The bound instruction does not have reversed operands in gas.
Fixes PR27653.
Patch by Maya Madhavan.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43243
llvm-svn: 325178
Try to keep PACK*SDW/PACK*SWB as wide as possible, this helps ComputeNumSignBits as it can only peek through bitcasts to wider types, pre-AVX2 codegen was already doing this as it could peek through bitcasts/subvectors more easily than AVX2 could through shuffles.
This shouldn't affect existing results as calls to truncateVectorWithPACK ensure we have enough sign bits to pack to the same value, but it should make it possible to use truncateVectorWithPACK chains to perform saturation in combineTruncateWithSat with a future patch.
llvm-svn: 325149
The prologue-end line record must be emitted after the last
instruction that is part of the function frame setup code and before
the instruction that marks the beginning of the function body.
Patch by Carlos Alberto Enciso!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41762
llvm-svn: 325143
If a load follows a store and reloads data that the store has written to memory, Intel microarchitectures can in many cases forward the data directly from the store to the load, This "store forwarding" saves cycles by enabling the load to directly obtain the data instead of accessing the data from cache or memory.
A "store forward block" occurs in cases that a store cannot be forwarded to the load. The most typical case of store forward block on Intel Core microarchiticutre that a small store cannot be forwarded to a large load.
The estimated penalty for a store forward block is ~13 cycles.
This pass tries to recognize and handle cases where "store forward block" is created by the compiler when lowering memcpy calls to a sequence
of a load and a store.
The pass currently only handles cases where memcpy is lowered to XMM/YMM registers, it tries to break the memcpy into smaller copies.
breaking the memcpy should be possible since there is no atomicity guarantee for loads and stores to XMM/YMM.
Change-Id: Ic41aa9ade6512e0478db66e07e2fde41b4fb35f9
llvm-svn: 325128
While the AVX512 VTRUNCS/VTRUNCUS instructions require legal types, truncateVectorWithPACK handles cases with multiples of legal types through splitting/concatenation. So we just need to ensure that the src/dst scalar types are correct and leave truncateVectorWithPACK to handle the rest of it.
llvm-svn: 325127
Summary:
Instead of solving the hard problem of how to pass the callee to the indirect
jump thunk without a register, just use a CSR. At a call boundary, there's
nothing stopping us from using a CSR to hold the callee as long as we save and
restore it in the prologue.
Also, add tests for this mregparm=3 case. I wrote execution tests for
__llvm_retpoline_push, but they never got committed as lit tests, either
because I never rewrote them or because they got lost in merge conflicts.
Reviewers: chandlerc, dwmw2
Subscribers: javed.absar, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43214
llvm-svn: 325049
Expand existing SchedRW to encompass these like it did for the other memory offset movs - added comments to closing braces to keep track of def scopes.
We only tagged it with the itinerary class, so completeness checks were erroneously passed (PR35639).
llvm-svn: 324910
Tag AVX512 variants to match SSE/AVX originals.
We only tagged it with the itinerary class, so completeness checks were erroneously passed (PR35639).
llvm-svn: 324901
We only tagged it with the itinerary class, so completeness checks were erroneously passed (PR35639).
AMD targets can perform these a lot quicker than WriteMicrocoded so will need an override in the models.
llvm-svn: 324897
It asserts building Chromium; see PR36346.
(This also reverts the follow-up r324836.)
> If a load follows a store and reloads data that the store has written to memory, Intel microarchitectures can in many cases forward the data directly from the store to the load, This "store forwarding" saves cycles by enabling the load to directly obtain the data instead of accessing the data from cache or memory.
> A "store forward block" occurs in cases that a store cannot be forwarded to the load. The most typical case of store forward block on Intel Core microarchiticutre that a small store cannot be forwarded to a large load.
> The estimated penalty for a store forward block is ~13 cycles.
>
> This pass tries to recognize and handle cases where "store forward block" is created by the compiler when lowering memcpy calls to a sequence
> of a load and a store.
>
> The pass currently only handles cases where memcpy is lowered to XMM/YMM registers, it tries to break the memcpy into smaller copies.
> breaking the memcpy should be possible since there is no atomicity guarantee for loads and stores to XMM/YMM.
llvm-svn: 324887
I don't believe we ever create an X86ISD::SUB with a 0 constant which is what the TEST handling needs. The ternary operator at the end of this code shows up as only going one way in the llvm-cov report from the bots.
llvm-svn: 324865
ISD::ADD implies individual vector element addition with no carries between elements. But for a vXi1 type that would be the same as XOR. And we already turn ISD::ADD into ISD::XOR for all vXi1 types during lowering. So the ISD::ADD pattern would never be able to match anyway.
KADD is different, it adds the elements but also propagates a carry between them. This just a way of doing an add in k-register without bitcasting to the scalar domain. There's still no way to match the pattern, but at least its not obviously wrong.
llvm-svn: 324861
Previously we just emitted this as a MOV8rm which would likely get folded during the peephole pass anyway. This just makes it explicit earlier.
The gpr-to-mask.ll test changed because the kaddb instruction has no memory form.
llvm-svn: 324860
Summary:
Currently we only use min/max to help with ule/uge compares because it removes an invert of the result that would otherwise be needed. But we can also use it for ult/ugt compares if it will prevent the need for a sign bit flip needed to use pcmpgt at the cost of requiring an invert after the compare.
I also refactored the code so that the max/min code is self contained and does its own return instead of setting up a flag to manipulate the rest of the function's behavior.
Most of the test cases look ok with this. I did notice that we added instructions when one of the operands being sign flipped is a constant vector that we were able to constant fold the flip into.
I also noticed that sometimes the SSE min/max clobbers a register that is needed after the compare. This resulted in an extra move being inserted before the min/max to preserve the register. We could try to detect this and switch from min to max and change the compare operands to use the operand that gets reused in the compare.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42935
llvm-svn: 324842
This allows us to recognise more saturation patterns and also simplify some MINMAX codegen that was failing to combine CMPGE comparisons to a legal CMPGT.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43014
llvm-svn: 324837
If a load follows a store and reloads data that the store has written to memory, Intel microarchitectures can in many cases forward the data directly from the store to the load, This "store forwarding" saves cycles by enabling the load to directly obtain the data instead of accessing the data from cache or memory.
A "store forward block" occurs in cases that a store cannot be forwarded to the load. The most typical case of store forward block on Intel Core microarchiticutre that a small store cannot be forwarded to a large load.
The estimated penalty for a store forward block is ~13 cycles.
This pass tries to recognize and handle cases where "store forward block" is created by the compiler when lowering memcpy calls to a sequence
of a load and a store.
The pass currently only handles cases where memcpy is lowered to XMM/YMM registers, it tries to break the memcpy into smaller copies.
breaking the memcpy should be possible since there is no atomicity guarantee for loads and stores to XMM/YMM.
Change-Id: I620b6dc91583ad9a1444591e3ddc00dd25d81748
llvm-svn: 324835
This patch adds a new function attribute "required-vector-width" that can be set by the frontend to indicate the maximum vector width present in the original source code. The idea is that this would be set based on ABI requirements, intrinsics or explicit vector types being used, maybe simd pragmas, etc. The backend will then use this information to determine if its save to make 512-bit vectors illegal when the preference is for 256-bit vectors.
For code that has no vectors in it originally and only get vectors through the loop and slp vectorizers this allows us to generate code largely similar to our AVX2 only output while still enabling AVX512 features like mask registers and gather/scatter. The loop vectorizer doesn't always obey TTI and will create oversized vectors with the expectation the backend will legalize it. In order to avoid changing the vectorizer and potentially harm our AVX2 codegen this patch tries to make the legalizer behavior similar.
This is restricted to CPUs that support AVX512F and AVX512VL so that we have good fallback options to use 128 and 256-bit vectors and still get masking.
I've qualified every place I could find in X86ISelLowering.cpp and added tests cases for many of them with 2 different values for the attribute to see the codegen differences.
We still need to do frontend work for the attribute and teach the inliner how to merge it, etc. But this gets the codegen layer ready for it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42724
llvm-svn: 324834
We promote these via a DAG combine now before lowering gets the chance.
Also remove the v2i1 custom handling since it will no longer be triggered.
llvm-svn: 324833
These were added as part of the refactoring for prefer vector width. At the time I thought the hasAVX512 here would be replaced with "allow 512 bit vectors" so that it would read "allow 512 bit vectors OR VLX". But now the plan is to only give the option of disabling 512 bit vectors when VLX is enabled. So we don't need this qualification at all
llvm-svn: 324831
Summary:
This patch changes the signature of the avx512 packed fp compare intrinsics to return a vXi1 vector and no longer take a mask as input. The casts to scalar type will now need to be explicit in the IR. The masking node will now be an explicit and in the IR.
This makes the intrinsic look much more similar to an fcmp instruction that we wish we could use for these but can't. We already use icmp instructions for integer compares.
Previously the lowering step of isel would turn the intrinsic into an X86 specific ISD node and a emit the masking nodes as well as some bitcasts. This means DAG combines can't see the vXi1 type until somewhat late, making it more difficult to combine out gpr<->mask transition sequences. By exposing the vXi1 type explicitly in the IR and initial SelectionDAG we give earlier DAG combines and even InstCombine the chance to see it and optimize it.
This should make any issues with gpr<->mask sequences the same between integer and fp. Meaning we only have to fix them once.
Reviewers: spatel, delena, RKSimon, zvi
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43137
llvm-svn: 324827
Undef VLX, getSetCCResultType returns v2i1/v4i1 for v2f32/v4f32 so default type legalization will end up changing the setcc result type back to vXi1 if it had been extended. The resulting extend gets messed up further by type legalization and is difficult to recombine back to (v4i32 (setcc (v4f32))) after legalization.
I went ahead and enabled this for SSE2 and later since its always the result we want and this helps type legalization get there in less steps.
llvm-svn: 324822
This prevents extends of masks being introduced during lowering where it become difficult to combine them out.
There are a few oddities in here.
We sometimes concatenate two k-registers produced by two compares, sign_extend the combined pair, then extract two halves. This worked better previously because the sign_extend wasn't created until after the fp_to_sint was split which led to a split sign_extend being created.
We probably also need to custom type legalize (v2i32 (sext v2i1)) via widening.
llvm-svn: 324820
This avoids a constant pool load to create 1.
The int->float are showing converts to mask and back. We probably need to widen inputs to sint_to_fp/uint_to_fp before type legalization.
llvm-svn: 324805
In the rare case where the input contains rip-relative addressing with
immediate displacements, *and* the instruction ends with an immediate,
we encode the instruction in the wrong way:
movl $12345678, 0x400(%rdi) // all good, no rip-relative addr
movl %eax, 0x400(%rip) // all good, no immediate at the end of the instruction
movl $12345678, 0x400(%rip) // fails, encodes address as 0x3fc(%rip)
Offset is a label:
movl $12345678, foo(%rip)
we want to account for the size of the immediate (in this case,
$12345678, 4 bytes).
Offset is an immediate:
movl $12345678, 0x400(%rip)
we should not account for the size of the immediate, assuming the
immediate offset is what the user wanted.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43050
llvm-svn: 324772
Previously we extracted two subvectors and concatenate. But the concatenate will be lowered to two insert subvectors. Then DAG combine will merge once of the inserts and one of the extracts back into the original vector. We might as well just directly use one extract and one insert.
llvm-svn: 324710
This regresses a couple cases in the shuffle combining test. But those cases use intrinsics that InstCombine knows how to turn into a generic shuffle earlier. This should give opportunities to fold this earlier in InstCombine or DAG combine.
llvm-svn: 324709
The patch essentially makes sure that X86CallLowering adds proper
G_COPY/G_TRUNC and G_ANYEXT/G_COPY when we are doing lowering of
arguments/returns for floating point values passed on registers.
Tests are updated accordingly
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42287
llvm-svn: 324665
