phrases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54175
llvm-svn: 354930
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
Sometimes it's useful to emit assembly after LTO stage to modify it manually. Emitting precodegen bitcode file (via save-temps plugin option) and then feeding it to llc doesn't always give the same binary as original.
This patch is simpler alternative to https://reviews.llvm.org/D24020.
Patch by Denis Bakhvalov.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini, tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: MaskRay, inglorion, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56114
llvm-svn: 350276
Summary:
This function is very similar to add_llvm_library(), so this patch merges it
into add_llvm_library() and replaces all calls to add_llvm_loadable_module(lib ...)
with add_llvm_library(lib MODULE ...)
Reviewers: philip.pfaffe, beanz, chandlerc
Reviewed By: philip.pfaffe
Subscribers: chapuni, mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51748
llvm-svn: 349839
Summary:
r336838 allowed these to be toggleable.
r336858 reverted r336838.
r336943 made the generation of these sections conditional on LDPO_REL.
This commit brings back the toggle-ability. You can specify:
-plugin-opt=-function-sections
-plugin-opt=-data-sections
For your linker flags to disable the changes made in r336943.
Without toggling r336943 off, arm64 linux kernels linked with gold-plugin
see significant boot time regressions, but with r336943 outright reverted
x86_64 linux kernels linked with gold-plugin fail to boot.
Reviewers: pcc, void
Reviewed By: pcc
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits, srhines
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55291
llvm-svn: 348389
Summary: This is to be consistent with lld behavior since rLLD340364.
Reviewers: tejohnson
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Subscribers: steven_wu, eraman, mehdi_amini, inglorion, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51060
llvm-svn: 340380
Not all programs want section ordering when compiled with LTO.
In particular, the Linux kernel is very sensitive when it comes to linking, and
doesn't boot when each function is placed in its own sections.
Reviewed By: pcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48756
llvm-svn: 336943
Some programs (e.g. Linux) aren't able to handle function/data sections when
LTO is used. Thus they need a way to disable it. That can be done with these
plugin options:
-plugin-opt=-function-sections=0
-plugin-opt=-data-sections=0
llvm-svn: 336838
