X = sext x; x >s c ? X : C+1 --> X = sext x; X <s C+1 ? C+1 : X
X = sext x; x <s c ? X : C-1 --> X = sext x; X >s C-1 ? C-1 : X
X = zext x; x >u c ? X : C+1 --> X = zext x; X <u C+1 ? C+1 : X
X = zext x; x <u c ? X : C-1 --> X = zext x; X >u C-1 ? C-1 : X
X = sext x; x >u c ? X : C+1 --> X = sext x; X <u C+1 ? C+1 : X
X = sext x; x <u c ? X : C-1 --> X = sext x; X >u C-1 ? C-1 : X
Instead of calculating this with mixed types promote all to the
larger type. This enables scalar evolution to analyze this
expression. PR8866
llvm-svn: 123034
if both A op B and A op C simplify. This fires fairly often but doesn't
make that much difference. On gcc-as-one-file it removes two "and"s and
turns one branch into a select.
llvm-svn: 122399
This resolves a README entry and technically resolves PR4916,
but we still get poor code for the testcase in that PR because
GVN isn't CSE'ing uadd with add, filed as PR8817.
Previously we got:
_test7: ## @test7
addq %rsi, %rdi
cmpq %rdi, %rsi
movl $42, %eax
cmovaq %rsi, %rax
ret
Now we get:
_test7: ## @test7
addq %rsi, %rdi
movl $42, %eax
cmovbq %rsi, %rax
ret
llvm-svn: 122182
the old thing end up on the instcombine worklist. Not doing this
can cause an extra top-level iteration of instcombine, burning
compile time.
llvm-svn: 122179
sadd formed is half the size of the original type. We can
now compile this into a sadd.i8:
unsigned char X(char a, char b) {
int res = a+b;
if ((unsigned )(res+128) > 255U)
abort();
return res;
}
llvm-svn: 122178
checking to see if the high bits of the original add result were dead.
Inserting a smaller add and zexting back to that size is not good enough.
This is likely to be the fix for 8816.
llvm-svn: 122177
on the DragonEgg self-host bot. Unfortunately, the testcase is pretty messy and doesn't reduce well due to
interactions with other parts of InstCombine.
llvm-svn: 122072
dragonegg self-host buildbot. Original commit message:
Add an InstCombine transform to recognize instances of manual overflow-safe addition
(performing the addition in a wider type and explicitly checking for overflow), and
fold them down to intrinsics. This currently only supports signed-addition, but could
be generalized if someone works out the magic constant formulas for other operations.
llvm-svn: 121965
(performing the addition in a wider type and explicitly checking for overflow), and
fold them down to intrinsics. This currently only supports signed-addition, but could
be generalized if someone works out the magic constant formulas for other operations.
Fixes <rdar://problem/8558713>.
llvm-svn: 121905
(x & 2^n) ? 2^m+C : C
we can offset both arms by C to get the "(x & 2^n) ? 2^m : 0" form, optimize the
select to a shift and apply the offset afterwards.
llvm-svn: 121609
zextOrTrunc(), and APSInt methods extend(), extOrTrunc() and new method
trunc(), to be const and to return a new value instead of modifying the
object in place.
llvm-svn: 121120
