Report proper error code from MachOObjectFile constructor if we
can't parse another segment load command (we already return a proper
error if segment load command contents is suspicious).
llvm-svn: 239109
Summary:
Properly report the error in segment load commands from MachOObjectFile
constructor instead of crashing the program.
Adjust the test case accordingly.
Test Plan: regression test suite
Reviewers: rafael, filcab
Subscribers: llvm-commits
llvm-svn: 239081
Summary:
Currently all load commands are parsed in MachOObjectFile constructor.
If the next load command cannot be parsed, or if command size is too
small, properly report it through the error code and fail to construct
the object, instead of crashing the program.
Test Plan: regression test suite
Reviewers: rafael, filcab
Subscribers: llvm-commits
llvm-svn: 239080
Summary: Instead, properly report this error from MachOObjectFile constructor.
Test Plan: regression test suite
Reviewers: rafael
Subscribers: llvm-commits
llvm-svn: 239078
MachO and COFF quite reasonably only define the size for common symbols.
We used to try to figure out the "size" by computing the gap from one symbol to
the next.
This would not be correct in general, since a part of a section can belong to no
visible symbol (padding, private globals).
It was also really expensive, since we would walk every symbol to find the size
of one.
If a caller really wants this, it can sort all the symbols once and get all the
gaps ("size") in O(n log n) instead of O(n^2).
On MachO this also has the advantage of centralizing all the checks for an
invalid n_sect.
llvm-svn: 238028
Summary:
Shift an older “invalid file” test to get a consistent naming for these tests.
Bugs found by afl-fuzz
Reviewers: rafael
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6945
llvm-svn: 226219
