Split off pinsr/pextr and extractps instructions.
(Mostly) fixes PR36887.
Note: It might be worth adding a WriteFInsertLd class as well in the future.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45929
llvm-svn: 330714
Summary:
If attribute "use-soft-float"="true" is set then X86ISelLowering.cpp sets
'Promote' action for ISD::SINT_TO_FP operation on type i32.
But 'Promote' action is not proper in this case since lib function
__floatsidf is available for casting from signed int to float type.
Thus Expand action is more suitable here.
The Expand action should be set for ISD::UINT_TO_FP for soft float as well.
If function attribute "use-soft-float"="true" is set then infinite looping
can happen in DAG combining, function visitSINT_TO_FP() replaces SINT_TO_FP
node with UINT_TO_FP node and function combineUIntToFP() replace vice versa in cycle.
The fix prevents it.
Patch by vrybalov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45572
llvm-svn: 330711
loop unswitch.
This code incorrectly added the header to the loop block set early. As
a consequence we would incorrectly conclude that a nested loop body had
already been visited when the header of the outer loop was the preheader
of the nested loop. In retrospect, adding the header eagerly doesn't
really make sense. It seems nicer to let the cycle be formed naturally.
This will catch crazy bugs in the CFG reconstruction where we can't
correctly form the cycle earlier rather than later, and makes the rest
of the logic just fall out.
I've also added various asserts that make these issues *much* easier to
debug.
llvm-svn: 330707
This patch aims to provide correct dwarf unwind information in function
epilogue for X86.
It consists of two parts. The first part inserts CFI instructions that set
appropriate cfa offset and cfa register in emitEpilogue() in
X86FrameLowering. This part is X86 specific.
The second part is platform independent and ensures that:
* CFI instructions do not affect code generation (they are not counted as
instructions when tail duplicating or tail merging)
* Unwind information remains correct when a function is modified by
different passes. This is done in a late pass by analyzing information
about cfa offset and cfa register in BBs and inserting additional CFI
directives where necessary.
Added CFIInstrInserter pass:
* analyzes each basic block to determine cfa offset and register are valid
at its entry and exit
* verifies that outgoing cfa offset and register of predecessor blocks match
incoming values of their successors
* inserts additional CFI directives at basic block beginning to correct the
rule for calculating CFA
Having CFI instructions in function epilogue can cause incorrect CFA
calculation rule for some basic blocks. This can happen if, due to basic
block reordering, or the existence of multiple epilogue blocks, some of the
blocks have wrong cfa offset and register values set by the epilogue block
above them.
CFIInstrInserter is currently run only on X86, but can be used by any target
that implements support for adding CFI instructions in epilogue.
Patch by Violeta Vukobrat.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42848
llvm-svn: 330706
Guard the MIPS64 variant correctly for i64, mark the MIPS32 version as not
in microMIPS and provide the microMIPS version.
Additionally, remove a related stale XFAIL'd test as bswap has its own test
case providing coverage.
Reviewers: smaksimovic, abeserminji, atanasyan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45816
llvm-svn: 330705
Summary:
The pass is supposed to scalarize such intrinsics if the target does not support
them natively, so if the scalarization does not happen instruction selection
crashes due to inability to lower these intrinsics.
Reviewers: andrew.w.kaylor, craig.topper
Reviewed By: andrew.w.kaylor
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45947
llvm-svn: 330700
Add explicit dependency on ObjcopyTableGen
and rerun the tests on Windows.
I will double-check the build bots
and revert this commit if necessary.
llvm-svn: 330685
This encoding is recognized by the CPU, but the behavior is undefined. This makes the disassembler handle it correctly so we don't print bswapl with a 16-bit register.
llvm-svn: 330682
This code path can very clearly be called in a context where we have
baselined all the cloned blocks to a particular loop and are trying to
handle nested subloops. There is no harm in this, so just relax the
assert. I've added a test case that will make sure we actually exercise
this code path.
llvm-svn: 330680
I was reminded today that this patch got reverted in r301885. I can no
longer reproduce the failure that caused the revert locally (...almost
one year later), and the patch applied pretty cleanly, so I guess we'll
see if the bots still get angry about it.
The original breakage was InstSimplify complaining (in "assertion
failed" form) about getting passed some crazy IR when running `ninja
check-sanitizer`. I'm unable to find traces of what, exactly, said crazy
IR was. I suppose we'll find out pretty soon if that's still the case.
:)
Original commit:
Author: gbiv
Date: Mon May 1 18:12:08 2017
New Revision: 301880
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=301880&view=rev
Log:
[InstSimplify] Handle selects of GEPs with 0 offset
In particular (since it wouldn't fit nicely in the summary):
(select (icmp eq V 0) P (getelementptr P V)) -> (getelementptr P V)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31435
llvm-svn: 330667
As we're becoming stricter w/ respect to not allowing vregs having LLTs
and regclasses assigned both mid-globalisel pipeline, the number of
extra copies grows, some of which separate G_UNMERGE's from their
corresponding G_MERGE's, becoming a performance concern.
It's worth mentioning that we're already looking through copies while
combining legalization artifacts for every kind of artifact but
G_UNMERGE.
Reviewed By: aditya_nandakumar
Reviewers: ab, t.p.northover, volkan, javed.absar
Subscribers: rovka, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45644
llvm-svn: 330660
Summary:
This is [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37104 | PR37104 ]].
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6773 | PR6773 ]] will introduce an IR canonicalization that is likely bad for the end assembly.
Previously, `andl`+`andn`/`andps`+`andnps` / `bic`/`bsl` would be generated. (see `@out`)
Now, they would no longer be generated (see `@in`).
So we need to make sure that they are still generated.
If the mask is constant, we do nothing. InstCombine should have unfolded it.
Else, i use `hasAndNot()` TLI hook.
For now, only handle scalars.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/bO6
----
I *really* don't like the code i wrote in `DAGCombiner::unfoldMaskedMerge()`.
It is super fragile. Is there something like IR Pattern Matchers for this?
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, RKSimon, javed.absar
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: andreadb, courbet, kristof.beyls, javed.absar, rengolin, nemanjai, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45733
llvm-svn: 330646
Summary:
This is [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37104 | PR37104 ]].
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6773 | PR6773 ]] will introduce an IR canonicalization that is likely bad for the end assembly.
Previously, `andl`+`andn`/`andps`+`andnps` / `bic`/`bsl` would be generated. (see `@out`)
Now, they would no longer be generated (see `@in`).
I'm guessing `llvm/lib/CodeGen/SelectionDAG/DAGCombiner.cpp` should be able to unfold this.
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, RKSimon, javed.absar
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: nemanjai, rengolin, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45563
llvm-svn: 330645
I'm not sure if this is where we should try to fold these
patterns inspired by:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37098
...if this isn't the right place, we can move the tests.
llvm-svn: 330642
Summary: We do not need nonull attribute if we know an argument is going to be constant.
Reviewers: junbuml, davide, fhahn
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45608
llvm-svn: 330641
Summary:
Skip basic blocks not reachable from the entry node
in MemCpyOptPass::iterateOnFunction.
Code that is unreachable may have properties that do not exist
for reachable code (an instruction in a basic block can for
example be dominated by a later instruction in the same basic
block, for example if there is a single block loop).
MemCpyOptPass::processStore is only safe to use for reachable
basic blocks, since it may iterate past the basic block
beginning when used for unreachable blocks. By simply skipping
to optimize unreachable basic blocks we can avoid asserts such
as "Assertion `!NodePtr->isKnownSentinel()' failed."
in MemCpyOptPass::processStore.
The problem was detected by fuzz tests.
Reviewers: eli.friedman, dneilson, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: efriedma, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45889
llvm-svn: 330635
This reland includes a check to prevent the DAG combiner from folding an
offset that is smaller than the existing one. This can cause oscillations
between two possible DAGs, which was the cause of the hang and later assertion
failure observed on the lnt-ctmark-aarch64-O3-flto bot.
http://green.lab.llvm.org/green/job/lnt-ctmark-aarch64-O3-flto/2024/
Original commit message:
> This is a code size win in code that takes offseted addresses
> frequently, such as C++ constructors that typically need to compute
> an offseted address of a vtable. This reduces the size of Chromium
> for Android's .text section by 108KB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45199
llvm-svn: 330630
Summary:
This change teaches DSE that the atomic memory intrinsics are stores
that can be eliminated, and can allow other stores to be eliminated.
This change specifically does not teach DSE that these intrinsics
can be partially eliminated (i.e. length reduced, and dest/src changed);
that will be handled in another change.
Reviewers: mkazantsev, skatkov, apilipenko, efriedma, rsmith
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: dmgreen, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45535
llvm-svn: 330629
This patch adds a cost model test case for vector shuffles having transpose
masks. The given costs are inaccurate and will be updated in a follow-on patch.
llvm-svn: 330625
This demonstrates a bug where the encoding for a 16-bit bswap prints a 16-bit register and a 32-bit mnemonic. Intel docs say 16-bit bswap is undefined. We should either claim it as an invalid encoding or we should print a 16-bit mnemonic.
objdump does print the encoding as bswap with a 16-bit register. But it doesn't seem to ever print a suffix.
llvm-svn: 330621
This helps debug issues where selection-dag assigns the wrong location
to an instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45913
llvm-svn: 330618
It's possible to validly spill the frame offset register
in a call sequence to a VGPR. There are definitely issues
with SGPR spilling to memory, so move the assert later.
llvm-svn: 330612
We use llvm-symbolizer in some production systems, and we run it
against all possibly related files, including some that are not
ELF. We noticed that for some of those invalid files, llvm-symbolizer
would crash with SEGFAULT. Here is an example of such a file.
It is due to that in computeSymbolSizes, a loop uses condition
for (unsigned I = 0, N = Addresses.size() - 1; I < N; ++I) {
where if Addresses.size() is 0, N would overflow and causing the loop
to access invalid memory.
Instead of patching the loop conditions, the commit makes so that the
function returns early if Addresses is empty.
Validated by checking that llvm-symbolizer no longer crashes.
Patch by Teng Qin!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44285
llvm-svn: 330610
Summary:
See the new test case; this is really unlikely to happen with real code,
but I ran into this while attempting to bugpoint-reduce a different issue.
Change-Id: I9ade1dc1aa8fd9c4d9fc83661d7b80e310b5c4a6
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45885
llvm-svn: 330585
LoopRotate only invalidates innermost loops while the changes that it makes may
also affert any of this parents. With patch rL329047, SCEV becomes much smarter
about calculation of exit counts for outer loops, so we cannot assume that they are
not affected.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45945
llvm-svn: 330582
In the function `simplifyOneLoop` we optimistically assume that changes in the
inner loop only affect this very loop and have no impact on its parents. In fact,
after rL329047 has been merged, we can now calculate exit counts for outer
loops which may depend on inner loops. Thus, we need to invalidate all parents
when we do something to a loop.
There is an evidence of incorrect behavior of `simplifyOneLoop`: when we insert
`SE->verify()` check in the end of this funciton, it fails on a bunch of existing
test, in particular:
LLVM :: Transforms/LoopUnroll/peel-loop-not-forced.ll
LLVM :: Transforms/LoopUnroll/peel-loop-pgo.ll
LLVM :: Transforms/LoopUnroll/peel-loop.ll
LLVM :: Transforms/LoopUnroll/peel-loop2.ll
Note that previously we have fixed issues of this variety, see rL328483.
This patch makes this function invalidate the outermost loop properly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45937
Reviewed By: chandlerc
llvm-svn: 330576
The condition this was asserting doesn't actually hold. I've added
comments to explain why, removed the assert, and added a fun test case
reduced out of 403.gcc.
llvm-svn: 330564
The SandyBridge BMI tests are actually run on IvyBridge as that's the first lowest CPU that actually support the ISAs (but still use the SandyBridge model).
llvm-svn: 330556
Summary: Wrap LLVMDIBuilderCreateAutoVariable, LLVMDIBuilderCreateParameterVariable, LLVMDIBuilderCreateExpression, and move and correct LLVMDIBuilderInsertDeclareBefore and LLVMDIBuilderInsertDeclareAtEnd from the Go bindings to the C bindings.
Reviewers: harlanhaskins, whitequark, deadalnix
Reviewed By: harlanhaskins, whitequark
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45928
llvm-svn: 330555
This is the last step in getting constant pattern matchers to allow
undef elements in constant vectors.
I'm adding a dedicated m_ZeroInt() function and building m_Zero() from
that. In most cases, calling code can be updated to use m_ZeroInt()
directly when there's no need to match pointers, but I'm leaving that
efficiency optimization as a follow-up step because it's not always
clear when that's ok.
There are just enough icmp folds in InstSimplify that can be used for
integer or pointer types, that we probably still want a generic m_Zero()
for those cases. Otherwise, we could eliminate it (and possibly add a
m_NullPtr() as an alias for isa<ConstantPointerNull>()).
We're conservatively returning a full zero vector (zeroinitializer) in
InstSimplify/InstCombine on some of these folds (see diffs in InstSimplify),
but I'm not sure if that's actually necessary in all cases. We may be
able to propagate an undef lane instead. One test where this happens is
marked with 'TODO'.
llvm-svn: 330550
