This commit starts with a "git mv ARM64 AArch64" and continues out
from there, renaming the C++ classes, intrinsics, and other
target-local objects for consistency.
"ARM64" test directories are also moved, and tests that began their
life in ARM64 use an arm64 triple, those from AArch64 use an aarch64
triple. Both should be equivalent though.
This finishes the AArch64 merge, and everyone should feel free to
continue committing as normal now.
llvm-svn: 209577
I'm doing this in two phases for a better "git blame" record. This
commit removes the previous AArch64 backend and redirects all
functionality to ARM64. It also deduplicates test-lines and removes
orphaned AArch64 tests.
The next step will be "git mv ARM64 AArch64" and rewire most of the
tests.
Hopefully LLVM is still functional, though it would be even better if
no-one ever had to care because the rename happens straight
afterwards.
llvm-svn: 209576
This adds a second implementation of the AArch64 architecture to LLVM,
accessible in parallel via the "arm64" triple. The plan over the
coming weeks & months is to merge the two into a single backend,
during which time thorough code review should naturally occur.
Everything will be easier with the target in-tree though, hence this
commit.
llvm-svn: 205090
As an example that was not actually being used, it suffered from a slow bitrot.
The two main issues with it were that it had no cmake support and
included a copy of the autoconf directory. The reality is that
autoconf is not easily composable. The lack of composabilty is why we
have clang options in llvm's configure. Suggesting that users include
a copy of autoconf/ in their projects seems a bad idea.
We are also in the process of switching to cmake, so pushing autoconf
to new project is probably not what we want.
llvm-svn: 203728
The shared library generated by autoconf will now be called
libLLVM-$(VERSION_MAJOR).$(VERSION_MINOR).$(VERSION_PATCH)$(VERSION_SUFFIX).so
and a symlink named
libLLVM-$(VERSION_MAJOR).$(VERSION_MINOR)$(VERSION_SUFFIX).so will
also be created in the install directory.
llvm-svn: 202720
baseline is now C++11, and we unconditionally add -std=c++11 to the
flags.
This has the dim potential to break some non-GNU-compatible compiler (in
terms of -std flags) using the makefiles, but those makefiles are
littered with GNU-style compile flags so it would be very surprising to
me for it to actually happen in practice. As always, do let me know if
there is a toolchain you're using where this doesn't work, and I'll be
watching the bots.
llvm-svn: 202569
systems have the default as C++11, but retain the ability to build with
C++98.
Again, please restrain your enthusiasm a bit in case this needs to be
reverted. =]
llvm-svn: 202546
Teach autoconf/configure.ac to AC_SUBST several additional values in
Makefile.config to make them available to Makefile code. These will
be useful to generate CMake package modules from the Makefile build.
Contributed by Brad King.
llvm-svn: 201052
ISSUE:
On Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, arc4random is provided by libbsd.so, which is a
transitive dependency of libedit. If a system had libedit on it that
was implemented in terms of libbsd.so, then the arc4random test,
previously implemented as a linker test, would succeed with -ledit.
However, on Ubuntu this would also require a #include <bsd/stdlib.h>.
This caused a build breakage on configure-based Ubuntu 12.04 with
libedit installed.
FIX:
This fix changes configure to test for arc4random by searching for it
in the standard header files. On Ubuntu 12.04, this test now properly
fails to find arc4random as it is not defined in the default header
locations. It also tweaks the #define names to match the output of the
header check command, which is slightly different than the linker
function check #defines.
I tested the following scenarios:
(1) Ubuntu 12.04 without the libedit package [did not find arc4random,
as expected]
(2) Ubuntu 12.04 with libedit package [properly did not find
arc4random, as expected]
(3) Ubuntu 12.04 with most recent libedit, custom built, and not
dependent on libbsd.so [properly did not find arc4random, as
expected].
(4) FreeBSD 10.0B1 [properly found arc4random, as expected]
llvm-svn: 200819
This library will be used by clang-query. I can imagine LLDB becoming another
client of this library, so I think LLVM is a sensible place for it to live.
It wraps libedit, and adds tab completion support.
The code is loosely based on the line editor bits in LLDB, with a few
improvements:
- Polymorphism for retrieving the list of tab completions, based on
the concept pattern from the new pass manager.
- Tab completion doesn't corrupt terminal output if the input covers
multiple lines. Unfortunately this can only be done in a truly horrible
way, as far as I can tell. But since the alternative is to implement our
own line editor (which I don't think LLVM should be in the business of
doing, at least for now) I think it may be acceptable.
- Includes a fallback for the case where the user doesn't have libedit
installed.
Note that this uses C stdio, mainly because libedit also uses C stdio.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2200
llvm-svn: 200595
which catch buggy versions of libstdc++. While libc++ would pass them,
we don't actually update the state in the configure script to use libc++
when we pass --enable-libcpp, the logic for that is in the
Makefiles. So just completely skip the library test when that configure
flag is passed.
Hopefully this will be enough to fix the darwin bots at last, and thanks
to Duncan Smith for getting things set up so I can watch the bots myself
on lab.llvm.org and see any failures!
llvm-svn: 199334
enable flag that selects the C++ standard library to use with the host
toolchain. Otherwise we end up testing the wrong config.
I'm not really happy about this placement, but its pragmatic and should
unblock the Apple builders.
llvm-svn: 199325
libstdc++v4.6. This is quite hard to test directly, so we test for it by
checking a known missing feature in that version that was added in v4.7.
This should prevent users from upgrading Clang but not GCC and hosting
with a too-old GCC's libstdc++ and getting strange and hard to debug
errors when we switch to C++11 by default.
Also, switch several of the macros I introduced to use AC_LANG_SOURCE
rather than AC_LANG_PROGRAM as we don't need configure's help writing
our main function (and we don't need such a function at all for most of
the tests).
llvm-svn: 199313
requires Clang 3.1 or GCC 4.7. If the compiler isn't Clang or GCC, we
don't try to do any sanity checking, but this give us at least
a reasonable baseline of modern compilers.
Also, I'm not claiming that this is the best way to do compiler version
tests. I'm happy for anyone to suggest better ways of doing this test.
llvm-svn: 199182
Also, so is stacker, llvm-tv, etc. Wow.
But will someone please fess up to what projects/privbracket is and why
our autoconf build supports it?
llvm-svn: 199179
- We do some nasty things w.r.t. installing or overriding signal handlers in
order to improve our crash recovery support or interaction with crash
reporting software, and those things are not necessarily appropriate when
LLVM is being linked into a client application that has its own ideas about
how to do things. This gives those clients a way to disable that handling at
build time.
- Currently, the code this guards is all Apple specific, but other platforms
might have the same concerns so I went for a more generic configure
name. Someone who is more familiar with library embedding on Windows can
handle choosing which of the Windows/Signals.inc behaviors might make sense
to go under this flag.
- This also fixes the proper autoconf'ing of ENABLE_BACKTRACES. The code
expects it to be undefined when disabled, but the autoconf check was just
defining it to 0.
llvm-svn: 189694
I don't actually have a version of autoconf so I edited configure directly
as well. It's copy-pasted so I think there was little margin for error.
See also Clang-side dependency graph changes.
llvm-svn: 189026
curses.h). Finding these headers is next to impossible. For example, on
Debian systems libtinfo-dev provides the terminfo reading library we
want, but *not* term.h. For the header, you have to use libncurses-dev.
And libncursesw-dev provides a *different* term.h in a different
location!
These headers aren't worth it. We want two functions the signatures of
which are clearly spec'ed in sys-v and other documentation. Just declare
them ourselves and call them. This should fix some debian builders and
provide better support for "minimal" debian systems that do want color
autodetection.
llvm-svn: 188165
library for color support detection. This still will use a curses
library if that is all we have available on the system. This change
tries to use a smaller subset of the curses library, specifically the
subset that is on some systems split off into a separate library. For
example, if you install ncurses configured --with-tinfo, a 'libtinfo' is
install that provides just the terminfo querying functionality. That
library is now used instead of curses when it is available.
This happens to fix a build error on systems with that library because
when we tried to link ncurses into the binary, we didn't pull tinfo in
as well. =]
It should also provide an easy path for supporting the NetBSD
libterminfo library, but as I don't have access to a NetBSD system I'm
leaving adding that support to those folks.
llvm-svn: 188160
using it to detect whether or not a terminal supports colors. This
replaces a particularly egregious hack that merely compared the TERM
environment variable to "dumb". That doesn't really translate to
a reasonable experience for users that have actually ensured their
terminal's capabilities are accurately reflected.
This makes testing a terminal for color support somewhat more expensive,
but it is called very rarely anyways. The important fast path when the
output is being piped somewhere is already in place.
The global lock may seem excessive, but the spec for calling into curses
is *terrible*. The whole library is terrible, and I spent quite a bit of
time looking for a better way of doing this before convincing myself
that this was the fundamentally correct way to behave. The damage of the
curses library is very narrowly confined, and we continue to use raw
escape codes for actually manipulating the colors which is a much sane
system than directly using curses here (IMO).
If this causes trouble for folks, please let me know. I've tested it on
Linux and will watch the bots carefully. I've also worked to account for
the variances of curses interfaces that I could finde documentation for,
but that may not have been sufficient.
llvm-svn: 187874
