Similar for or/xor with 0 in place of -1.
This is the canonical form produced by InstCombine for something like `c ? x & y : x;` Since we have to use control flow to expand select we'll usually end up with a mv in basic block. By folding this we may be able to pull the and/or/xor into the block instead and avoid a mv instruction.
The code here is based on code from ARM that uses this to create predicated instructions. I'm doing it on SELECT_CC so it happens late, but we could do it on select earlier which is what ARM does. I'm not sure if we lose any combine opportunities if we do it earlier.
I left out add and sub because this can separate sext.w from the add/sub. It also made a conditional i64 addition/subtraction on RV32 worse. I guess both of those would be fixed by doing this earlier on select.
The select-binop-identity.ll test has not been commited yet, but I made the diff show the changes to it.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101485
These require the input to be zero or sign extended. If we have
sext.b, sext.h or zext.h instructions we can use them. Otherwise
we need to use a pair of shifts to accomplish the zero/sign extend
and the final shift.
We don't currently use zext.h when it is available.
