In the following loop the dependence distance is 2 and can only be
vectorized if the vector length is no larger than this.
void foo(int *a, int *b, int N) {
#pragma clang loop vectorize(enable) vectorize_width(4)
for (int i=0; i<N; ++i) {
a[i + 2] = a[i] + b[i];
}
}
However, when specifying a VF of 4 via a loop hint this loop is
vectorized. According to [1][2], loop hints are ignored if the
optimization is not safe to apply.
This patch introduces a check to bail of vectorization if the user
specified VF is greater than the maximum feasible VF, unless explicitly
forced with '-force-vector-width=X'.
[1] https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#llvm-loop-vectorize-and-llvm-loop-interleave
[2] https://clang.llvm.org/docs/LanguageExtensions.html#extensions-for-loop-hint-optimizations
Reviewed By: sdesmalen, fhahn, Meinersbur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90687
This patch replaces the attribute `unsigned VF` in the class
IntrinsicCostAttributes by `ElementCount VF`.
This is a non-functional change to help upcoming patches to compute the cost
model for scalable vector inside this class.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91532
Instruction ExtractValue wasn't handled in
LoopVectorizationCostModel::getInstructionCost(). As a result, it was modeled
as a mul which is not really accurate. Since it is free (most of the times),
this now gets a cost of 0 using getInstructionCost.
This is a follow-up of D92208, that required changing this regression test.
In a follow up I will look at InsertValue which also isn't handled yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92317
The PREDICATE_CAST node is used to model moves between MVE predicate
registers and gpr's, and eventually become a VMSR p0, rn. When moving to
a predicate only the bottom 16 bits of the sources register are
demanded. This adds a simple fold for that, allowing it to potentially
remove instructions like uxth.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92213
Currently when we dump sections, we dump them in the order,
which is specified in the sections header table.
With that the order in the output might not match the order in the file.
This patch starts sorting them by by file offsets when dumping.
When the order in the section header table doesn't match the order
in the file, we should emit the "SectionHeaderTable" key. This patch does it.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91249
This merges `invalid-attr-section-size.test` and `invalid-attr-version.test`
into `invalid-attributes-sec.test`.
This allows to have a single place where other related test cases can be added.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92316
This introduces the overload for `reportUniqueWarning` which allows
to avoid using `createError` in many places.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92371
This makes the options API composable, allows boolean flags to imply non-boolean values and makes the code more logical (IMO).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91861
This is a part of the plan we had previously to convert all calls to
`reportUniqueWarning` and then rename it to just `reportWarning`.
I was a bit unsure about this particular change at first, because it doesn't add a
new functionality: seems it is impossible to trigger a warning duplication currently.
At the same time I find the idea of the plan mentioned very reasonable.
And with that we will be sure that `DynRegionInfo` can't report duplicate
warnings, what looks like a nice feature for possible refactorings and further tool development.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92224
This moves the `reportUniqueWarning` method to the base class.
My motivation is the following:
I've experimented with replacing `reportWarning` calls with `reportUniqueWarning`
in ELF dumper. I've found that for example for removing them from `DynRegionInfo` helper
class, it is worth to pass a dumper instance to it (to be able to call dumper()->reportUniqueWarning()).
The problem was that `ELFDumper<ELFT>` is a template class. I had to make `DynRegionInfo` to be templated
and do lots of minor changes everywhere what did not look reasonable/nice.
At the same time I guess one day other dumpers like COFF/MachO/Wasm etc might want to
start using `reportUniqueWarning` API too. Then it looks reasonable to move the logic to the
base class.
With that the problem of passing the dumper instance will be gone.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92218
This is the #2 of 2 changes that make remarks hotness threshold option
available in more tools. The changes also allow the threshold to sync with
hotness threshold from profile summary with special value 'auto'.
This change expands remarks hotness threshold option
-fdiagnostics-hotness-threshold in clang and *-remarks-hotness-threshold in
other tools to utilize hotness threshold from profile summary.
Remarks hotness filtering relies on several driver options. Table below lists
how different options are correlated and affect final remarks outputs:
| profile | hotness | threshold | remarks printed |
|---------|---------|-----------|-----------------|
| No | No | No | All |
| No | No | Yes | None |
| No | Yes | No | All |
| No | Yes | Yes | None |
| Yes | No | No | All |
| Yes | No | Yes | None |
| Yes | Yes | No | All |
| Yes | Yes | Yes | >=threshold |
In the presence of profile summary, it is often more desirable to directly use
the hotness threshold from profile summary. The new argument value 'auto'
indicates threshold will be synced with hotness threshold from profile summary
during compilation. The "auto" threshold relies on the availability of profile
summary. In case of missing such information, no remarks will be generated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85808
This is the #1 of 2 changes that make remarks hotness threshold option
available in more tools. The changes also allow the threshold to sync with
hotness threshold from profile summary with special value 'auto'.
This change modifies the interface of lto::setupLLVMOptimizationRemarks() to
accept remarks hotness threshold. Update all the tools that use it with remarks
hotness threshold options:
* lld: '--opt-remarks-hotness-threshold='
* llvm-lto2: '--pass-remarks-hotness-threshold='
* llvm-lto: '--lto-pass-remarks-hotness-threshold='
* gold plugin: '-plugin-opt=opt-remarks-hotness-threshold='
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85809
Adds a constructor to MachineModuleInfo and MachineModuleInfoWapperPass that
takes an external MCContext. If provided, the external context will be used
throughout codegen instead of MMI's default one.
This enables external drivers to take ownership of data put on the MMI's context
during codegen. The internal context is used otherwise and destroyed upon
finish.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91313
By explicitly requesting the system linker with `-fuse-ld=`, the
tests are able to CHECK for the system linker even with
CLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld.
Alternative to D74704.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92291
The lowering of vector selects needs to first splat the scalar mask into a vector
first.
This was causing a crash when building oggenc in the test suite.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91655
The existing code handles this correctly and I checked that the code
in NativeInlineSiteSymbol also handles this correctly, but it was
wrong in the NativeFunctionSymbol code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92134
Now that we flush the local value map for every instruction, we don't
need any extra flushes for specific cases. Also, LastFlushPoint is
not used for anything. Follow-ups to #dc35368 (D91734).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92338
Enable performing mandatory inlinings upfront, by reusing the same logic
as the full inliner, instead of the AlwaysInliner. This has the
following benefits:
- reduce code duplication - one inliner codebase
- open the opportunity to help the full inliner by performing additional
function passes after the mandatory inlinings, but before th full
inliner. Performing the mandatory inlinings first simplifies the problem
the full inliner needs to solve: less call sites, more contextualization, and,
depending on the additional function optimization passes run between the
2 inliners, higher accuracy of cost models / decision policies.
Note that this patch does not yet enable much in terms of post-always
inline function optimization.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91567
Apart from getting the entry in the table (which is already a
separate function), the remaining logic is different for all
alignment types and is better combined with getAlignment().
This is a minor efficiency improvement, and should make further
improvements like using separate storage for different alignment
types simpler.
There's a small number of users of this function, they are all updated.
This updates the C API adding a new method LLVMGetTypeByName2 that takes a context and a name.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78793
If prefaced with a %, expand text macros and macro functions in any statement.
Also, prevent expanding text macros in the message of an ECHO directive unless expanded explicitly by the statement expansion operator.
Reviewed By: thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89740
The model was committed in 4b8ade837e36b7f0181ce86fc23f33851d0fdd35
but not yet enabled to allow for a few fix ups. This adds a few
of these fixes, and also a LLVM MCA test to check most instructions.
While I do have plans to look into some more tuning, it's time to
enable this as it better than using the A53 schedule.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88017
For LP64 mode, this has no effect as pointers are already 64 bits.
For ILP32 mode (x32), this extension is specified by the ABI.
Reviewed By: pengfei
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91338
Pass through the demanded elts mask to the source operands.
The next step will be to add support for folding to add/sub if we only demand odd/even elements.
This change introduces a new clang switch `-fpseudo-probe-for-profiling` to enable AutoFDO with pseudo instrumentation. Please refer to https://reviews.llvm.org/D86193 for the whole story.
One implication from pseudo-probe instrumentation is that the profile is now sensitive to CFG changes. We perform the pseudo instrumentation very early in the pre-LTO pipeline, before any CFG transformation. This ensures that the CFG instrumented and annotated is stable and optimization-resilient.
The early instrumentation also allows the inliner to duplicate probes for inlined instances. When a probe along with the other instructions of a callee function are inlined into its caller function, the GUID of the callee function goes with the probe. This allows samples collected on inlined probes to be reported for the original callee function.
Reviewed By: wmi
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86502
