Moving accesses in MemorySSA at InsertionPlace::End, when an instruction is
moved into a block, almost always means insert at the end of the block, but
before the block terminator. This matters when the block terminator is a
MemoryAccess itself (an invoke), and the insertion must be done before
the terminator for the update to be correct.
Insert an additional position: InsertionPlace:BeforeTerminator and update
current usages where this applies.
Resolves PR44027.
When simplifying a Phi to the unique value found incoming, check that
there wasn't a Phi already created to break a cycle. If so, remove it.
Resolves PR43541.
Some additional nits included.
llvm-svn: 374471
Summary:
Whenever we get the previous definition, the assumption is that the
recursion starts ina reachable block.
If the recursion starts in an unreachable block, we may recurse
indefinitely. Handle this case by returning LoE if the block is
unreachable.
Resolves PR43426.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: Prazek, sanjoy.google, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68809
llvm-svn: 374447
Summary:
The rule for the moveAllAfterMergeBlocks API si for all instructions
from `From` to have been moved to `To`, while keeping the CFG edges (and
block terminators) unchanged.
Update all the callsites for moveAllAfterMergeBlocks to follow this.
Pending follow-up: since the same behavior is needed everytime, merge
all callsites into one. The common denominator may be the call to
`MergeBlockIntoPredecessor`.
Resolves PR43569.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: Prazek, sanjoy.google, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68659
llvm-svn: 374177
MemoryPhis should be added in the IDF of the blocks newly gaining Defs.
This includes the blocks that gained a Phi and the block gaining a Def,
if the block did not have one before.
Resolves PR43427.
llvm-svn: 373505
If a single predecessor is found, still check if the block is
unreachable. The test that found this had a self loop unreachable block.
Resolves PR43493.
llvm-svn: 373383
The check for "was there an access in this block" should be: is the last
access in this block and is it not a newly inserted phi.
Resolves new test in PR43438.
Also fix a typo when simplifying trivial Phis to match the comment.
llvm-svn: 373380
Summary:
If a block has all incoming values with the same MemoryAccess (ignoring
incoming values from unreachable blocks), then use that incoming
MemoryAccess and do not create a Phi in the first place.
Revert IDF work-around added in rL372673; it should not be required unless
the Def inserted is the first in its block.
The patch also cleans up a series of tests, added during the many
iterations on insertDef.
The patch also fixes PR43438.
The same issue that occurs in insertDef with "adding phis, hence the IDF of
Phis is needed", can also occur in fixupDefs: the `getPreviousRecursive`
call only adds Phis walking on the predecessor edges, which means there
may be the case of a Phi added walking the CFG "backwards" which
triggers the needs for an additional Phi in successor blocks.
Such Phis are added during fixupDefs only in the presence of unreachable
blocks.
Hence this highlights the need to avoid adding Phis in blocks with
unreachable predecessors in the first place.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: Prazek, sanjoy.google, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67995
llvm-svn: 372932
Summary:
MemoryPhis may be needed following a Def insertion inthe IDF of all the
new accesses added (phis + potentially a def). Ensure this also occurs when
only the new MemoryPhis are the defining accesses.
Note: The need for computing IDF here is because of new Phis added with
edges incoming from unreachable code, Phis that had previously been
simplified. The preferred solution is to not reintroduce such Phis.
This patch is the needed fix while working on the preferred solution.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: Prazek, sanjoy.google, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67927
llvm-svn: 372673
Summary:
When inserting a Def, the current algorithm is walking edges backward
and inserting new Phis where needed. There may be additional Phis needed
in the IDF of the newly inserted Def and Phis.
Adding Phis in the IDF of the Def was added ina previous patch, but we
may also need other Phis in the IDF of the newly added Phis.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: Prazek, sanjoy.google, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67637
llvm-svn: 372138
Summary:
Regularly when moving an instruction that may not read or write memory,
the instruction is not modelled in MSSA, so not action is necessary.
For a non-conventional AA pipeline, MSSA needs to explicitly check when
creating accesses, so as to not model instructions that may not read and
write memory.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: Prazek, sanjoy.google, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67562
llvm-svn: 372137
Summary:
Do not model debuginfo intrinsics in MemorySSA.
Regularly these are non-memory modifying instructions. With -disable-basicaa, they were being modelled as Defs.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: aprantl, Prazek, sanjoy.google, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67307
llvm-svn: 371565
Summary:
When inserting a new Def, and inserting Phis in the IDF when needed,
also mark the already existing Phis in the IDF as non-optimized, since
these may need fixing as well.
In the test attached, there is a Phi in the IDF that happens to be
trivial, and is wrongfully removed by the call to getLastDef that
follows. This is a valid situation and the existing IDF Phis need to
marked as "may need fixing" as well.
Resolves PR43044.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: Prazek, sanjoy.google, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66495
llvm-svn: 369464
Summary:
When inserting uses from outside the MemorySSA creation, we don't
normally need to rename uses, based on the assumption that there will be
no inserted Phis (if Def existed that required a Phi, that Phi already
exists). However, when dealing with unreachable blocks, MemorySSA will
optimize away Phis whose incoming blocks are unreachable, and these Phis end
up being re-added when inserting a Use.
There are two potential solutions here:
1. Analyze the inserted Phis and clean them up if they are unneeded
(current method for cleaning up trivial phis does not cover this)
2. Leave the Phi in place and rename uses, the same way as whe inserting
defs.
This patch use approach 2.
Resolves first test in PR42940.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: Prazek, sanjoy.google, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66033
llvm-svn: 369291
Summary:
Verify that the incoming defs into phis are the last defs from the
respective incoming blocks.
When moving blocks, insertDef must RenameUses. Adding this verification
makes GVNHoist tests fail that uncovered this issue.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63147
llvm-svn: 367451
Summary:
LoopRotate may simplify instructions, leading to the new instructions not having memory accesses created for them.
Allow this behavior, by allowing the new access to be null when the template is null, and looking upwards for the proper defined access when dealing with simplified instructions.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65338
llvm-svn: 367352
Summary:
The map kept in loop rotate is used for instruction remapping, in order
to simplify the clones of instructions. Thus, if an instruction can be
simplified, its simplified value is placed in the map, even when the
clone is added to the IR. MemorySSA in contrast needs to know about that
clone, so it can add an access for it.
To resolve this: keep a different map for MemorySSA.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63680
llvm-svn: 365672
Summary:
The getClobberingMemoryAccess API checks for clobbering accesses in a loop by walking the backedge. This may check if a memory access is being
clobbered by the loop in a previous iteration, depending how smart AA got over the course of the updates in MemorySSA (it does not occur when built from scratch).
If no clobbering access is found inside the loop, it will optimize to an access outside the loop. This however does not mean that access is safe to sink.
Given:
```
for i
load a[i]
store a[i]
```
The access corresponding to the load can be optimized to outside the loop, and the load can be hoisted. But it is incorrect to sink it.
In order to sink the load, we'd need to check no Def clobbers the Use in the same iteration. With this patch we currently restrict sinking to either
Defs not existing in the loop, or Defs preceding the load in the same block. An easy extension is to ensure the load (Use) post-dominates all Defs.
Caught by PR42294.
This issue also shed light on the converse problem: hoisting stores in this same scenario would be illegal. With this patch we restrict
hoisting of stores to the case when their corresponding Defs are dominating all Uses in the loop.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63582
llvm-svn: 363982
Summary:
This is unfortunately needed for correctness, if we are to extend the tolerance of the update API to the way simple loop unswitch is doing cloning.
In simple loop unswitch (as opposed to loop unswitch), not all blocks are cloned. This can create unreachable cloned blocks (no predecessor), which are later cleaned up.
In MemorySSA, the APIs for supporting these kind of updates (clone + update exit blocks), make certain assumption on the integrity of the CFG. When cloning, if something was not cloned, it's values in MemorySSA default to LiveOnEntry. When updating exit blocks, it is safe to assume that we can first insert phis in the blocks merging two clones, then add additional phis in the IDF of the blocks that received phis. This no longer holds true if one of the clones being merged comes from an unreachable block. We'd conservatively need to add all phis before filling in their incoming definitions. In practice this restriction can be relaxed if we clean up trivial phis after the first round of insertion.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63354
llvm-svn: 363880
Summary:
LoopRotate doesn't create a faithful clone of an instruction, it may
simplify it beforehand. Hence the clone of an instruction that has a
MemoryDef associated may not be a definition, but a use or not a memory
alternig instruction.
Don't rely on the template when the clone may be simplified.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63355
llvm-svn: 363597
Summary:
Add all MemoryPhis in IDF before filling in their incomign values.
Otherwise, a new Phi can be added that needs to become the incoming
value of another Phi.
Test fails the verification in verifyPrevDefInPhis.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: jlebar, Prazek, zzheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63353
llvm-svn: 363590
Summary: After applying a set of insert updates, there may be trivial Phis left over. Clean them up.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63033
llvm-svn: 363094
LoopSimplify can preserve MemorySSA after r360270.
But the MemorySSA analysis is retrieved and preserved only when the
EnableMSSALoopDependency is set to true. Use the same conditional to
mark the pass as preserved, otherwise subsequent passes will get an
invalid analysis.
Resolves PR41853.
llvm-svn: 360697
Summary:
Originally the insertDef method was only used when building MemorySSA, and was limiting the number of Phi nodes that it created.
Now it's used for updates as well, and it can create additional Phis needed for correctness.
Make sure no Phis are created in unreachable blocks (condition met during MSSA build), otherwise the renamePass will find a null DTNode.
Resolves PR41640.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61410
llvm-svn: 359845
Summary:
MemorySSA keeps internal pointers of AA and DT.
If these get invalidated, so should MemorySSA.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv, chandlerc
Subscribers: jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits
Tags: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61043
llvm-svn: 359627
Summary:
MemorySSA keeps internal pointers of AA and DT.
If these get invalidated, so should MemorySSA.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv, chandlerc
Subscribers: jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61043
........
This was causing windows build bot failures
llvm-svn: 359555
Summary:
MemorySSA keeps internal pointers of AA and DT.
If these get invalidated, so should MemorySSA.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv, chandlerc
Subscribers: jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61043
llvm-svn: 359519
Summary:
When inserting a new Def, MemorySSA may be have non-minimal number of Phis.
While inserting, the walk to find the previous definition may cleanup minimal Phis.
When the last definition is trivial to obtain, we do not cache it.
It is possible while getting the previous definition for a Def to get two different answers:
- one that was straight-forward to find when walking the first path (a trivial phi in this case), and
- another that follows a cleanup of the trivial phi, it determines it may need additional Phi nodes, it inserts them and returns a new phi in the same position as the former trivial one.
While the Phis added for the second path are all redundant, they are not complete (the walk is only done upwards), and they are not properly cleaned up afterwards.
A way to fix this problem is to cache the straight-forward answer we got on the first walk.
The caching is only kept for the duration of a getPreviousDef call, and for Phis we use TrackingVH, so removing the trivial phi will lead to replacing it with the next dominating phi in the cache.
Resolves PR40749.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60634
llvm-svn: 358313
Summary:
After introducing the limit for clobber walking, `walkToPhiOrClobber` would assert that the limit is at least 1 on entry.
The test included triggered that assert.
The callsite in `tryOptimizePhi` making the calls to `walkToPhiOrClobber` is structured like this:
```
while (true) {
if (getBlockingAccess()) { // calls walkToPhiOrClobber
}
for (...) {
walkToPhiOrClobber();
}
}
```
The cleanest fix is to check if the limit was reached inside `walkToPhiOrClobber`, and give an allowence of 1.
This approach not make any alias() calls (no calls to instructionClobbersQuery), so the performance condition is enforced.
The limit is set back to 0 if not used, as this provides info on the fact that we stopped before reaching a true clobber.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60479
llvm-svn: 358303
Summary:
The original assumption for the insertDef method was that it would not
materialize Defs out of no-where, hence it will not insert phis needed
after inserting a Def.
However, when cloning an instruction (use case used in LICM), we do
materialize Defs "out of no-where". If the block receiving a Def has at
least one other Def, then no processing is needed. If the block just
received its first Def, we must check where Phi placement is needed.
The only new usage of insertDef is in LICM, hence the trigger for the bug.
But the original goal of the method also fails to apply for the move()
method. If we move a Def from the entry point of a diamond to either the
left or right blocks, then the merge block must add a phi.
While this usecase does not currently occur, or may be viewed as an
incorrect transformation, MSSA must behave corectly given the scenario.
Resolves PR40749 and PR40754.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, Prazek, jdoerfert, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58652
llvm-svn: 355040
The correct edge being deleted is not to the unswitched exit block, but to the
original block before it was split. That's the key in the map, not the
value.
The insert is correct. The new edge is to the .split block.
The splitting turns OriginalBB into:
OriginalBB -> OriginalBB.split.
Assuming the orignal CFG edge: ParentBB->OriginalBB, we must now delete
ParentBB->OriginalBB, not ParentBB->OriginalBB.split.
llvm-svn: 354656
Summary:
This verification may fail after certain transformations due to
BasicAA's fragility. Added a small explanation and a testcase that
triggers the assert in checkClobberSanity (before its removal).
Addresses PR40509.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, llvm-commits, Prazek
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57973
llvm-svn: 353739
Summary:
Support for this option is needed for building Linux kernel.
This is a very frequently requested feature by kernel developers.
More details : https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/4/4/601
GCC option description for -fdelete-null-pointer-checks:
This Assume that programs cannot safely dereference null pointers,
and that no code or data element resides at address zero.
-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks is the inverse of this implying that
null pointer dereferencing is not undefined.
This feature is implemented in LLVM IR in this CL as the function attribute
"null-pointer-is-valid"="true" in IR (Under review at D47894).
The CL updates several passes that assumed null pointer dereferencing is
undefined to not optimize when the "null-pointer-is-valid"="true"
attribute is present.
Reviewers: t.p.northover, efriedma, jyknight, chandlerc, rnk, srhines, void, george.burgess.iv
Reviewed By: efriedma, george.burgess.iv
Subscribers: eraman, haicheng, george.burgess.iv, drinkcat, theraven, reames, sanjoy, xbolva00, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47895
llvm-svn: 336613
