We can replace the return values with undef if we replaced all
the call uses with a constant/undef.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22336
llvm-svn: 276174
Summary:
Previously we wouldn't move loads/stores across instructions that had
side-effects, where that was defined as may-write or may-throw. But
this is not sufficiently restrictive: Stores can't safely be moved
across instructions that may load.
This patch also adds a DEBUG check that all instructions in our chain
are either loads or stores.
Reviewers: asbirlea
Subscribers: llvm-commits, jholewinski, arsenm, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22547
llvm-svn: 276171
Summary:
Previously if we had a chain that contained a side-effecting
instruction, we wouldn't vectorize it at all. Now we'll vectorize
everything that comes before the side-effecting instruction.
Reviewers: asbirlea
Subscribers: arsenm, jholewinski, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22536
llvm-svn: 276170
A seemingly common use for the walker's getClobberingMemoryAccess
function is:
```
MemoryAccess *getClobber(MemorySSAWalker *W, MemoryUseOrDef *MUD) {
const Instruction *I = MUD->getMemoryInst();
return W->getClobberingMemoryAccess(I);
}
```
Which is kind of redundant, since walkers will ultimately query MSSA to
find out which MemoryAccess `I` maps to (...which is always `MUD`).
So, this patch adds an overload of getClobberingMemoryAccess that
accepts MemoryAccesses directly. As a result, the Instruction overload
of getClobberingMemoryAccess becomes a lightweight wrapper around our
new overload.
Additionally, this patch un`virtual`izes the Instruction overload of
getClobberingMemoryAccess, since there doesn't seem to be a walker that
benefits from that being virtual, and I can't think of how else one
would implement it. Happy to make it virtual again if we would benefit
from doing so.
llvm-svn: 276169
This should be all the low-level instruction selection needs to determine how
to implement an operation, with the remaining context taken from the opcode
(e.g. G_ADD vs G_FADD) or other flags not based on type (e.g. fast-math).
llvm-svn: 276158
Avoid unnecessary spills of byval arguments of device functions to
local space on SASS level and subsequent pointer conversion to generic
address space that follows. Instead, make a local copy in IR, provide
a way to access arguments directly, and let LLVM optimize the copy away
when possible.
Differential Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21421
llvm-svn: 276153
Summary:
Mirroring most cleanup changed from compiler-rt/lib/builtins/cpu_model.
x86 methods are still returning a bool.
Reviewers: llvm-commits, echristo, craig.topper, sanjoy
Subscribers: mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22480
llvm-svn: 276149
As noted in https://reviews.llvm.org/D22537 , we can use this functionality in
visitSelectInstWithICmp() and InstSimplify, but currently we have duplicated
code.
llvm-svn: 276140
In D12090, the ExprValueMap was added to reuse existing value during SCEV expansion.
However, const folding and sext/zext distribution can make the reuse still difficult.
A simplified case is: suppose we know S1 expands to V1 in ExprValueMap, and
S1 = S2 + C_a
S3 = S2 + C_b
where C_a and C_b are different SCEVConstants. Then we'd like to expand S3 as
V1 - C_a + C_b instead of expanding S2 literally. It is helpful when S2 is a
complex SCEV expr and S2 has no entry in ExprValueMap, which is usually caused
by the fact that S3 is generated from S1 after const folding.
In order to do that, we represent ExprValueMap as a mapping from SCEV to
ValueOffsetPair. We will save both S1->{V1, 0} and S2->{V1, C_a} into the
ExprValueMap when we create SCEV for V1. When S3 is expanded, it will first
expand S2 to V1 - C_a because of S2->{V1, C_a} in the map, then expand S3 to
V1 - C_a + C_b.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21313
llvm-svn: 276136
Lots of blocks had "llvm" or "nasm" syntax types but either weren't following
the syntax, or the syntax has changed (and sphinx hasn't keep up) or the type
doesn't even exist (nasm?).
Other documents had :options: what were invalid. I only removed those that had
warnings, and left the ones that didn't, in order to follow the principle of
least surprise.
This is like this for ages, but the buildbot is now failing on errors. It may
take a while to upgrade the buildbot's sphinx, if that's even possible, but
that shouldn't stop us from getting docs updates (which seem down for quite
a while).
Also, we're not losing any syntax highlight, since when it doesn't parse, it
doesn't colour. Ie. those blocks are not being highlighted anyway.
I'm trying to get all docs in one go, so that it's easy to revert later if we
do fix, or at least easy to know what's to fix.
llvm-svn: 276109
Summary: In r275989 we enabled the folding of `logic(cast(icmp), cast(icmp))` to `cast(logic(icmp, icmp))`. Here we add more test cases to assure this folding works for all logical operations `and`/`or`/`xor`.
Reviewers: grosser
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22561
Contributed-by: Matthias Reisinger
llvm-svn: 276105
This patch adds costs for the vectorized implementations of CTPOP, the default values were seriously underestimating the cost of these and was encouraging vectorization on targets where serialized use of POPCNT would be much better.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22456
llvm-svn: 276104
Retry r275776 (no changes, we suspect the issue was with another commit).
The current logic for handling inline asm operands in DAGToDAGISel interprets
the operands by looking for constants, which should represent the flags
describing the kind of operand we're dealing with (immediate, memory, register
def etc). The operands representing actual data are skipped only if they are
non-const, with the exception of immediate operands which are skipped explicitly
when a flag describing an immediate is found.
The oversight is that memory operands may be const too (e.g. for device drivers
reading a fixed address), so we should explicitly skip the operand following a
flag describing a memory operand. If we don't, we risk interpreting that
constant as a flag, which is definitely not intended.
Fixes PR26038
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22103
llvm-svn: 276101
This document was crafted from the various (320+) emails between 2nd June and
20th July regarding the move to GitHub. It tried to consolidate every issue that
was raised and every solution that was presented to have a GitHub repository
with sub-modules.
It *does not* try to argue whether sub-modules are better or worse than any other
Git solution, nor if Git is better than any other VCS, nor if GitHub is better
than any other free code hosting service. This is just the final conclusions of
48 days and 320 emails (plus a lot of IRC discussions) on the LLVM community.
This document will be presented at the survey that the foundation will setup for
us to decide if we move to this solution or not. It reflects what was discussed
on the lists, but it's not authoritative. If something is not clear enough,
please refer to the mailing list discussions (hint: search for "GitHub").
Review: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22463
llvm-svn: 276097
Inference of the 'returned' attribute was fixed in r276008, lets try
turning the backend support back on.
This reverts commit r275677.
llvm-svn: 276081
Summary:
getVectorizablePrefix previously didn't work properly in the face of
aliasing loads/stores. It unwittingly assumed that the loads/stores
appeared in the BB in address order. If they didn't, it would do the
wrong thing.
Reviewers: asbirlea, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22535
llvm-svn: 276072
Reverting this commit for now as it seems to be causing failures on
test-suite tests on the clang-ppc64le-linux-lnt bot.
This reverts commit r276044.
llvm-svn: 276068
Add a check that the layout predecessor of a block is an actual CFG
predecssor of the block as well. No current code fails this check, but
upcoming patches can trigger this, and it makes sense to separate it
out.
llvm-svn: 276066
Revert "[LoopSimplify] Update LCSSA after separating nested loops."
This reverts commit r275891.
Revert "[LCSSA] Post-process PHI-nodes created by SSAUpdate when constructing LCSSA form."
This reverts commit r275883.
llvm-svn: 276064
We just set PreserveLCSSA to always true since we don't have an
analogous method `mustPreserveAnalysisID(LCSSA)`.
Also port LoopInfo verifier pass to test LoopUnrollPass.
llvm-svn: 276063
canTailDuplicate accepts two blocks and returns true if the first can be
duplicated into the second successfully. Use this function to
encapsulate the heuristic.
llvm-svn: 276062
Summary:
Functions like "slice" and "drop_front" sound like they might mutate the
underlying object, but they don't. Warning on unused results would have
saved me an hour yesterday, and I'm sure I'm not the only one.
LLVM and Clang are clean wrt this warning after D22540.
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: sanjoy, chandlerc, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22541
llvm-svn: 276058
Summary: substr doesn't modify the string, so this line has no effect.
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22540
llvm-svn: 276057
Summary:
Previously, the insertion point for stores was the last instruction in
Chain *before calling getVectorizablePrefixEndIdx*. Thus if
getVectorizablePrefixEndIdx didn't return Chain.size(), we still would
insert at the last instruction in Chain.
This patch changes our internal API a bit in an attempt to make it less
prone to this sort of error. As a result, we end up recalculating the
Chain's boundary instructions, but I think worrying about the speed hit
of this is a premature optimization right now.
Reviewers: asbirlea, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22534
llvm-svn: 276056
Summary:
The DEBUG message was hard to read because two Values were being printed
on the same line with only the delimiter "aliases". This change makes
us print each Value on its own line.
Reviewers: asbirlea
Subscribers: llvm-commits, arsenm, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22533
llvm-svn: 276055
