Make requiresFrameIndexScavenging return true, and create virtual registers in
the spilling code instead of using the register scavenger directly. This makes
the target-level code simpler, and importantly, delays the scavenging until
after callee-saved register processing (which will be important for later
changes).
Also cleans up trackLivenessAfterRegAlloc (makes it inline in the header with
the other related functions). This makes it clear that it always returns true.
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 177107
We used to add a spill slot for the register scavenger whenever the function
has a frame pointer. This is unnecessarily conservative: We may need the spill
slot for dynamic stack allocations, and functions with dynamic stack
allocations always have a FP, but we might also have a FP for other reasons
(such as the user explicitly disabling frame-pointer elimination), and we don't
necessarily need a spill slot for those functions.
The structsinregs test needed adjustment because it disables FP elimination.
llvm-svn: 177106
By terrible I mean we store/load from the stack.
This matters on PAQp8 in _Z5trainPsS_ii (which is inlined into Mixer::update)
where we decide to vectorize a loop with a VF of 8 resulting in a 25%
degradation on a cortex-a8.
LV: Found an estimated cost of 2 for VF 8 For instruction: icmp slt i32
LV: Found an estimated cost of 2 for VF 8 For instruction: select i1, i32, i32
The bug that tracks the CodeGen part is PR14868.
radar://13403975
llvm-svn: 177105
I don't think that it is otherwise clear how the overlapping offsets
are processed into distinct spill slots. Comment that this is done
in processFunctionBeforeFrameFinalized.
llvm-svn: 177094
Rules include:
1)1 x*y +/- x*z => x*(y +/- z)
(the order of operands dosen't matter)
2) y/x +/- z/x => (y +/- z)/x
The transformation is disabled if the new add/sub expr "y +/- z" is a
denormal/naz/inifinity.
rdar://12911472
llvm-svn: 177088
The fundamental problem is that SROA didn't allow for overly wide loads
where the bits past the end of the alloca were masked away and the load
was sufficiently aligned to ensure there is no risk of page fault, or
other trapping behavior. With such widened loads, SROA would delete the
load entirely rather than clamping it to the size of the alloca in order
to allow mem2reg to fire. This was exposed by a test case that neatly
arranged for GVN to run first, widening certain loads, followed by an
inline step, and then SROA which miscompiles the code. However, I see no
reason why this hasn't been plaguing us in other contexts. It seems
deeply broken.
Diagnosing all of the above took all of 10 minutes of debugging. The
really annoying aspect is that fixing this completely breaks the pass.
;] There was an implicit reliance on the fact that no loads or stores
extended past the alloca once we decided to rewrite them in the final
stage of SROA. This was used to encode information about whether the
loads and stores had been split across multiple partitions of the
original alloca. That required threading explicit tracking of whether
a *use* of a partition is split across multiple partitions.
Once that was done, another problem arose: we allowed splitting of
integer loads and stores iff they were loads and stores to the entire
alloca. This is a really arbitrary limitation, and splitting at least
some integer loads and stores is crucial to maximize promotion
opportunities. My first attempt was to start removing the restriction
entirely, but currently that does Very Bad Things by causing *many*
common alloca patterns to be fully decomposed into i8 operations and
lots of or-ing together to produce larger integers on demand. The code
bloat is terrifying. That is still the right end-goal, but substantial
work must be done to either merge partitions or ensure that small i8
values are eagerly merged in some other pass. Sadly, figuring all this
out took essentially all the time and effort here.
So the end result is that we allow splitting only when the load or store
at least covers the alloca. That ensures widened loads and stores don't
hurt SROA, and that we don't rampantly decompose operations more than we
have previously.
All of this was already fairly well tested, and so I've just updated the
tests to cover the wide load behavior. I can add a test that crafts the
pass ordering magic which caused the original PR, but that seems really
brittle and to provide little benefit. The fundamental problem is that
widened loads should Just Work.
llvm-svn: 177055
constructs default arguments. It can now take default arguments from
cl::opt'ions. Add a new -default-gcov-version=... option, and actually test it!
Sink the reverse-order of the version into GCOVProfiling, hiding it from our
users.
llvm-svn: 177002
emitProfileNotes(), similar to emitProfileArcs(). Also update its comment.
Also add a comment on Version[4] (there will be another comment in clang later),
and compress lines that exceeded 80 columns.
llvm-svn: 176994
This doesn't reset all of the target options within the TargetOptions
object. This is because some of those are ABI-specific and must be determined if
it's okay to change those on the fly.
llvm-svn: 176986
codegen passes. This brings it in to line with clang and llc's codegen setup,
and tidies up the code.
If I understand correctly, adding ModulePasses to a FunctionPassManager is
bogus. It only seems to explode if an added ModulePass depends on a
FunctionPass though, which might be why this code has survived so long.
Fixes <rdar://problem/13386816>.
llvm-svn: 176977
In r176898 I updated the cost model to reflect the fact that sext/zext/cast on
v8i32 <-> v8i8 and v16i32 <-> v16i8 are expensive.
This test case is so that we make sure to update the cost model once we fix
CodeGen.
llvm-svn: 176955
