A conversion from `pow` to `sqrt` shall not call an `errno`-setting
`sqrt` with -//infinity//: the `sqrt` will set `EDOM` where the `pow`
call need not.
This patch avoids the erroneous (pun not intended) transformation by
applying the restrictions discussed in the thread for
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-September/145051.html.
The existing tests are updated (depending on emphasis in the checks for
library calls, avoidance of overlap, and overall coverage):
- to add `ninf`, retaining the intended library call,
- to use the intrinsic, retaining the use of `select`, or
- to expect the replacement to not occur.
The following is tested:
- The pow intrinsic folds to a `select` instruction to
handle -//infinity//.
- The pow library call folds, with `ninf`, to `sqrt` without the
`select` instruction associated with handling -//infinity//.
- The pow library call does not fold to `sqrt` without `ninf`.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87877
The motivation here is that MachineBlockPlacement relies on analyzeBranch to remove branches to fallthrough blocks when the branch is not fully analyzeable. With the introduction of the FAULTING_OP psuedo for implicit null checking (see D87861), this case becomes important. Note that it's hard to otherwise exercise this path as BranchFolding handle's any fully analyzeable branch sequence without using this interface.
p.s. For anyone who saw my comment in the original review, what I thought was an issue in BranchFolding originally turned out to simply be a bug in my patch. (Now fixed.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88035
When pairing ldr instructions to an ldp instruction, we cannot pair two ldr
destination registers where one is a sub or super register of the other.
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86906
This completes the circle, complementing -lto-embed-bitcode
(specifically, post-merge-pre-opt). Using -thinlto-assume-merged skips
function importing. The index file is still needed for the other data it
contains.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87949
Similar to the ConstantRange::getActiveBits(), and to similarly-named
methods in APInt, returns the bitwidth needed to represent
the given signed constant range
As an exhaustive test shows, this logic is fully identical to the old
implementation, with exception of the case where both of the operands
had empty ranges:
```
TEST_F(ConstantRangeTest, CVP_UDiv) {
unsigned Bits = 4;
EnumerateConstantRanges(Bits, [&](const ConstantRange &CR0) {
if(CR0.isEmptySet())
return;
EnumerateConstantRanges(Bits, [&](const ConstantRange &CR1) {
if(CR0.isEmptySet())
return;
unsigned MaxActiveBits = 0;
for (const ConstantRange &CR : {CR0, CR1})
MaxActiveBits = std::max(MaxActiveBits, CR.getActiveBits());
ConstantRange OperandRange(Bits, /*isFullSet=*/false);
for (const ConstantRange &CR : {CR0, CR1})
OperandRange = OperandRange.unionWith(CR);
unsigned NewWidth = OperandRange.getUnsignedMax().getActiveBits();
EXPECT_EQ(MaxActiveBits, NewWidth) << CR0 << " " << CR1;
});
});
}
```
Much like APInt::getActiveBits(), computes how many bits are needed
to be able to represent every value in this constant range,
treating the values as unsigned.
Use the fact that `~X` is equivalent to `-1 - X`, which gives us
fully-precise answer, and we only need to special-handle the wrapped case.
This fires ~16k times for vanilla llvm test-suite + RawSpeed.
This is a continuation of 8d487668d09fb0e4e54f36207f07c1480ffabbfd,
the logic is pretty much identical for SRem:
Name: pos pos
Pre: C0 >= 0 && C1 >= 0
%r = srem i8 C0, C1
=>
%r = urem i8 C0, C1
Name: pos neg
Pre: C0 >= 0 && C1 <= 0
%r = srem i8 C0, C1
=>
%r = urem i8 C0, -C1
Name: neg pos
Pre: C0 <= 0 && C1 >= 0
%r = srem i8 C0, C1
=>
%t0 = urem i8 -C0, C1
%r = sub i8 0, %t0
Name: neg neg
Pre: C0 <= 0 && C1 <= 0
%r = srem i8 C0, C1
=>
%t0 = urem i8 -C0, -C1
%r = sub i8 0, %t0
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/Vd6
Now, this new logic does not result in any new catches
as of vanilla llvm test-suite + RawSpeed.
but it should be virtually compile-time free,
and it may be important to be consistent in their handling,
because if we had a pair of sdiv-srem, and only converted one of them,
-divrempairs will no longer see them as a pair,
and thus not "merge" them.
The current code for handling pow(x, y) where y is an integer plus 0.5
is not explicitly guarded against attempting to transform the case where
abs(y) is exactly 0.5.
The latter case is meant to be handled by `replacePowWithSqrt`. Indeed,
if the pow(x, integer+0.5) case proceeds past a certain point, it will
hit an assertion by attempting to form pow(x, 0) using `getPow`.
This patch adds an explicit check to prevent attempting the
pow(x, integer+0.5) transformation on pow(x, +/-0.5) as suggested during
the review of D87877. This has the effect of retaining the shrinking of
`pow` to `powf` when the `sqrt` libcall cannot be formed.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88066
The subject test was not actually running. This patch adds the
relevant suffix to the list of lit case filename extensions for the
enclosing directory.
Minor adjustments are also made to deal with bit rot.
Reviewed By: daltenty
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87122
This patch implements the vector string isolate (predicate and non-predicate
versions) builtins. The predicate builtins are custom selected within PPCISelDAGToDAG.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87671
This patch implements the 128-bit vector divide extended builtins in Clang/LLVM.
These builtins map to the vdivesq and vdiveuq instructions respectively.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87729
Just scalarize trunc stores - GenWidenVectorTruncStores does the same thing but is flawed (PR42046) and unused.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87708
Refactored __tgt_target_data_begin_mapper_<issue|wait> to receive the handle as an input/output argument.
This given the compiler warning of returning the handle as copy.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88029
Re-use an optimizition from the old LTO API (used by ld64).
This sorts modules in ascending order, based on bitcode size, so that larger modules are processed first. This allows for smaller modules to be process last, and better fill free threads 'slots', and thusly allow for better multi-thread load balancing.
In our case (on dual Intel Xeon Gold 6140, Windows 10 version 2004, two-stage build), this saves 15 sec when linking `clang.exe` with LLD & `-flto=thin`, `/opt:lldltojobs=all`, no ThinLTO cache, -DLLVM_INTEGRATED_CRT_ALLOC=d:\git\rpmalloc.
Before patch: 102 sec
After patch: 85 sec
Inspired by the work done by David Callahan in D60495.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87966
This provides a convenient way to print VPValues and recipes in a
debugger. In particular it saves the user from instantiating
VPSlotTracker to print recipes or values.
Stop combining loads and stores with PPCISD::ADD_TLS before we can merge the
node with with TLS_LOCAL_EXEC_MAT_ADDR. The issue is that
TLS_LOCAL_EXEC_MAT_ADDR cannot be selected by itself and requires the previous
ADD_TLS node that goes with it. However, we sometimes try to combine ADD_TLS
with loads and stores that come after it. If this happens then the ADD_TLS is
removed and TLS_LOCAL_EXEC_MAT_ADDR cannot be selected.
While this bug fix will address the issue it my not be ideal from a performance
perspective as we may be able to add patterns to combine TLS_LOCAL_EXEC_MAT_ADDR
with ADD_TLS with the load and store that comes after it all in one. However,
this is beyond the scope of this patch.
Reviewed By: NeHuang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88030
