So that the two operations in DwarfDebug couldn't get separated (because
I accidentally separated them in some work in progress), put them
together. While we're here, move DwarfUnit::addRange to
DwarfCompileUnit, since it's not relevant to type units.
llvm-svn: 217468
PrevSection/PrevCU are used to detect holes in the address range of a CU
to ensure the DW_AT_ranges does not include those holes. When we see a
function with no debug info, though it may be in the same range as the
prior and subsequent functions, there should be a gap in the CU's
ranges. By setting PrevCU to null in that case, the range would not be
extended to cover the gap.
llvm-svn: 217466
DW_TAG_lexical_scopes inform debuggers about the instruction range for
which a given variable (or imported declaration/module/etc) is valid. If
the scope doesn't itself contain any such entities, it's a waste of
space and should be omitted.
We were correctly doing this for entirely empty leaves, but not for
intermediate nodes.
Reduces total (not just debug sections) .o file size for a bootstrap
-gmlt LLVM by 22% and bootstrap -gmlt clang executable by 13%. The wins
for a full -g build will be less as a % (and in absolute terms), but
should still be substantial - with some of that win being fewer
relocations, thus more substantiall reducing link times than fewer bytes
alone would have.
llvm-svn: 216861
This makes the emptiness of the scope with regards to variables and
nested scopes is the same as with regards to imported entities. Just
check if we had nothing at all before we build the node.
llvm-svn: 216840
First of many steps to improve lexical scope construction (to omit
trivial lexical scopes - those without any direct variables). To that
end it's easier not to create imported entities directly into the
lexical scope node, but to build them, then add them if necessary.
llvm-svn: 216838
Rushed when I realized I hadn't committed the FreeDeleter for a clang
change I'd committed, and didn't check that I had things lying around in
my client.
Apologies for the noise.
llvm-svn: 216792
Somewhat unnoticed in the original implementation of discriminators, but
it could cause instructions to end up in new, small,
DW_TAG_lexical_blocks due to the use of DILexicalBlock to track
discriminator changes.
Instead, use DILexicalBlockFile which we already use to track file
changes without introducing new scopes, so it works well to track
discriminator changes in the same way.
llvm-svn: 216239
buildLocationLists easier to read.
The previous implementation conflated the merging of individual pieces
and the merging of entire DebugLocEntries.
By splitting this functionality into two separate functions the intention
of the code should be clearer.
llvm-svn: 215383
Due to an unnecessary special case, inlined arguments that happened to
be from the same function as they were inlined into were misclassified
as non-inline arguments and would overwrite the non-inlined arguments.
Assert that we never overwrite a function's arguments, and stop
misclassifying inlined arguments as non-inline arguments to fix this
issue.
Excuse the rather crappy test case - handcrafted IR might do better, or
someone who understands better how to tickle the inliner to create a
recursive inlining situation like this (though it may also be necessary
to tickle the variable in a particular way to cause it to be recorded in
the MMI side table and go down this particular path for location
information).
llvm-svn: 215157
This was coming in weird debug info that had variables (and hence
debug_locs) but was in GMLT mode (because it was missing the 13th field
of the compile_unit metadata) so no ranges were constructed. We should
always have at least one range for any CU with a debug_loc in it -
because the range should cover the debug_loc.
The assertion just ensures that the "!= 1" range case inside the
subsequent loop doesn't get entered for the case where there are no
ranges at all, which should never reach here in the first place.
llvm-svn: 214939
This simplifies construction and usage while making the data structure
smaller. It was a holdover from the days when we didn't have a separate
DebugLocList and all we had was a flat list of DebugLocEntries.
llvm-svn: 214933
Originally reverted in r213432 with flakey failures on an ASan self-host
build. After reduction it seems to be the same issue fixed in r213805
(ArgPromo + DebugInfo: Handle updating debug info over multiple
applications of argument promotion) and r213952 (by having
LiveDebugVariables strip dbg_value intrinsics in functions that are not
described by debug info). Though I cannot explain why this failure was
flakey...
llvm-svn: 214761
variables (for example, by-value struct arguments passed in registers, or
large integer values split across several smaller registers).
On the IR level, this adds a new type of complex address operation OpPiece
to DIVariable that describes size and offset of a variable fragment.
On the DWARF emitter level, all pieces describing the same variable are
collected, sorted and emitted as DWARF expressions using the DW_OP_piece
and DW_OP_bit_piece operators.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D3373
rdar://problem/15928306
What this patch doesn't do / Future work:
- This patch only adds the backend machinery to make this work, patches
that change SROA and SelectionDAG's type legalizer to actually create
such debug info will follow. (http://reviews.llvm.org/D2680)
- Making the DIVariable complex expressions into an argument of dbg.value
will reduce the memory footprint of the debug metadata.
- The sorting/uniquing of pieces should be moved into DebugLocEntry,
to facilitate the merging of multi-piece entries.
llvm-svn: 214576
Per feedback on r214111, we are going to use null to represent unspecified
parameter. If the type array is {null}, it means a function that returns void;
If the type array is {null, null}, it means a variadic function that returns
void. In summary if we have more than one element in the type array and the last
element is null, it is a variadic function.
rdar://17628609
llvm-svn: 214189
The enum types array by design contains pointers to MDNodes rather than DIRefs.
Unique them when handling the enum types in DwarfDebug.
rdar://17628609
llvm-svn: 214139
DITypeArray is an array of DITypeRef, at its creation, we will create
DITypeRef (i.e use the identifier if the type node has an identifier).
This is the last patch to unique the type array of a subroutine type.
rdar://17628609
llvm-svn: 214132
This is the second of a series of patches to handle type uniqueing of the
type array for a subroutine type.
For vector and array types, getElements returns the array of subranges, so it
is a better name than getTypeArray. Even for class, struct and enum types,
getElements returns the members, which can be subprograms.
setArrays can set up to two arrays, the second is the templates.
This commit should have no functionality change.
llvm-svn: 214112
This recommits r208930, r208933, and r208975 (by reverting r209338) and
reverts r209529 (the FIXME to readd this functionality once the tools
were fixed) now that DWP has been fixed to cope with a single section
for all fission type units.
Original commit message:
"Since type units in the dwo file are handled by a debug aware tool,
they don't need to leverage the ELF comdat grouping to implement
deduplication. Avoid creating all the .group sections for these as a
space optimization."
llvm-svn: 213956
Reverted by Eric Christopher (Thanks!) in r212203 after Bob Wilson
reported LTO issues. Duncan Exon Smith and Aditya Nandakumar helped
provide a reduced reproduction, though the failure wasn't too hard to
guess, and even easier with the example to confirm.
The assertion that the subprogram metadata associated with an
llvm::Function matches the scope data referenced by the DbgLocs on the
instructions in that function is not valid under LTO. In LTO, a C++
inline function might exist in multiple CUs and the subprogram metadata
nodes will refer to the same llvm::Function. In this case, depending on
the order of the CUs, the first intance of the subprogram metadata may
not be the one referenced by the instructions in that function and the
assertion will fail.
A test case (test/DebugInfo/cross-cu-linkonce-distinct.ll) is added, the
assertion removed and a comment added to explain this situation.
This was then reverted again in r213581 as it caused PR20367. The root
cause of this was the early exit in LiveDebugVariables meant that
spurious DBG_VALUE intrinsics that referenced dead variables were not
removed, causing an assertion/crash later on. The fix is to have
LiveDebugVariables strip all DBG_VALUE intrinsics in functions without
debug info as they're not needed anyway. Test case added to cover this
situation (that occurs when a debug-having function is inlined into a
nodebug function) in test/DebugInfo/X86/nodebug_with_debug_loc.ll
Original commit message:
If a function isn't actually in a CU's subprogram list in the debug info
metadata, ignore all the DebugLocs and don't try to build scopes, track
variables, etc.
While this is possibly a minor optimization, it's also a correctness fix
for an incoming patch that will add assertions to LexicalScopes and the
debug info verifier to ensure that all scope chains lead to debug info
for the current function.
Fix up a few test cases that had broken/incomplete debug info that could
violate this constraint.
Add a test case where this occurs by design (inlining a
debug-info-having function in an attribute nodebug function - we want
this to work because /if/ the nodebug function is then inlined into a
debug-info-having function, it should be fine (and will work fine - we
just stitch the scopes up as usual), but should the inlining not happen
we need to not assert fail either).
llvm-svn: 213952
Recommits 212776 which was reverted in r212793. This has been committed
and recommitted a few times as I try to test it harder and find/fix more
issues. The most recent revert was due to an asan bot failure which I
can't seem to reproduce locally, though I believe I'm following all the
steps the buildbot does.
So I'm going to recommit this in the hopes of investigating the failure
on the buildbot itself... apologies in advance for the bot noise. If
anyone sees failures with this /please/ provide me with any
reproductions, etc.
llvm-svn: 213391
Found during windows unwinding work. This header is indirectly included through
a chain leading through Support/Win64EH.h. Explicitly include the header. NFC.
llvm-svn: 212955
This reverts commit r212776.
Nope, still seems to be failing on the sanitizer bots... but hey, not
the msan self-host anymore, it's failing in asan now. I'll start looking
there next.
llvm-svn: 212793
Committed in r212205 and reverted in r212226 due to msan self-hosting
failure, I believe I've got that fixed by r212761 to Clang.
Original commit message:
"Originally committed in r211723, reverted in r211724 due to failure
cases found and fixed (ArgumentPromotion: r211872, Inlining: r212065),
committed again in r212085 and reverted again in r212089 after fixing
some other cases, such as debug info subprogram lists not keeping track
of the function they represent (r212128) and then short-circuiting
things like LiveDebugVariables that build LexicalScopes for functions
that might not have full debug info.
And again, I believe the invariant actually holds for some reasonable
amount of code (but I'll keep an eye on the buildbots and see what
happens... ).
Original commit message:
PR20038: DebugInfo: Inlined call sites where the caller has debug info
but the call itself has no debug location.
This situation does bad things when inlined, so I've fixed Clang not to
produce inlinable call sites without locations when the caller has debug
info (in the one case where I could find that this occurred). This
updates the PR20038 test case to be what clang now produces, and readds
the assertion that had to be removed due to this bug.
I've also beefed up the debug info verifier to help diagnose these
issues in the future, and I hope to add checks to the inliner to just
assert-fail if it encounters this situation. If, in the future, we
decide we have to cope with this situation, the right thing to do is
probably to just remove all the DebugLocs from the inlined
instructions."
llvm-svn: 212776
Reverted by Eric Christopher (Thanks!) in r212203 after Bob Wilson
reported LTO issues. Duncan Exon Smith and Aditya Nandakumar helped
provide a reduced reproduction, though the failure wasn't too hard to
guess, and even easier with the example to confirm.
The assertion that the subprogram metadata associated with an
llvm::Function matches the scope data referenced by the DbgLocs on the
instructions in that function is not valid under LTO. In LTO, a C++
inline function might exist in multiple CUs and the subprogram metadata
nodes will refer to the same llvm::Function. In this case, depending on
the order of the CUs, the first intance of the subprogram metadata may
not be the one referenced by the instructions in that function and the
assertion will fail.
A test case (test/DebugInfo/cross-cu-linkonce-distinct.ll) is added, the
assertion removed and a comment added to explain this situation.
Original commit message:
If a function isn't actually in a CU's subprogram list in the debug info
metadata, ignore all the DebugLocs and don't try to build scopes, track
variables, etc.
While this is possibly a minor optimization, it's also a correctness fix
for an incoming patch that will add assertions to LexicalScopes and the
debug info verifier to ensure that all scope chains lead to debug info
for the current function.
Fix up a few test cases that had broken/incomplete debug info that could
violate this constraint.
Add a test case where this occurs by design (inlining a
debug-info-having function in an attribute nodebug function - we want
this to work because /if/ the nodebug function is then inlined into a
debug-info-having function, it should be fine (and will work fine - we
just stitch the scopes up as usual), but should the inlining not happen
we need to not assert fail either).
llvm-svn: 212649
