The llvm-cov version information will be useful to the user when comparing the code coverage across different versions of llvm-cov. This patch provides the llvm-cov version information in the generated coverage report.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24457
llvm-svn: 281321
These asserts are making tests fragile. The renderer does not enter an
invalid state when they fail, however, it may spit out a garbled
coverage report because the source text no longer matches the provided
coverage mapping.
Another follow-up to r281072.
llvm-svn: 281076
Treat filenames the same way in the text index as we do in the html
index. This is a follow-up to r281008 (an attempt to unbreak the
native_separators.c test on Windows).
Patch by Maggie Yi!
llvm-svn: 281062
llvm-cov writes out an index file in '-output-dir' mode, albeit not a
very informative one. Try to fix that by using the CoverageReport API to
include some basic summary information in the index file.
llvm-svn: 281011
It would be nice to prepare file reports (using the CoverageReport API)
without actually rendering them to the console. I plan on using this to
flesh out the 'index' files in the coverage views.
llvm-svn: 281009
The text and html coverage views take different approaches to emitting
highlighted regions. That's because this problem is easier in the text
view: there's no need to worry about escaping text or adding tooltip
content to a highlighted snippet.
Unfortunately, the html view didn't get region highlighting quite right.
This patch fixes the situation, bringing parity between the two views.
llvm-svn: 280981
In r279628, we made SourceCoverageView list the binary associated with a
view and started adding labels (e.g "Source: foo" or "Function: bar") to
everything. Condense this information a bit to unclutter reports.
llvm-svn: 280896
Use the same color for counts and percentages. There doesn't seem to be
a reason for them to be different, and the summary looks more consistent
this way.
llvm-svn: 280765
This patch provides easy navigation to find the zero count lines, especially useful when the source file is very large.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23277
llvm-svn: 280739
The coverage reports contain the source or binary file paths. On Windows,
the file path might contain the seperators of both '/' and '\'. This patch
uses the native path in the coverage reports. For example, on Windows,
all '/' are converted to '\'.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23922
llvm-svn: 280061
This patch includes the following changes:
- Included header "Code coverage report" and include the date that the report was created.
- Included title (as specified in a command line option, (i.e llvm-cov -project-title="Simple Test")
- In the summary, list the elf files that the source code file has contributed to.
- Used column heading for "Line No.", "Count No.", Source".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23345
llvm-svn: 279628
In the coverage report, the line and count columns have been swapped to make it more readable.
A follow-up commit in compiler-rt is needed
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23281
llvm-svn: 278152
When using orbis-llvm-cov.exe to generate the HTML report, the HTML report
can look quite different to the source file if it includes tabs.The default
tab size is 2 spaces instead of 8 spaces. A command line switch is
be added to set the tab size.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23087
llvm-svn: 277715
This fixes the highlighting for lines without any coverage segments. I
don't have a neat way of testing this yet, but am working on it.
llvm-svn: 276906
This enables users to export coverage information as portable JSON for use by
analysis tools and storage in document based databases.
The export sub-command is invoked just like the others:
llvm-cov export -instr-profile path/to/foo.profdata path/to/foo.binary
The resulting JSON contains a list of files and functions. Every file object
contains a list of segments, expansions, and a summary of the file's region,
function, and line coverage. Every function object contains the function's name
and regions. There is also a total summary for the entire object file.
Changes since the initial commit (r276813):
- Fixed the regexes in the tests to handle Windows filepaths.
Patch by Eddie Hurtig!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22651
llvm-svn: 276818
This enables users to export coverage information as portable JSON for use by
analysis tools and storage in document based databases.
The export sub-command is invoked just like the others:
llvm-cov export -instr-profile path/to/foo.profdata path/to/foo.binary
The resulting JSON contains a list of files and functions. Every file object
contains a list of segments, expansions, and a summary of the file's region,
function, and line coverage. Every function object contains the function's name
and regions. There is also a total summary for the entire object file.
Patch by Eddie Hurtig!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22651
llvm-svn: 276813
The llvm-cov ‘report' command displays a summary of the coverage of a binary file.
The summary report currently only includes covered regions and covered functions.
This patch adds the coverage of lines in the summary report.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22569
llvm-svn: 276409
This makes it easy to swap out the default stylesheet for a custom one.
It also shaves ~6.62 MB out of the report directory for a full coverage
build of llvm+clang.
While we're at it, prune the CSS and add tests for it.
llvm-svn: 276359
Add an option to specify a symbol demangler (as well as options to the
demangler). This can be used to make reports more human-readable.
This option is especially useful in -output-dir mode, since it isn't as
easy to manually pipe reports into a demangler in this mode.
llvm-svn: 275640
Taking a lock before appending to a vector does no good unless threads
reading from the vector also take the lock, because the vector could be
re-sized.
I don't have a good isolated test for this. I found the issue with ASan
while testing a large project. I'm working on a bot that does this.
llvm-svn: 275516
Writing `for (StringRef &SourceFile : ...)` is strange to begin with.
Subsequently capturing "SourceFile" by reference is even stranger. Just
copy the StringRef, since that's cheap to do.
llvm-svn: 275515
It's safe to print out source coverage views using multiple threads when
using the -output-dir mode of the `llvm-cov show` sub-command.
While testing this on my development machine, I observed that the speed
up is roughly linear with the number of available cores. Avg. time for
`llvm-cov show ./llvm-as -show-line-counts-or-regions`:
1 thread: 7.79s user 0.33s system 98% cpu 8.228 total
4 threads: 7.82s user 0.34s system 283% cpu 2.880 total
llvm-svn: 275321
