For the PowerPC 64-bit ELF Linux ABI, aggregates of size less than 8
bytes are to be passed in the low-order bits ("right-adjusted") of the
doubleword register or memory slot assigned to them. A previous patch
addressed this for aggregates passed in registers. However, small
aggregates passed in the overflow portion of the parameter save area are
still being passed left-adjusted.
The fix is made in PPCTargetLowering::LowerCall_Darwin_Or_64SVR4 on the
caller side, and in PPCTargetLowering::LowerFormalArguments_64SVR4 on
the callee side. The main fix on the callee side simply extends
existing logic for 1- and 2-byte objects to 1- through 7-byte objects,
and correcting a constant left over from 32-bit code. There is also a
fix to a bogus calculation of the offset to the following argument in
the parameter save area.
On the caller side, again a constant left over from 32-bit code is
fixed. Additionally, some code for 1, 2, and 4-byte objects is
duplicated to handle the 3, 5, 6, and 7-byte objects for SVR4 only. The
LowerCall_Darwin_Or_64SVR4 logic is getting fairly convoluted trying to
handle both ABIs, and I propose to separate this into two functions in a
future patch, at which time the duplication can be removed.
The patch adds a new test (structsinmem.ll) to demonstrate correct
passing of structures of all seven sizes. Eight dummy parameters are
used to force these structures to be in the overflow portion of the
parameter save area.
As a side effect, this corrects the case when aggregates passed in
registers are saved into the first eight doublewords of the parameter
save area: Previously they were stored left-justified, and now are
properly stored right-justified. This requires changing the expected
output of existing test case structsinregs.ll.
llvm-svn: 166022
Stack is formed improperly for long structures passed as byval arguments for
EABI mode.
If we took AAPCS reference, we can found the next statements:
A: "If the argument requires double-word alignment (8-byte), the NCRN (Next
Core Register Number) is rounded up to the next even register number." (5.5
Parameter Passing, Stage C, C.3).
B: "The alignment of an aggregate shall be the alignment of its most-aligned
component." (4.3 Composite Types, 4.3.1 Aggregates).
So if we have structure with doubles (9 double fields) and 3 Core unused
registers (r1, r2, r3): caller should use r2 and r3 registers only.
Currently r1,r2,r3 set is used, but it is invalid.
Callee VA routine should also use r2 and r3 regs only. All is ok here. This
behaviour is guessed by rounding up SP address with ADD+BFC operations.
Fix:
Main fix is in ARMTargetLowering::HandleByVal. If we detected AAPCS mode and
8 byte alignment, we waste odd registers then.
P.S.:
I also improved LDRB_POST_IMM regression test. Since ldrb instruction will
not generated by current regression test after this patch.
llvm-svn: 166018
Original message:
The attached is the fix to radar://11663049. The optimization can be outlined by following rules:
(select (x != c), e, c) -> select (x != c), e, x),
(select (x == c), c, e) -> select (x == c), x, e)
where the <c> is an integer constant.
The reason for this change is that : on x86, conditional-move-from-constant needs two instructions;
however, conditional-move-from-register need only one instruction.
While the LowerSELECT() sounds to be the most convenient place for this optimization, it turns out to be a bad place. The reason is that by replacing the constant <c> with a symbolic value, it obscure some instruction-combining opportunities which would otherwise be very easy to spot. For that reason, I have to postpone the change to last instruction-combining phase.
The change passes the test of "make check-all -C <build-root/test" and "make -C project/test-suite/SingleSource".
Original message since r165661:
My previous change has a bug: I negated the condition code of a CMOV, and go ahead creating a new CMOV using the *ORIGINAL* condition code.
llvm-svn: 166017
- Besides used in SjLj exception handling, __builtin_setjmp/__longjmp is also
used as a light-weight replacement of setjmp/longjmp which are used to
implementation continuation, user-level threading, and etc. The support added
in this patch ONLY addresses this usage and is NOT intended to support SjLj
exception handling as zero-cost DWARF exception handling is used by default
in X86.
llvm-svn: 165989
Also provide an MRI::getReservedRegs() function to access the frozen
register set, and isReserved() and isAllocatable() methods to test
individual registers.
The various implementations of TRI::getReservedRegs() are quite
complicated, and many passes need to look at the reserved register set.
This patch makes it possible for these passes to use the cached copy in
MRI, avoiding a lot of malloc traffic and repeated calculations.
llvm-svn: 165982
inline assembly. For the time being, these will be called directly by clang.
However, in the near future I expect these to be sunk back into the MC layer
and more basic APIs (e.g., getClobbers(), getConstraints(), etc.) will be called
by clang.
llvm-svn: 165946
includes extracting ints for copying elsewhere and inserting ints when
copying into the alloca. This should fix the CanSROA assertion coming
out of Clang's regression test suite.
llvm-svn: 165931
cases where we have partial integer loads and stores to an otherwise
promotable alloca to widen[1] those loads and stores to cover the entire
alloca and bitcast them into the appropriate type such that promotion
can proceed.
These partial loads and stores stem from an annoying confluence of ARM's
calling convention and ABI lowering and the FCA pre-splitting which
takes place in SROA. Clang lowers a { double, double } in-register
function argument as a [4 x i32] function argument to ensure it is
placed into integer 32-bit registers (a really unnerving implicit
contract between Clang and the ARM backend I would add). This results in
a FCA load of [4 x i32]* from the { double, double } alloca, and SROA
decomposes this into a sequence of i32 loads and stores. Inlining
proceeds, code gets folded, but at the end of the day, we still have i32
stores to the low and high halves of a double alloca. Widening these to
be i64 operations, and bitcasting them to double prior to loading or
storing allows promotion to proceed for these allocas.
I looked quite a bit changing the IR which Clang produces for this case
to be more friendly, but small changes seem unlikely to help. I think
the best representation we could use currently would be to pass 4 i32
arguments thereby avoiding any FCAs, but that would still require this
fix. It seems like it might eventually be nice to somehow encode the ABI
register selection choices outside of the parameter type system so that
the parameter can be a { double, double }, but the CC register
annotations indicate that this should be passed via 4 integer registers.
This patch does not address the second problem in PR14059, which is the
reverse: when a struct alloca is loaded as a *larger* single integer.
This patch also does not address some of the code quality issues with
the FCA-splitting. Those don't actually impede any optimizations really,
but they're on my list to clean up.
[1]: Pedantic footnote: for those concerned about memory model issues
here, this is safe. For the alloca to be promotable, it cannot escape or
have any use of its address that could allow these loads or stores to be
racing. Thus, widening is always safe.
llvm-svn: 165928
