There's still lots of callers passing nullptr, of course - some because
they'll never be migrated (InstCombines for bitcasts - well they don't
make any sense when the pointer type is opaque anyway, for example) and
others that will need more engineering to pass Types around.
llvm-svn: 234126
InstCombine didn't realize that it needs to use DataLayout to determine
how wide pointers are. This lead to assertion failures.
This fixes PR23113.
llvm-svn: 234046
The plan here is to push the API changes out from the common components
(like Constant::getGetElementPtr and IRBuilder::CreateGEP related
functions) and just update callers to either pass the type if it's
obvious, or pass null.
Do this with LoadInst as well and anything else that comes up, then to
start porting specific uses to not pass null anymore - this may require
some refactoring in each case.
llvm-svn: 234042
This prevents us from running out of registers in the backend.
Introducing stack malloc calls prevents the backend from recognizing the
inline asm operands as stack objects. When the backend recognizes a
stack object, it doesn't need to materialize the address of the memory
in a physical register. Instead it generates a simple SP-based memory
operand. Introducing a stack malloc forces the backend to find a free
register for every memory operand. 32-bit x86 simply doesn't have enough
registers for this to succeed in most cases.
Reviewers: kcc, samsonov
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8790
llvm-svn: 233979
Summary:
The old requirement on GEP candidates being in bounds is unnecessary.
For off-bound GEPs, we still have
&B[i * S] = B + (i * S) * e = B + (i * e) * S
Test Plan: slsr_offbound_gep in slsr-gep.ll
Reviewers: meheff
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8809
llvm-svn: 233949
Require the pointee type to be passed explicitly and assert that it is
correct. For now it's possible to pass nullptr here (and I've done so in
a few places in this patch) but eventually that will be disallowed once
all clients have been updated or removed. It'll be a long road to get
all the way there... but if you have the cahnce to update your callers
to pass the type explicitly without depending on a pointer's element
type, that would be a good thing to do soon and a necessary thing to do
eventually.
llvm-svn: 233938
We used to do this before refactorings around r225640.
Some clang users checked for _chk libcall availability using:
__has_builtin(__builtin___memcpy_chk)
When compiling with -fno-builtin, this is always true.
When passing -ffreestanding/-mkernel, which both imply -fno-builtin, we
end up with fortified libcalls, which isn't acceptable in a freestanding
environment which only provides their non-fortified counterparts.
Until we change clang and/or teach external users to check for availability
differently, disregard the "nobuiltin" attribute and TLI::has.
Workaround for PR23093.
llvm-svn: 233776
This pushes the use of PointerType::getElementType up into several
callers - I'll essentially just have to keep pushing that up the stack
until I can eliminate every call to it...
llvm-svn: 233604
This just didn't need to be here at all, but the assertion I tried to
add wasn't appropriate either - the circumstance isn't impossible, it's
just not important to deal with it here - the gep-rooted version of this
instcombine will handle this case, we don't need to duplicate it for the
case where the gep happens to be used in a bitcast.
llvm-svn: 233404
We make many redundant calls to isInterestingAlloca in the AddressSanitzier
pass. This is especially inefficient for allocas that have many uses. Let's
cache the results to speed up compilation.
The compile time improvements depend on the input. I did not see much
difference on benchmarks; however, I have a test case where compile time
goes from minutes to under a second.
llvm-svn: 233397
This re-adds float2int to the tree, after fixing PR23038. It turns
out the argument to APSInt() is true-if-unsigned, rather than
true-if-signed :(. Added testcase and explanatory comment.
llvm-svn: 233370
The assertion here was more expensive then it needed to be. We're only inserting allocas in the entry block, so we only need to consider ones in the entry block.
llvm-svn: 233362
Summary:
This patch enhances SLSR to handle another candidate form &B[i * S]. If
we found two candidates
S1: X = &B[i * S]
S2: Y = &B[i' * S]
and S1 dominates S2, we can replace S2 with
Y = &X[(i' - i) * S]
Test Plan:
slsr-gep.ll
X86/no-slsr.ll: verify that we do not run SLSR on GEPs that already fit into
an addressing mode
Reviewers: eliben, atrick, meheff, hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7459
llvm-svn: 233286
The changes to InstCombine (& SCEV) do seem a bit silly - it doesn't make
anything obviously better to have the caller access the pointers element
type (the thing I'm trying to remove) than the GEP itself, but it's a
helpful migration step. This will allow me to more obviously lock down
GEP (& Load, etc) API usage, then fix all the code that accesses pointer
element types except the places that need to be removed (most of the
InstCombines) anyway - at which point I'll need to just remove all that
code because it won't be meaningful anymore (there will be no pointer
types, so no bitcasts to combine)
SCEV looks like it'll need some restructuring - we'll have to do a bit
more work for GEP canonicalization, since it'll depend on how it's used
if we can even manage to canonicalize it to a non-ugly GEP. I guess we
can do some fun stuff like voting (do 2 out of 3 load from the GEP with
a certain type that gives a pretty GEP? Does every typed use of the GEP
use either a specific type or a generic type (i8*, etc)?)
llvm-svn: 233131
The changes to InstCombine do seem a bit silly - it doesn't make
anything obviously better to have the caller access the pointers element
type (the thing I'm trying to remove) than the GEP itself, but it's a
helpful migration step. This will allow me to more obviously lock down
GEP (& Load, etc) API usage, then fix all the code that accesses pointer
element types except the places that need to be removed (most of the
InstCombines) anyway - at which point I'll need to just remove all that
code because it won't be meaningful anymore (there will be no pointer
types, so no bitcasts to combine)
llvm-svn: 233126
This patch tries to merge duplicate landing pads when they branch to a common shared target.
Given IR that looks like this:
lpad1:
%exn = landingpad {i8*, i32} personality i32 (...)* @__gxx_personality_v0
cleanup
br label %shared_resume
lpad2:
%exn2 = landingpad {i8*, i32} personality i32 (...)* @__gxx_personality_v0
cleanup
br label %shared_resume
shared_resume:
call void @fn()
ret void
}
We can rewrite the users of both landing pad blocks to use one of them. This will generally allow the shared_resume block to be merged with the common landing pad as well.
Without this change, tail duplication would likely kick in - creating N (2 in this case) copies of the shared_resume basic block.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8297
llvm-svn: 233125
Assert that this doesn't fire - I'll remove all of this later, but just
leaving it in for a while in case this is firing & we just don't have
test coverage.
llvm-svn: 233116
This is the IR optimizer follow-on patch for D8563: the x86 backend patch
that converts this kind of shuffle back into a vperm2.
This is also a continuation of the transform that started in D8486.
In that patch, Andrea suggested that we could convert vperm2 intrinsics that
use zero masks into a single shuffle.
This is an implementation of that suggestion.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8567
llvm-svn: 233110
This caused PR23008, compiles failing with: "Use still stuck around after Def is
destroyed: %.sroa.speculated"
Also reverting follow-up r233064.
llvm-svn: 233105
IRCE requires the induction variables it handles to not sign-overflow.
The current scheme of checking if sext({X,+,S}) == {sext(X),+,sext(S)}
fails when SCEV simplifies sext(X) too. After this change we //also//
check no-signed-wrap by looking at the flags set on the SCEVAddRecExpr.
llvm-svn: 233102
It is possible to have code that converts from integer to float, performs operations then converts back, and the result is provably the same as if integers were used.
This can come from different sources, but the most obvious is a helper function that uses floats but the arguments given at an inlined callsites are integers.
This pass considers all integers requiring a bitwidth less than or equal to the bitwidth of the mantissa of a floating point type (23 for floats, 52 for doubles) as exactly representable in floating point.
To reduce the risk of harming efficient code, the pass only attempts to perform complete removal of inttofp/fptoint operations, not just move them around.
llvm-svn: 233062
