The hardware has created a real mess in the naming for add/sub, which
have been renamed basically every generation. Switch the carry out
pseudos to have the gfx9/gfx10 names. We were using the original SI/CI
v_add_i32/v_sub_i32 names. Later targets reintroduced these names as
carryless instructions with a saturating clamp bit, which we do not
define. Do this rename so we can unambiguously add these missing
instructions.
The carry-in versions should also be renamed, but at least those had a
consistent _u32 name to begin with. The 16-bit instructions were also
renamed, but aren't ambiguous.
This does regress assembler error message quality in some cases. In
mismatched wave32/wave64 situations, this will switch from
"unsupported instruction" to "invalid operand", with the error
pointing at the wrong position. I couldn't quite follow how the
assembler selects these, but the previous behavior seemed accidental
to me. It looked like there was a partial attempt to handle this which
was never completed (i.e. there is an AMDGPUOperand::isBoolReg but it
isn't used for anything).
There are a number of MIR tests using instructions on subtargets where
they don't really exist. These are some of the easy cases that don't
require splitting up test functions.
Summary:
Moving SMRD to VMEM in SIFixSGPRCopies is rather bad for performance if
the load is really uniform. So select the scalar load intrinsics directly
to either VMEM or SMRD buffer loads based on divergence analysis.
If an offset happens to end up in a VGPR -- either because a floating
point calculation was involved, or due to other remaining deficiencies
in SIFixSGPRCopies -- we use v_readfirstlane.
There is some unrelated churn in tests since we now select MUBUF offsets
in a unified way with non-scalar buffer loads.
Change-Id: I170e6816323beb1348677b358c9d380865cd1a19
Reviewers: arsenm, alex-t, rampitec, tpr
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, t-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53283
llvm-svn: 348050
Summary:
Moving SMRD to VMEM in SIFixSGPRCopies is rather bad for performance if
the load is really uniform. So select the scalar load intrinsics directly
to either VMEM or SMRD buffer loads based on divergence analysis.
If an offset happens to end up in a VGPR -- either because a floating
point calculation was involved, or due to other remaining deficiencies
in SIFixSGPRCopies -- we use v_readfirstlane.
There is some unrelated churn in tests since we now select MUBUF offsets
in a unified way with non-scalar buffer loads.
Change-Id: I170e6816323beb1348677b358c9d380865cd1a19
Reviewers: arsenm, alex-t, rampitec, tpr
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, t-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53283
llvm-svn: 344696
