This refers to a temporary path that can be shared across all tests,
identified by a particular label. This can be used for things like
caches.
At the moment, the character set for the LABEL is limited to C
identifier characters, plus '-', '+', '=', and '.'. This is the same
set of characters currently allowed in REQUIRES clause identifiers.
llvm-svn: 315697
Minor doc update that the FileCheck matcher supports POSIX ERE.
It also fixes a minor issue in the regexp describing a variable
name: underscores are allowed too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38787
llvm-svn: 315679
Here we add a secondary option parser to llvm-isel-fuzzer (and provide
it for use with other fuzzers). With this, you can copy the fuzzer to
a name like llvm-isel-fuzzer=aarch64-gisel for a fuzzer that fuzzer
AArch64 with GlobalISel enabled, or fuzzer=x86_64 to fuzz x86, with no
flags required. This should be useful for running these in OSS-Fuzz.
Note that this handrolls a subset of cl::opts to recognize, rather
than embedding a complete command parser for argv[0]. If we find we
really need the flexibility of handling arbitrary options at some
point we can rethink this.
This re-applies 315545 using "=" instead of ":" as a separator for
arguments.
llvm-svn: 315557
It broke some tests on Windows:
Failing Tests (4):
LLVM :: tools/llvm-isel-fuzzer/execname-options.ll
LLVM :: tools/llvm-isel-fuzzer/missing-triple.ll
LLVM :: tools/llvm-isel-fuzzer/x86-empty-bc.ll
LLVM :: tools/llvm-isel-fuzzer/x86-empty.ll
> llvm-isel-fuzzer: Handle a subset of backend flags in the executable name
>
> Here we add a secondary option parser to llvm-isel-fuzzer (and provide
> it for use with other fuzzers). With this, you can copy the fuzzer to
> a name like llvm-isel-fuzzer:aarch64-gisel for a fuzzer that fuzzer
> AArch64 with GlobalISel enabled, or fuzzer:x86_64 to fuzz x86, with no
> flags required. This should be useful for running these in OSS-Fuzz.
>
> Note that this handrolls a subset of cl::opts to recognize, rather
> than embedding a complete command parser for argv[0]. If we find we
> really need the flexibility of handling arbitrary options at some
> point we can rethink this.
llvm-svn: 315554
Here we add a secondary option parser to llvm-isel-fuzzer (and provide
it for use with other fuzzers). With this, you can copy the fuzzer to
a name like llvm-isel-fuzzer:aarch64-gisel for a fuzzer that fuzzer
AArch64 with GlobalISel enabled, or fuzzer:x86_64 to fuzz x86, with no
flags required. This should be useful for running these in OSS-Fuzz.
Note that this handrolls a subset of cl::opts to recognize, rather
than embedding a complete command parser for argv[0]. If we find we
really need the flexibility of handling arbitrary options at some
point we can rethink this.
llvm-svn: 315545
This patch adds a post-linking pass which replaces the function pointer of enqueued
block kernel with a global variable (runtime handle) and adds
runtime-handle attribute to the enqueued block kernel.
In LLVM CodeGen the runtime-handle metadata will be translated to
RuntimeHandle metadata in code object. Runtime allocates a global buffer
for each kernel with RuntimeHandel metadata and saves the kernel address
required for the AQL packet into the buffer. __enqueue_kernel function
in device library knows that the invoke function pointer in the block
literal is actually runtime handle and loads the kernel address from it
and puts it into AQL packet for dispatching.
This cannot be done in FE since FE cannot create a unique global variable
with external linkage across LLVM modules. The global variable with internal
linkage does not work since optimization passes will try to replace loads
of the global variable with its initialization value.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38610
llvm-svn: 315352
At the last LLVM dev meeting we had a debug info for optimized code
BoF session. In that session I presented some graphs that showed how
the quality of the debug info produced by LLVM changed over the last
couple of years. This is a cleaned up version of the patch I used to
collect the this data. It is implemented as an extension of
llvm-dwarfdump, adding a new --statistics option. The intended
use-case is to automatically run this on the debug info produced by,
e.g., our bots, to identify eyebrow-raising changes or regressions
introduced by new transformations that we could act on.
In the current form, two kinds of data are being collected:
- The number of variables that have a debug location versus the number
of variables in total (this takes into account inlined instances of
the same function, so if a variable is completely missing form only
one instance it will be found).
- The PC range covered by variable location descriptions versus the PC
range of all variables' containing lexical scopes.
The output format is versioned and extensible, so I'm looking forward
to both bug fixes and ideas for other data that would be interesting
to track.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36627
llvm-svn: 315101
The fix is to avoid invalidating our insertion point in
replaceDbgDeclare:
Builder.insertDeclare(NewAddress, DIVar, DIExpr, Loc, InsertBefore);
+ if (DII == InsertBefore)
+ InsertBefore = &*std::next(InsertBefore->getIterator());
DII->eraseFromParent();
I had to write a unit tests for this instead of a lit test because the
use list order matters in order to trigger the bug.
The reduced C test case for this was:
void useit(int*);
static inline void inlineme() {
int x[2];
useit(x);
}
void f() {
inlineme();
inlineme();
}
llvm-svn: 313905
.. as well as the two subsequent changes r313826 and r313875.
This leads to segfaults in combination with ASAN. Will forward repro
instructions to the original author (rnk).
llvm-svn: 313876
Summary:
The documentation refers to a boolean that controls whether response files are
handled, but this is incorrect. Since r165535, response files are always
enabled.
Reviewers: compnerd, rafael
Reviewed By: compnerd
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38095
llvm-svn: 313830
Summary:
This implements the design discussed on llvm-dev for better tracking of
variables that live in memory through optimizations:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-September/117222.html
This is tracked as PR34136
llvm.dbg.addr is intended to be produced and used in almost precisely
the same way as llvm.dbg.declare is today, with the exception that it is
control-dependent. That means that dbg.addr should always have a
position in the instruction stream, and it will allow passes that
optimize memory operations on local variables to insert llvm.dbg.value
calls to reflect deleted stores. See SourceLevelDebugging.rst for more
details.
The main drawback to generating DBG_VALUE machine instrs is that they
usually cause LLVM to emit a location list for DW_AT_location. The next
step will be to teach DwarfDebug.cpp how to recognize more DBG_VALUE
ranges as not needing a location list, and possibly start setting
DW_AT_start_offset for variables whose lifetimes begin mid-scope.
Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie, probinson
Subscribers: eraman, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37768
llvm-svn: 313825
Summary: Resubmission of D37937. Fixed i386 target building (conversion from std::size_t& to uint64_t& failed). Fixed documentation warning failure about docs/CFIVerify.rst not being in the tree.
Reviewers: vlad.tsyrklevich
Reviewed By: vlad.tsyrklevich
Patch by Mitch Phillips
Subscribers: sbc100, mgorny, pcc, llvm-commits, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38089
llvm-svn: 313809
Summary: Resubmission of D37937. Fixed i386 target building (conversion from std::size_t& to uint64_t& failed). Fixed documentation warning failure about docs/CFIVerify.rst not being in the tree.
Reviewers: vlad.tsyrklevich
Reviewed By: vlad.tsyrklevich
Patch by Mitch Phillips
Subscribers: mgorny, pcc, llvm-commits, kcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38089
llvm-svn: 313798
Summary: Introduces the llvm-cfi-verify tool to llvm. Includes the design document (docs/CFIVerify.rst). Current implementation of the tool is simply a disassembler that identifies and prints the indirect control flow instructions.
Reviewers: vlad.tsyrklevich
Reviewed By: vlad.tsyrklevich
Patch by Mitch Phillips
Subscribers: llvm-commits, kcc, pcc, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37937
llvm-svn: 313688
After clang started emitting deferred regions (r312818), llvm-cov has
had a hard time picking reasonable line execuction counts. There have
been one or two generic improvements in this area (e.g r310012), but
line counts can still report coverage for whitespace instead of code
(llvm.org/PR34612).
To fix the problem:
* Introduce a new region kind so that frontends can explicitly label
gap areas.
This is done by changing the encoding of the columnEnd field of
MappingRegion. This doesn't substantially increase binary size, and
makes it easy to maintain backwards-compatibility.
* Don't set the line count to a count from a gap area, unless the count
comes from a wrapped segment.
* Don't highlight gap areas as uncovered.
Fixes llvm.org/PR34612.
llvm-svn: 313597
Summary:
This change adds support for explicit tail-exit records to be written by
the XRay runtime. This lets us differentiate the tail exit
records/events in the log, and allows us to treat those exit events
especially in the future. For now we allow printing those out in YAML
(and reading them in).
Reviewers: kpw, pelikan
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37964
llvm-svn: 313514
Summary:
This intrinsic represents a label with a list of associated metadata
strings. It is modelled as reading and writing inaccessible memory so
that it won't be removed as dead code. I think the intention is that the
annotation strings should appear at most once in the debug info, so I
marked it noduplicate. We are allowed to inline code with annotations as
long as we strip the annotation, but that can be done later.
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36904
llvm-svn: 312569
The CodingStandards section on avoiding the re-evaluation of end() hasn't been
updated since range-based for loops were adopted in the LLVM codebase. This
patch adds a very brief section that documents how range-based for loops
should be used wherever possible. It also moves example code in
CodingStandards to use range-based for loops and auto when appropriate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37264
llvm-svn: 312236
Summary: Add a -name-whitelist option, which behaves in the same way as -name, but it reads in multiple function names from the given input file(s).
Reviewers: vsk
Reviewed By: vsk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37111
llvm-svn: 312227
