We had two code paths. One would create names like "foo.1" and the other
names like "foo1".
For globals it is important to use "foo.1" to help C++ name demangling.
For locals there is no strong reason to go one way or the other so I
kept the most common mangling (foo1).
llvm-svn: 253804
Removed some duplicate test cases from the file /test/Transforms/InstCombine/shift.ll.
test54 and test57 were duplicates of each other.
test55 and test58 were duplicates of each other.
(Removed test57 and test58)
llvm-svn: 223767
PR17026. Also avoid undefined shifts and shift amounts larger than 64 bits
(those are always undef because we can't represent integer types that large).
llvm-svn: 189672
This update was done with the following bash script:
find test/Transforms -name "*.ll" | \
while read NAME; do
echo "$NAME"
if ! grep -q "^; *RUN: *llc" $NAME; then
TEMP=`mktemp -t temp`
cp $NAME $TEMP
sed -n "s/^define [^@]*@\([A-Za-z0-9_]*\)(.*$/\1/p" < $NAME | \
while read FUNC; do
sed -i '' "s/;\(.*\)\([A-Za-z0-9_]*\):\( *\)@$FUNC\([( ]*\)\$/;\1\2-LABEL:\3@$FUNC(/g" $TEMP
done
mv $TEMP $NAME
fi
done
llvm-svn: 186268
This change attempts to simplify (X^Y) -> X or Y in the user's context if we know that
only bits from X or Y are demanded.
A minimized case is provided bellow. This change will simplify "t>>16" into "var1 >>16".
=============================================================
unsigned foo (unsigned val1, unsigned val2) {
unsigned t = val1 ^ 1234;
return (t >> 16) | t; // NOTE: t is used more than once.
}
=============================================================
Note that if the "t" were used only once, the expression would be finally optimized as well.
However, with with this change, the optimization will take place earlier.
Reviewed by Nadav, Thanks a lot!
llvm-svn: 169317
This change tries to simmplify E1 = " X >> C1 << C2" into :
- E2 = "X << (C2 - C1)" if C2 > C1, or
- E2 = "X >> (C1 - C2)" if C1 > C2, or
- E2 = X if C1 == C2.
Reviewed by Nadav. Thanks!
llvm-svn: 169182
Original commit message:
Defer some shl transforms to DAGCombine.
The shl instruction is used to represent multiplication by a constant
power of two as well as bitwise left shifts. Some InstCombine
transformations would turn an shl instruction into a bit mask operation,
making it difficult for later analysis passes to recognize the
constsnt multiplication.
Disable those shl transformations, deferring them to DAGCombine time.
An 'shl X, C' instruction is now treated mostly the same was as 'mul X, C'.
These transformations are deferred:
(X >>? C) << C --> X & (-1 << C) (When X >> C has multiple uses)
(X >>? C1) << C2 --> X << (C2-C1) & (-1 << C2) (When C2 > C1)
(X >>? C1) << C2 --> X >>? (C1-C2) & (-1 << C2) (When C1 > C2)
The corresponding exact transformations are preserved, just like
div-exact + mul:
(X >>?,exact C) << C --> X
(X >>?,exact C1) << C2 --> X << (C2-C1)
(X >>?,exact C1) << C2 --> X >>?,exact (C1-C2)
The disabled transformations could also prevent the instruction selector
from recognizing rotate patterns in hash functions and cryptographic
primitives. I have a test case for that, but it is too fragile.
llvm-svn: 155362
While the patch was perfect and defect free, it exposed a really nasty
bug in X86 SelectionDAG that caused an llc crash when compiling lencod.
I'll put the patch back in after fixing the SelectionDAG problem.
llvm-svn: 155181
The shl instruction is used to represent multiplication by a constant
power of two as well as bitwise left shifts. Some InstCombine
transformations would turn an shl instruction into a bit mask operation,
making it difficult for later analysis passes to recognize the
constsnt multiplication.
Disable those shl transformations, deferring them to DAGCombine time.
An 'shl X, C' instruction is now treated mostly the same was as 'mul X, C'.
These transformations are deferred:
(X >>? C) << C --> X & (-1 << C) (When X >> C has multiple uses)
(X >>? C1) << C2 --> X << (C2-C1) & (-1 << C2) (When C2 > C1)
(X >>? C1) << C2 --> X >>? (C1-C2) & (-1 << C2) (When C1 > C2)
The corresponding exact transformations are preserved, just like
div-exact + mul:
(X >>?,exact C) << C --> X
(X >>?,exact C1) << C2 --> X << (C2-C1)
(X >>?,exact C1) << C2 --> X >>?,exact (C1-C2)
The disabled transformations could also prevent the instruction selector
from recognizing rotate patterns in hash functions and cryptographic
primitives. I have a test case for that, but it is too fragile.
llvm-svn: 155136
exact/nsw/nuw shifts and have instcombine infer them when it can prove
that the relevant properties are true for a given shift without them.
Also, a variety of refactoring to use the new patternmatch logic thrown
in for good luck. I believe that this takes care of a bunch of related
code quality issues attached to PR8862.
llvm-svn: 125267
While there, I noticed that the transform "undef >>a X -> undef" was wrong.
For example if X is 2 then the top two bits must be equal, so the result can
not be anything. I fixed this in the constant folder as well. Also, I made
the transform for "X << undef" stronger: it now folds to undef always, even
though X might be zero. This is in accordance with the LangRef, but I must
admit that it is fairly aggressive. Also, I added "i32 X << 32 -> undef"
following the LangRef and the constant folder, likewise fairly aggressive.
llvm-svn: 123417
A = shl x, 42
...
B = lshr ..., 38
which can be transformed into:
A = shl x, 4
...
iff we can prove that the would-be-shifted-in bits
are already zero. This eliminates two shifts in the testcase
and allows eliminate of the whole i128 chain in the real example.
llvm-svn: 112314
framework, which is good at ripping through bitfield
operations. This generalize a bunch of the existing
xforms that instcombine does, such as
(x << c) >> c -> and
to handle intermediate logical nodes. This is useful for
ripping up the "promote to large integer" code produced by
SRoA.
llvm-svn: 112304
1. Make instcombine always canonicalize trunc x to i1 into an icmp(x&1). This
exposes the AND to other instcombine xforms and is more of what the code
generator expects.
2. Rewrite the remaining trunc pattern match to use 'match', which
simplifies it a lot.
llvm-svn: 67635
