This requires custom handling because BasicAA caches handles to other
analyses and so it needs to trigger indirect invalidation.
This fixes one of the common crashes when using the new PM in real
pipelines. I've also tweaked a regression test to check that we are at
least handling the most immediate case.
I'm going to work at re-structuring this test some to both scale better
(rather than all being in one file) and check more invalidation paths in
a follow-up commit, but I wanted to get the basic bug fix in place.
llvm-svn: 290603
When iterating over data operands in AA, don't make argument-attribute-specific
queries on bundle operands. Trying to fix self hosting...
llvm-svn: 289765
After r289755, the AssumptionCache is no longer needed. Variables affected by
assumptions are now found by using the new operand-bundle-based scheme. This
new scheme is more computationally efficient, and also we need much less
code...
llvm-svn: 289756
Instead, expose whether the current type is an array or a struct, if an array
what the upper bound is, and if a struct the struct type itself. This is
in preparation for a later change which will make PointerType derive from
Type rather than SequentialType.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26594
llvm-svn: 288458
analyses to have a common type which is enforced rather than using
a char object and a `void *` type when used as an identifier.
This has a number of advantages. First, it at least helps some of the
confusion raised in Justin Lebar's code review of why `void *` was being
used everywhere by having a stronger type that connects to documentation
about this.
However, perhaps more importantly, it addresses a serious issue where
the alignment of these pointer-like identifiers was unknown. This made
it hard to use them in pointer-like data structures. We were already
dodging this in dangerous ways to create the "all analyses" entry. In
a subsequent patch I attempted to use these with TinyPtrVector and
things fell apart in a very bad way.
And it isn't just a compile time or type system issue. Worse than that,
the actual alignment of these pointer-like opaque identifiers wasn't
guaranteed to be a useful alignment as they were just characters.
This change introduces a type to use as the "key" object whose address
forms the opaque identifier. This both forces the objects to have proper
alignment, and provides type checking that we get it right everywhere.
It also makes the types somewhat less mysterious than `void *`.
We could go one step further and introduce a truly opaque pointer-like
type to return from the `ID()` static function rather than returning
`AnalysisKey *`, but that didn't seem to be a clear win so this is just
the initial change to get to a reliably typed and aligned object serving
is a key for all the analyses.
Thanks to Richard Smith and Justin Lebar for helping pick plausible
names and avoid making this refactoring many times. =] And thanks to
Sean for the super fast review!
While here, I've tried to move away from the "PassID" nomenclature
entirely as it wasn't really helping and is overloaded with old pass
manager constructs. Now we have IDs for analyses, and key objects whose
address can be used as IDs. Where possible and clear I've shortened this
to just "ID". In a few places I kept "AnalysisID" to make it clear what
was being identified.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27031
llvm-svn: 287783
In BasicAA GEP operand values get adjusted ("wrap-around") based on the
pointersize. Otherwise, in non-64b modes, AA could report false negatives.
However, a wrap-around is valid only for a fully evaluated expression.
It had been introduced to fix an alias problem in
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20160118/326163.html.
This commit restricts the wrap-around to constant gep operands only where the
value is known at compile-time.
llvm-svn: 284908
Recursive calls to aliasCheck from alias[GEP|Select|PHI] may result in a second call to GetUnderlyingObject for a Value, whose underlying object is already computed. This patch ensures that in this situations, the underlying object is not computed again, and the result of the previous call is resued.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D22305
llvm-svn: 278519
Summary:
We teach alias analysis that invariant.start is readonly.
This helps with GVN and memcopy optimizations that currently treat.
invariant.start as a clobber.
We need to treat this as readonly, so that DSE does not incorrectly
remove stores prior to the invariant.start
Reviewers: sanjoy, reames, majnemer, dberlin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23214
llvm-svn: 278138
Besides a general consistently benefit, the extra layer of indirection
allows the mechanical part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D23256 that
requires touching every transformation and analysis to be factored out
cleanly.
Thanks to David for the suggestion.
llvm-svn: 278077
Motivated by the work on the llvm.noalias intrinsic, teach BasicAA to look
through returned-argument functions when answering queries. This is essential
so that we don't loose all other AA information when supplementing with
llvm.noalias.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9383
llvm-svn: 275035
Summary:
This complements the earlier addition of IntrWriteMem and IntrWriteArgMem
LLVM intrinsic properties, see D18291.
Also start using the attribute for memset, memcpy, and memmove intrinsics,
and remove their special-casing in BasicAliasAnalysis.
Reviewers: reames, joker.eph
Subscribers: joker.eph, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18714
llvm-svn: 274485
Patch by Taewook Oh
Summary: Patch for Bug 27478. Make BasicAliasAnalysis claims NoAlias if two GEPs index different fields of the same structure.
Reviewers: hfinkel, dberlin
Subscribers: dberlin, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20665
llvm-svn: 271415
r270777 improved the precision of alloca vs. inbounbds GEP alias queries: if
we have (a) an inbounds GEP and (b) a pointer based on an alloca, and the
beginning of the object the GEP points to would have a negative offset with
respect to the alloca, then the GEP can not alias pointer (b).
This makes the same logic fire when (b) is based on a GlobalVariable instead
of an alloca.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20652
llvm-svn: 270893
It turns out that too many passes are relying on alias analysis results
for control dependencies. Until we fix that by introducing a more accurate
modelling of control dependencies, special case assume in MemorySSA instead.
Also introduce tests to ensure we don't regress the FunctionAttrs or LICM
passes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20658
llvm-svn: 270823
If a we have (a) a GEP and (b) a pointer based on an alloca, and the
beginning of the object the GEP points would have a negative offset with
repsect to the alloca, then the GEP can not alias pointer (b).
For example, consider code like:
struct { int f0, int f1, ...} foo;
...
foo alloca;
foo *random = bar(alloca);
int *f0 = &alloca.f0
int *f1 = &random->f1;
Which is lowered, approximately, to:
%alloca = alloca %struct.foo
%random = call %struct.foo* @random(%struct.foo* %alloca)
%f0 = getelementptr inbounds %struct, %struct.foo* %alloca, i32 0, i32 0
%f1 = getelementptr inbounds %struct, %struct.foo* %random, i32 0, i32 1
Assume %f1 and %f0 alias. Then %f1 would point into the object allocated
by %alloca. Since the %f1 GEP is inbounds, that means %random must also
point into the same object. But since %f0 points to the beginning of %alloca,
the highest %f1 can be is (%alloca + 3). This means %random can not be higher
than (%alloca - 1), and so is not inbounds, a contradiction.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20495
llvm-svn: 270777
When it has a DataLayout, DecomposeGEPExpression() should return the same object
as GetUnderlyingObject(). Per the FIXME, it currently always has a DL, so the
runtime check is redundant and can become an assert.
llvm-svn: 270268
Equivalent GEP indices with different types are treated as different
indices altogether, leading to an incorrect AA result. Fix the issue
by comparing indices based on their values.
Thanks to Mikael Holmén for reporting the issue!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19935
llvm-svn: 269197
Summary:
The idea is very close to what we do for assume intrinsics: we mark the
guard intrinsics as writing to arbitrary memory to maintain control
dependence, but under the covers we teach AA that they do not mod any
particular memory location.
Reviewers: chandlerc, hfinkel, gbiv, reames
Subscribers: george.burgess.iv, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19575
llvm-svn: 269007
I tried to be as close as possible to the strongest check that
existed before; cleaning these up properly is left for future work.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19469
llvm-svn: 267758
Summary:
Fixes PR26774.
If you're aware of the issue, feel free to skip the "Motivation"
section and jump directly to "This patch".
Motivation:
I define "refinement" as discarding behaviors from a program that the
optimizer has license to discard. So transforming:
```
void f(unsigned x) {
unsigned t = 5 / x;
(void)t;
}
```
to
```
void f(unsigned x) { }
```
is refinement, since the behavior went from "if x == 0 then undefined
else nothing" to "nothing" (the optimizer has license to discard
undefined behavior).
Refinement is a fundamental aspect of many mid-level optimizations done
by LLVM. For instance, transforming `x == (x + 1)` to `false` also
involves refinement since the expression's value went from "if x is
`undef` then { `true` or `false` } else { `false` }" to "`false`" (by
definition, the optimizer has license to fold `undef` to any non-`undef`
value).
Unfortunately, refinement implies that the optimizer cannot assume
that the implementation of a function it can see has all of the
behavior an unoptimized or a differently optimized version of the same
function can have. This is a problem for functions with comdat
linkage, where a function can be replaced by an unoptimized or a
differently optimized version of the same source level function.
For instance, FunctionAttrs cannot assume a comdat function is
actually `readnone` even if it does not have any loads or stores in
it; since there may have been loads and stores in the "original
function" that were refined out in the currently visible variant, and
at the link step the linker may in fact choose an implementation with
a load or a store. As an example, consider a function that does two
atomic loads from the same memory location, and writes to memory only
if the two values are not equal. The optimizer is allowed to refine
this function by first CSE'ing the two loads, and the folding the
comparision to always report that the two values are equal. Such a
refined variant will look like it is `readonly`. However, the
unoptimized version of the function can still write to memory (since
the two loads //can// result in different values), and selecting the
unoptimized version at link time will retroactively invalidate
transforms we may have done under the assumption that the function
does not write to memory.
Note: this is not just a problem with atomics or with linking
differently optimized object files. See PR26774 for more realistic
examples that involved neither.
This patch:
This change introduces a new set of linkage types, predicated as
`GlobalValue::mayBeDerefined` that returns true if the linkage type
allows a function to be replaced by a differently optimized variant at
link time. It then changes a set of IPO passes to bail out if they see
such a function.
Reviewers: chandlerc, hfinkel, dexonsmith, joker.eph, rnk
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18634
llvm-svn: 265762
This doesn't change how many times we construct domtrees in the normal
pipeline, and it removes fragility and instability where basic-aa may
not be run in time to see domtrees because they happen to be constructed
afterward.
This isn't quite as clean as the change to memdep because there is
a mode where basic-aa specifically runs without domtrees -- in the
hacking version used by function-attrs with the legacy pass manager.
llvm-svn: 263234
This was originally a pointer to support pass managers which didn't use
AnalysisManagers. However, that doesn't realistically come up much and
the complexity of supporting it doesn't really make sense.
In fact, *many* parts of the pass manager were just assuming the pointer
was never null already. This at least makes it much more explicit and
clear.
llvm-svn: 263219
work in the face of the limitations of DLLs and templated static
variables.
This requires passes that use the AnalysisBase mixin provide a static
variable themselves. So as to keep their APIs clean, I've made these
private and befriended the CRTP base class (which is the common
practice).
I've added documentation to AnalysisBase for why this is necessary and
at what point we can go back to the much simpler system.
This is clearly a better pattern than the extern template as it caught
*numerous* places where the template magic hadn't been applied and
things were "just working" but would eventually have broken
mysteriously.
llvm-svn: 263216
MemoryDependenceAnalysis had a hard-coded exception to the general aliasing rules for malloc and calloc. The reasoning that applied there is equally valid in BasicAA and clarifies the remaining logic in MDA.
In principal, this can expose slightly more optimization opportunities, but since essentially all of our aliasing aware memory optimization passes go through MDA, this will likely be NFC in practice.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15912
llvm-svn: 263075
parts of the AA interface out of the base class of every single AA
result object.
Because this logic reformulates the query in terms of some other aspect
of the API, it would easily cause O(n^2) query patterns in alias
analysis. These could in turn be magnified further based on the number
of call arguments, and then further based on the number of AA queries
made for a particular call. This ended up causing problems for Rust that
were actually noticable enough to get a bug (PR26564) and probably other
places as well.
When originally re-working the AA infrastructure, the desire was to
regularize the pattern of refinement without losing any generality.
While I think it was successful, that is clearly proving to be too
costly. And the cost is needless: we gain no actual improvement for this
generality of making a direct query to tbaa actually be able to
re-use some other alias analysis's refinement logic for one of the other
APIs, or some such. In short, this is entirely wasted work.
To the extent possible, delegation to other API surfaces should be done
at the aggregation layer so that we can avoid re-walking the
aggregation. In fact, this significantly simplifies the logic as we no
longer need to smuggle the aggregation layer into each alias analysis
(or the TargetLibraryInfo into each alias analysis just so we can form
argument memory locations!).
However, we also have some delegation logic inside of BasicAA and some
of it even makes sense. When the delegation logic is baking in specific
knowledge of aliasing properties of the LLVM IR, as opposed to simply
reformulating the query to utilize a different alias analysis interface
entry point, it makes a lot of sense to restrict that logic to
a different layer such as BasicAA. So one aspect of the delegation that
was in every AA base class is that when we don't have operand bundles,
we re-use function AA results as a fallback for callsite alias results.
This relies on the IR properties of calls and functions w.r.t. aliasing,
and so seems a better fit to BasicAA. I've lifted the logic up to that
point where it seems to be a natural fit. This still does a bit of
redundant work (we query function attributes twice, once via the
callsite and once via the function AA query) but it is *exactly* twice
here, no more.
The end result is that all of the delegation logic is hoisted out of the
base class and into either the aggregation layer when it is a pure
retargeting to a different API surface, or into BasicAA when it relies
on the IR's aliasing properties. This should fix the quadratic query
pattern reported in PR26564, although I don't have a stand-alone test
case to reproduce it.
It also seems general goodness. Now the numerous AAs that don't need
target library info don't carry it around and depend on it. I think
I can even rip out the general access to the aggregation layer and only
expose that in BasicAA as it is the only place where we re-query in that
manner.
However, this is a non-trivial change to the AA infrastructure so I want
to get some additional eyes on this before it lands. Sadly, it can't
wait long because we should really cherry pick this into 3.8 if we're
going to go this route.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17329
llvm-svn: 262490
analyses in the new pass manager.
These just handle really basic stuff: turning a type name into a string
statically that is nice to print in logs, and getting a static unique ID
for each analysis.
Sadly, the format of passes in anonymous namespaces makes using their
names in tests really annoying so I've customized the names of the no-op
passes to keep tests sane to read.
This is the first of a few simplifying refactorings for the new pass
manager that should reduce boilerplate and confusion.
llvm-svn: 262004
Summary:
GEPOperator: provide getResultElementType alongside getSourceElementType.
This is made possible by adding a result element type field to GetElementPtrConstantExpr, which GetElementPtrInst already has.
GEP: replace get(Pointer)ElementType uses with get{Source,Result}ElementType.
Reviewers: mjacob, dblaikie
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16275
llvm-svn: 258145
Since writeonly is the only missing attribute and special case left for the memset/memcpy family of intrinsics, rearrange the code to make that much more clear.
llvm-svn: 256949
Most of the properties of memset_pattern16 can be now covered by the generic attributes and inferred by InferFunctionAttrs. The only exceptions are:
- We don't yet have a writeonly attribute for the first argument.
- We don't have an attribute for modeling the access size facts encoded in MemoryLocation.cpp.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15879
llvm-svn: 256911
We only need to describe the writeonly property of one of the arguments. All of the rest of the semantics are nicely described by existing attributes in Intrinsics.td.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15880
llvm-svn: 256910
In getArgModRefInfo we consider all arguments as having MRI_ModRef.
However for arguments marked with readonly attribute we can return
more precise answer - MRI_Ref.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13992
llvm-svn: 251525
