Summary:
Depends on https://reviews.llvm.org/D71899.
The third in a series of patches that ports the LLVM coroutines passes
to the new pass manager infrastructure. This patch implements 'coro-elide'.
The new pass manager infrastructure does not implicitly repeat CGSCC
pass pipelines when a function is devirtualized, and so the tests
for the new pass manager that rely on that behavior now explicitly
specify `repeat<2>`.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, lewissbaker, chandlerc, jdoerfert, junparser, deadalnix, wenlei
Reviewed By: wenlei
Subscribers: wenlei, EricWF, Prazek, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71900
Summary:
This patch has four dependencies:
1. The first in this series of patches that implement coroutine passes in the
new pass manager: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71898.
2. A patch that introduces an API for CGSCC passes to add new reference
edges to a `LazyCallGraph`, `updateCGAndAnalysisManagerForCGSCCPass`:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D72025.
3. A patch that introduces a `CallGraphUpdater` helper class that is
capable of mutating internal `LazyCallGraph` state in order to insert
new function nodes into a specific SCC: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70927.
4. And finally, a small edge case fix for updating `LazyCallGraph` that
patch 3 above happens to run into: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72226.
This is the second in a series of patches that ports the LLVM coroutines
passes to the new pass manager infrastructure. This patch implements
'coro-split'.
Some notes:
* Using the new CGSCC pass manager resulted in IR being printed in the
reverse order in some tests. To prevent FileCheck checks from failing due
to these reversed orders, this patch splits up test files that test
multiple different coroutine functions: specifically
coro-alloc-with-param.ll, coro-split-eh.ll, and coro-eh-aware-edge-split.ll.
* CoroSplit.cpp contained 2 overloads of `splitCoroutine`, one of which
dispatched to the other based on the coroutine ABI being used (C++20
switch-based versus Swift returned-continuation-based). I found this
confusing, especially with the additional branching based on `CallGraph`
vs. `LazyCallGraph`, so I removed the ABI-checking overload of
`splitCoroutine`.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, lewissbaker, chandlerc, jdoerfert, junparser, deadalnix, wenlei
Reviewed By: wenlei
Subscribers: wenlei, qcolombet, EricWF, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71899
Summary:
The first in a series of patches that ports the LLVM coroutines passes
to the new pass manager infrastructure. This patch implements
'coro-early'.
NB: All coroutines passes begin by checking that coroutine intrinsics are
declared within the LLVM IR module they're operating on. To do so, they call
`coro::declaresIntrinsics`. The next 3 patches in this series, which add new
pass manager implementations of the 'coro-split', 'coro-elide', and
'coro-cleanup' passes, use a similar pattern as the one used here: a static
function is shared across both old and new passes to detect if relevant
coroutine intrinsics are delcared. To make this pattern easier to read, this
patch adds `const` keywords to the parameters of `coro::declaresIntrinsics`.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, lewissbaker, junparser, chandlerc, deadalnix, wenlei
Reviewed By: wenlei
Subscribers: ychen, wenlei, EricWF, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71898
In addition to a single bit per memory locations, e.g., globals and
arguments, we now collect more information about the actual accesses,
e.g., what instruction caused it, was it a read/write/read+write, and
what the underlying base pointer was. Follow up patches will make
explicit use of this.
Reviewed By: uenoku
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73527
In addition to memory behavior attributes (readonly/writeonly) we now
derive memory location attributes (argmemonly/inaccessiblememonly/...).
The former is part of AAMemoryBehavior and the latter part of
AAMemoryLocation. While they are similar in nature it got messy when
they were put in a single AA. Location attributes for arguments and
floating values will follow later.
Note that both memory attributes kinds can derive readnone. If there are
no accesses AAMemoryBehavior will derive readnone. If there are accesses
but only to stack (=local) locations AAMemoryLocation will derive
readnone.
Reviewed By: uenoku
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73426
replaceDbgDeclare is used to update the descriptions of stack variables
when they are moved (e.g. by ASan or SafeStack). A side effect of
replaceDbgDeclare is that it moves dbg.declares around in the
instruction stream (typically by hoisting them into the entry block).
This behavior was introduced in llvm/r227544 to fix an assertion failure
(llvm.org/PR22386), but no longer appears to be necessary.
Hoisting a dbg.declare generally does not create problems. Usually,
dbg.declare either describes an argument or an alloca in the entry
block, and backends have special handling to emit locations for these.
In optimized builds, LowerDbgDeclare places dbg.values in the right
spots regardless of where the dbg.declare is. And no one uses
replaceDbgDeclare to handle things like VLAs.
However, there doesn't seem to be a positive case for moving
dbg.declares around anymore, and this reordering can get in the way of
understanding other bugs. I propose getting rid of it.
Testing: stage2 RelWithDebInfo sanitized build, check-llvm
rdar://59397340
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74517
This reverts commit 61b35e4111160fe834a00c33d040e01150b576ac.
This commit causes a timeout in chromium builds; likely to have a
similar cause to the previous timeout issue caused by this commit (see
6ded69f294a9 for more details). It is possible that there is no way to
fix this bug that will not cause this issue; further investigations as
to the efficiency of handling large amounts of debug info will be
necessary.
We used coarse-grained liveness before, thus we looked if the
instruction was executed, but we did not use fine-grained liveness,
hence if the instruction was needed or could be deleted even if the
surrounding ones are live. This patches introduces this level of
liveness checks together with other liveness queries, e.g., for uses.
For more control we enforce that all liveness queries go through the
Attributor.
Test have been adjusted to reflect the changes or augmented to prevent
deletion of the parts we want to check.
Reviewed By: sstefan1
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73313
This reverts commit 636c93ed11a5f98b5c3ff88241460d61cb7785bb.
The original patch caused build failures on TSan buildbots. Commit 6ded69f294a9
fixes this issue by reducing the rate at which empty debug intrinsics
propagate, reducing the memory footprint and preventing a fatal spike.
The changeXXXAfterManifest functions are better suited to deal with
changes so we should prefer them. These functions also recursively
delete dead instructions which is why we see test changes.
Summary: It attempts to devirtualize a call on alloca through vtable loads.
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: mgorny, Prazek, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71308
We have several bug reports that could be characterized as "reducing scalarization",
and this topic was also raised on llvm-dev recently:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-January/138157.html
...so I'm proposing that we deal with these patterns in a new, lightweight IR vector
pass that runs before/after other vectorization passes.
There are 4 alternate options that I can think of to deal with this kind of problem
(and we've seen various attempts at all of these), but they all have flaws:
InstCombine - can't happen without TTI, but we don't want target-specific
folds there.
SDAG - too late to assist other vectorization passes; TLI is not equipped
for these kind of cost queries; limited to a single basic block.
CGP - too late to assist other vectorization passes; would need to re-implement
basic cleanups like CSE/instcombine.
SLP - doesn't fit with existing transforms; limited to a single basic block.
This initial patch/transform is based on existing code in AggressiveInstCombine:
we walk backwards through the function looking for a pattern match. But we diverge
from that cost-independent IR canonicalization pass by using TTI to decide if the
vector alternative is profitable.
We probably have at least 10 similar bug reports/patterns (binops, constants,
inserts, cheap shuffles, etc) that would fit in this pass as follow-up enhancements.
It's possible that we could iterate on a worklist to fix-point like InstCombine does,
but it's safer to start with a most basic case and evolve from there, so I didn't
try to do anything fancy with this initial implementation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73480
In addition to the module pass, this patch introduces a CGSCC pass that
runs the Attributor on a strongly connected component of the call graph
(both old and new PM). The Attributor was always design to be used on a
subset of functions which makes this patch mostly mechanical.
The one change is that we give up `norecurse` deduction in the module
pass in favor of doing it during the CGSCC pass. This makes the
interfaces simpler but can be revisited if needed.
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70767
The OpenMPOpt pass is a CGSCC pass in which OpenMP specific
optimizations can reside.
The OpenMPOpt pass uses the OpenMPKinds.def file to identify runtime
calls and their uses. This allows targeted transformations and eases
their implementation.
This initial patch deduplicates `__kmpc_global_thread_num` and
`omp_get_thread_num` calls. We can also identify arguments that are
equivalent to such a call result and use it instead. Later we can
determine "gtid" arguments based on the use in kernel functions etc.
Reviewed By: JonChesterfield
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69930
The CallGraphUpdater is a helper that simplifies the process of updating
the call graph, both old and new style, while running an CGSCC pass.
The uses are contained in different commits, e.g. D70767.
More functionality is added as we need it.
Reviewed By: modocache, hfinkel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70927
Bionic has had `__strlen_chk` for a while. Optimizing that into a
constant is quite profitable, when possible.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74079
Summary:
Tune the profile threshold flag value for instrumentation PGO based on internal
benchmarks.
Also, add flags to allow profile guided size optimizations for non-cold code
to be enabled separately for instrumentation and sample PGSO.
Neither changes the default behavior (yet) as it's disabled for non-cold code.
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72937
This reverts commit 41784bed01543315a1d03141e6ddc023fd914c0b.
Since the original revision ead815924e6ebeaf02c31c37ebf7a560b5fdf67b,
this revision fixes three issues:
- This revision fixes the Windows build. My original patch improperly
copied EH pads on Windows. This patch disregards jump threading
opportunities having to do with EH pads.
- This revision fixes jump threading to a wrong destination.
Specifically, my original patch treated any Constant other than 0 as 1
while evaluating the branch condition. This bug led to treating
constant expressions like:
icmp ugt i8* null, inttoptr (i64 4 to i8*)
to "true". This patch fixes the bug by calling isOneValue.
- This revision fixes the cost calculation of two basic blocks being
threaded through. Note that getJumpThreadDuplicationCost returns
"(unsigned)~0" for those basic blocks that cannot be duplicated. If
we sum of two return values from getJumpThreadDuplicationCost, we
could have an unsigned overflow like:
(unsigned)~0 + 5 = 4
and mistakenly determine that it's safe and profitable to proceed
with the jump threading opportunity. The patch fixes the bug by
checking each return value before summing them up.
[JumpThreading] Thread jumps through two basic blocks
Summary:
This patch teaches JumpThreading.cpp to thread through two basic
blocks like:
bb3:
%var = phi i32* [ null, %bb1 ], [ @a, %bb2 ]
%tobool = icmp eq i32 %cond, 0
br i1 %tobool, label %bb4, label ...
bb4:
%cmp = icmp eq i32* %var, null
br i1 %cmp, label bb5, label bb6
by duplicating basic blocks like bb3 above. Once we duplicate bb3 as
bb3.dup and redirect edge bb2->bb3 to bb2->bb3.dup, we have:
bb3:
%var = phi i32* [ @a, %bb2 ]
%tobool = icmp eq i32 %cond, 0
br i1 %tobool, label %bb4, label ...
bb3.dup:
%var = phi i32* [ null, %bb1 ]
%tobool = icmp eq i32 %cond, 0
br i1 %tobool, label %bb4, label ...
bb4:
%cmp = icmp eq i32* %var, null
br i1 %cmp, label bb5, label bb6
Then the existing code in JumpThreading.cpp can thread edge
bb3.dup->bb4 through bb4 and eventually create bb3.dup->bb5.
Reviewers: wmi
Subscribers: hiraditya, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70247
Adds the global (cl::opt) GVNOption enable-load-in-loop-pre in order
to control whether the optimization will be performed if the load
is part of a loop.
Patch by Hendrik Greving!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73804
Summary:
Method appendLoopsToWorklist is duplicate in LoopUnroll and in the
LoopPassManager as an internal method. Make it an utility.
Reviewers: dmgreen, chandlerc, fedor.sergeev, yamauchi
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, hiraditya, zzheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73569
This renames Worklist.AddDeferred() to Worklist.add() and
Worklist.Add() to Worklist.push(). The intention here is that
Worklist.add() should be the go-to method for explicit worklist
management, while the raw Worklist.push() is mostly for
InstCombine internals. I will then migrate uses of Worklist.push()
to Worklist.add() in followup changes.
As suggested by spatel on D73411 I'm also changing the remaining
method names to lowercase first character, in line with current
coding standards.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73745
Duplicating instructions can lead to code size increases but using
a threshold of 3 is good for reducing code size.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72916
If we know that all call sites have been processed we can derive an
early fixpoint. The use in this patch is likely not to trigger right now
but a follow up patch will make use of it.
Reviewed By: uenoku, baziotis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72016
Fix attempt
this is part of the implementation of http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html
this patch gives the basis of building an assume to preserve all information from an instruction and add support for building an assume that preserve the information from a call.
Summary:
this is part of the implementation of http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html
this patch gives the basis of building an assume to preserve all information from an instruction and add support for building an assume that preserve the information from a call.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: mgrang, fhahn, mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72475
Summary:
this is part of the implementation of http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html
this patch gives the basis of building an assume to preserve all information from an instruction and add support for building an assume that preserve the information from a call.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: mgrang, fhahn, mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72475
Summary:
this is part of the implementation of http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html
this patch gives the basis of building an assume to preserve all information from an instruction and add support for building an assume that preserve the information from a call.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: mgrang, fhahn, mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72475
Summary:
this is part of the implementation of http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-December/137632.html
this patch gives the basis of building an assume to preserve all information from an instruction and add support for building an assume that preserve the information from a call.
Reviewers: jdoerfert
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: mgrang, fhahn, mgorny, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72475
Some code gen passes use MBFIWrapper to keep track of the frequency of new
blocks. This was not taken into account and could lead to incorrect frequencies
as MBFI silently returns zero frequency for unknown/new blocks.
Add a variant for MBFIWrapper in the PGSO query interface.
Depends on D73494.
InstCombine operates on the basic premise that the operands of the
currently processed instruction have already been simplified. It
achieves this by pushing instructions to the worklist in reverse
program order, so that instructions are popped off in program order.
The worklist management in the main combining loop also makes sure
to uphold this invariant.
However, the same is not true for all the code that is performing
manual worklist management. The largest problem (addressed in this
patch) are instructions inserted by InstCombine's IRBuilder. These
will be pushed onto the worklist in order of insertion (generally
matching program order), which means that a) the users of the
original instruction will be visited first, as they are pushed later
in the main loop and b) the newly inserted instructions will be
visited in reverse program order.
This causes a number of problems: First, folds operate on instructions
that have not had their operands simplified, which may result in
optimizations being missed (ran into this in
https://reviews.llvm.org/D72048#1800424, which was the original
motivation for this patch). Additionally, this increases the amount
of folds InstCombine has to perform, both within one iteration, and
by increasing the number of total iterations.
This patch addresses the issue by adding a Worklist.AddDeferred()
method, which is used for instructions inserted by IRBuilder. These
will only be added to the real worklist after the combine finished,
and in reverse order, so they will end up processed in program order.
I should note that the same should also be done to nearly all other
uses of Worklist.Add(), but I'm starting with just this occurrence,
which has by far the largest test fallout.
Most of the test changes are due to
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44521 or other cases where
we don't canonicalize something. These are neutral. One regression
has been addressed in D73575 and D73647. The remaining regression
in an shl+sdiv fold can't really be fixed without dropping another
transform, but does not seem particularly problematic in the first
place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73411
A pointer is privatizeable if it can be replaced by a new, private one.
Privatizing pointer reduces the use count, interaction between unrelated
code parts. This is a first step towards replacing argument promotion.
While we can already handle recursion (unlike argument promotion!) we
are restricted to stack allocations for now because we do not analyze
the uses in the callee.
Reviewed By: uenoku
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68852
The helpers AAReturnedFromReturnedValues and
AACallSiteReturnedFromReturned are useful not only to avoid code
duplication but also to avoid recomputation of results. If we have N
call sites we should not recompute the function return information N
times but once. These are mostly straightforward usages with some minor
improvements on the helpers and addition of a new one
(IRPosition::getAssociatedType) that knows about function return types.
This commit fixes PR39321.
GlobalExtensions is not guaranteed to be destroyed when optimizer plugins are unloaded. If it is indeed destroyed after a plugin is dlclose-d, the destructor of the corresponding ExtensionFn is not mapped anymore, causing a call to unmapped memory during destruction.
This commit guarantees that extensions coming from external plugins are removed from GlobalExtensions when the plugin is unloaded if GlobalExtensions has not been destroyed yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71959
proven safe.
Summary:
Currently LoopFusion give up when the second loop nest preheader is
not empty. For example:
for (int i = 0; i < 100; ++i) {}
x+=1;
for (int i = 0; i < 100; ++i) {}
The above example should be safe to fuse.
This PR moves instructions in FC1 preheader (e.g. x+=1; ) to
FC0 preheader, which then LoopFusion is able to fuse them.
Reviewer: kbarton, Meinersbur, jdoerfert, dmgreen, fhahn, hfinkel,
bmahjour, etiotto
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71821
There was a TODO in AAValueConstantRangeArgument to reuse
AAArgumentFromCallSiteArguments. We now do this by allowing new States
to be build from the bestState.
During extraction, stale llvm.assume handles may be retained in the
original function. The setup is:
1) CodeExtractor unregisters assumptions in the blocks that are to be
extracted.
2) Extraction happens. There are now two functions: f1 and f1.extracted.
3) Leftover assumptions in f1 (/not/ removed as they were not in the set of
blocks to be extracted) now have affected-value llvm.assume handles in
f1.extracted.
When assumptions for a value used in f1 are looked up, ValueTracking can assert
as some of the handles are in the wrong function. To fix this, simply erase the
llvm.assume calls in the extracted function.
Alternatives include flushing the assumption cache in the original function, or
walking all values used in the original function to prune stale affected-value
handles. Both seem more expensive.
Testing: check-llvm, LNT run with -mllvm -hot-cold-split enabled
rdar://58460728
Summary:
Currently IsControlFlowEquivalent determine if two blocks are control
flow equivalent by checking if A dominates B and B post dominates A.
There exists blocks that are control flow equivalent even if they don't
satisfy the A dominates B and B post dominates A condition.
For example,
if (cond)
A
if (cond)
B
In the PR, we determine if two blocks are control flow equivalent by
also checking if the two sets of conditions A and B depends on are
equivalent.
Reviewer: jdoerfert, Meinersbur, dmgreen, etiotto, bmahjour, fhahn,
hfinkel, kbarton
Reviewed By: fhahn
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tag: LLVM
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71578
