MIOperands/ConstMIOperands are classes iterating over the MachineOperand
of a MachineInstr, however MachineInstr::mop_iterator does the same
thing.
I assume these two iterators exist to have a uniform interface to
iterate over the operands of a machine instruction bundle and a single
machine instruction. However in practice I find it more confusing to have 2
different iterator classes, so this patch transforms (nearly all) the
code to use mop_iterators.
The only exception being MIOperands::anlayzePhysReg() and
MIOperands::analyzeVirtReg() still needing an equivalent, I leave that
as an exercise for the next patch.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9932
This version is slightly modified from the proposed revision in that it
introduces MachineInstr::getOperandNo to avoid the extra counting
variable in the few loops that previously used MIOperands::getOperandNo.
llvm-svn: 238539
We were previously codegen'ing these as regular load/store operations and
hoping that the register allocator would allocate registers in ascending order
so that we could apply an LDM/STM combine after register allocation. According
to the commit that first introduced this code (r37179), we planned to teach
the register allocator to allocate the registers in ascending order. This
never got implemented, and up to now we've been stuck with very poor codegen.
A much simpler approach for achiveing better codegen is to create LDM/STM
instructions with identical sets of virtual registers, let the register
allocator pick arbitrary registers and order register lists when printing an
MCInst. This approach also avoids the need to repeatedly calculate offsets
which ultimately ought to be eliminated pre-RA in order to decrease register
pressure.
This is implemented by lowering the memcpy intrinsic to a series of SD-only
MCOPY pseudo-instructions which performs a memory copy using a given number
of registers. During SD->MI lowering, we lower MCOPY to LDM/STM. This is a
little unusual, but it avoids the need to encode register lists in the SD,
and we can take advantage of SD use lists to decide whether to use the _UPD
variant of the instructions.
Fixes PR9199.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9508
llvm-svn: 238473
Now that most of the methods in Clang and LLVM that were parsing arch/cpu/fpu
strings are using ARMTargetParser, it's time to make it a bit more conforming
with what the ABI says.
This commit adds some clarification on what build attributes are accepted and
which are "non-standard". It also makes clear that the "defaultCPU" and
"defaultArch" methods were really just build attribute getters.
It also diverges from GCC's behaviour to say that armv2/armv3 are really an
ARMv4 in the build attributes, when the ABI has a clear state for that: Pre-v4.
llvm-svn: 238344
Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
The first several times this was committed (e.g. r229831, r233055), it caused several buildbot failures.
Apparently the reason for most failures was both clang and gcc's inability to deal with large numbers (> 10K) of bitset constructor calls in tablegen-generated initializers of instruction info tables.
This should now be fixed.
llvm-svn: 238192
This is part of the work to remove TargetMachine::resetTargetOptions.
In this patch, instead of updating global variable NoFramePointerElim in
resetTargetOptions, its use in DisableFramePointerElim is replaced with a call
to TargetFrameLowering::noFramePointerElim. This function determines on a
per-function basis if frame pointer elimination should be disabled.
There is no change in functionality except that cl:opt option "disable-fp-elim"
can now override function attribute "no-frame-pointer-elim".
llvm-svn: 238080
The list of subtarget features for the 7em triple contains 't2xtpk',
which actually disables that subtarget feature. Correct that to
'+t2xtpk' and test that the instructions enabled by that feature do
actually work.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9936
llvm-svn: 238022
This starts merging MCSection and MCSectionData.
There are a few issues with the current split between MCSection and
MCSectionData.
* It optimizes the the not as important case. We want the production
of .o files to be really fast, but the split puts the information used
for .o emission in a separate data structure.
* The ELF/COFF/MachO hierarchy is not represented in MCSectionData,
leading to some ad-hoc ways to represent the various flags.
* It makes it harder to remember where each item is.
The attached patch starts merging the two by moving the alignment from
MCSectionData to MCSection.
Most of the patch is actually just dropping 'const', since
MCSectionData is mutable, but MCSection was not.
llvm-svn: 237936
Ideally this is going to be and LLVM IR pass (shared, among others
with AArch64), but for the time being just enable it if consumers
ask us for optimization and not unconditionally.
Discussed with Tim Northover on IRC.
llvm-svn: 237837
This was previously returning int. However there are no negative opcode
numbers and more importantly this was needlessly different from
MCInstrDesc::getOpcode() (which even is the value returned here) and
SDValue::getOpcode()/SDNode::getOpcode().
llvm-svn: 237611
Previously, they were forced to immediately follow the actual branch
instruction. This was usually OK (the LEAs actually accessing them got emitted
nearby, and weren't usually separated much afterwards). Unfortunately, a
sufficiently nasty phi elimination dumps many instructions right before the
basic block terminator, and this can increase the range too much.
This patch frees them up to be placed as usual by the constant islands pass,
and consequently has to slightly modify the form of TBB/TBH tables to refer to
a PC-relative label at the final jump. The other jump table formats were
already position-independent.
rdar://20813304
llvm-svn: 237590
This patch implements LLVM support for the ACLE special register intrinsics in
section 10.1, __arm_{w,r}sr{,p,64}.
This patch is intended to lower the read/write_register instrinsics, used to
implement the special register intrinsics in the clang patch for special
register intrinsics (see http://reviews.llvm.org/D9697), to ARM specific
instructions MRC,MCR,MSR etc. to allow reading an writing of coprocessor
registers in AArch32 and AArch64. This is done by inspecting the register
string passed to the intrinsic and then lowering to the appropriate
instruction.
Patch by Luke Cheeseman.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9699
llvm-svn: 237579
There's no need to manually pass modifier strings around to tell an operand how
to print now, that information is encoded in the operand itself since the MC
layer came along.
llvm-svn: 237295
We were creating and propagating two separate indices for each jump table (from
back in the mists of time). However, the generic index used by other backends
is sufficient to emit a unique symbol so this was unneeded.
llvm-svn: 237294
The previous logic mixed 2 separate questions:
+ Can we form a TBB/TBH instruction?
+ Can we remove the jump-table calculation before it?
It then performed a bunch of random tests on the instructions earlier in the
basic block, which were probably sufficient to answer 2 but only because of the
very limited ways in which a t2BR_JT can actually be created.
For example there's no reason to expect the LeaInst to define the same base
register as the following indexing calulation. In practice this means we might
have missed opportunities to form TBB/TBH, in theory you could end up
misidentifying a sequence and removing the wrong LEA:
%R1 = t2LEApcrelJT ...
%R2 = t2LEApcrelJT ...
<... using and killing %R2 ...>
%R2 = t2ADDr %R1, $Ridx
Before we would have looked for an LEA defining %R2 and found the wrong one. We
just got lucky that jump table setup was (almost?) always confined to a single
basic block and there was only one jump table per block.
llvm-svn: 237293
Previously, subtarget features were a bitfield with the underlying type being uint64_t.
Since several targets (X86 and ARM, in particular) have hit or were very close to hitting this bound, switching the features to use a bitset.
No functional change.
The first two times this was committed (r229831, r233055), it caused several buildbot failures.
At least some of the ARM and MIPS ones were due to gcc/binutils issues, and should now be fixed.
llvm-svn: 237234
